comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 53 seconds ago
comment by Boobystu (U21578)
posted 4 minutes ago
Scousers , if Kane was off side , then so was Salah . Dier played a ball through to Salah in a offside position and loveren played Kane through in a offside position. Which is it scousers ? Either both wrong or both right you choose
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah they have to go with the rules rather than yeah but no but yeah but you got a goal from a completely different situation so we're allowed one.
I suppose this isn't offside either?
https://mobile.twitter.com/empireofthekop/status/960222815671717892?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet
Three dives for penalties and you got two of them which funnily enough were offside before they even got to that stage.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
WOW
comment by Bake 'em away toys (U7303)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 32 seconds ago
comment by Boobystu (U21578)
posted 4 minutes ago
Scousers , if Kane was off side , then so was Salah . Dier played a ball through to Salah in a offside position and loveren played Kane through in a offside position. Which is it scousers ? Either both wrong or both right you choose
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah they have to go with the rules rather than yeah but no but yeah but you got a goal from a completely different situation so we're allowed one.
I suppose this isn't offside either?
https://mobile.twitter.com/empireofthekop/status/960222815671717892?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet
Three dives for penalties and you got two of them which funnily enough were offside before they even got to that stage.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Love that picture. Doesn't show he is offside at all if you look closely.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How closely do I have to look? Like if I zoom in x10000?
TOOR, seriously what part of his body is offside?
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Boobystu (U21578)
posted 4 minutes ago
Scousers , if Kane was off side , then so was Salah . Dier played a ball through to Salah in a offside position and loveren played Kane through in a offside position. Which is it scousers ? Either both wrong or both right you choose
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah they have to go with the rules rather than yeah but no but yeah but you got a goal from a completely different situation so we're allowed one.
I suppose this isn't offside either?
https://mobile.twitter.com/empireofthekop/status/960222815671717892?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet
Three dives for penalties and you got two of them which funnily enough were offside before they even got to that stage.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You don’t really get it do you , Loveren played Kane onside by the action of choosing to play the ball , once he makes contact with the ball Kane , by all the rules in football becomes onside , if Loveren had just left it Kane would have been offside. Now is that clear enough for you
comment by Boobystu (U21578)
posted 19 seconds ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Boobystu (U21578)
posted 4 minutes ago
Scousers , if Kane was off side , then so was Salah . Dier played a ball through to Salah in a offside position and loveren played Kane through in a offside position. Which is it scousers ? Either both wrong or both right you choose
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah they have to go with the rules rather than yeah but no but yeah but you got a goal from a completely different situation so we're allowed one.
I suppose this isn't offside either?
https://mobile.twitter.com/empireofthekop/status/960222815671717892?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet
Three dives for penalties and you got two of them which funnily enough were offside before they even got to that stage.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You don’t really get it do you , Loveren played Kane onside by the action of choosing to play the ball , once he makes contact with the ball Kane , by all the rules in football becomes onside , if Loveren had just left it Kane would have been offside. Now is that clear enough for you
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You don't get it, the Fa's own rules state that if the ball deflects off a player into the path of an offside player then it's offside. It's different if the player plays the ball to the opposition. Regardless of that, Kane then dives for a penalty and the keeper saves it.
It's the match changing decision which is more frustrating considering Lamela dives for a penalty from an offside position. If the assistant was doing his main role properly he wouldn't have to make a call which goes against the referee.
I agree OP otherwise TAA would’ve been rightly sent off
comment by Edinspur (U1109)
posted 1 minute ago
I agree OP otherwise TAA would’ve been rightly sent off
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And Dier I assume?
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Boobystu (U21578)
posted 19 seconds ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Boobystu (U21578)
posted 4 minutes ago
Scousers , if Kane was off side , then so was Salah . Dier played a ball through to Salah in a offside position and loveren played Kane through in a offside position. Which is it scousers ? Either both wrong or both right you choose
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah they have to go with the rules rather than yeah but no but yeah but you got a goal from a completely different situation so we're allowed one.
I suppose this isn't offside either?
https://mobile.twitter.com/empireofthekop/status/960222815671717892?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet
Three dives for penalties and you got two of them which funnily enough were offside before they even got to that stage.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You don’t really get it do you , Loveren played Kane onside by the action of choosing to play the ball , once he makes contact with the ball Kane , by all the rules in football becomes onside , if Loveren had just left it Kane would have been offside. Now is that clear enough for you
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You don't get it, the Fa's own rules state that if the ball deflects off a player into the path of an offside player then it's offside. It's different if the player plays the ball to the opposition. Regardless of that, Kane then dives for a penalty and the keeper saves it.
