comment by Mr Chelsea. (U3579)
posted 15 minutes ago
Iqbal Mirchi. Mirchi means spicy. Iqbal means one hair
One Hair Spicy
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He worked for the biggest underground don in Pakistan/India, dead guy now though for some time
4zskin
I haven't defended anybody.
Mr C
I have already had wiki remove 'Vidicschin' from the list.
I must be the only person in Britain who couldn't care less about the Panama Papers
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 47 minutes ago
In true JA606 fashion everyone has totally ignored the disclaimer and gone in full steam ahead.
Sometimes I really do despair.
----------------
I don't think it's been ignored, it's simply not relevant. Whether it's legal or not is besides the point. The rich and powerful (as we all know they do), get to hide funds that should be invested back into their societies and local economies.
The fact that this behaviour is indeed legal is exactly the problem.
I look forward to this report bringing down as many people as possible. Been in the pipeline for ages and required loads of competing news outlets working together to sift through all the evidence
I don't think it's been ignored, it's simply not relevant.
................
Well, it really is relevant.
................
Whether it's legal or not is besides the point.
.................
That is the exact point of the disclaimer.
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 2 minutes ago
I don't think it's been ignored, it's simply not relevant.
................
Well, it really is relevant.
................
Whether it's legal or not is besides the point.
.................
That is the exact point of the disclaimer.
-----------------------------
I explained why the legality wasn't relevant to the morally/ethics of it. Quoting out of context again though... Nice.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
VC is spot on.
99% of this is perfectly legal. Either change the law or quit complaining. Nobody should pay a penny more tax than they are due and if the rules are written in such a way that you can avoid tax legally then fingers should be pointed at the lawmakers.
The only ones that will be brought down Robb are the ones that acted illegally. Which is probably not the majority.
The others should be ashamed though, as the sums of money they earn should be sufficient after they have paid their fair whack of tax. It may not be illegal buts it's immoral in my eyes.
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 1 hour, 53 minutes ago
Very important to read the disclaimer.
ICIJ published the following disclaimer with regard to the data provided: "There are legitimate uses for offshore companies, foundations and trusts. We do not intend to suggest or imply that any persons, companies or other entities included in the ICIJ Power Players interactive application have broken the law or otherwise acted improperly
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah that will just be ignored by the daily star brigade on ja 606
I knew Messi was a tax dodger
United we win.
If you had millions your exactly the person who doesn't need to keep every penny, but can pay your tax and still be mega rich.
Every normal working person in the UK has their tax taken out of their salary before they get it. No cheating there.
Politicians who clain that they want to catch tax cheats and benefit cheats and then move their money abroad are hypocrits. But then, we all know that after the expenses scandal.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Yes, I really think it matters.
really surprised about messi being involved
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Quoting out of context again though
.............
I am not the one incorrectly arguing over a disclaimer.
Obviously you have a problem with the fact that people on this list may well have not done anything illegal at all.
God only knows why?
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
United we win.
You do realise that the less they pay, the more you will have to pay. Unless you have an offshore account yourself.
Hardly a shock Barca we win condone's tax dodging, half the team he supports does it.
To think Cameron wanted to take a few quid away from disabled people who in a lot of cases through no fault of their own find mobility more difficult whilst benefiting from his father's conscious efforts for most of his working life to not pay as much tax as he might in the UK is abhorrent in my view.
comment by Obi Won K-Iwobi (U20802)
posted 2 minutes ago
To think Cameron wanted to take a few quid away from disabled people who in a lot of cases through no fault of their own find mobility more difficult whilst benefiting from his father's conscious efforts for most of his working life to not pay as much tax as he might in the UK is abhorrent in my view.
..........
Has Camerons father been avoiding his UK tax responsibilities?
I sort of agree Obi. Completely with the disabled point.
Less about Cameron,much as I dislike his politics. His fathers doings are not his fault and I'm sure that his Dad didn't go into the morallity of it with his son. Plus not many sons would question their father on their money.
But it wouldn't surprise me if something came out about Cameron himself.
comment by Darren The King Fletcher (U10026)
posted 13 minutes ago
Hardly a shock Barca we win condone's tax dodging, half the team he supports does it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Probably the funniest thing I've read on here
comment by United we win (U19958)
posted 16 minutes ago
Lol at all this moral rubbish. You really think that matters. There is nothing wrong with being clever with your tax. There is also never too much money as money can be blown in an instant. The real immoral ones are the people who sit at home and claim benefits for no good reason. They take and contribute nothing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You're so stupid. This isn't anything to do with moral rubbish, its about fairness. It's no clever it's cheating the society of their money.
Any normal person has to pay all their taxes, but the rich can get away with it? The only people who get affected are the common, which is the majority of the population.
And those on benefits are a small percentage in the big scale. Big companies and these people dodging their taxes hits the economy much harder than the ones on benefits will ever do.
Sign in if you want to comment
Footballers named in the Panama Papers
Page 2 of 6
6
posted on 7/4/16
comment by Mr Chelsea. (U3579)
posted 15 minutes ago
Iqbal Mirchi. Mirchi means spicy. Iqbal means one hair
One Hair Spicy
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He worked for the biggest underground don in Pakistan/India, dead guy now though for some time
posted on 7/4/16
4zskin
I haven't defended anybody.
