It all comes down to 2 things:
1) Money
2) Religion
Trump has two poodles now, May and Macron, so will be purchasing another lead today.
Total nonsensical bombing, when all three countries arm to the teeth all the armies in the Middle East, and Britain seems quite happy with its mate Saudi Arabia carpet bombing the Yemen with British made bombs.
Utterly hypocrytical rubbish coming out of May`s gob as per usual.
comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 9 minutes ago
Trump has two poodles now, May and Macron, so will be purchasing another lead today.
Total nonsensical bombing, when all three countries arm to the teeth all the armies in the Middle East, and Britain seems quite happy with its mate Saudi Arabia carpet bombing the Yemen with British made bombs.
Utterly hypocrytical rubbish coming out of May`s gob as per usual.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I was just watching her announcement, she looks and sounds a nervous wreck,Parliament should be interesting Monday.
They basically want Iran to retaliate because this phoney bombing in Syria has no gain. It won’t remove Assad and it won’t stop Russia having access to the oil.
comment by Bake 'em away toys (U7303)
posted 26 minutes ago
It all comes down to 2 things:
1) Money
2) Religion
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Very true. You can ban one of those things and eventually I believe it will happen
Why do no other countries in the world feel the need to start bombing all around the world, other than the usual three suspects USA, Britain and France.
Everybody is getting fed up with these war mongering leaders, who are doing it not to help the poor people of Syria, but for their own political gain.
comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 1 minute ago
Why do no other countries in the world feel the need to start bombing all around the world, other than the usual three suspects USA, Britain and France.
Everybody is getting fed up with these war mongering leaders, who are doing it not to help the poor people of Syria, but for their own political gain.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So that's going to be the UK and France at the top of the terrorist hit list again for the foreseeable future.
We never learn
comment by plastic fantastic (U21613)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 1 minute ago
Why do no other countries in the world feel the need to start bombing all around the world, other than the usual three suspects USA, Britain and France.
Everybody is getting fed up with these war mongering leaders, who are doing it not to help the poor people of Syria, but for their own political gain.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So that's going to be the UK and France at the top of the terrorist hit list again for the foreseeable future.
We never learn
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Politicians don`t care, it never affects them. They are quite happy to send our soldiers to pointless wars, if they think they can get a few more votes.
The reason other countries don’t do it is because they generally don’t have the defence budgets of the US, UK and France. I’m personally pleased that someone has the bottle to stand up to Assad and do something about chemical weapons.
It might be for their own political gain but why should someone use chemical weapons and face absolutely no consequences? Who else is going to do something about it?
comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by plastic fantastic (U21613)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 1 minute ago
Why do no other countries in the world feel the need to start bombing all around the world, other than the usual three suspects USA, Britain and France.
Everybody is getting fed up with these war mongering leaders, who are doing it not to help the poor people of Syria, but for their own political gain.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So that's going to be the UK and France at the top of the terrorist hit list again for the foreseeable future.
We never learn
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Politicians don`t care, it never affects them. They are quite happy to send our soldiers to pointless wars, if they think they can get a few more votes.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is just possibly the States and Russia having a willy waving contest,they should just blow each other up and cal it a day.
I do see a huge difference between this and the phoney Iraq war and the dodgy dossier which I think people are still reeling about
Blackstar, totally agree with you. President Trump has a lot of faults, but atleast he has the balls to actually take action against monsters like Assad unlike that doormatt Obama. I think people are being extremely dramatic in thinking world war 3 is coming oh please!!! You are dammed if you do, dammed if you don't with certain people in this country. If people are getting killed in other 3rd world countries and people do nothing about it, they get criticised. People get killed in a 3rd world country and finally we do something about it, you get people screaming we are starting wars
I wonder what Putin will have to say about this ?
comment by Edward Elizabeth Hitler. (U14393)
posted 56 seconds ago
I wonder what Putin will have to say about this ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'll turn your gas off
Putin will do nothing because Russia are nowhere near as powerful as they like to believe. The USA and its allies would wipe the floor on Russia if Putin tried anything stupid. But it won't get to that stage anyway, people are getting incredibly dramatic predicting world war 3.
