Eh? 15 mil is 15 mil still and anelka was better than marez. I ain't getting it.

comment by Wahl Icht (U10322)
posted 20 seconds ago
Eh? 15 mil is 15 mil still and anelka was better than marez. I ain't getting it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly, youyou, Chelsea, Arsenal nor Barca ain't

comment by Wahl Icht (U10322)
posted 20 seconds ago
Eh? 15 mil is 15 mil still and anelka was better than marez. I ain't getting it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
at that stage of his career he wasn't better than mahrez is now, no.

and if you don't think that transfer fee inflation is relevant then presumably you think that fellaini is 5 times the player maradona ever was?

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Yeah he was, anelka was way better than marez is now. Lol. Which means marez ain't worth 15 mil since he ain't as good as anelka was.

comment by Wahl Icht (U10322)
posted 4 seconds ago
Yeah he was, anelka was way better than marez is now. Lol. Which means marez ain't worth 15 mil since he ain't as good as anelka was.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
right you are. then you'll be delighted if your lot don't spend £15m on him then, so everyone's happy.

Mahrez looks more direct and better at scoring goal compare to Hazard....but we will need to see whether Mahrez is Michu or real gem of a player...time will tell.

comment by Don Draper's dandruff (U20155)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by kneerash-23 Cara Gold (U6876)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Don Draper's dandruff (U20155)
posted 40 seconds ago
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? (U3126)
posted 4 minutes ago
Don Draper's

Think it’s been fairly widely reported that £15m is his current value. While not always 100% accurate transfer market also valued him at £15m. Leicester will obviously not wish to consider selling him (at all) let alone £15m, which is why I believe they’ll want to get him signed to a new contract sooner rather than later.

Also from the player's point of view, a club like Barca would be difficult to say no to. Leicester will be fully aware of this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ok, must have missed that...but seems like a bizarrely low figure, it's barely more than ross mccormack!

from what i see he signed an extension in august, and the club is lining up a new contract for the summer...they can certainly afford to tell any PL team to eff off for less than £30m, and as I said short of downing tools and refusing to play they can do the same to barca.

though i do agree, i've never been to leicester, but think i would find the leicester-barca move hard to turn down.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
15 million is calculated for what it will cost to buy him out of his current contract, between now and the end of his contract LCFC will pay him about 15 million, therefore that's what it would cost to buy him out of his contract, leave any idea of playing quality out for a moment.

He's on very low wages in terms of other PL footballers hence the 15 million.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
sure, but who was the last player to actually buy out the last 3 years of his contract and move?

suarez was on £200k a week, but i don't remember barca ordering him to buy out the remaining 4 years of his contract at £42m and then picking him up for nothing (having given him the £42m of course).

----------------------------------------------------------------------
I get what you're saying and agree with you, I don't think Mahrez would be sold for 15 million but that's what the bidding would start at based on his current deal.

comment by Wahl Icht (U10322)
posted 27 minutes ago
Yeah he was, anelka was way better than marez is now. Lol. Which means marez ain't worth 15 mil since he ain't as good as anelka was.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What a shocking logic. Put it this was I'd rather have Mahrez now, than a fully primed Anelka any day, Call me biased. don't care.

If Barcelona want him, Barcelona will get him. But with a lengthy time left on his contract, I hope we follow suit of the American owners of Liverpool and Utd and play hardball.

Reserves for 2 years or pay what we ask. I really like that sentiment. Berahinho has learned something from that as well!

So, £35m and Barca, Leicester and Mahrez will be happy.

£15m and id rather let him play for the under 21s and lose the money. The TV deal will see we don't need it.

Merseysidefox

In the main, football clubs tend to be pragmatic, in that it helps no one letting a player’s book value depreciate by letting them play in the reserves as suggested. No one wins.

comment by Wahl Icht (U10322)
posted 49 minutes ago
15 million is good for marez. We paid 15 for anelka and he was better than marez is now.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah back in 2008 or something lol how can you comparer the two Appes to oranges mate

Put it this was I'd rather have Mahrez now, than a fully primed Anelka any day, Call me biased. don't care.
------------
WOW. PMSL

Ffs 15 mil is stil 15 mil. Why does it matter when it happened?

comment by Wahl Icht (U10322)
posted 1 minute ago
Ffs 15 mil is stil 15 mil. Why does it matter when it happened?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
oh dear. go back to school, learn about price increases/inflation, and then you might have something sensible to add to the debate.

until then it is a waste of time trying to educate you.

Wahl Icht

The obvious being that the (Anelka) valuation was many years ago. Player’s wages/contracts are considerably higher now than when Anelka played for Chelsea.

I don't get it bro. Whats the difference between 15 mil now and 15 mil in 2008. Its the same amount, ain't it?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inflation

comment by Wahl Icht (U10322)
posted 1 minute ago
I don't get it bro. Whats the difference between 15 mil now and 15 mil in 2008. Its the same amount, ain't it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.investopedia.com/university/inflation/inflation1.asp

now go away. bro.

comment by Wahl Icht (U10322)
posted 3 minutes ago
Put it this was I'd rather have Mahrez now, than a fully primed Anelka any day, Call me biased. don't care.
------------
WOW. PMSL
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Anelka, decent player but a moody journeyman with a shocking goal return for the teams he's played in.

Mahrez offers more, and is more of a flair player capable of that little bit of magic to win you a game.

comment by Wahl Icht (U10322)
posted 2 minutes ago
Ffs 15 mil is stil 15 mil. Why does it matter when it happened?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
OK we'll keep Mahrez and give you £15 Mill for Hazard, after all £15 Mill is £15 Mill

Wahl Icht

Arsenal signed Henry for £11m in 1999.

Do you think a 22yr old Thierry Henry would cost £11m in today's market? Have a think.

Bro, this don't make no sense. Anelka is a better player than marez, right? So that means the value of anelka is higher. So he should cost more momey then, right?

And honour dude, gtfo. Anelka shiiits on marez. Guys a furrrking legend.

Nah but pearce dude, henry werent any good before he went to arsenal.

a legend for being a mardy ass journeyman, yeah.