It's the match changing decision which is more frustrating considering Lamela dives for a penalty from an offside position. If the assistant was doing his main role properly he wouldn't have to make a call which goes against the referee.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No it doesn’t , Loveren choose to play the ball , IT didn’t deflect off him , you choose to see the rules to suit you attempt at making a case against Kane
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 19 minutes ago
comment by ツ Hєиgу+ (U9129)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 21 seconds ago
Can't wait for VAR to come in and after this season I doubt any Liverpool fan disagrees. Its been a shocking season for us in terms of incorrect decisions.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Although none happened today
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Personally I think giving a goal which was offside is an incorrect decision. VAR would have easily sorted that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But the rules are that regardless if he’s offside in the first instance Lovren plays the ball and the second phase happens
VAR would have no choice but to give it also.
comment by Poolmyfinger - American Eagle #YNWA #AupaAthletic (U12438)
posted 34 minutes ago
comment by TTliv87 (U11882)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Poolmyfinger - American Eagle #YNWA #AupaAthletic (U12438)
posted 1 minute ago
Yes, considering that the linesman celebrated giving the second penalty to Spurs, VAR needs to be introduced to prevent corruption and cheating.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
have a video of that?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
http://metro.co.uk/2018/02/04/linesman-celebrates-giving-tottenham-penalty-liverpool-dramatic-2-2-draw-7286475/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
😂😂..oh well, that's conclusive proof if ever I saw it! Jog on belly end.
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Edinspur (U1109)
posted 1 minute ago
I agree OP otherwise TAA would’ve been rightly sent off
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And Dier I assume?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No
Also, that photo
VAR anyway you look at it both were penalties. The 2nd was a stone Waller. 1st was soft but there was contact.
comment by ツ Hєиgу+ (U9129)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 19 minutes ago
comment by ツ Hєиgу+ (U9129)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 21 seconds ago
Can't wait for VAR to come in and after this season I doubt any Liverpool fan disagrees. Its been a shocking season for us in terms of incorrect decisions.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Although none happened today
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Personally I think giving a goal which was offside is an incorrect decision. VAR would have easily sorted that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But the rules are that regardless if he’s offside in the first instance Lovren plays the ball and the second phase happens
VAR would have no choice but to give it also.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I disagree. That decision doesn't really matter in the grand scheme of things anyhow as Kane missed after the dive.
The second one was worse as it was a straight offside with no interpretation needed.
How are you even so bitter about the penalties ffs just be happy you got a point after being dominated the whole second half. It was the fair result.
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 39 seconds ago
comment by ツ Hєиgу+ (U9129)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 19 minutes ago
comment by ツ Hєиgу+ (U9129)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 21 seconds ago
Can't wait for VAR to come in and after this season I doubt any Liverpool fan disagrees. Its been a shocking season for us in terms of incorrect decisions.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Although none happened today
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Personally I think giving a goal which was offside is an incorrect decision. VAR would have easily sorted that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But the rules are that regardless if he’s offside in the first instance Lovren plays the ball and the second phase happens
VAR would have no choice but to give it also.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I disagree. That decision doesn't really matter in the grand scheme of things anyhow as Kane missed after the dive.
The second one was worse as it was a straight offside with no interpretation needed.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Offside wtf there’s even a pic to prove its onside
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by ツ Hєиgу+ (U9129)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 19 minutes ago
comment by ツ Hєиgу+ (U9129)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 21 seconds ago
Can't wait for VAR to come in and after this season I doubt any Liverpool fan disagrees. Its been a shocking season for us in terms of incorrect decisions.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Although none happened today
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Personally I think giving a goal which was offside is an incorrect decision. VAR would have easily sorted that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But the rules are that regardless if he’s offside in the first instance Lovren plays the ball and the second phase happens
VAR would have no choice but to give it also.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I disagree. That decision doesn't really matter in the grand scheme of things anyhow as Kane missed after the dive.
The second one was worse as it was a straight offside with no interpretation needed.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s a dive now even your goalie said he touched him
First one was offside tbf, Lovren wouldn’t have touched the ball had he not been rushed by Kane like that.
Second is this ridiculous hopeful aerial shot in which a lot of assumptions have to be made in terms of the line drawn and when the ball was headed. Beyond desperate.
comment by Phenom (U20037)
posted 11 seconds ago
How are you even so bitter about the penalties ffs just be happy you got a point after being dominated the whole second half. It was the fair result.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why would I be happy when the official took two points away from us?