I reckon Trump and Putin need to sit down and have a beer and talk it through.
It would go like this
Trump , Ya ain’t gonna get us to bail you out like dabbia dabbia 2 are ya ?
For any kind of WW3 scenario, Russia would need to join with China and possibly North Korea. You then have an alliance which can pose a genuine problem to the US and it’s allies.
At the moment Russia can’t take on the US alone. The US spend £600m on defence, Russia spend £60m
Why do no other countries in the world feel the need to start bombing all around the world, other than the usual three suspects USA, Britain and France.
Everybody is getting fed up with these war mongering leaders, who are doing it not to help the poor people of Syria, but for their own political gain.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So that's going to be the UK and France at the top of the terrorist hit list again for the foreseeable future.
We never learn
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We do it because we have values, we can't just let countries use chemical.weapons on its own civilians, the question we should be asking is why do other countries sit back and let this happen?
On saying that we are picking and choosing when we do this, and are hypocritical in the way we don't apply the same rules to all atrocities and to all chemical attacks.
If we didn't do anything because we are scared of terrorists then what message does that send out?
Do what ever you want because Britain are too weak to do the right thing and administer justice where deserved, in case we upset some criminals?
With wealth and influence comes responsibility. ..we can't have it both ways.
comment by Bake 'em away toys (U7303)
posted 1 hour, 15 minutes ago
It all comes down to 2 things:
1) Money
2) Religion
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This 👍🏽
comment by oddiY.. (U1585)
posted 6 minutes ago
Why do no other countries in the world feel the need to start bombing all around the world, other than the usual three suspects USA, Britain and France.
Everybody is getting fed up with these war mongering leaders, who are doing it not to help the poor people of Syria, but for their own political gain.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So that's going to be the UK and France at the top of the terrorist hit list again for the foreseeable future.
We never learn
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We do it because we have values, we can't just let countries use chemical.weapons on its own civilians, the question we should be asking is why do other countries sit back and let this happen?
On saying that we are picking and choosing when we do this, and are hypocritical in the way we don't apply the same rules to all atrocities and to all chemical attacks.
If we didn't do anything because we are scared of terrorists then what message does that send out?
Do what ever you want because Britain are too weak to do the right thing and administer justice where deserved, in case we upset some criminals?
With wealth and influence comes responsibility. ..we can't have it both ways.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What happened to these values when Mugabe was running a mock in Zimbabwe....oh yeah there’s no gain whatsoever by taking action there
comment by dangerdog (U20986)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by oddiY.. (U1585)
posted 6 minutes ago
Why do no other countries in the world feel the need to start bombing all around the world, other than the usual three suspects USA, Britain and France.
Everybody is getting fed up with these war mongering leaders, who are doing it not to help the poor people of Syria, but for their own political gain.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So that's going to be the UK and France at the top of the terrorist hit list again for the foreseeable future.
We never learn
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We do it because we have values, we can't just let countries use chemical.weapons on its own civilians, the question we should be asking is why do other countries sit back and let this happen?
On saying that we are picking and choosing when we do this, and are hypocritical in the way we don't apply the same rules to all atrocities and to all chemical attacks.
If we didn't do anything because we are scared of terrorists then what message does that send out?
Do what ever you want because Britain are too weak to do the right thing and administer justice where deserved, in case we upset some criminals?
With wealth and influence comes responsibility. ..we can't have it both ways.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What happened to these values when Mugabe was running a mock in Zimbabwe....oh yeah there’s no gain whatsoever by taking action there
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A bit like the Mog back in the 90s civil war, the yanks went in got there butts kicked and pulled out two weeks later.
If Russian targets are hit then there might be retaliation I dont think any were.So no escalation.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by dangerdog (U20986)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by oddiY.. (U1585)
posted 6 minutes ago
Why do no other countries in the world feel the need to start bombing all around the world, other than the usual three suspects USA, Britain and France.
