That Jay Slater has been found then

I don't have anyone filtered. It's easy enough to just scroll past any posters you don't want to read, but surely if you filter you miss big chunks of conversations.

comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 1 minute ago
I don't have anyone filtered. It's easy enough to just scroll past any posters you don't want to read, but surely if you filter you miss big chunks of conversations.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I just find it ironic that a right winger would be against free speech repeatedly.

comment by Robbing Hoody - I want to play by my own rules and if I can’t I’ll sue you (U6374)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 1 minute ago
I don't have anyone filtered. It's easy enough to just scroll past any posters you don't want to read, but surely if you filter you miss big chunks of conversations.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I just find it ironic that a right winger would be against free speech repeatedly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Filtering isn't really against free speech. He isn't stopping anyone saying anything, just choosing not to read it.

Here’s a summary of the study I posted above:

https://theconversation.com/twitters-algorithm-favours-the-political-right-a-recent-study-finds-175154

Also trying to find another article I read about Musk having his developers code him a ‘global unmute’ button, which allows him, at will, to cancel all active user requests to mute him on their feeds

comment by Sydney Sweeney (U11781)
posted 4 minutes ago
That Jay Slater has been found then
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is he ok?

^ On the topic of filtering!

comment by Sydney Sweeney (U11781)
posted 4 minutes ago
That Jay Slater has been found then
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Was he stuck to a cactus?

comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - I want to play by my own rules and if I can’t I’ll sue you (U6374)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 1 minute ago
I don't have anyone filtered. It's easy enough to just scroll past any posters you don't want to read, but surely if you filter you miss big chunks of conversations.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I just find it ironic that a right winger would be against free speech repeatedly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Filtering isn't really against free speech. He isn't stopping anyone saying anything, just choosing not to read it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

It’s literally censorship.

comment by Robbing Hoody - I want to play by my own rules and if I can’t I’ll sue you (U6374)
posted 32 seconds ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - I want to play by my own rules and if I can’t I’ll sue you (U6374)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 1 minute ago
I don't have anyone filtered. It's easy enough to just scroll past any posters you don't want to read, but surely if you filter you miss big chunks of conversations.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I just find it ironic that a right winger would be against free speech repeatedly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Filtering isn't really against free speech. He isn't stopping anyone saying anything, just choosing not to read it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

It’s literally censorship.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No it aint

comment by #4zA (U22472)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Sydney Sweeney (U11781)
posted 4 minutes ago
That Jay Slater has been found then
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is he ok?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The news says ‘human remains’ so he’s probably being mopped up as we speak

comment by #4zA (U22472)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - I want to play by my own rules and if I can’t I’ll sue you (U6374)
posted 32 seconds ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - I want to play by my own rules and if I can’t I’ll sue you (U6374)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 1 minute ago
I don't have anyone filtered. It's easy enough to just scroll past any posters you don't want to read, but surely if you filter you miss big chunks of conversations.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I just find it ironic that a right winger would be against free speech repeatedly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Filtering isn't really against free speech. He isn't stopping anyone saying anything, just choosing not to read it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

It’s literally censorship.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No it aint
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Well, yeah, it is.

Is blocking someone on twitter censorship

comment by Robbing Hoody - I want to play by my own rules and if I can’t I’ll sue you (U6374)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - I want to play by my own rules and if I can’t I’ll sue you (U6374)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 1 minute ago
I don't have anyone filtered. It's easy enough to just scroll past any posters you don't want to read, but surely if you filter you miss big chunks of conversations.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I just find it ironic that a right winger would be against free speech repeatedly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Filtering isn't really against free speech. He isn't stopping anyone saying anything, just choosing not to read it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

It’s literally censorship.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

No it isn't. He hasn't censored anybody.

If you mute Musk on Twitter, do you believe you are censoring him or impinging on his free speech?

comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 38 seconds ago
Is blocking someone on twitter censorship
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Yes. If you’re suppressing information, that’s literally censorship.

