Filtering is for girls according to VC and Mud
52 hates questions. Because he can't answer then most of the time. And Im far from think. Grandad
comment by Reddevilsdouble - give peace a chance (U12215)
posted 9 minutes ago
Red, do you accept Sweden is north of Latvia and these migrants might also favour the UK over Latvia / Romania
-----------
I don't just accept it I know it is.
Just like I know you used Latvia and Estonia with the U.K. as a context... and then starting muttering about Sweden after the event.
and you complained to the admin.. 3 times this morning!
If I'm racist then ban me
If you dont like what I say about football then don't read it or respond.
But please guys let's all get a grip. What happened to keeping thr peace?
I love Rdd and 52s battles
Like VC and Robb.
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 15 hours, 56 minutes ago
I'm not voting as I don't know the true benifit a of staying or leaving.
If the facts were out there in black and white, and debates were handled in a sensible and meaningful manor, I'd have enough knowledge vote. Truth is most of us are voting on a calculated guess.
----------------------------------------------------------------------Busby---
The problem is there is no one right or wrong answer, Staying in has it's benefit but it also has some issues, leaving has it's issues but also has a few benefits. It's more down to what is important to you.
For me it's to stay in as leaving would mean uncertainty which quite frankly is crazy considering what we have all gone through these last few years.
The point was the migrants will travel beyond safety to reach affluent countries. A point you can't dent you clown.
And yes I complained to Admin about you and kung fu. But only so I could accuse tou if racism as you did me.
Per capita, the UK receives far, far fewer asylum applications than the vast majority of EU countries, including the likes of Bulgaria and Iceland.
The EU average is 260 applications per 100,000 people per annum. The UK receives 60.
Looking, if you prefer, at the bottom line, the UK receives less than 5% of all EU asylum applications, and fewer than Italy, Sweden, Germany, France, Netherlands, Belgium, Hungary, Austria or Greece.
Turns out we're not that popular after all.
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-34131911
comment by Just Shoot (U10408)
posted 1 second ago
comment by Admin1 (U1)
posted 1 minute ago
Surely just because someone walks over a border would not mean they have all the documentation to prove they can live and work in the UK
-------------------------------------------
Much like the jungle in Calais? But if it is the mainland UK that is the desired "destination" then we could see Belfast as a potential choke point. These are entirely hypothetical propositions of a complex dynamic system. But just demonstrating that a vote "out" could in all possibility lead to a rapid increase of migration in the short term.
Essentially why both sides cant offer up any guarantees. This is particularly significant when we are talking economic numbers.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Can't disagree. It seems we have problems now and in the future regardless of which way the vote goes.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Take for example the UKIP poster, independent of the intended purpose, whether you are in or out, the influx of migrants(refugees who have not claimed asylum) and the subsequent humanitarian/infrastructure crisis is something that whether the UK has an open or closed border or is in or out of the EU, it sure as damn will be our problem either directly of indirectly. That's the nature of huge economic powerhouses, they tend to apply pressures one way or another.
Take a complex dynamic system...For example the EU sanctioning Russia, results in ultimately in economic hardship for farmers(£9bn export market), in Scotland for example Scottish mackerel fishermen were left with worthless catches and insolvency.
If Europe is forced to handle the crisis alone, the UK will have to pay its pound of flesh one way or another.
I don't battle with 52. I asked questionnaire generate debate. He calls them click bait because he is old and has little else in his life. Take a look at his threads. Very little contributions.
comment by rossobianchi - Vote Drizzle! (U17054)
posted 36 seconds ago
Per capita, the UK receives far, far fewer asylum applications than the vast majority of EU countries, including the likes of Bulgaria and Iceland.
The EU average is 260 applications per 100,000 people per annum. The UK receives 60.
Looking, if you prefer, at the bottom line, the UK receives less than 5% of all EU asylum applications, and fewer than Italy, Sweden, Germany, France, Netherlands, Belgium, Hungary, Austria or Greece.