Everybody is getting fed up with these war mongering leaders, who are doing it not to help the poor people of Syria, but for their own political gain.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So that's going to be the UK and France at the top of the terrorist hit list again for the foreseeable future.
We never learn
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We do it because we have values, we can't just let countries use chemical.weapons on its own civilians, the question we should be asking is why do other countries sit back and let this happen?
On saying that we are picking and choosing when we do this, and are hypocritical in the way we don't apply the same rules to all atrocities and to all chemical attacks.
If we didn't do anything because we are scared of terrorists then what message does that send out?
Do what ever you want because Britain are too weak to do the right thing and administer justice where deserved, in case we upset some criminals?
With wealth and influence comes responsibility. ..we can't have it both ways.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What happened to these values when Mugabe was running a mock in Zimbabwe....oh yeah there’s no gain whatsoever by taking action there
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, you are right
Now you have highlighted one of the hypocracies my mind is changed ...because of Zimbabwe we can sit back on our moral high horse and say fack the innocent children in Syriah without a twinge of guilt.
Thanks for your help in changing my moral compass, I failed to indicate at a roundabout the other day ...so now I refuse to indicate at any junction ever again.
The media are still saying alleged chemical weapons attack. Has it been conclusively proven that there were and and who was responsible? Was there an investigation and who decided who was guilty and what punishment must be given. The USA has backed rebels to over throw Asad so are they the right impartial party to make this decision?
To me it seems bomb first ask questions later and has nothing to do with the Syrian people and more to do with a war with Russia. Its not world war 3 but another cold war which might become warmer..
Sign in if you want to comment
World War 3 Has It Started?
Page 1 of 4
posted on 14/4/18
It all comes down to 2 things:
1) Money
2) Religion
posted on 14/4/18
Trump has two poodles now, May and Macron, so will be purchasing another lead today.
Total nonsensical bombing, when all three countries arm to the teeth all the armies in the Middle East, and Britain seems quite happy with its mate Saudi Arabia carpet bombing the Yemen with British made bombs.
Utterly hypocrytical rubbish coming out of May`s gob as per usual.
posted on 14/4/18
comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 9 minutes ago
Trump has two poodles now, May and Macron, so will be purchasing another lead today.
Total nonsensical bombing, when all three countries arm to the teeth all the armies in the Middle East, and Britain seems quite happy with its mate Saudi Arabia carpet bombing the Yemen with British made bombs.
Utterly hypocrytical rubbish coming out of May`s gob as per usual.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I was just watching her announcement, she looks and sounds a nervous wreck,Parliament should be interesting Monday.
posted on 14/4/18
They basically want Iran to retaliate because this phoney bombing in Syria has no gain. It won’t remove Assad and it won’t stop Russia having access to the oil.
posted on 14/4/18
comment by Bake 'em away toys (U7303)
posted 26 minutes ago
It all comes down to 2 things:
1) Money
2) Religion
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Very true. You can ban one of those things and eventually I believe it will happen
posted on 14/4/18
Why do no other countries in the world feel the need to start bombing all around the world, other than the usual three suspects USA, Britain and France.
Everybody is getting fed up with these war mongering leaders, who are doing it not to help the poor people of Syria, but for their own political gain.
posted on 14/4/18
comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 1 minute ago
Why do no other countries in the world feel the need to start bombing all around the world, other than the usual three suspects USA, Britain and France.
Everybody is getting fed up with these war mongering leaders, who are doing it not to help the poor people of Syria, but for their own political gain.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So that's going to be the UK and France at the top of the terrorist hit list again for the foreseeable future.
We never learn
posted on 14/4/18
comment by plastic fantastic (U21613)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 1 minute ago
Why do no other countries in the world feel the need to start bombing all around the world, other than the usual three suspects USA, Britain and France.
Everybody is getting fed up with these war mongering leaders, who are doing it not to help the poor people of Syria, but for their own political gain.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So that's going to be the UK and France at the top of the terrorist hit list again for the foreseeable future.
