comment by Benji Veniamin (U19953)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by T Bone Steak Roysters (U3947)
posted 26 minutes ago
Liverpool have only ever had one window with an unhealthy net spend. If the rule is in place we will stick to it. Until this summer our net spend was lower than the likes of Bournemouth and Palace.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
was only mentioned because this summer you were the only club who wouldve broken it. 89m is a big net spend, wonder if any clubs will have a huge January in anticipation
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yea, I can see that too. Think it will make for a competitive league as it will affect the richer teams more.
comment by Firmino's Brightest Tooth (U1217)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by Benji Veniamin (U19953)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by T Bone Steak Roysters (U3947)
posted 26 minutes ago
Liverpool have only ever had one window with an unhealthy net spend. If the rule is in place we will stick to it. Until this summer our net spend was lower than the likes of Bournemouth and Palace.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
was only mentioned because this summer you were the only club who wouldve broken it. 89m is a big net spend, wonder if any clubs will have a huge January in anticipation
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wouldn't surprise me. I think our January will be a quiet one but could see United spending quite a bit, possibly Arsenal too.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Can't. Broke.
comment by Firmino's Brightest Tooth (U1217)
posted 9 minutes ago
I was thinking Spurs, they could do with spending a bit. But with all the stadium delays and extra costs etc. I'm not sure.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They had a bit of money and I reckon they may try and pick someone up from a CL drop out team or someone like Rabiot as they did Moura.
What is the definition of net spend?
comment by Robbing_Hoody (U6374)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by Firmino's Brightest Tooth (U1217)
posted 9 minutes ago
I was thinking Spurs, they could do with spending a bit. But with all the stadium delays and extra costs etc. I'm not sure.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They had a bit of money and I reckon they may try and pick someone up from a CL drop out team or someone like Rabiot as they did Moura.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
rabiot is coming to us, im itk
comment by Faran Van Jiniho (U5318)
posted 13 minutes ago
What is the definition of net spend?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
according to Uefa its "maximum deficit clubs are allowed in the market per season"
So it comes into effect next summer and this time the rule is pretty straight forward. You can’t have a net spend greater than £89m.
-------------------------------
It isn't really that straightforward as the vast majority of transfer fees are paid in instalments and contain add ons.
So if we bought a player for £100m and structured it so that we paid £50m this summer and £50m the next, would we be breaking the rules? I doubt it as they would probably do it per financial year.
Teams will find a way round it.
id say an agreement to buy would count as a deficit regardless of payment terms.
comment by Benji Veniamin (U19953)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Faran Van Jiniho (U5318)
posted 13 minutes ago
What is the definition of net spend?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
according to Uefa its "maximum deficit clubs are allowed in the market per season"
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Does it mean just transfer net spend though or overall spend. Seen as though we make bucketloads of cash each yr
normally its a 1/3rd that is paid upfront with the rest over the next 2 seasons
though for someone like oblak the full fee was required upfront
what is curious is that its all season
so int heory a team could spend 200m in summer and just tell uefa they intend to sell 111m in january
but then struggle
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 3 minutes ago
So it comes into effect next summer and this time the rule is pretty straight forward. You can’t have a net spend greater than £89m.
-------------------------------
It isn't really that straightforward as the vast majority of transfer fees are paid in instalments and contain add ons.
So if we bought a player for £100m and structured it so that we paid £50m this summer and £50m the next, would we be breaking the rules? I doubt it as they would probably do it per financial year.
Teams will find a way round it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
but if in your example you did that
youd only have 39m this year left to spend and 39m the following year, so it will catch up with clubs who do that
comment by Adam 'The interview' Lallana (U20650)
posted 39 minutes ago
comment by Robbing_Hoody (U6374)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by Firmino's Brightest Tooth (U1217)
posted 9 minutes ago
I was thinking Spurs, they could do with spending a bit. But with all the stadium delays and extra costs etc. I'm not sure.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They had a bit of money and I reckon they may try and pick someone up from a CL drop out team or someone like Rabiot as they did Moura.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
rabiot is coming to us, im itk
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I would like that!
comment by (Kash) I'm the Mane (U1108)
posted 2 hours, 3 minutes ago
Doesn't stop Sanchez earning 850k a week though
----------------------------------------------------------------------
£425 a week each for Sanchez and the imaginary friend he passes to
comment by Benji Veniamin (U19953)
posted 2 hours, 49 minutes ago
im not sure you could limit an individuals wages. you could probably create a club wide salary cap.
i think the target is 100m euro which ironically is 89m quid at todays exchange
----------------------------------------------------------------------
LaLiga's had a salary cap for a few seasons now.
Not sure of the exact details, but I believe the total outlay on players' wages is a % linked to the club's turnover.
In principle it benefits the clubs with the biggest revenues, of course, but press reports over the past couple of years have suggested that the big 2 are both operating extremely close to that cap, which has been to have hamstringed Real Madrid's ability to make new big-name signings.
That said, Ronaldo's departure seemed mainly to be aimed at reducing the wage bill in preparation for one or two big summer signings, but they never materialised, no idea why.
comment by Paulpowersleftfoot (U1037)
posted 12 hours, 43 minutes ago
comment by (Kash) I'm the Mane (U1108)
posted 2 hours, 3 minutes ago
Doesn't stop Sanchez earning 850k a week though
----------------------------------------------------------------------
£425 a week each for Sanchez and the imaginary friend he passes to
----------------------------------------------------------------------
His passing was pretty good on derby day where you fecked it up.
