Try managing a bunch of over hyped,millionaire prima donna's,unless you have access to an AK47 you're not likely to win.
But Jose won theleague with that squad Wahl so the players were playing for him, it was a poor season overall and Chelsea didn't have to be brilliant to win it but still Jose had a squad capeable of winning the league.
Why do you thenk the players decided to stop playing for him so quickly after winning the league?
Knee dude, it was because they won the league! They worked so hard to achieve that and I think after that they just didn't want to try hard like that ever again. That shows their bad attitudes.
So they just lost the hunger after winning it? None of Jose's actions had an impact?
If Mourinho's actions had impact, why would the players have not gotten back to their best when he was sacked?
comment by Wahl Icht. (U21057)
posted 7 seconds ago
If Mourinho's actions had impact, why would the players have not gotten back to their best when he was sacked?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Maybe they are still upset that Eva's no longer there
The woman was a 5/10 at best. We should just hire a hotter girl if that's all it takes.
It's fatty benitez's fault, he infected your club with his own brand of poison
comment by Wahl Icht. (U21057)
posted 9 minutes ago
If Mourinho's actions had impact, why would the players have not gotten back to their best when he was sacked?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Interesting point
I guess if Jose goes on to do well at united and Conte struggles at Chelsea you will have concrete evidence to back up your suggestion Wahl.
Knee dude, and I am sure those two things will happen
Wahl where do you see both Chelsea and United finishing this season?
Jose had to go Whaldude, he was unbearable towards the end of his stint at Chelsea, attracting negative press and was damaging the club image with his weekly rants.
Bro Wonder, Man Utd 1st, Chelsea 6th.
Shouldn't you be embarrassed with your pathetic team mounting title challange this decade ?
Just to clear uo the confusion, Ignore my last post Whaldude, wrong intended destination
Wahl do you have beef with b*tch boy again after he won you over at the end of last season?
Yeah, I do Broctavian. I thought he was gonna try harder for the team, but I can see now he ain't ever gonna change.
comment by Wahl Icht. (U21057)
posted 3 hours, 25 minutes ago
Matadude, Mourinho wanted to add to the squad in 2015 Summer, but he wasn't able to get the players he wanted. He wanted Stones but ended up with Djilobodji. He wanted Pogba but didn't get ANY midfielder. I think he knew what was going to happen (Although I don't think he expected to be as bad as it was) but wasn't given what he needed to stop it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't buy that for 1 minute. FFS Chelsea have at least 26 players out on loan and if Maureen wanted replacements he should have used some of those.
I mean, what is the point of keeping players if they're not going to perform or just aren't good enough when he could have used some of the loanees and ditched the bad element.
Think about this for a minute. Maybe if he's have ditched some of the trouble makers and used loanees instead, would Chelsea have finished down in 10th?
Maybe, maybe not, but, Jose might have kept his job, Chelsea might have some good young players in the squad and the bad element would be gone.
That's why Maureen is such a knоb, he could have turned it around but HE chose not to, therefore it is all Maureen's fault and nobody else's.
Sign in if you want to comment
Double Standards
Page 2 of 2
posted on 26/9/16
Try managing a bunch of over hyped,millionaire prima donna's,unless you have access to an AK47 you're not likely to win.
posted on 26/9/16
Who is biitch boy?
posted on 26/9/16
Biiitch boy is Hazard.
posted on 26/9/16
But Jose won theleague with that squad Wahl so the players were playing for him, it was a poor season overall and Chelsea didn't have to be brilliant to win it but still Jose had a squad capeable of winning the league.
Why do you thenk the players decided to stop playing for him so quickly after winning the league?
posted on 26/9/16
Knee dude, it was because they won the league! They worked so hard to achieve that and I think after that they just didn't want to try hard like that ever again. That shows their bad attitudes.
posted on 26/9/16
So they just lost the hunger after winning it? None of Jose's actions had an impact?
posted on 26/9/16
If Mourinho's actions had impact, why would the players have not gotten back to their best when he was sacked?
posted on 26/9/16
comment by Wahl Icht. (U21057)
posted 7 seconds ago
If Mourinho's actions had impact, why would the players have not gotten back to their best when he was sacked?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Maybe they are still upset that Eva's no longer there
posted on 26/9/16
The woman was a 5/10 at best. We should just hire a hotter girl if that's all it takes.
posted on 26/9/16
It's fatty benitez's fault, he infected your club with his own brand of poison
posted on 26/9/16
comment by Wahl Icht. (U21057)
posted 9 minutes ago
If Mourinho's actions had impact, why would the players have not gotten back to their best when he was sacked?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Interesting point
posted on 26/9/16
posted on 26/9/16
I guess if Jose goes on to do well at united and Conte struggles at Chelsea you will have concrete evidence to back up your suggestion Wahl.
posted on 26/9/16
Knee dude, and I am sure those two things will happen
posted on 26/9/16
Wahl where do you see both Chelsea and United finishing this season?
posted on 26/9/16
Jose had to go Whaldude, he was unbearable towards the end of his stint at Chelsea, attracting negative press and was damaging the club image with his weekly rants.
posted on 26/9/16
Bro Wonder, Man Utd 1st, Chelsea 6th.
posted on 26/9/16
Shouldn't you be embarrassed with your pathetic team mounting title challange this decade ?
posted on 26/9/16
Just to clear uo the confusion, Ignore my last post Whaldude, wrong intended destination
posted on 26/9/16
Wahl do you have beef with b*tch boy again after he won you over at the end of last season?
posted on 26/9/16
Yeah, I do Broctavian. I thought he was gonna try harder for the team, but I can see now he ain't ever gonna change.
posted on 26/9/16
comment by Wahl Icht. (U21057)
posted 3 hours, 25 minutes ago
Matadude, Mourinho wanted to add to the squad in 2015 Summer, but he wasn't able to get the players he wanted. He wanted Stones but ended up with Djilobodji. He wanted Pogba but didn't get ANY midfielder. I think he knew what was going to happen (Although I don't think he expected to be as bad as it was) but wasn't given what he needed to stop it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't buy that for 1 minute. FFS Chelsea have at least 26 players out on loan and if Maureen wanted replacements he should have used some of those.
I mean, what is the point of keeping players if they're not going to perform or just aren't good enough when he could have used some of the loanees and ditched the bad element.
Think about this for a minute. Maybe if he's have ditched some of the trouble makers and used loanees instead, would Chelsea have finished down in 10th?
Maybe, maybe not, but, Jose might have kept his job, Chelsea might have some good young players in the squad and the bad element would be gone.
That's why Maureen is such a knоb, he could have turned it around but HE chose not to, therefore it is all Maureen's fault and nobody else's.
Page 2 of 2