We never learn
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Politicians don`t care, it never affects them. They are quite happy to send our soldiers to pointless wars, if they think they can get a few more votes.
posted on 14/4/18
The reason other countries don’t do it is because they generally don’t have the defence budgets of the US, UK and France. I’m personally pleased that someone has the bottle to stand up to Assad and do something about chemical weapons.
It might be for their own political gain but why should someone use chemical weapons and face absolutely no consequences? Who else is going to do something about it?
posted on 14/4/18
comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by plastic fantastic (U21613)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 1 minute ago
Why do no other countries in the world feel the need to start bombing all around the world, other than the usual three suspects USA, Britain and France.
Everybody is getting fed up with these war mongering leaders, who are doing it not to help the poor people of Syria, but for their own political gain.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So that's going to be the UK and France at the top of the terrorist hit list again for the foreseeable future.
We never learn
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Politicians don`t care, it never affects them. They are quite happy to send our soldiers to pointless wars, if they think they can get a few more votes.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is just possibly the States and Russia having a willy waving contest,they should just blow each other up and cal it a day.
posted on 14/4/18
I do see a huge difference between this and the phoney Iraq war and the dodgy dossier which I think people are still reeling about
posted on 14/4/18
Blackstar, totally agree with you. President Trump has a lot of faults, but atleast he has the balls to actually take action against monsters like Assad unlike that doormatt Obama. I think people are being extremely dramatic in thinking world war 3 is coming oh please!!! You are dammed if you do, dammed if you don't with certain people in this country. If people are getting killed in other 3rd world countries and people do nothing about it, they get criticised. People get killed in a 3rd world country and finally we do something about it, you get people screaming we are starting wars
posted on 14/4/18
I wonder what Putin will have to say about this ?
posted on 14/4/18
comment by Edward Elizabeth Hitler. (U14393)
posted 56 seconds ago
I wonder what Putin will have to say about this ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'll turn your gas off
posted on 14/4/18
Putin will do nothing because Russia are nowhere near as powerful as they like to believe. The USA and its allies would wipe the floor on Russia if Putin tried anything stupid. But it won't get to that stage anyway, people are getting incredibly dramatic predicting world war 3.
posted on 14/4/18
I reckon Trump and Putin need to sit down and have a beer and talk it through.
It would go like this
Trump , Ya ain’t gonna get us to bail you out like dabbia dabbia 2 are ya ?
posted on 14/4/18
For any kind of WW3 scenario, Russia would need to join with China and possibly North Korea. You then have an alliance which can pose a genuine problem to the US and it’s allies.
At the moment Russia can’t take on the US alone. The US spend £600m on defence, Russia spend £60m
posted on 14/4/18
Why do no other countries in the world feel the need to start bombing all around the world, other than the usual three suspects USA, Britain and France.
Everybody is getting fed up with these war mongering leaders, who are doing it not to help the poor people of Syria, but for their own political gain.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So that's going to be the UK and France at the top of the terrorist hit list again for the foreseeable future.
We never learn
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We do it because we have values, we can't just let countries use chemical.weapons on its own civilians, the question we should be asking is why do other countries sit back and let this happen?
On saying that we are picking and choosing when we do this, and are hypocritical in the way we don't apply the same rules to all atrocities and to all chemical attacks.
If we didn't do anything because we are scared of terrorists then what message does that send out?
Do what ever you want because Britain are too weak to do the right thing and administer justice where deserved, in case we upset some criminals?
With wealth and influence comes responsibility. ..we can't have it both ways.
posted on 14/4/18
comment by Bake 'em away toys (U7303)
posted 1 hour, 15 minutes ago
It all comes down to 2 things:
1) Money
2) Religion
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This 👍🏽
posted on 14/4/18
comment by oddiY.. (U1585)
posted 6 minutes ago
Why do no other countries in the world feel the need to start bombing all around the world, other than the usual three suspects USA, Britain and France.
