comment by Leonidas....Where you bring carnage, I bring c... (U3432)
posted 1 minute ago
Laudrup (U12366)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by Leonidas....Where you bring carnage, I bring c... (U3432)
posted 59 seconds ago
Curly 💩 (U1103)
posted 7 seconds ago
Of course the stats don't lie

It is just people who kanny koont that cannot understand them!

If we had took our chances we would have won 6-2

That is just a simple FACT

---------------------------------------------



yer gonna have to explain that wan curly?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
DOH


--------------------------------------------


ffs thats rich coming from ja's resident haufwit
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Says the brain of Britain accompanied by a poster with senile dementia

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by jimmybhoy (U20107)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Miller (U9310)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by Leonidas....Where you bring carnage, I bring candles ! (U3432)
posted 1 minute ago
10 shots on target = 10 + 2 = 12


6 shots on target = 6 + 1 = 7



is that simple enough?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where did he mention celtic would have equal proficiency?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Rangers gave it their all and still came up short. Celtic deserved the win. Anyone thinkin otherwise needs their head examined
----------------------------------------------------------------------
With some clinical finishing and better decision making the score would have been oh so different

Laudrup (U12366)
posted 39 seconds ago
comment by Leonidas....Where you bring carnage, I bring c... (U3432)
posted 1 minute ago
Laudrup (U12366)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by Leonidas....Where you bring carnage, I bring c... (U3432)
posted 59 seconds ago
Curly 💩 (U1103)
posted 7 seconds ago
Of course the stats don't lie

It is just people who kanny koont that cannot understand them!

If we had took our chances we would have won 6-2

That is just a simple FACT

---------------------------------------------



yer gonna have to explain that wan curly?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
DOH


--------------------------------------------


ffs thats rich coming from ja's resident haufwit
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Says the brain of Britain accompanied by a poster with senile dementia

--------------------------------------------------------



laudo explain the 6-2 thingy, show us yer wisdom?

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by Leonidas....Where you bring carnage, I bring c... (U3432)
posted 2 minutes ago
Laudrup (U12366)
posted 20 seconds ago
comment by Leonidas....Where you bring carnage, I bring c... (U3432)
posted 32 seconds ago
Miller (U9310)
posted 48 seconds ago
comment by Leonidas....Where you bring carnage, I bring candles ! (U3432)
posted 1 minute ago
10 shots on target = 10 + 2 = 12


6 shots on target = 6 + 1 = 7



is that simple enough?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where did he mention celtic would have equal proficiency?

------------------------------------------------------------


what do you class as chances missed?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hitting the post
Not knocking it across to dodoo with an open goal


--------------------------------------------------------


sinclair hit the post before dembele scored.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And? We aren't talking about Celtics missed chances only Rangers

comment by Leonidas....Where you bring carnage, I bring candles ! (U3432)
posted 1 minute ago
Laudrup (U12366)
posted 20 seconds ago
comment by Leonidas....Where you bring carnage, I bring c... (U3432)
posted 32 seconds ago
Miller (U9310)
posted 48 seconds ago
comment by Leonidas....Where you bring carnage, I bring candles ! (U3432)
posted 1 minute ago
10 shots on target = 10 + 2 = 12


6 shots on target = 6 + 1 = 7



is that simple enough?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where did he mention celtic would have equal proficiency?

------------------------------------------------------------


what do you class as chances missed?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hitting the post
Not knocking it across to dodoo with an open goal


--------------------------------------------------------


sinclair hit the post before dembele scored.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Yer no grasping this. He didn't say if Celtic took their chances.

Fvckin painful reading

Curly 💩 (U1103)
posted 1 minute ago
Curly 💩 (U1103)
posted 7 seconds ago
Of course the stats don't lie

It is just people who kanny koont that cannot understand them!

If we had took our chances we would have won 6-2

That is just a simple FACT

---------------------------------------------



yer gonna have to explain that wan curly?

++++

Ok (can someone hum the Play School theme tune in the background please)

1. Laudrup said we would have won if we took our chances

2. You said it was rubbish and to check the stats

3. The stats are 10 on target for Celtic, 6 on target for rangers

4. The game finished 2-1 to Celtic

Are you following or am I going too quick?