Turns out we're not that popular after all.
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-34131911
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So these counties have greater net migration than 333000 per annum? Wow
Yes, it's true, you are far from think RDD:
Still waiting to know what riposte to answer lad.
All welcome to click on my member page and see the articles I have created.
I din't quite know why he thinks getting older is a bad thing, doesn't he want to?
It means you've seen more, done more, and best of all now have the time and leisure (and money normally) to do as you wish.
Be that having four holidays a year, eating out regularly, visiting children and grand children. Or going on football forums to talk about the sport you love, or to enjoy spats with numpties.
comment by Reddevilsdouble - give peace a chance (U12215)
posted 56 minutes ago
Filtering is for girls according to VC and Mud
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I have never seen VC make this statement and I am 100% sure I have not made it as I have filtered people.
I would filter you but you provide me much entertainment
comment by rossobianchi - Vote Drizzle! (U17054)
posted 40 minutes ago
Per capita, the UK receives far, far fewer asylum applications than the vast majority of EU countries, including the likes of Bulgaria and Iceland.
The EU average is 260 applications per 100,000 people per annum. The UK receives 60.
Looking, if you prefer, at the bottom line, the UK receives less than 5% of all EU asylum applications, and fewer than Italy, Sweden, Germany, France, Netherlands, Belgium, Hungary, Austria or Greece.
Turns out we're not that popular after all.
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-34131911
----------------------------------------------------------------------
These clowns are allergic to facts
comment by Reddevilsdouble - give peace a chance (U12215)
posted 1 hour, 15 minutes ago
Admin, I didn't ask for the thread to be pulled and didnt tell me or anyone else why is was pulled and it was red in the head who introduced flawed hypothesis as to why.
I'm now guessing Admin is from a migrant background,is overly sensitive and voting remain.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What a moronic post.
I have told you this in the past. People have little patience for idiots like you.
It is not about being sensitive, it is about highlighting your stupidity
comment by Reddevilsdouble - give peace a chance (U12215)
posted 45 minutes ago
comment by rossobianchi - Vote Drizzle! (U17054)
posted 36 seconds ago
Per capita, the UK receives far, far fewer asylum applications than the vast majority of EU countries, including the likes of Bulgaria and Iceland.
The EU average is 260 applications per 100,000 people per annum. The UK receives 60.
Looking, if you prefer, at the bottom line, the UK receives less than 5% of all EU asylum applications, and fewer than Italy, Sweden, Germany, France, Netherlands, Belgium, Hungary, Austria or Greece.
Turns out we're not that popular after all.
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-34131911
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So these counties have greater net migration than 333000 per annum? Wow
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you know what net migration is?
Yawn
Iv never said anything racist
I sympathise with the Syrian refugees. I just accept we cannot accommodate everybody in this small island of ours.
I don't particularly like Farage but equally dislike the assassination of every argument that raises immigration as racist.
I did complain 3 times this morning
The first 2 were about posts from Redinthehead and Kung fu. I did so to mock them for having posts deleted as they did me. The third complaint was about Admin 1 and was a joke
52, Mud, I find you both boring, uninteresting and highly strung and therefore like to tease you a little when k have time.
In short, if the asmins think I'm racist they can ban me.
If you don't like what I say filter me or dot read it.
Peace
Whereas we just find you thick, and very loosely strung.
Of course you can filter us, or not read us if you wish.
This will help
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/aug/10/10-truths-about-europes-refugee-crisis
Sign in if you want to comment
EU Special
Page 14 of 32
15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19
posted on 20/6/16
Filtering is for girls according to VC and Mud
posted on 20/6/16
52 hates questions. Because he can't answer then most of the time. And Im far from think. Grandad
posted on 20/6/16
comment by Reddevilsdouble - give peace a chance (U12215)
posted 9 minutes ago
Red, do you accept Sweden is north of Latvia and these migrants might also favour the UK over Latvia / Romania
-----------
I don't just accept it I know it is.