Yes a draw was a fair result but football isn't fair, we are the better team in nearly every game we play but we don't win all those games, you actually have to score more than the opposition to win. The officials nearly helped you achieve that, inst ad having to settle for giving you a point.
comment by Edinspur (U1109)
posted 39 seconds ago
First one was offside tbf, Lovren wouldn’t have touched the ball had he not been rushed by Kane like that.
Second is this ridiculous hopeful aerial shot in which a lot of assumptions have to be made in terms of the line drawn and when the ball was headed. Beyond desperate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This second paragraph is exactly what I have been saying. No way can you say it was offside and I honestly don't think VAR would change that decision. Inconclusive picture atla poor angle. TOOR of course thinks it's offside.
comment by Edinspur (U1109)
posted 55 seconds ago
Was TAA’s tackle a red?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It would have been harsh but like Dier's you've seen them given.
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 29 seconds ago
comment by Edinspur (U1109)
posted 55 seconds ago
Was TAA’s tackle a red?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It would have been harsh but like Dier's you've seen them given.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Desperation
comment by Bake 'em away toys (U7303)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Edinspur (U1109)
posted 39 seconds ago
First one was offside tbf, Lovren wouldn’t have touched the ball had he not been rushed by Kane like that.
Second is this ridiculous hopeful aerial shot in which a lot of assumptions have to be made in terms of the line drawn and when the ball was headed. Beyond desperate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This second paragraph is exactly what I have been saying. No way can you say it was offside and I honestly don't think VAR would change that decision. Inconclusive picture atla poor angle. TOOR of course thinks it's offside.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course VAR would change it as from the still of when the ball was played you can see Lamela is offside, as per the photo.
The photo isn’t inconclusive it’s a terrible angle, from miles away in which you have no clue at what stage the ball left Llorentes head
Sign in if you want to comment
VAR unstoppable
Page 2 of 6
6
posted on 4/2/18
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 53 seconds ago
comment by Boobystu (U21578)
posted 4 minutes ago
Scousers , if Kane was off side , then so was Salah . Dier played a ball through to Salah in a offside position and loveren played Kane through in a offside position. Which is it scousers ? Either both wrong or both right you choose
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah they have to go with the rules rather than yeah but no but yeah but you got a goal from a completely different situation so we're allowed one.
I suppose this isn't offside either?
https://mobile.twitter.com/empireofthekop/status/960222815671717892?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet
Three dives for penalties and you got two of them which funnily enough were offside before they even got to that stage.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
WOW
posted on 4/2/18
comment by Bake 'em away toys (U7303)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 32 seconds ago
comment by Boobystu (U21578)
posted 4 minutes ago
Scousers , if Kane was off side , then so was Salah . Dier played a ball through to Salah in a offside position and loveren played Kane through in a offside position. Which is it scousers ? Either both wrong or both right you choose
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah they have to go with the rules rather than yeah but no but yeah but you got a goal from a completely different situation so we're allowed one.
I suppose this isn't offside either?
https://mobile.twitter.com/empireofthekop/status/960222815671717892?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet
Three dives for penalties and you got two of them which funnily enough were offside before they even got to that stage.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Love that picture. Doesn't show he is offside at all if you look closely.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
posted on 4/2/18
How closely do I have to look? Like if I zoom in x10000?
posted on 4/2/18
TOOR, seriously what part of his body is offside?
posted on 4/2/18
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Boobystu (U21578)
posted 4 minutes ago
Scousers , if Kane was off side , then so was Salah . Dier played a ball through to Salah in a offside position and loveren played Kane through in a offside position. Which is it scousers ? Either both wrong or both right you choose
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah they have to go with the rules rather than yeah but no but yeah but you got a goal from a completely different situation so we're allowed one.
I suppose this isn't offside either?
https://mobile.twitter.com/empireofthekop/status/960222815671717892?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet
Three dives for penalties and you got two of them which funnily enough were offside before they even got to that stage.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You don’t really get it do you , Loveren played Kane onside by the action of choosing to play the ball , once he makes contact with the ball Kane , by all the rules in football becomes onside , if Loveren had just left it Kane would have been offside. Now is that clear enough for you
posted on 4/2/18
comment by Boobystu (U21578)
posted 19 seconds ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Boobystu (U21578)
posted 4 minutes ago
Scousers , if Kane was off side , then so was Salah . Dier played a ball through to Salah in a offside position and loveren played Kane through in a offside position. Which is it scousers ? Either both wrong or both right you choose
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah they have to go with the rules rather than yeah but no but yeah but you got a goal from a completely different situation so we're allowed one.
