comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 52 seconds ago
comment by Superb - we De Zerbi to have a better season (U6486)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by The Guvnor XI -AKA The Shōguv (U12889)
posted 4 minutes ago
We live in an age where attention spans are shorter. Most people wouldn't even be able to watch a movie for 2 hours at home, let alone watching it at the cinema.
It's all about providing content as quickly as possible at any time.
It's sad but this is a byproduct of technology.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's an even wider concern though. A lot of people can't sit for two hours and concentrate on something without the need to check their phone to see what someone had for breakfast on Facebook.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
somewhat disagree with this, this generation now binge watch tv series, forget 2hrs people watch 8/9/11 hrs worth of a series.
Its more down to the luxuries at home and the cinema just not being worth it IMO.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ok there's definitely truth in that. But why are people turning up in their droves to watch Avatar 2 ? Which did 2 billion.
comment by Superb - we De Zerbi to have a better season (U6486)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 52 seconds ago
comment by Superb - we De Zerbi to have a better season (U6486)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by The Guvnor XI -AKA The Shōguv (U12889)
posted 4 minutes ago
We live in an age where attention spans are shorter. Most people wouldn't even be able to watch a movie for 2 hours at home, let alone watching it at the cinema.
It's all about providing content as quickly as possible at any time.
It's sad but this is a byproduct of technology.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's an even wider concern though. A lot of people can't sit for two hours and concentrate on something without the need to check their phone to see what someone had for breakfast on Facebook.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
somewhat disagree with this, this generation now binge watch tv series, forget 2hrs people watch 8/9/11 hrs worth of a series.
Its more down to the luxuries at home and the cinema just not being worth it IMO.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ok there's definitely truth in that. But why are people turning up in their droves to watch Avatar 2 ? Which did 2 billion.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
cos its a film that specifically utilises the visuals of something you cant get at home. it is a visual based film and for that reason people went out to get the very best experience of a film that lends itself soley to that experience. Or so I believe anyway.
The difference in watching an Avatar at cinema from home is not the same as watching other big hits IMO.
Wud love too sea Bluey at imax
comment by The greatest thing that ever happened to humankind (U1282)
posted 4 hours, 1 minute ago
comment by The greatest thing that ever happened to humankind (U1282)
posted 16 hours, 15 minutes ago
The Watched - 45m
Inside Out 2 - 450m
Bad Boys 4 - 450m
A Quiet Place Day 1 - 200m
Despicable Me 4 - 500m
Twisters - 50m
Deadpool 3 - 650m
I've made some changes. Make sure you factor those in, capiche Pun?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
acknowledged
comment by #4zA (U22472)
posted 1 minute ago
Wud love too sea Bluey at imax
----------------------------------------------------------------------
you and String wouldnt see any of the film
Yeah true. But couldn't the visual bonanza aspect thing apply to lots of movies ?
Like Furiosa was a visual bonanza with great action sequences that aren't going to look as good if not seen on a big screen. And yet that movie is tanking by all accounts.
I understand that the world Cameron created in Avatar is unique.
comment by Superb - we De Zerbi to have a better season (U6486)
posted 8 minutes ago
Yeah true. But couldn't the visual bonanza aspect thing apply to lots of movies ?
Like Furiosa was a visual bonanza with great action sequences that aren't going to look as good if not seen on a big screen. And yet that movie is tanking by all accounts.
I understand that the world Cameron created in Avatar is unique.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
it would only apply to visual specific films.
I dont think and neither does the majority of the world imo. No one sees Furiosa as a visual ground-breaking film the way Avatar is/was.
Avatar is pretty much a full on visual effort and like I said was completely ground breaking and pushing the boundaries of what can be done visually.
They should’ve marketed Furiosa as something worth the IMAX fee
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Superb - we De Zerbi to have a better season (U6486)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by The Guvnor XI -AKA The Shōguv (U12889)
posted 4 minutes ago
We live in an age where attention spans are shorter. Most people wouldn't even be able to watch a movie for 2 hours at home, let alone watching it at the cinema.
It's all about providing content as quickly as possible at any time.
It's sad but this is a byproduct of technology.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's an even wider concern though. A lot of people can't sit for two hours and concentrate on something without the need to check their phone to see what someone had for breakfast on Facebook.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
somewhat disagree with this, this generation now binge watch tv series, forget 2hrs people watch 8/9/11 hrs worth of a series.
Its more down to the luxuries at home and the cinema just not being worth it IMO.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I disagree.