Mr C
I have already had wiki remove 'Vidicschin' from the list.
posted on 7/4/16
I must be the only person in Britain who couldn't care less about the Panama Papers
posted on 7/4/16
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 47 minutes ago
In true JA606 fashion everyone has totally ignored the disclaimer and gone in full steam ahead.
Sometimes I really do despair.
----------------
I don't think it's been ignored, it's simply not relevant. Whether it's legal or not is besides the point. The rich and powerful (as we all know they do), get to hide funds that should be invested back into their societies and local economies.
The fact that this behaviour is indeed legal is exactly the problem.
posted on 7/4/16
I look forward to this report bringing down as many people as possible. Been in the pipeline for ages and required loads of competing news outlets working together to sift through all the evidence
posted on 7/4/16
I don't think it's been ignored, it's simply not relevant.
................
Well, it really is relevant.
................
Whether it's legal or not is besides the point.
.................
That is the exact point of the disclaimer.
posted on 7/4/16
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 2 minutes ago
I don't think it's been ignored, it's simply not relevant.
................
Well, it really is relevant.
................
Whether it's legal or not is besides the point.
.................
That is the exact point of the disclaimer.
-----------------------------
I explained why the legality wasn't relevant to the morally/ethics of it. Quoting out of context again though... Nice.
posted on 7/4/16
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 7/4/16
VC is spot on.
99% of this is perfectly legal. Either change the law or quit complaining. Nobody should pay a penny more tax than they are due and if the rules are written in such a way that you can avoid tax legally then fingers should be pointed at the lawmakers.
posted on 7/4/16
The only ones that will be brought down Robb are the ones that acted illegally. Which is probably not the majority.
The others should be ashamed though, as the sums of money they earn should be sufficient after they have paid their fair whack of tax. It may not be illegal buts it's immoral in my eyes.
posted on 7/4/16
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 1 hour, 53 minutes ago
Very important to read the disclaimer.
ICIJ published the following disclaimer with regard to the data provided: "There are legitimate uses for offshore companies, foundations and trusts. We do not intend to suggest or imply that any persons, companies or other entities included in the ICIJ Power Players interactive application have broken the law or otherwise acted improperly
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah that will just be ignored by the daily star brigade on ja 606
I knew Messi was a tax dodger
posted on 7/4/16
United we win.
If you had millions your exactly the person who doesn't need to keep every penny, but can pay your tax and still be mega rich.
Every normal working person in the UK has their tax taken out of their salary before they get it. No cheating there.
Politicians who clain that they want to catch tax cheats and benefit cheats and then move their money abroad are hypocrits. But then, we all know that after the expenses scandal.
posted on 7/4/16
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 7/4/16
Yes, I really think it matters.
posted on 7/4/16
really surprised about messi being involved
posted on 7/4/16
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 7/4/16
Quoting out of context again though
.............
I am not the one incorrectly arguing over a disclaimer.
Obviously you have a problem with the fact that people on this list may well have not done anything illegal at all.
God only knows why?
posted on 7/4/16
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 7/4/16
United we win.
You do realise that the less they pay, the more you will have to pay. Unless you have an offshore account yourself.
posted on 7/4/16
Hardly a shock Barca we win condone's tax dodging, half the team he supports does it.
posted on 7/4/16
To think Cameron wanted to take a few quid away from disabled people who in a lot of cases through no fault of their own find mobility more difficult whilst benefiting from his father's conscious efforts for most of his working life to not pay as much tax as he might in the UK is abhorrent in my view.
posted on 7/4/16
comment by Obi Won K-Iwobi (U20802)
posted 2 minutes ago
To think Cameron wanted to take a few quid away from disabled people who in a lot of cases through no fault of their own find mobility more difficult whilst benefiting from his father's conscious efforts for most of his working life to not pay as much tax as he might in the UK is abhorrent in my view.
..........
Has Camerons father been avoiding his UK tax responsibilities?
posted on 7/4/16
I sort of agree Obi. Completely with the disabled point.
Less about Cameron,much as I dislike his politics. His fathers doings are not his fault and I'm sure that his Dad didn't go into the morallity of it with his son. Plus not many sons would question their father on their money.
But it wouldn't surprise me if something came out about Cameron himself.
posted on 7/4/16
comment by Darren The King Fletcher (U10026)
posted 13 minutes ago
Hardly a shock Barca we win condone's tax dodging, half the team he supports does it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Probably the funniest thing I've read on here
posted on 7/4/16
comment by United we win (U19958)
posted 16 minutes ago
Lol at all this moral rubbish. You really think that matters. There is nothing wrong with being clever with your tax. There is also never too much money as money can be blown in an instant. The real immoral ones are the people who sit at home and claim benefits for no good reason. They take and contribute nothing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You're so stupid. This isn't anything to do with moral rubbish, its about fairness. It's no clever it's cheating the society of their money.
Any normal person has to pay all their taxes, but the rich can get away with it? The only people who get affected are the common, which is the majority of the population.
And those on benefits are a small percentage in the big scale. Big companies and these people dodging their taxes hits the economy much harder than the ones on benefits will ever do.
Page 2 of 6
6