Just like I know you used Latvia and Estonia with the U.K. as a context... and then starting muttering about Sweden after the event.
and you complained to the admin.. 3 times this morning!
posted on 20/6/16
If I'm racist then ban me
If you dont like what I say about football then don't read it or respond.
But please guys let's all get a grip. What happened to keeping thr peace?
posted on 20/6/16
You tell us Nancy boy.
posted on 20/6/16
I love Rdd and 52s battles
Like VC and Robb.
posted on 20/6/16
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 15 hours, 56 minutes ago
I'm not voting as I don't know the true benifit a of staying or leaving.
If the facts were out there in black and white, and debates were handled in a sensible and meaningful manor, I'd have enough knowledge vote. Truth is most of us are voting on a calculated guess.
----------------------------------------------------------------------Busby---
The problem is there is no one right or wrong answer, Staying in has it's benefit but it also has some issues, leaving has it's issues but also has a few benefits. It's more down to what is important to you.
For me it's to stay in as leaving would mean uncertainty which quite frankly is crazy considering what we have all gone through these last few years.
posted on 20/6/16
The point was the migrants will travel beyond safety to reach affluent countries. A point you can't dent you clown.
And yes I complained to Admin about you and kung fu. But only so I could accuse tou if racism as you did me.
posted on 20/6/16
Ok Nancy Boy x 3
posted on 20/6/16
Per capita, the UK receives far, far fewer asylum applications than the vast majority of EU countries, including the likes of Bulgaria and Iceland.
The EU average is 260 applications per 100,000 people per annum. The UK receives 60.
Looking, if you prefer, at the bottom line, the UK receives less than 5% of all EU asylum applications, and fewer than Italy, Sweden, Germany, France, Netherlands, Belgium, Hungary, Austria or Greece.
Turns out we're not that popular after all.
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-34131911
posted on 20/6/16
comment by Just Shoot (U10408)
posted 1 second ago
comment by Admin1 (U1)
posted 1 minute ago
Surely just because someone walks over a border would not mean they have all the documentation to prove they can live and work in the UK
-------------------------------------------
Much like the jungle in Calais? But if it is the mainland UK that is the desired "destination" then we could see Belfast as a potential choke point. These are entirely hypothetical propositions of a complex dynamic system. But just demonstrating that a vote "out" could in all possibility lead to a rapid increase of migration in the short term.
Essentially why both sides cant offer up any guarantees. This is particularly significant when we are talking economic numbers.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Can't disagree. It seems we have problems now and in the future regardless of which way the vote goes.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Take for example the UKIP poster, independent of the intended purpose, whether you are in or out, the influx of migrants(refugees who have not claimed asylum) and the subsequent humanitarian/infrastructure crisis is something that whether the UK has an open or closed border or is in or out of the EU, it sure as damn will be our problem either directly of indirectly. That's the nature of huge economic powerhouses, they tend to apply pressures one way or another.
Take a complex dynamic system...For example the EU sanctioning Russia, results in ultimately in economic hardship for farmers(£9bn export market), in Scotland for example Scottish mackerel fishermen were left with worthless catches and insolvency.
If Europe is forced to handle the crisis alone, the UK will have to pay its pound of flesh one way or another.
posted on 20/6/16
I don't battle with 52. I asked questionnaire generate debate. He calls them click bait because he is old and has little else in his life. Take a look at his threads. Very little contributions.
posted on 20/6/16
The battle rages on.
posted on 20/6/16
comment by rossobianchi - Vote Drizzle! (U17054)
posted 36 seconds ago
Per capita, the UK receives far, far fewer asylum applications than the vast majority of EU countries, including the likes of Bulgaria and Iceland.
The EU average is 260 applications per 100,000 people per annum. The UK receives 60.