People do binge watch but it's because they can stop and do other things. I doubt people are watching a show for several hours in a row, without getting up to do other things or pausing it, or checking their phones during the show.
It's the same reason why nobody reads books anymore.
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 41 minutes ago
comment by Superb - we De Zerbi to have a better season (U6486)
posted 8 minutes ago
Yeah true. But couldn't the visual bonanza aspect thing apply to lots of movies ?
Like Furiosa was a visual bonanza with great action sequences that aren't going to look as good if not seen on a big screen. And yet that movie is tanking by all accounts.
I understand that the world Cameron created in Avatar is unique.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
it would only apply to visual specific films.
I dont think and neither does the majority of the world imo. No one sees Furiosa as a visual ground-breaking film the way Avatar is/was.
Avatar is pretty much a full on visual effort and like I said was completely ground breaking and pushing the boundaries of what can be done visually.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Agreed.
Based on the trailers, Furiosa doesn't offer anything more in terms of action, than the Fast and furious franchise does.
comment by Michael Edwards FC 2.0 loading…{Proud owner of the 5 000 000th comment} (U2720)
posted 3 minutes ago
They should’ve marketed Furiosa as something worth the IMAX fee
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It wouldn't have helped.
Furiosa is a movie about a character that most people don't have an interest in and it's based on a franchise that hasn't been active since 2015. Even then, Mad Max isn't a franchise that would have a big enough following to make a dent in the box office.
comment by The Guvnor XI -AKA The Shōguv (U12889)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Superb - we De Zerbi to have a better season (U6486)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by The Guvnor XI -AKA The Shōguv (U12889)
posted 4 minutes ago
We live in an age where attention spans are shorter. Most people wouldn't even be able to watch a movie for 2 hours at home, let alone watching it at the cinema.
It's all about providing content as quickly as possible at any time.
It's sad but this is a byproduct of technology.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's an even wider concern though. A lot of people can't sit for two hours and concentrate on something without the need to check their phone to see what someone had for breakfast on Facebook.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
somewhat disagree with this, this generation now binge watch tv series, forget 2hrs people watch 8/9/11 hrs worth of a series.
Its more down to the luxuries at home and the cinema just not being worth it IMO.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I disagree.
People do binge watch but it's because they can stop and do other things. I doubt people are watching a show for several hours in a row, without getting up to do other things or pausing it, or checking their phones during the show.
It's the same reason why nobody reads books anymore.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
hmm not sure about that,
Film lengths have increased over the years not decreased, as do tv shows, most shows used to be only 25mins long that seems to be rare now.
unless your watching a 45mins star wars episode
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by The Guvnor XI -AKA The Shōguv (U12889)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Superb - we De Zerbi to have a better season (U6486)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by The Guvnor XI -AKA The Shōguv (U12889)
posted 4 minutes ago
We live in an age where attention spans are shorter. Most people wouldn't even be able to watch a movie for 2 hours at home, let alone watching it at the cinema.
It's all about providing content as quickly as possible at any time.
It's sad but this is a byproduct of technology.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's an even wider concern though. A lot of people can't sit for two hours and concentrate on something without the need to check their phone to see what someone had for breakfast on Facebook.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
somewhat disagree with this, this generation now binge watch tv series, forget 2hrs people watch 8/9/11 hrs worth of a series.
Its more down to the luxuries at home and the cinema just not being worth it IMO.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I disagree.
People do binge watch but it's because they can stop and do other things. I doubt people are watching a show for several hours in a row, without getting up to do other things or pausing it, or checking their phones during the show.
It's the same reason why nobody reads books anymore.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
hmm not sure about that,
Film lengths have increased over the years not decreased, as do tv shows, most shows used to be only 25mins long that seems to be rare now.
unless your watching a 45mins star wars episode
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think people are sitting through shows without pausing or going on their phones. The invested fans aside of course.
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 1 hour, 21 minutes ago
comment by #4zA (U22472)
posted 1 minute ago
Wud love too sea Bluey at imax
----------------------------------------------------------------------
you and String wouldnt see any of the film
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They'd be seeing something gluey.
comment by The Guvnor XI -AKA The Shōguv (U12889)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 1 hour, 21 minutes ago
comment by #4zA (U22472)
posted 1 minute ago
Wud love too sea Bluey at imax
----------------------------------------------------------------------
you and String wouldnt see any of the film
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They'd be seeing something gluey.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
they must prefer their popcorn salty
Mandem all over this place this morning lol
Venom trailer yay
Complete with the trailer for the trailer in the first few seconds of the trailer yayyyy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=__2bjWbetsA
Yo Pun, Venom 3 trailer just dropped. You know what to do fam
Insert my boot up your ass?
