So how far do the tension have to rise with Russia before the UK disarm?

Should Japan and South Korea never have the right to defend themselves?

If North Korea and Russia swapped places and regimes, would it be OK for Japan and Korea to get Nukes then, and for the UK to disarm?

Your hypocrisy is clear as you do not have a consistent view.

comment by D4thincarnation (U2520)
posted 31 minutes ago
Clinton was the one arming ISIS.

...............

No, she wasn't.

comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by D4thincarnation (U2520)
posted 31 minutes ago
Clinton was the one arming ISIS.

...............

No, she wasn't.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So why were all these ISIS freindly states paying her millions, then getting weapon deals with the US?

That whole Gaddaffi thing was a joke, with Clinton's hands all over that one as well.

.......................

Other than her being at fault for Bengazi, which was her remit, the other events in Lybia were down to the UN. You were told this earlier on, on this thread.

It takes a very special kind of re tardedness to keep ignoring the facts, which is why I keep telling you that you are an ideal trump victim.

o why were all these ISIS freindly states paying her millions

.............

They were not. again, you have been misled.

D4

And your choice to iron out the complexities of international diplomatic negotiations, is a celebrity. A complete beginner, who has proven to be temperamentally damaged.

It’s akin to asking a post man to perform open heart surgery without even attending nursing college.

Yip, that’ll work…

comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 2 minutes ago
o why were all these ISIS freindly states paying her millions

.............

They were not. again, you have been misled.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Stay in denial then.

comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? (U3126)
posted 58 seconds ago
D4

And your choice to iron out the complexities of international diplomatic negotiations, is a celebrity. A complete beginner, who has proven to be temperamentally damaged.

It’s akin to asking a post man to perform open heart surgery without even attending nursing college.

Yip, that’ll work…
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Politics need to change, they have no respect for the people, because they know no matter what they do, cowards like you are too afraid to go somewhere else.

Stay in denial then.

...............

I don't have anything to be in denial over. I have frequently told you that I can't stand Clinton either.

You on the other hand are very simple and easily led because, like you hero, you can't separate fact from fiction.

comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 2 minutes ago
o why were all these ISIS freindly states paying her millions

.............

They were not. again, you have been misled.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not so sure.

HC has been overseeing the entire US administration didn't you know? Nothing has ever been passed by the Senate, nor the house of reps...

Not so sure.

HC has been overseeing the entire US administration didn't you know? Nothing has ever been passed by the Senate, nor the house of reps...

..............

Got to hand it to Hilary. She has also been overseeing the UN as well.

Quite clearly the more qualified candidate. If only she would develop a catch phrase.

comment by D4thincarnation (U2520)
posted 58 minutes ago
So how far do the tension have to rise with Russia before the UK disarm?

Should Japan and South Korea never have the right to defend themselves?

If North Korea and Russia swapped places and regimes, would it be OK for Japan and Korea to get Nukes then, and for the UK to disarm?

Your hypocrisy is clear as you do not have a consistent view.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
D4

I would be hypocritical if I had said that the UK should have nuclear weapons but Japan & South Korea shouldn't. I haven't said this

comment by CoutinhosHappyFeet (U18971)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by D4thincarnation (U2520)
posted 58 minutes ago
So how far do the tension have to rise with Russia before the UK disarm?

Should Japan and South Korea never have the right to defend themselves?

If North Korea and Russia swapped places and regimes, would it be OK for Japan and Korea to get Nukes then, and for the UK to disarm?

Your hypocrisy is clear as you do not have a consistent view.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
D4

I would be hypocritical if I had said that the UK should have nuclear weapons but Japan & South Korea shouldn't. I haven't said this
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well if your view is consistent and believe none should be making nukes, then I was wrong.

comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? (U3126)
posted 1 hour, 5 minutes ago
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 2 minutes ago
o why were all these ISIS freindly states paying her millions

.............

They were not. again, you have been misled.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not so sure.

HC has been overseeing the entire US administration didn't you know? Nothing has ever been passed by the Senate, nor the house of reps...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
She was making deals with these countries on her own and using her position to get them what they want

She was making deals with these countries on her own and using her position to get them what they want

.......

Who are 'these countries'? What did she get them and how did she do it on her own?

There was a prisoner exchange that went hush hush on the news where we give an organization in Iran $400m in exchange for 4 prisoners.

http://www.npr.org/2016/08/18/490553251/iran-payment-used-as-leverage-in-prisoner-swap-state-department-says

Hillary was running that department at the time.

comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 2 minutes ago
She was making deals with these countries on her own and using her position to get them what they want

.......

Who are 'these countries'? What did she get them and how did she do it on her own?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
She got them to donate to the Clinton Foundation for weapons deals and other perks that her position gave her.

Whether or not the nuclear deal was part of that agreement is up for your interpretation on the timing.

Should've made myself a bit clearer.

Hillary was not running the department at the time BUT how much influence did she have over this whole process.

She got them to donate to the Clinton Foundation for weapons deals and other perks that her position gave her.

.............

Good grief. You just make it up as you go long, don't you.

So you find this so abhorrent you don't believe. So if I prove it to you will you denounce Hillary?

comment by D4thincarnation (U2520)
posted 5 seconds ago
So you find this so abhorrent you don't believe. So if I prove it to you will you denounce Hillary?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
no he won't unfortunately

It's like the whole 'corbyn' situation in the U.K, people are prepared to 'jump into bed' with communism because of their hatred towards the Tories.

I can see some people having a breakdown when Trump wins.

Hillary was not running the department at the time BUT how much influence did she have over this whole process.

..............

None. She wasn't in any Government position as far as I can tell. She isn't a sitting Senator any more so I doubt she even gets a vote on these things.

https://youtu.be/7LYRUOd_QoM

Think need To look At This