Looking, if you prefer, at the bottom line, the UK receives less than 5% of all EU asylum applications, and fewer than Italy, Sweden, Germany, France, Netherlands, Belgium, Hungary, Austria or Greece.
Turns out we're not that popular after all.
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-34131911
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So these counties have greater net migration than 333000 per annum? Wow
posted on 20/6/16
Yes, it's true, you are far from think RDD:
posted on 20/6/16
Still waiting to know what riposte to answer lad.
posted on 20/6/16
All welcome to click on my member page and see the articles I have created.
I din't quite know why he thinks getting older is a bad thing, doesn't he want to?
It means you've seen more, done more, and best of all now have the time and leisure (and money normally) to do as you wish.
Be that having four holidays a year, eating out regularly, visiting children and grand children. Or going on football forums to talk about the sport you love, or to enjoy spats with numpties.
posted on 20/6/16
comment by Reddevilsdouble - give peace a chance (U12215)
posted 56 minutes ago
Filtering is for girls according to VC and Mud
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I have never seen VC make this statement and I am 100% sure I have not made it as I have filtered people.
I would filter you but you provide me much entertainment
posted on 20/6/16
comment by rossobianchi - Vote Drizzle! (U17054)
posted 40 minutes ago
Per capita, the UK receives far, far fewer asylum applications than the vast majority of EU countries, including the likes of Bulgaria and Iceland.
The EU average is 260 applications per 100,000 people per annum. The UK receives 60.
Looking, if you prefer, at the bottom line, the UK receives less than 5% of all EU asylum applications, and fewer than Italy, Sweden, Germany, France, Netherlands, Belgium, Hungary, Austria or Greece.
Turns out we're not that popular after all.
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-34131911
----------------------------------------------------------------------
These clowns are allergic to facts
posted on 20/6/16
comment by Reddevilsdouble - give peace a chance (U12215)
posted 1 hour, 15 minutes ago
Admin, I didn't ask for the thread to be pulled and didnt tell me or anyone else why is was pulled and it was red in the head who introduced flawed hypothesis as to why.
I'm now guessing Admin is from a migrant background,is overly sensitive and voting remain.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What a moronic post.
I have told you this in the past. People have little patience for idiots like you.
It is not about being sensitive, it is about highlighting your stupidity
posted on 20/6/16
comment by Reddevilsdouble - give peace a chance (U12215)
posted 45 minutes ago
comment by rossobianchi - Vote Drizzle! (U17054)
posted 36 seconds ago
Per capita, the UK receives far, far fewer asylum applications than the vast majority of EU countries, including the likes of Bulgaria and Iceland.
The EU average is 260 applications per 100,000 people per annum. The UK receives 60.
Looking, if you prefer, at the bottom line, the UK receives less than 5% of all EU asylum applications, and fewer than Italy, Sweden, Germany, France, Netherlands, Belgium, Hungary, Austria or Greece.
Turns out we're not that popular after all.
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-34131911
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So these counties have greater net migration than 333000 per annum? Wow
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you know what net migration is?
posted on 20/6/16
Yawn
Iv never said anything racist
I sympathise with the Syrian refugees. I just accept we cannot accommodate everybody in this small island of ours.
I don't particularly like Farage but equally dislike the assassination of every argument that raises immigration as racist.
I did complain 3 times this morning
The first 2 were about posts from Redinthehead and Kung fu. I did so to mock them for having posts deleted as they did me. The third complaint was about Admin 1 and was a joke
52, Mud, I find you both boring, uninteresting and highly strung and therefore like to tease you a little when k have time.
In short, if the asmins think I'm racist they can ban me.
If you don't like what I say filter me or dot read it.
Peace
posted on 20/6/16
Whereas we just find you thick, and very loosely strung.
Of course you can filter us, or not read us if you wish.
posted on 20/6/16
Yawn
posted on 20/6/16
This will help
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/aug/10/10-truths-about-europes-refugee-crisis
Page 14 of 32
15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19