You said that incorrect decisions can never affect the total points of a given team. And more - that it's crazy to say so.
When you realised that the past half of an hour was a waste of space
Mr. Eboue Emmanuel (U12374)
I said you can't quantify it.
And I'm right.
Handpicking some decisions that we agree were incorrect doesn't change that.
And I can handpick you a lot more. I'm still waiting for you counter hand picked decisions against us.
Mr. Eboue Emmanuel (U12374)
The fact that you think this is still a case of who can find the most 'incorrect' decisions shows that you haven't understood a word that has been said.
Embarrassing.
You're using circular self referenced reasoning and you don't even notice it. That's the whole problem.
Your opinion is not falsifiable. Whatever I say you just counter with my opinion is right because it's crazy to thing otherwise. And everything is subjective.
While my opinion is easily falsifiable. For each decision I say goes against us you can counter with an opposing decision or explanation why it's not. If there are more game changing decisions like (illegal goals/penalties/etc.) in our favour I'll admit it's laughable. Easy as pie.
Your argument is similar to what astrology does. You can never disprove it.
Mr. Eboue Emmanuel (U12374)
No, I counter what you are saying with logic and fact.
You believe it is possible to list correct and incorrect decisions in all Arsenal games and conclude, on that basis, if Arsenal should have received more points than they have.
That is incorrect.
It is incorrect because most decisions are not a matter of fact, therefore there is no way of conclusively allocating every decision into 'correct' or incorrect'.
It's also incorrect because you cannot possibly understand how every 'incorrect' decision has affected a game. How the little offside decisions may have broken up a spell of territorial possession, for example.
Those two reasons alone are absolute proof that your summary of points that Arsenal are owed is utter nonsense.
Some logic yes - but not fact.
You said most decisions. Which of the ones I listed you are subjective and which not. You keep avoiding that.
Plus as already said it's very easy to see how `incorrect` decisions in the end of the game changes it without any problem. And two of those games were changed like that.
Mr. Eboue Emmanuel (U12374)
It is a fact that you cannot conclusively list every decision as either correct or incorrect i.e. in such a way that is a matter of fact.
It is also a fact that you cannot possibly know what would have happened following the incidents in question had the decision been given in the way that you believe it should have done.
You said that most of decisions are subjective but you never said which of the listed decisions are. While I made my attempt you never said it was correct or not. That will hurt your agenda. And you don't accept that wrongful decision in the end of a game have deterministic role in the outcome of a game which I think is obvious to any sane football fan.
Mr. Eboue Emmanuel (U12374)
Yes, most are.
Anything that isn't a matter of fact i.e. offside, ball out of play, is subjective.
There's no agenda here - there's just one person who understands a rather basic point and one who doesn't.
Go on, you run off and tell everyone how referees have cost you nine points this season. It doesn't make you sound stupid. Not one bit.
Go on, you run off and tell everyone how referees have cost you nine points this season
True that. Finally....
Its really funny how many times this guy tries to weasel out of a simple question that will crush his stupid point to pieces...
Mr. Eboue Emmanuel (U12374)
You sound really rather desperate now.
Don't get mad. It's just banter
Mr. Eboue Emmanuel (U12374)
Mad?
I find it funny when people do what you have just done.
http://www.skysports.com/football/news/11095/11194092/ref-watch-mike-dean-criticism-has-been-merciless-says-dermot-gallagher
So many key bad decisions.
It's subjective according to my friend Winston Also no way it affected the total points of Arsenal
Mr. Eboue Emmanuel (U12374)
You're beyond help, aren't you.
Sign in if you want to comment
offside goal for Spurs?
Page 8 of 8
6 | 7 | 8
posted on 3/1/18
You said that incorrect decisions can never affect the total points of a given team. And more - that it's crazy to say so.
posted on 3/1/18
When you realised that the past half of an hour was a waste of space
posted on 3/1/18
Mr. Eboue Emmanuel (U12374)
I said you can't quantify it.