I suppose this isn't offside either?
https://mobile.twitter.com/empireofthekop/status/960222815671717892?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet
Three dives for penalties and you got two of them which funnily enough were offside before they even got to that stage.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You don’t really get it do you , Loveren played Kane onside by the action of choosing to play the ball , once he makes contact with the ball Kane , by all the rules in football becomes onside , if Loveren had just left it Kane would have been offside. Now is that clear enough for you
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You don't get it, the Fa's own rules state that if the ball deflects off a player into the path of an offside player then it's offside. It's different if the player plays the ball to the opposition. Regardless of that, Kane then dives for a penalty and the keeper saves it.
It's the match changing decision which is more frustrating considering Lamela dives for a penalty from an offside position. If the assistant was doing his main role properly he wouldn't have to make a call which goes against the referee.
posted on 4/2/18
I agree OP otherwise TAA would’ve been rightly sent off
posted on 4/2/18
comment by Edinspur (U1109)
posted 1 minute ago
I agree OP otherwise TAA would’ve been rightly sent off
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And Dier I assume?
posted on 4/2/18
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Boobystu (U21578)
posted 19 seconds ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Boobystu (U21578)
posted 4 minutes ago
Scousers , if Kane was off side , then so was Salah . Dier played a ball through to Salah in a offside position and loveren played Kane through in a offside position. Which is it scousers ? Either both wrong or both right you choose
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah they have to go with the rules rather than yeah but no but yeah but you got a goal from a completely different situation so we're allowed one.
I suppose this isn't offside either?
https://mobile.twitter.com/empireofthekop/status/960222815671717892?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet
Three dives for penalties and you got two of them which funnily enough were offside before they even got to that stage.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You don’t really get it do you , Loveren played Kane onside by the action of choosing to play the ball , once he makes contact with the ball Kane , by all the rules in football becomes onside , if Loveren had just left it Kane would have been offside. Now is that clear enough for you
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You don't get it, the Fa's own rules state that if the ball deflects off a player into the path of an offside player then it's offside. It's different if the player plays the ball to the opposition. Regardless of that, Kane then dives for a penalty and the keeper saves it.
It's the match changing decision which is more frustrating considering Lamela dives for a penalty from an offside position. If the assistant was doing his main role properly he wouldn't have to make a call which goes against the referee.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No it doesn’t , Loveren choose to play the ball , IT didn’t deflect off him , you choose to see the rules to suit you attempt at making a case against Kane
posted on 4/2/18
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 19 minutes ago
comment by ツ Hєиgу+ (U9129)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 21 seconds ago
Can't wait for VAR to come in and after this season I doubt any Liverpool fan disagrees. Its been a shocking season for us in terms of incorrect decisions.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Although none happened today
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Personally I think giving a goal which was offside is an incorrect decision. VAR would have easily sorted that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But the rules are that regardless if he’s offside in the first instance Lovren plays the ball and the second phase happens
VAR would have no choice but to give it also.
posted on 4/2/18
comment by Poolmyfinger - American Eagle #YNWA #AupaAthletic (U12438)
posted 34 minutes ago
comment by TTliv87 (U11882)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Poolmyfinger - American Eagle #YNWA #AupaAthletic (U12438)
posted 1 minute ago
Yes, considering that the linesman celebrated giving the second penalty to Spurs, VAR needs to be introduced to prevent corruption and cheating.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
have a video of that?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
http://metro.co.uk/2018/02/04/linesman-celebrates-giving-tottenham-penalty-liverpool-dramatic-2-2-draw-7286475/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
😂😂..oh well, that's conclusive proof if ever I saw it! Jog on belly end.
posted on 4/2/18
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Edinspur (U1109)
posted 1 minute ago
I agree OP otherwise TAA would’ve been rightly sent off
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And Dier I assume?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No
Also, that photo
posted on 4/2/18
VAR anyway you look at it both were penalties. The 2nd was a stone Waller. 1st was soft but there was contact.
posted on 4/2/18
comment by ツ Hєиgу+ (U9129)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 19 minutes ago
comment by ツ Hєиgу+ (U9129)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 21 seconds ago
Can't wait for VAR to come in and after this season I doubt any Liverpool fan disagrees. Its been a shocking season for us in terms of incorrect decisions.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Although none happened today
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Personally I think giving a goal which was offside is an incorrect decision. VAR would have easily sorted that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But the rules are that regardless if he’s offside in the first instance Lovren plays the ball and the second phase happens
VAR would have no choice but to give it also.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I disagree. That decision doesn't really matter in the grand scheme of things anyhow as Kane missed after the dive.