5. So, if rangers took all our chances we would have scored 6

6. Celtic scored 2

7. If we therefore took all our chances we would have won 6-2


Is that clear enough for you?

----------------------------------------------------



and if we would have took ours, if if if....................


are you dizzee cants still pashed

comment by PointyBirds (U8853)
posted 2 minutes ago
So why is it so busy if it's rubbish
---
If what's rubbish, my petal?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
comment by PointyBirds (U8853)
posted 1 minute ago
who is the moderators POV and heed the baw
---
Your mum. Your mum moderates it. She moderates it reeeeeal good.

That is just a simple FACT
---
It's a pretty rubbish one though.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by Curly 💩 (U1103)
posted 1 minute ago
Curly 💩 (U1103)
posted 7 seconds ago
Of course the stats don't lie

It is just people who kanny koont that cannot understand them!

If we had took our chances we would have won 6-2

That is just a simple FACT

---------------------------------------------



yer gonna have to explain that wan curly?

++++

Ok (can someone hum the Play School theme tune in the background please)

1. Laudrup said we would have won if we took our chances

2. You said it was rubbish and to check the stats

3. The stats are 10 on target for Celtic, 6 on target for rangers

4. The game finished 2-1 to Celtic

Are you following or am I going too quick?

5. So, if rangers took all our chances we would have scored 6

6. Celtic scored 2

7. If we therefore took all our chances we would have won 6-2


Is that clear enough for you?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How is a shot on target a chance? Half those shots were from fourty yards.

Your argument makes no sense that's like saying if Dembele and Sinclair didn't play Rangers would have won.

comment by lauders-happy new year to one and all (U9757)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Leonidas....Where you bring carnage, I bring candles ! (U3432)
posted 1 minute ago
Laudrup (U12366)
posted 20 seconds ago
comment by Leonidas....Where you bring carnage, I bring c... (U3432)
posted 32 seconds ago
Miller (U9310)
posted 48 seconds ago
comment by Leonidas....Where you bring carnage, I bring candles ! (U3432)
posted 1 minute ago
10 shots on target = 10 + 2 = 12


6 shots on target = 6 + 1 = 7



is that simple enough?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where did he mention celtic would have equal proficiency?

------------------------------------------------------------


what do you class as chances missed?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hitting the post
Not knocking it across to dodoo with an open goal


--------------------------------------------------------


sinclair hit the post before dembele scored.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Yer no grasping this. He didn't say if Celtic took their chances.

Fvckin painful reading
----------------------------------------------------------------------

comment by Laudrup (U12366)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by jimmybhoy (U20107)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Miller (U9310)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by Leonidas....Where you bring carnage, I bring candles ! (U3432)
posted 1 minute ago
10 shots on target = 10 + 2 = 12


6 shots on target = 6 + 1 = 7



is that simple enough?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where did he mention celtic would have equal proficiency?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Rangers gave it their all and still came up short. Celtic deserved the win. Anyone thinkin otherwise needs their head examined
----------------------------------------------------------------------
With some clinical finishing and better decision making the score would have been oh so different
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm guessing you are missing the point that Celtic created more chances

lauders-happy new year to one and all (U9757)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Leonidas....Where you bring carnage, I bring candles ! (U3432)
posted 1 minute ago
Laudrup (U12366)
posted 20 seconds ago
comment by Leonidas....Where you bring carnage, I bring c... (U3432)
posted 32 seconds ago
Miller (U9310)
posted 48 seconds ago
comment by Leonidas....Where you bring carnage, I bring candles ! (U3432)
posted 1 minute ago
10 shots on target = 10 + 2 = 12


6 shots on target = 6 + 1 = 7



is that simple enough?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where did he mention celtic would have equal proficiency?

------------------------------------------------------------


what do you class as chances missed?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hitting the post
Not knocking it across to dodoo with an open goal


--------------------------------------------------------


sinclair hit the post before dembele scored.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Yer no grasping this. He didn't say if Celtic took their chances.