Probably would be more entertaining than Venom tbh
comment by The Guvnor XI -AKA The Shōguv (U12889)
posted 1 hour, 37 minutes ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 41 minutes ago
comment by Superb - we De Zerbi to have a better season (U6486)
posted 8 minutes ago
Yeah true. But couldn't the visual bonanza aspect thing apply to lots of movies ?
Like Furiosa was a visual bonanza with great action sequences that aren't going to look as good if not seen on a big screen. And yet that movie is tanking by all accounts.
I understand that the world Cameron created in Avatar is unique.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
it would only apply to visual specific films.
I dont think and neither does the majority of the world imo. No one sees Furiosa as a visual ground-breaking film the way Avatar is/was.
Avatar is pretty much a full on visual effort and like I said was completely ground breaking and pushing the boundaries of what can be done visually.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Agreed.
Based on the trailers, Furiosa doesn't offer anything more in terms of action, than the Fast and furious franchise does.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's definitely way better than the dumb Fast and Furious movies. Those movies are for people with less than five brain cells
Furiosa is a high quality movie and worthy predecessor to Fury Road, if not quite as good. Still well worth seeing and you can watch them back to back.
comment by Pun (U21588)
posted 1 hour, 57 minutes ago
Wtf even is this chat
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Have we moved on from incestuous sexual assaults in Star Wars then ? Gutted
comment by Superbi De Zerbi (U6486)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by Pun (U21588)
posted 1 hour, 57 minutes ago
Wtf even is this chat
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Have we moved on from incestuous sexual assaults in Star Wars then ? Gutted
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't even know what this morning's chat was
Sign in if you want to comment
Marvel & DC Cinematic Universes Thread
Page 1996 of 2192
1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2001
posted on 3/6/24
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 52 seconds ago
comment by Superb - we De Zerbi to have a better season (U6486)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by The Guvnor XI -AKA The Shōguv (U12889)
posted 4 minutes ago
We live in an age where attention spans are shorter. Most people wouldn't even be able to watch a movie for 2 hours at home, let alone watching it at the cinema.
It's all about providing content as quickly as possible at any time.
It's sad but this is a byproduct of technology.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's an even wider concern though. A lot of people can't sit for two hours and concentrate on something without the need to check their phone to see what someone had for breakfast on Facebook.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
somewhat disagree with this, this generation now binge watch tv series, forget 2hrs people watch 8/9/11 hrs worth of a series.
Its more down to the luxuries at home and the cinema just not being worth it IMO.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ok there's definitely truth in that. But why are people turning up in their droves to watch Avatar 2 ? Which did 2 billion.
posted on 3/6/24
comment by Superb - we De Zerbi to have a better season (U6486)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 52 seconds ago
comment by Superb - we De Zerbi to have a better season (U6486)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by The Guvnor XI -AKA The Shōguv (U12889)
posted 4 minutes ago
We live in an age where attention spans are shorter. Most people wouldn't even be able to watch a movie for 2 hours at home, let alone watching it at the cinema.
It's all about providing content as quickly as possible at any time.
It's sad but this is a byproduct of technology.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's an even wider concern though. A lot of people can't sit for two hours and concentrate on something without the need to check their phone to see what someone had for breakfast on Facebook.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
somewhat disagree with this, this generation now binge watch tv series, forget 2hrs people watch 8/9/11 hrs worth of a series.
Its more down to the luxuries at home and the cinema just not being worth it IMO.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ok there's definitely truth in that. But why are people turning up in their droves to watch Avatar 2 ? Which did 2 billion.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
cos its a film that specifically utilises the visuals of something you cant get at home. it is a visual based film and for that reason people went out to get the very best experience of a film that lends itself soley to that experience. Or so I believe anyway.
The difference in watching an Avatar at cinema from home is not the same as watching other big hits IMO.
posted on 3/6/24
Wud love too sea Bluey at imax
posted on 3/6/24
comment by The greatest thing that ever happened to humankind (U1282)
posted 4 hours, 1 minute ago
comment by The greatest thing that ever happened to humankind (U1282)
posted 16 hours, 15 minutes ago
The Watched - 45m
Inside Out 2 - 450m
Bad Boys 4 - 450m
A Quiet Place Day 1 - 200m
Despicable Me 4 - 500m
Twisters - 50m
Deadpool 3 - 650m
I've made some changes. Make sure you factor those in, capiche Pun?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
acknowledged
posted on 3/6/24
comment by #4zA (U22472)
posted 1 minute ago
Wud love too sea Bluey at imax
----------------------------------------------------------------------
you and String wouldnt see any of the film
posted on 3/6/24
Yeah true. But couldn't the visual bonanza aspect thing apply to lots of movies ?
