As, you can see, Chelsea strikers and forwards languishing at the bottom half of this table. Hence the reason for our league table position.
--------
Nah that'd be your terrible defence.

Sakho 4/10?

He contributes so much to our team in holding the bll up and dragging players out of position and creating space.

Nonsense article

Wow has Falcao been that bad?

Remy would be a lot higher if Jose actually trusted him, i rate Remy.

Can't see Bony on the list so i've rated him as 5/10.

True, considering defense has always been one of our strongest area in the past. But, on top of that the goals have dried up. Half of our goals this season have come from set pieces, we rarely score form open play

comment by Komakino (U7809)
posted 39 seconds ago
Remy would be a lot higher if Jose actually trusted him, i rate Remy.

Can't see Bony on the list so i've rated him as 5/10.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Bony had a few sub appearance this season, I don't think he has impressed

Neither do we but we are third because we can defend.

It's actually amazing how bad your defence has become. Never thought I'd see a Mourinho team so poor at the back.

I think if your defence gets sorted out you'll start picking up results as it's what Chelsea tend to do.

Think Courtois coming back should help. Begovic is a good keeper but Courtois is much better and brings more of a calming presence.

Based on this season they are pretty fiar ratings, Gomis started so well now Swansea are struggling so is he or the other way round?

Yup, I agree

Yes, we managed three clean sheets in the row. So, we're heading in the right direction. Cortouis return to the goal will definitely add more strength to our defense.

Sturbridge had 4 goals in basically less than a game...

comment by Tomkins (U1116)
posted 23 minutes ago
Sakho 4/10?

He contributes so much to our team in holding the bll up and dragging players out of position and creating space.

Nonsense article
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Your best player has been Payet, who is not a striker or a forward for that matter

comment by 李贝 If anyone can, Emre Can... And don�... (U3979)
posted 1 minute ago
Sturbridge had 4 goals in basically less than a game...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who is Sturbride ?

Nah that'd be your terrible defence.

Wrong Dazzle . its Midfield

How on earth is Arouna Kone (5 goals, 3 assists from 9 starts) rated the same as, for example, Pedro (1 goal, 2 assists from 9 starts)??

Some quite frankly ridiculous ratings tbh.

this is a sharticle

Add to the previous point, I can assure you the performances of Kone have been better, by a distance, than Pedro's - it isn't just stats that the error is shown up by.

We have been poor in every department, be that in defense, midfield and attack . It's fair to say that our team as whole has been shlte

comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 5 minutes ago
How on earth is Arouna Kone (5 goals, 3 assists from 9 starts) rated the same as, for example, Pedro (1 goal, 2 assists from 9 starts)??

Some quite frankly ridiculous ratings tbh.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's your opinion, does not mean that it is correct though.

I don't particularly rate Kone. Anyways, I placed him higher than Pedro in my table

Midfield is crap as well.

That's your opinion, does not mean that it is correct though.

I don't particularly rate Kone. Anyways, I placed him higher than Pedro in my table

==========
Sorry, but according to your article :

"My rating is be based on the contributions (i.e. assists and goals), that each of these strikers/forwards have made for their respective teams.: "

Yet you don't rate someone who has 5 goals and 3 assists in 9 starts, and place him lower than the likes of Berahino (3 goals), Benteke (4 goals, 1 assist) and alongside Pedro, Perez and Hazard (0 goals and 3 assists)

As I, and others, have said - a ridiculous list, especially considering YOUR criteria!!

Brilliant Article

comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 7 minutes ago
That's your opinion, does not mean that it is correct though.

I don't particularly rate Kone. Anyways, I placed him higher than Pedro in my table

==========
Sorry, but according to your article :

"My rating is be based on the contributions (i.e. assists and goals), that each of these strikers/forwards have made for their respective teams.: "

Yet you don't rate someone who has 5 goals and 3 assists in 9 starts, and place him lower than the likes of Berahino (3 goals), Benteke (4 goals, 1 assist) and alongside Pedro, Perez and Hazard (0 goals and 3 assists)

As I, and others, have said - a ridiculous list, especially considering YOUR criteria!!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Off course, I am aware of Kone's contribution. But, I don't think he is anywhere as good as the other strikers or forwards in the top half of that table. Not sure why you're so miffed about this list either.

Not sure how you can have players like : Wijnaldum, Willian, Mane and not players like Ozil, Eriksen, Lamela etc

Off course, I am aware of Kone's contribution. But, I don't think he is anywhere as good as the other strikers or forwards in the top half of that table. Not sure why you're so miffed about this list either.
=========
But you claim you based the list off of contributions (ie assists and goals) - and Kone has contributed more than many in the list rated the same or better than him.

Either it is based on the contributions this season or it is based on your personal opinion - yet this seems a mish mash without any consistent criteria followed.

comment by H (U9129)
posted 4 minutes ago
Not sure how you can have players like : Wijnaldum, Willian, Mane and not players like Ozil, Eriksen, Lamela etc
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Neither of the above (well apart from Willian) are strikers or forwards