Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Commenting just so I can follow the over excited bears thinking this is real and a great thing
4m for a 33 yr old... aye ok !! 1-1.5m MAX !! then aye. they paid 5m when he was 31 why would we pay 4 at 33, how long has he left on his contract?
4m
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
I actually hope that isn't true. I'd take skrtel but I think spending that on a soon to be 33 year old is crazy.
comment by Call Sign: đ´ó §ó ˘ó łó Łó ´ó ż Armstr... (U3627)
posted 39 seconds ago
Commenting just so I can follow the over excited bears thinking this is real and a great thing
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s in the Turkish press not the DR. So why would it not be real ?
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Stevie G - mon then (U21838)
posted 35 seconds ago
4m for a 33 yr old... aye ok !! 1-1.5m MAX !! then aye. they paid 5m when he was 31 why would we pay 4 at 33, how long has he left on his contract?
4m
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s not about age. It’s about quality.
I take it you wouldn’t pay £4m for 33 yr old Ronaldo then ?
4 million turkish delights maybe if they want rid of him we miht sign him but if thy plan on keeping him im ure they will
.... he has 1 year left on his current deal.... 4m
comment by Esctosh - back to saying it like it is đ (U8215)
posted 37 seconds ago
comment by Call Sign: đ´ó §ó ˘ó łó Łó ´ó ż Armstr... (U3627)
posted 39 seconds ago
Commenting just so I can follow the over excited bears thinking this is real and a great thing
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s in the Turkish press not the DR. So why would it not be real ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
comment by Dustin Hoffman Touched my Tuppence (U19139)
posted 1 minute ago
4m Turkish lira surely?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Just got there before me!
a year to go on his current deal and 33 years old
its just as well its probably rubbish cause thats absurd if its true.
comment by Stevie G - mon then (U21838)
posted 6 seconds ago
.... he has 1 year left on his current deal.... 4m
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Rangers spend no money. Rangers bad
Rangers spend money. Rangers bad
Make your mind up đ
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Just out of interest...
So how much do people reckon 33yr old Ronaldo is worth ?
comment by Esctosh - back to saying it like it is đ (U8215)
posted 48 seconds ago
comment by Stevie G - mon then (U21838)
posted 35 seconds ago
4m for a 33 yr old... aye ok !! 1-1.5m MAX !! then aye. they paid 5m when he was 31 why would we pay 4 at 33, how long has he left on his contract?
4m
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s not about age. It’s about quality.
I take it you wouldn’t pay £4m for 33 yr old Ronaldo then ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
naw its about money !! I think we learned that the hard way !!
if we paid 4m for him I want a refund on my season book!! If Gerrard wanted to spend most of his budget on a 33yr old I would say he is massively wrong.
And Ronaldo is still world class Skrtel never was
comment by Esctosh - back to saying it like it is đ (U8215)
posted 58 seconds ago
comment by Stevie G - mon then (U21838)
posted 6 seconds ago
.... he has 1 year left on his current deal.... 4m
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Rangers spend no money. Rangers bad
Rangers spend money. Rangers bad
Make your mind up đ
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This would be bad spending.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Stevie G - mon then (U21838)
posted 25 seconds ago
comment by Esctosh - back to saying it like it is đ (U8215)
posted 48 seconds ago
comment by Stevie G - mon then (U21838)
posted 35 seconds ago
4m for a 33 yr old... aye ok !! 1-1.5m MAX !! then aye. they paid 5m when he was 31 why would we pay 4 at 33, how long has he left on his contract?
4m
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s not about age. It’s about quality.
I take it you wouldn’t pay £4m for 33 yr old Ronaldo then ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
naw its about money !! I think we learned that the hard way !!
if we paid 4m for him I want a refund on my season book!! If Gerrard wanted to spend most of his budget on a 33yr old I would say he is massively wrong.
And Ronaldo is still world class Skrtel never was
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who said that’s most of his budget ?
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Esctosh - back to saying it like it is đ (U8215)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Stevie G - mon then (U21838)
posted 6 seconds ago
.... he has 1 year left on his current deal.... 4m
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Rangers spend no money. Rangers bad
Rangers spend money. Rangers bad
Make your mind up đ
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Rangers paying 4m for Skrtel would be shocking but there is no way its happening, none , nada not for 4m!
He would be a great player for us I reckon but not for 4m
Sign in if you want to comment
Rangers bid £4m for Skrtel
Page 1 of 4
posted on 15/5/18
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 15/5/18
Commenting just so I can follow the over excited bears thinking this is real and a great thing
posted on 15/5/18
4m for a 33 yr old... aye ok !! 1-1.5m MAX !! then aye. they paid 5m when he was 31 why would we pay 4 at 33, how long has he left on his contract?