Like Furiosa was a visual bonanza with great action sequences that aren't going to look as good if not seen on a big screen. And yet that movie is tanking by all accounts.
I understand that the world Cameron created in Avatar is unique.
posted on 3/6/24
comment by Superb - we De Zerbi to have a better season (U6486)
posted 8 minutes ago
Yeah true. But couldn't the visual bonanza aspect thing apply to lots of movies ?
Like Furiosa was a visual bonanza with great action sequences that aren't going to look as good if not seen on a big screen. And yet that movie is tanking by all accounts.
I understand that the world Cameron created in Avatar is unique.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
it would only apply to visual specific films.
I dont think and neither does the majority of the world imo. No one sees Furiosa as a visual ground-breaking film the way Avatar is/was.
Avatar is pretty much a full on visual effort and like I said was completely ground breaking and pushing the boundaries of what can be done visually.
posted on 3/6/24
They should’ve marketed Furiosa as something worth the IMAX fee
posted on 3/6/24
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Superb - we De Zerbi to have a better season (U6486)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by The Guvnor XI -AKA The Shōguv (U12889)
posted 4 minutes ago
We live in an age where attention spans are shorter. Most people wouldn't even be able to watch a movie for 2 hours at home, let alone watching it at the cinema.
It's all about providing content as quickly as possible at any time.
It's sad but this is a byproduct of technology.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's an even wider concern though. A lot of people can't sit for two hours and concentrate on something without the need to check their phone to see what someone had for breakfast on Facebook.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
somewhat disagree with this, this generation now binge watch tv series, forget 2hrs people watch 8/9/11 hrs worth of a series.
Its more down to the luxuries at home and the cinema just not being worth it IMO.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I disagree.
People do binge watch but it's because they can stop and do other things. I doubt people are watching a show for several hours in a row, without getting up to do other things or pausing it, or checking their phones during the show.
It's the same reason why nobody reads books anymore.
posted on 3/6/24
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 41 minutes ago
comment by Superb - we De Zerbi to have a better season (U6486)
posted 8 minutes ago
Yeah true. But couldn't the visual bonanza aspect thing apply to lots of movies ?
Like Furiosa was a visual bonanza with great action sequences that aren't going to look as good if not seen on a big screen. And yet that movie is tanking by all accounts.
I understand that the world Cameron created in Avatar is unique.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
it would only apply to visual specific films.
I dont think and neither does the majority of the world imo. No one sees Furiosa as a visual ground-breaking film the way Avatar is/was.
Avatar is pretty much a full on visual effort and like I said was completely ground breaking and pushing the boundaries of what can be done visually.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Agreed.
Based on the trailers, Furiosa doesn't offer anything more in terms of action, than the Fast and furious franchise does.
posted on 3/6/24
comment by Michael Edwards FC 2.0 loading…{Proud owner of the 5 000 000th comment} (U2720)
posted 3 minutes ago
They should’ve marketed Furiosa as something worth the IMAX fee
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It wouldn't have helped.
Furiosa is a movie about a character that most people don't have an interest in and it's based on a franchise that hasn't been active since 2015. Even then, Mad Max isn't a franchise that would have a big enough following to make a dent in the box office.
posted on 3/6/24
comment by The Guvnor XI -AKA The Shōguv (U12889)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Superb - we De Zerbi to have a better season (U6486)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by The Guvnor XI -AKA The Shōguv (U12889)
posted 4 minutes ago
We live in an age where attention spans are shorter. Most people wouldn't even be able to watch a movie for 2 hours at home, let alone watching it at the cinema.
It's all about providing content as quickly as possible at any time.
It's sad but this is a byproduct of technology.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's an even wider concern though. A lot of people can't sit for two hours and concentrate on something without the need to check their phone to see what someone had for breakfast on Facebook.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
somewhat disagree with this, this generation now binge watch tv series, forget 2hrs people watch 8/9/11 hrs worth of a series.
Its more down to the luxuries at home and the cinema just not being worth it IMO.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I disagree.