Everybody is getting fed up with these war mongering leaders, who are doing it not to help the poor people of Syria, but for their own political gain.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So that's going to be the UK and France at the top of the terrorist hit list again for the foreseeable future.
We never learn
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We do it because we have values, we can't just let countries use chemical.weapons on its own civilians, the question we should be asking is why do other countries sit back and let this happen?
On saying that we are picking and choosing when we do this, and are hypocritical in the way we don't apply the same rules to all atrocities and to all chemical attacks.
If we didn't do anything because we are scared of terrorists then what message does that send out?
Do what ever you want because Britain are too weak to do the right thing and administer justice where deserved, in case we upset some criminals?
With wealth and influence comes responsibility. ..we can't have it both ways.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What happened to these values when Mugabe was running a mock in Zimbabwe....oh yeah there’s no gain whatsoever by taking action there
posted on 14/4/18
comment by dangerdog (U20986)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by oddiY.. (U1585)
posted 6 minutes ago
Why do no other countries in the world feel the need to start bombing all around the world, other than the usual three suspects USA, Britain and France.
Everybody is getting fed up with these war mongering leaders, who are doing it not to help the poor people of Syria, but for their own political gain.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So that's going to be the UK and France at the top of the terrorist hit list again for the foreseeable future.
We never learn
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We do it because we have values, we can't just let countries use chemical.weapons on its own civilians, the question we should be asking is why do other countries sit back and let this happen?
On saying that we are picking and choosing when we do this, and are hypocritical in the way we don't apply the same rules to all atrocities and to all chemical attacks.
If we didn't do anything because we are scared of terrorists then what message does that send out?
Do what ever you want because Britain are too weak to do the right thing and administer justice where deserved, in case we upset some criminals?
With wealth and influence comes responsibility. ..we can't have it both ways.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What happened to these values when Mugabe was running a mock in Zimbabwe....oh yeah there’s no gain whatsoever by taking action there
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A bit like the Mog back in the 90s civil war, the yanks went in got there butts kicked and pulled out two weeks later.
posted on 14/4/18
If Russian targets are hit then there might be retaliation I dont think any were.So no escalation.
posted on 14/4/18
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 14/4/18
comment by dangerdog (U20986)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by oddiY.. (U1585)
posted 6 minutes ago
Why do no other countries in the world feel the need to start bombing all around the world, other than the usual three suspects USA, Britain and France.
Everybody is getting fed up with these war mongering leaders, who are doing it not to help the poor people of Syria, but for their own political gain.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So that's going to be the UK and France at the top of the terrorist hit list again for the foreseeable future.
We never learn
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We do it because we have values, we can't just let countries use chemical.weapons on its own civilians, the question we should be asking is why do other countries sit back and let this happen?
On saying that we are picking and choosing when we do this, and are hypocritical in the way we don't apply the same rules to all atrocities and to all chemical attacks.
If we didn't do anything because we are scared of terrorists then what message does that send out?
Do what ever you want because Britain are too weak to do the right thing and administer justice where deserved, in case we upset some criminals?
With wealth and influence comes responsibility. ..we can't have it both ways.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What happened to these values when Mugabe was running a mock in Zimbabwe....oh yeah there’s no gain whatsoever by taking action there
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, you are right
Now you have highlighted one of the hypocracies my mind is changed ...because of Zimbabwe we can sit back on our moral high horse and say fack the innocent children in Syriah without a twinge of guilt.
Thanks for your help in changing my moral compass, I failed to indicate at a roundabout the other day ...so now I refuse to indicate at any junction ever again.
posted on 14/4/18
The media are still saying alleged chemical weapons attack. Has it been conclusively proven that there were and and who was responsible? Was there an investigation and who decided who was guilty and what punishment must be given. The USA has backed rebels to over throw Asad so are they the right impartial party to make this decision?
To me it seems bomb first ask questions later and has nothing to do with the Syrian people and more to do with a war with Russia. Its not world war 3 but another cold war which might become warmer..
Page 1 of 4