4m
posted on 15/5/18
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 15/5/18
I actually hope that isn't true. I'd take skrtel but I think spending that on a soon to be 33 year old is crazy.
posted on 15/5/18
comment by Call Sign: đ´ó §ó ˘ó łó Łó ´ó ż Armstr... (U3627)
posted 39 seconds ago
Commenting just so I can follow the over excited bears thinking this is real and a great thing
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s in the Turkish press not the DR. So why would it not be real ?
posted on 15/5/18
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 15/5/18
comment by Stevie G - mon then (U21838)
posted 35 seconds ago
4m for a 33 yr old... aye ok !! 1-1.5m MAX !! then aye. they paid 5m when he was 31 why would we pay 4 at 33, how long has he left on his contract?
4m
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s not about age. It’s about quality.
I take it you wouldn’t pay £4m for 33 yr old Ronaldo then ?
posted on 15/5/18
4 million turkish delights maybe if they want rid of him we miht sign him but if thy plan on keeping him im ure they will
posted on 15/5/18
.... he has 1 year left on his current deal.... 4m
posted on 15/5/18
comment by Esctosh - back to saying it like it is đ (U8215)
posted 37 seconds ago
comment by Call Sign: đ´ó §ó ˘ó łó Łó ´ó ż Armstr... (U3627)
posted 39 seconds ago
Commenting just so I can follow the over excited bears thinking this is real and a great thing
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s in the Turkish press not the DR. So why would it not be real ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
posted on 15/5/18
comment by Dustin Hoffman Touched my Tuppence (U19139)
posted 1 minute ago
4m Turkish lira surely?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Just got there before me!
posted on 15/5/18
a year to go on his current deal and 33 years old
its just as well its probably rubbish cause thats absurd if its true.
posted on 15/5/18
comment by Stevie G - mon then (U21838)
posted 6 seconds ago
.... he has 1 year left on his current deal.... 4m
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Rangers spend no money. Rangers bad
Rangers spend money. Rangers bad
Make your mind up đ
posted on 15/5/18
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 15/5/18
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 15/5/18
Just out of interest...
So how much do people reckon 33yr old Ronaldo is worth ?
posted on 15/5/18
comment by Esctosh - back to saying it like it is đ (U8215)
posted 48 seconds ago
comment by Stevie G - mon then (U21838)
posted 35 seconds ago
4m for a 33 yr old... aye ok !! 1-1.5m MAX !! then aye. they paid 5m when he was 31 why would we pay 4 at 33, how long has he left on his contract?
4m
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s not about age. It’s about quality.
I take it you wouldn’t pay £4m for 33 yr old Ronaldo then ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
naw its about money !! I think we learned that the hard way !!
if we paid 4m for him I want a refund on my season book!! If Gerrard wanted to spend most of his budget on a 33yr old I would say he is massively wrong.
And Ronaldo is still world class Skrtel never was
posted on 15/5/18
No chance
posted on 15/5/18
comment by Esctosh - back to saying it like it is đ (U8215)
posted 58 seconds ago
comment by Stevie G - mon then (U21838)
posted 6 seconds ago
.... he has 1 year left on his current deal.... 4m
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Rangers spend no money. Rangers bad
Rangers spend money. Rangers bad
Make your mind up đ
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This would be bad spending.
posted on 15/5/18
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 15/5/18
comment by Stevie G - mon then (U21838)
posted 25 seconds ago
comment by Esctosh - back to saying it like it is đ (U8215)
posted 48 seconds ago
comment by Stevie G - mon then (U21838)
posted 35 seconds ago
4m for a 33 yr old... aye ok !! 1-1.5m MAX !! then aye. they paid 5m when he was 31 why would we pay 4 at 33, how long has he left on his contract?
4m
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s not about age. It’s about quality.
I take it you wouldn’t pay £4m for 33 yr old Ronaldo then ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
naw its about money !! I think we learned that the hard way !!
if we paid 4m for him I want a refund on my season book!! If Gerrard wanted to spend most of his budget on a 33yr old I would say he is massively wrong.
And Ronaldo is still world class Skrtel never was
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who said that’s most of his budget ?
posted on 15/5/18
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 15/5/18
comment by Esctosh - back to saying it like it is đ (U8215)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Stevie G - mon then (U21838)
posted 6 seconds ago
.... he has 1 year left on his current deal.... 4m
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Rangers spend no money. Rangers bad
Rangers spend money. Rangers bad
Make your mind up đ
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Rangers paying 4m for Skrtel would be shocking but there is no way its happening, none , nada not for 4m!
He would be a great player for us I reckon but not for 4m
posted on 15/5/18
ronaldo and skrtel
Page 1 of 4