And I'm right.
Handpicking some decisions that we agree were incorrect doesn't change that.
posted on 3/1/18
And I can handpick you a lot more. I'm still waiting for you counter hand picked decisions against us.
posted on 3/1/18
Mr. Eboue Emmanuel (U12374)
The fact that you think this is still a case of who can find the most 'incorrect' decisions shows that you haven't understood a word that has been said.
Embarrassing.
posted on 3/1/18
You're using circular self referenced reasoning and you don't even notice it. That's the whole problem.
Your opinion is not falsifiable. Whatever I say you just counter with my opinion is right because it's crazy to thing otherwise. And everything is subjective.
While my opinion is easily falsifiable. For each decision I say goes against us you can counter with an opposing decision or explanation why it's not. If there are more game changing decisions like (illegal goals/penalties/etc.) in our favour I'll admit it's laughable. Easy as pie.
posted on 3/1/18
Your argument is similar to what astrology does. You can never disprove it.
posted on 3/1/18
Mr. Eboue Emmanuel (U12374)
No, I counter what you are saying with logic and fact.
You believe it is possible to list correct and incorrect decisions in all Arsenal games and conclude, on that basis, if Arsenal should have received more points than they have.
That is incorrect.
It is incorrect because most decisions are not a matter of fact, therefore there is no way of conclusively allocating every decision into 'correct' or incorrect'.
It's also incorrect because you cannot possibly understand how every 'incorrect' decision has affected a game. How the little offside decisions may have broken up a spell of territorial possession, for example.
Those two reasons alone are absolute proof that your summary of points that Arsenal are owed is utter nonsense.
posted on 3/1/18
Some logic yes - but not fact.
You said most decisions. Which of the ones I listed you are subjective and which not. You keep avoiding that.
posted on 3/1/18
Plus as already said it's very easy to see how `incorrect` decisions in the end of the game changes it without any problem. And two of those games were changed like that.
posted on 3/1/18
Mr. Eboue Emmanuel (U12374)
It is a fact that you cannot conclusively list every decision as either correct or incorrect i.e. in such a way that is a matter of fact.
It is also a fact that you cannot possibly know what would have happened following the incidents in question had the decision been given in the way that you believe it should have done.
posted on 3/1/18
Circular reasoning
posted on 3/1/18
You said that most of decisions are subjective but you never said which of the listed decisions are. While I made my attempt you never said it was correct or not. That will hurt your agenda. And you don't accept that wrongful decision in the end of a game have deterministic role in the outcome of a game which I think is obvious to any sane football fan.
posted on 3/1/18
Mr. Eboue Emmanuel (U12374)
Yes, most are.
Anything that isn't a matter of fact i.e. offside, ball out of play, is subjective.
There's no agenda here - there's just one person who understands a rather basic point and one who doesn't.
Go on, you run off and tell everyone how referees have cost you nine points this season. It doesn't make you sound stupid. Not one bit.
posted on 3/1/18
Go on, you run off and tell everyone how referees have cost you nine points this season
True that. Finally....
posted on 3/1/18
Its really funny how many times this guy tries to weasel out of a simple question that will crush his stupid point to pieces...
posted on 3/1/18
Mr. Eboue Emmanuel (U12374)
You sound really rather desperate now.
posted on 3/1/18
Don't get mad. It's just banter
posted on 3/1/18
Mr. Eboue Emmanuel (U12374)
Mad?
I find it funny when people do what you have just done.
posted on 3/1/18
posted on 3/1/18
http://www.skysports.com/football/news/11095/11194092/ref-watch-mike-dean-criticism-has-been-merciless-says-dermot-gallagher
So many key bad decisions.
posted on 3/1/18
It's subjective according to my friend Winston Also no way it affected the total points of Arsenal
posted on 4/1/18
Mr. Eboue Emmanuel (U12374)
You're beyond help, aren't you.
posted on 4/1/18
Page 8 of 8
6 | 7 | 8