The second one was worse as it was a straight offside with no interpretation needed.
posted on 4/2/18
How are you even so bitter about the penalties ffs just be happy you got a point after being dominated the whole second half. It was the fair result.
posted on 4/2/18
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 39 seconds ago
comment by ツ Hєиgу+ (U9129)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 19 minutes ago
comment by ツ Hєиgу+ (U9129)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 21 seconds ago
Can't wait for VAR to come in and after this season I doubt any Liverpool fan disagrees. Its been a shocking season for us in terms of incorrect decisions.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Although none happened today
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Personally I think giving a goal which was offside is an incorrect decision. VAR would have easily sorted that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But the rules are that regardless if he’s offside in the first instance Lovren plays the ball and the second phase happens
VAR would have no choice but to give it also.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I disagree. That decision doesn't really matter in the grand scheme of things anyhow as Kane missed after the dive.
The second one was worse as it was a straight offside with no interpretation needed.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Offside wtf there’s even a pic to prove its onside
posted on 4/2/18
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by ツ Hєиgу+ (U9129)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 19 minutes ago
comment by ツ Hєиgу+ (U9129)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 21 seconds ago
Can't wait for VAR to come in and after this season I doubt any Liverpool fan disagrees. Its been a shocking season for us in terms of incorrect decisions.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Although none happened today
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Personally I think giving a goal which was offside is an incorrect decision. VAR would have easily sorted that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But the rules are that regardless if he’s offside in the first instance Lovren plays the ball and the second phase happens
VAR would have no choice but to give it also.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I disagree. That decision doesn't really matter in the grand scheme of things anyhow as Kane missed after the dive.
The second one was worse as it was a straight offside with no interpretation needed.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s a dive now even your goalie said he touched him
posted on 4/2/18
First one was offside tbf, Lovren wouldn’t have touched the ball had he not been rushed by Kane like that.
Second is this ridiculous hopeful aerial shot in which a lot of assumptions have to be made in terms of the line drawn and when the ball was headed. Beyond desperate.
posted on 4/2/18
comment by Phenom (U20037)
posted 11 seconds ago
How are you even so bitter about the penalties ffs just be happy you got a point after being dominated the whole second half. It was the fair result.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why would I be happy when the official took two points away from us?
Yes a draw was a fair result but football isn't fair, we are the better team in nearly every game we play but we don't win all those games, you actually have to score more than the opposition to win. The officials nearly helped you achieve that, inst ad having to settle for giving you a point.
posted on 4/2/18
Was TAA’s tackle a red?
posted on 4/2/18
comment by Edinspur (U1109)
posted 39 seconds ago
First one was offside tbf, Lovren wouldn’t have touched the ball had he not been rushed by Kane like that.
Second is this ridiculous hopeful aerial shot in which a lot of assumptions have to be made in terms of the line drawn and when the ball was headed. Beyond desperate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This second paragraph is exactly what I have been saying. No way can you say it was offside and I honestly don't think VAR would change that decision. Inconclusive picture atla poor angle. TOOR of course thinks it's offside.
posted on 4/2/18
comment by Edinspur (U1109)
posted 55 seconds ago
Was TAA’s tackle a red?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It would have been harsh but like Dier's you've seen them given.
posted on 4/2/18
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 29 seconds ago
comment by Edinspur (U1109)
posted 55 seconds ago
Was TAA’s tackle a red?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It would have been harsh but like Dier's you've seen them given.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Desperation
posted on 4/2/18
comment by Bake 'em away toys (U7303)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Edinspur (U1109)
posted 39 seconds ago
First one was offside tbf, Lovren wouldn’t have touched the ball had he not been rushed by Kane like that.
Second is this ridiculous hopeful aerial shot in which a lot of assumptions have to be made in terms of the line drawn and when the ball was headed. Beyond desperate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This second paragraph is exactly what I have been saying. No way can you say it was offside and I honestly don't think VAR would change that decision. Inconclusive picture atla poor angle. TOOR of course thinks it's offside.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course VAR would change it as from the still of when the ball was played you can see Lamela is offside, as per the photo.
posted on 4/2/18
The photo isn’t inconclusive it’s a terrible angle, from miles away in which you have no clue at what stage the ball left Llorentes head
Page 2 of 6
6