Fvckin painful reading

---------------------------------------------


I never said he did, just replying with another if if if scenario...........

comment by timmy (U14278)
posted 38 seconds ago
comment by Curly 💩 (U1103)
posted 1 minute ago
Curly 💩 (U1103)
posted 7 seconds ago
Of course the stats don't lie

It is just people who kanny koont that cannot understand them!

If we had took our chances we would have won 6-2

That is just a simple FACT

---------------------------------------------



yer gonna have to explain that wan curly?

++++

Ok (can someone hum the Play School theme tune in the background please)

1. Laudrup said we would have won if we took our chances

2. You said it was rubbish and to check the stats

3. The stats are 10 on target for Celtic, 6 on target for rangers

4. The game finished 2-1 to Celtic

Are you following or am I going too quick?

5. So, if rangers took all our chances we would have scored 6

6. Celtic scored 2

7. If we therefore took all our chances we would have won 6-2


Is that clear enough for you?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How is a shot on target a chance? Half those shots were from fourty yards.

Your argument makes no sense that's like saying if Dembele and Sinclair didn't play Rangers would have won.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If celtic hadn't scored we'd have won 1-0.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by Curly 💩 (U1103)
posted 50 seconds ago
10 shots on target = 10 + 2 = 12


6 shots on target = 6 + 1 = 7



is that simple enough?


+++++

It is simple but not in the way you think, it is simple as in "dolly dimple"

Firstly, laudrup never mentioned Celtic taking their chances - all he said was if we took ours we would have won; which is a FACT

Secondly, you cannot add goals scored to shots on target as the goals are already included in the shots on stats


Is that simple enough

I suggest you just delete your account also as this is not going well for you
----------------------------------------------------------------------
don't explain it curly

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by Miller (U9310)
posted 25 seconds ago
comment by timmy (U14278)
posted 38 seconds ago
comment by Curly 💩 (U1103)
posted 1 minute ago
Curly 💩 (U1103)
posted 7 seconds ago
Of course the stats don't lie

It is just people who kanny koont that cannot understand them!

If we had took our chances we would have won 6-2

That is just a simple FACT

---------------------------------------------



yer gonna have to explain that wan curly?

++++

Ok (can someone hum the Play School theme tune in the background please)

1. Laudrup said we would have won if we took our chances

2. You said it was rubbish and to check the stats

3. The stats are 10 on target for Celtic, 6 on target for rangers

4. The game finished 2-1 to Celtic

Are you following or am I going too quick?

5. So, if rangers took all our chances we would have scored 6

6. Celtic scored 2

7. If we therefore took all our chances we would have won 6-2


Is that clear enough for you?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How is a shot on target a chance? Half those shots were from fourty yards.

Your argument makes no sense that's like saying if Dembele and Sinclair didn't play Rangers would have won.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If celtic hadn't scored we'd have won 1-0.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That is fact Miller they conveniently forget this

jimmy i cant believe they are missing the point,




you starting to understand yet curly.......if if if.




admin delete this cants account or refer him to a drugs counsellor

comment by Curly 💩 (U1103)
posted 7 seconds ago
Jesus fookin wept

I would love to see you think kants on University Challenge
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well we wouldn't think we had won a game we lost two one that's for sure.

comment by Laudrup (U12366)
posted 24 minutes ago
comment by Leonidas....Where you bring carnage, I bring c... (U3432)
posted 2 minutes ago
Curly 💩 (U1103)
posted 21 seconds ago
All have to do is take our chances , if we did that on Saturday we would have won

Sutton we are told is impartial how can he possibly be impartial when he wants us iliminated ? Scottish football eh? Brilliant stuff

-----------------------------------------


your finest pash to date............check the stats

+++++

No, it is perfectly true, check the stats yourself

If we had taken our chances we would have won 6-2

That is just a FACT

-----------------------------------------------------------------


shots on target

Celtic - 10

Rangers - 6


?????????????????????????????
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Your first shot on goal(not target) was when you scored
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Can someone please tell him that this is incorrect?? I believe we had at least 2 before that. Think there was even one before Rangers scored.

If?
Telly Savalas recorded that.

<sic>"If you grow a perr a baws then you will be a man my son."

wee laudo hanging onto curlys shirt tail

100