It’s already meant he hasn’t seen a scientific and peer reviewed link that shows he’s talking shiiiiiiiiit as usual.

comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 21 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - I want to play by my own rules and if I can’t I’ll sue you (U6374)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - I want to play by my own rules and if I can’t I’ll sue you (U6374)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 1 minute ago
I don't have anyone filtered. It's easy enough to just scroll past any posters you don't want to read, but surely if you filter you miss big chunks of conversations.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I just find it ironic that a right winger would be against free speech repeatedly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Filtering isn't really against free speech. He isn't stopping anyone saying anything, just choosing not to read it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

It’s literally censorship.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

No it isn't. He hasn't censored anybody.

If you mute Musk on Twitter, do you believe you are censoring him or impinging on his free speech?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes you're censoring his comments from view because you don't want to see them or disagree with what he's said.

No it bloody isn't censorship calm down

Blocking/filtering is just hiding something from yourself, censorship involves some kind of suppression

If SatNav was the OP, filtering would prevent someone from commenting here, that would be censorship

comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 21 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - I want to play by my own rules and if I can’t I’ll sue you (U6374)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - I want to play by my own rules and if I can’t I’ll sue you (U6374)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 1 minute ago
I don't have anyone filtered. It's easy enough to just scroll past any posters you don't want to read, but surely if you filter you miss big chunks of conversations.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I just find it ironic that a right winger would be against free speech repeatedly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Filtering isn't really against free speech. He isn't stopping anyone saying anything, just choosing not to read it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

It’s literally censorship.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

No it isn't. He hasn't censored anybody.

If you mute Musk on Twitter, do you believe you are censoring him or impinging on his free speech?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes you're censoring his comments from view because you don't want to see them or disagree with what he's said.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It philturin out stuff u donet wanna sea

Is not preventin the philturee sayin anythin

"If SatNav was the OP, filtering would prevent someone from commenting here, that would be censorship"

If Sat Navy filtered me because I disagreed and challenged his claim.about Twitter would that be censorship?

Yes of bloody would be

I’m perfectly calm, it’s still censorship. Feel free to demonstrate how filtering someone doesn’t achieve the following;

Censorship, the suppression of words, images, or ideas that are “offensive,”

That’s exactly what he’s done. Happy to been shown how he hasn’t.

comment by #4zA (U22472)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 21 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - I want to play by my own rules and if I can’t I’ll sue you (U6374)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - I want to play by my own rules and if I can’t I’ll sue you (U6374)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 1 minute ago
I don't have anyone filtered. It's easy enough to just scroll past any posters you don't want to read, but surely if you filter you miss big chunks of conversations.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I just find it ironic that a right winger would be against free speech repeatedly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Filtering isn't really against free speech. He isn't stopping anyone saying anything, just choosing not to read it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

It’s literally censorship.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

No it isn't. He hasn't censored anybody.

If you mute Musk on Twitter, do you believe you are censoring him or impinging on his free speech?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes you're censoring his comments from view because you don't want to see them or disagree with what he's said.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It philturin out stuff u donet wanna sea

Is not preventin the philturee sayin anythin
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The person filtering is choosing to see what they agree with and censoring (filtering) out what they disagree with.

comment by Robbing Hoody - I want to play by my own rules and if I can’t I’ll sue you (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
I’m perfectly calm, it’s still censorship. Feel free to demonstrate how filtering someone doesn’t achieve the following;

Censorship, the suppression of words, images, or ideas that are “offensive,”

That’s exactly what he’s done. Happy to been shown how he hasn’t.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because the words aren't suppressed, they're still on the forum for all to see (apart from SatNav who has chosen not to)

comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 15 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - I want to play by my own rules and if I can’t I’ll sue you (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
I’m perfectly calm, it’s still censorship. Feel free to demonstrate how filtering someone doesn’t achieve the following;

Censorship, the suppression of words, images, or ideas that are “offensive,”

That’s exactly what he’s done. Happy to been shown how he hasn’t.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because the words aren't suppressed, they're still on the forum for all to see (apart from SatNav who has chosen not to)
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Yes, so he has censored his own feed.

If I turn on the parental lock on iplayer, I am censoring what my children can watch (and myself).

I wouldn’t over think it, but it’s literally censorship and tbh, I don’t think it’s up for debate.

The Liverpool and Arsenal boards have been censoring me for about 8 years...