People do binge watch but it's because they can stop and do other things. I doubt people are watching a show for several hours in a row, without getting up to do other things or pausing it, or checking their phones during the show.
It's the same reason why nobody reads books anymore.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
hmm not sure about that,
Film lengths have increased over the years not decreased, as do tv shows, most shows used to be only 25mins long that seems to be rare now.
unless your watching a 45mins star wars episode
posted on 3/6/24
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by The Guvnor XI -AKA The Shōguv (U12889)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Superb - we De Zerbi to have a better season (U6486)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by The Guvnor XI -AKA The Shōguv (U12889)
posted 4 minutes ago
We live in an age where attention spans are shorter. Most people wouldn't even be able to watch a movie for 2 hours at home, let alone watching it at the cinema.
It's all about providing content as quickly as possible at any time.
It's sad but this is a byproduct of technology.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's an even wider concern though. A lot of people can't sit for two hours and concentrate on something without the need to check their phone to see what someone had for breakfast on Facebook.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
somewhat disagree with this, this generation now binge watch tv series, forget 2hrs people watch 8/9/11 hrs worth of a series.
Its more down to the luxuries at home and the cinema just not being worth it IMO.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I disagree.
People do binge watch but it's because they can stop and do other things. I doubt people are watching a show for several hours in a row, without getting up to do other things or pausing it, or checking their phones during the show.
It's the same reason why nobody reads books anymore.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
hmm not sure about that,
Film lengths have increased over the years not decreased, as do tv shows, most shows used to be only 25mins long that seems to be rare now.
unless your watching a 45mins star wars episode
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think people are sitting through shows without pausing or going on their phones. The invested fans aside of course.
posted on 3/6/24
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 1 hour, 21 minutes ago
comment by #4zA (U22472)
posted 1 minute ago
Wud love too sea Bluey at imax
----------------------------------------------------------------------
you and String wouldnt see any of the film
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They'd be seeing something gluey.
posted on 3/6/24
comment by The Guvnor XI -AKA The Shōguv (U12889)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 1 hour, 21 minutes ago
comment by #4zA (U22472)
posted 1 minute ago
Wud love too sea Bluey at imax
----------------------------------------------------------------------
you and String wouldnt see any of the film
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They'd be seeing something gluey.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
they must prefer their popcorn salty
posted on 3/6/24
Wtf even is this chat
posted on 3/6/24
Mandem all over this place this morning lol
posted on 3/6/24
Venom trailer yay
Complete with the trailer for the trailer in the first few seconds of the trailer yayyyy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=__2bjWbetsA
posted on 3/6/24
Yo Pun, Venom 3 trailer just dropped. You know what to do fam
posted on 3/6/24
Insert my boot up your ass?
posted on 3/6/24
BTA alert
posted on 3/6/24
Probably would be more entertaining than Venom tbh
posted on 3/6/24
comment by The Guvnor XI -AKA The Shōguv (U12889)
posted 1 hour, 37 minutes ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 41 minutes ago
comment by Superb - we De Zerbi to have a better season (U6486)
posted 8 minutes ago
Yeah true. But couldn't the visual bonanza aspect thing apply to lots of movies ?
Like Furiosa was a visual bonanza with great action sequences that aren't going to look as good if not seen on a big screen. And yet that movie is tanking by all accounts.
I understand that the world Cameron created in Avatar is unique.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
it would only apply to visual specific films.
I dont think and neither does the majority of the world imo. No one sees Furiosa as a visual ground-breaking film the way Avatar is/was.
Avatar is pretty much a full on visual effort and like I said was completely ground breaking and pushing the boundaries of what can be done visually.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Agreed.
Based on the trailers, Furiosa doesn't offer anything more in terms of action, than the Fast and furious franchise does.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's definitely way better than the dumb Fast and Furious movies. Those movies are for people with less than five brain cells
Furiosa is a high quality movie and worthy predecessor to Fury Road, if not quite as good. Still well worth seeing and you can watch them back to back.
posted on 3/6/24
comment by Pun (U21588)
posted 1 hour, 57 minutes ago
Wtf even is this chat
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Have we moved on from incestuous sexual assaults in Star Wars then ? Gutted
posted on 3/6/24
comment by Superbi De Zerbi (U6486)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by Pun (U21588)
posted 1 hour, 57 minutes ago
Wtf even is this chat
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Have we moved on from incestuous sexual assaults in Star Wars then ? Gutted
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't even know what this morning's chat was
Page 1996 of 2192
1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2001