cant believe how slow you are curly, not like you man



laudo.............as expected

My POV-will change name for food. (U10636)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Laudrup (U12366)
posted 24 minutes ago
comment by Leonidas....Where you bring carnage, I bring c... (U3432)
posted 2 minutes ago
Curly 💩 (U1103)
posted 21 seconds ago
All have to do is take our chances , if we did that on Saturday we would have won

Sutton we are told is impartial how can he possibly be impartial when he wants us iliminated ? Scottish football eh? Brilliant stuff

-----------------------------------------


your finest pash to date............check the stats

+++++

No, it is perfectly true, check the stats yourself

If we had taken our chances we would have won 6-2

That is just a FACT

-----------------------------------------------------------------


shots on target

Celtic - 10

Rangers - 6


?????????????????????????????
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Your first shot on goal(not target) was when you scored
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Can someone please tell him that this is incorrect?? I believe we had at least 2 before that. Think there was even one before Rangers scored.




and sinclair hit the post.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Anyway, the berrs are right.
Celtic aren't that good.
If they were they would have 60 points by now not a lousy 58.
Only good thing is the Ibrox club's targeted 55 won't be enough to overtake us.

Curly 💩 (U1103)
posted 44 seconds ago
jimmy i cant believe they are missing the point,




you starting to understand yet curly.......if if if.




admin delete this cants account or refer him to a drugs counsellor

+++++

I understand fully that you can neither read nor count

What is your core skill?

------------------------------------------------


fiddling with my abadus.

comment by Leonidas....Where you bring carnage, I bring candles ! (U3432)
posted 1 minute ago
My POV-will change name for food. (U10636)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Laudrup (U12366)
posted 24 minutes ago
comment by Leonidas....Where you bring carnage, I bring c... (U3432)
posted 2 minutes ago
Curly 💩 (U1103)
posted 21 seconds ago
All have to do is take our chances , if we did that on Saturday we would have won

Sutton we are told is impartial how can he possibly be impartial when he wants us iliminated ? Scottish football eh? Brilliant stuff

-----------------------------------------


your finest pash to date............check the stats

+++++

No, it is perfectly true, check the stats yourself

If we had taken our chances we would have won 6-2

That is just a FACT

-----------------------------------------------------------------


shots on target

Celtic - 10

Rangers - 6


?????????????????????????????
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Your first shot on goal(not target) was when you scored
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Can someone please tell him that this is incorrect?? I believe we had at least 2 before that. Think there was even one before Rangers scored.




and sinclair hit the post.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you hadn't done that then it would have been your first shot on goal

If Castle comes on here yooz are coppin it.

The point being made is correct. If Rangers had taken all of their chances, and Celtic had taken none of theirs then they would have won. That is undeniable.

The fact of the matter is they didn't though, and Celtic won. It's an attempt at a comfort blanket, to try and mask the widening gulf between the quality of the 2 teams and the 2 managers. The reality is the league table. 19 points behind the leaders, with the team behind them 2 points behind with a game in hand.

There's many excuses-injuries, takes time for players to settle, time for players to gel, look where we've came from, it's our first season in the big league(the same one that they've been telling us for the last few years is pash). Ultimately, it's all smoke and mirrors.

Here's the facts. Your directors are scheidt. Your stadium is scheidt. Your management team is scheidt. Your scouting system is scheidt. Your players are really scheidt. And your fans are fat.

It's like being in school again.
All ifs and buts
If Rangers had taken all their chances they would have won had Celtic not scored they would not have won yadda yadda ya. Celtic took enough chances to win they created more chances etc
Let's just agree that all Rangers fans are fat and some Celtic fans smell fans

Leo, what they are saying is that if the Rangers had won then Celtic would have lost.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 5 seconds ago
Leo, what they are saying is that if the Rangers had won then Celtic would have lost.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
We might have got there in the end. 🌟

comment by Leonidas....Where you bring carnage, I bring c... (U3432)
posted 4 minutes ago
Curly 💩 (U1103)
posted 44 seconds ago
jimmy i cant believe they are missing the point,




you starting to understand yet curly.......if if if.




admin delete this cants account or refer him to a drugs counsellor

+++++

I understand fully that you can neither read nor count

What is your core skill?

------------------------------------------------


fiddling with my abadus.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's a pity it has no spellcheck

My POV-will change name for food. (U10636)
posted 2 minutes ago
The point being made is correct. If Rangers had taken all of their chances, and Celtic had taken none of theirs then they would have won. That is undeniable.



agreed POV, cant believe how slow these cants are....if if if.

comment by PointyBirds (U8853)
posted 1 minute ago
That is just a simple FACT
---
It's a pretty rubbish one though.
---
The first sentence is Curly's. The second my direct response to it.

But really, see POV's post above for any further information.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
I just wanted to end this futile debate.

Zico - The Leper (persona non grata) (U21090)
posted 2 minutes ago
What's an abadus...?



ask curly?

comment by Zico - The Leper (persona non grata) (U21090)
posted 48 seconds ago
What's an abadus...?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A tool to focus on the point in question and ignore any other assumptions or potential occurrences.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Miller, after 120 mins and penalties?
Mibbe.

comment by Leonidas....Where you bring carnage, I bring c... (U3432)
posted 1 minute ago
My POV-will change name for food. (U10636)
posted 2 minutes ago
The point being made is correct. If Rangers had taken all of their chances, and Celtic had taken none of theirs then they would have won. That is undeniable.



agreed POV, cant believe how slow these cants are....if if if.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But that wasn't the question you are moving the goalposts now

Laudrup (U12366)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Leonidas....Where you bring carnage, I bring c... (U3432)
posted 4 minutes ago
Curly 💩 (U1103)
posted 44 seconds ago
jimmy i cant believe they are missing the point,




you starting to understand yet curly.......if if if.




admin delete this cants account or refer him to a drugs counsellor

+++++

I understand fully that you can neither read nor count

What is your core skill?

------------------------------------------------


fiddling with my abadus.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's a pity it has no spellcheck

------------------------------------------

again you make a cant a yersel, it was a sarky mention to curlys earlier use of the word "abacus",



as slow as a week in the jail ya nugget

comment by Leonidas....Where you bring carnage, I bring candles ! (U3432)
posted 1 minute ago
My POV-will change name for food. (U10636)
posted 2 minutes ago
The point being made is correct. If Rangers had taken all of their chances, and Celtic had taken none of theirs then they would have won. That is undeniable.



agreed POV, cant believe how slow these cants are....if if if.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why are you focusing on a straw man if you agree with what has been discussed?

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by Miller (U9310)
posted 32 seconds ago
comment by Leonidas....Where you bring carnage, I bring candles ! (U3432)
posted 1 minute ago
My POV-will change name for food. (U10636)
posted 2 minutes ago
The point being made is correct. If Rangers had taken all of their chances, and Celtic had taken none of theirs then they would have won. That is undeniable.



agreed POV, cant believe how slow these cants are....if if if.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why are you focusing on a straw man if you agree with what has been discussed?
----------------------------------------------------------------------