Will not make the slightest difference, the chequebook clubs always find a way around it. Unless you have a complete wage cap, and spending cap across the board, then nothing will change.
comment by Tommy Egan (U11781)
posted 14 hours, 49 minutes ago
comment by Firmino's Brightest Tooth (U1217)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by pingpong (U18972)
posted 47 minutes ago
Well hopefully it can prevent clubs paying circa £65m for a clown type GK
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nobody has done that. Weird comment.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No offence but man you’re a boring poster
----------------------------------------------------------------------
comment by pingpong (U18972)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Tommy Egan (U11781)
posted 14 hours, 49 minutes ago
comment by Firmino's Brightest Tooth (U1217)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by pingpong (U18972)
posted 47 minutes ago
Well hopefully it can prevent clubs paying circa £65m for a clown type GK
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nobody has done that. Weird comment.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No offence but man you’re a boring poster
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't know what you're laughing at, you're one of the most boring on the site.
comment by Firmino's Brightest Tooth (U1217)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by pingpong (U18972)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Tommy Egan (U11781)
posted 14 hours, 49 minutes ago
comment by Firmino's Brightest Tooth (U1217)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by pingpong (U18972)
posted 47 minutes ago
Well hopefully it can prevent clubs paying circa £65m for a clown type GK
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nobody has done that. Weird comment.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No offence but man you’re a boring poster
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't know what you're laughing at, you're one of the most boring on the site.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sign in if you want to comment
FFP 2.0
Page 2 of 2
posted on 11/9/18
comment by Benji Veniamin (U19953)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by T Bone Steak Roysters (U3947)
posted 26 minutes ago
Liverpool have only ever had one window with an unhealthy net spend. If the rule is in place we will stick to it. Until this summer our net spend was lower than the likes of Bournemouth and Palace.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
was only mentioned because this summer you were the only club who wouldve broken it. 89m is a big net spend, wonder if any clubs will have a huge January in anticipation
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yea, I can see that too. Think it will make for a competitive league as it will affect the richer teams more.
posted on 11/9/18
comment by Firmino's Brightest Tooth (U1217)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by Benji Veniamin (U19953)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by T Bone Steak Roysters (U3947)
posted 26 minutes ago
Liverpool have only ever had one window with an unhealthy net spend. If the rule is in place we will stick to it. Until this summer our net spend was lower than the likes of Bournemouth and Palace.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
was only mentioned because this summer you were the only club who wouldve broken it. 89m is a big net spend, wonder if any clubs will have a huge January in anticipation
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wouldn't surprise me. I think our January will be a quiet one but could see United spending quite a bit, possibly Arsenal too.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Can't. Broke.
posted on 11/9/18
comment by Firmino's Brightest Tooth (U1217)
posted 9 minutes ago
I was thinking Spurs, they could do with spending a bit. But with all the stadium delays and extra costs etc. I'm not sure.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They had a bit of money and I reckon they may try and pick someone up from a CL drop out team or someone like Rabiot as they did Moura.
posted on 11/9/18
What is the definition of net spend?
posted on 11/9/18
comment by Robbing_Hoody (U6374)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by Firmino's Brightest Tooth (U1217)
posted 9 minutes ago
I was thinking Spurs, they could do with spending a bit. But with all the stadium delays and extra costs etc. I'm not sure.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They had a bit of money and I reckon they may try and pick someone up from a CL drop out team or someone like Rabiot as they did Moura.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
rabiot is coming to us, im itk
posted on 11/9/18
comment by Faran Van Jiniho (U5318)
posted 13 minutes ago
What is the definition of net spend?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
according to Uefa its "maximum deficit clubs are allowed in the market per season"
posted on 11/9/18
So it comes into effect next summer and this time the rule is pretty straight forward. You can’t have a net spend greater than £89m.
-------------------------------
It isn't really that straightforward as the vast majority of transfer fees are paid in instalments and contain add ons.
So if we bought a player for £100m and structured it so that we paid £50m this summer and £50m the next, would we be breaking the rules? I doubt it as they would probably do it per financial year.
Teams will find a way round it.
posted on 11/9/18
id say an agreement to buy would count as a deficit regardless of payment terms.
posted on 11/9/18
comment by Benji Veniamin (U19953)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Faran Van Jiniho (U5318)
posted 13 minutes ago
What is the definition of net spend?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
according to Uefa its "maximum deficit clubs are allowed in the market per season"
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Does it mean just transfer net spend though or overall spend. Seen as though we make bucketloads of cash each yr
posted on 11/9/18
normally its a 1/3rd that is paid upfront with the rest over the next 2 seasons
though for someone like oblak the full fee was required upfront
posted on 11/9/18
what is curious is that its all season
so int heory a team could spend 200m in summer and just tell uefa they intend to sell 111m in january
but then struggle
posted on 11/9/18
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 3 minutes ago
So it comes into effect next summer and this time the rule is pretty straight forward. You can’t have a net spend greater than £89m.
-------------------------------
It isn't really that straightforward as the vast majority of transfer fees are paid in instalments and contain add ons.
So if we bought a player for £100m and structured it so that we paid £50m this summer and £50m the next, would we be breaking the rules? I doubt it as they would probably do it per financial year.
Teams will find a way round it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
but if in your example you did that
youd only have 39m this year left to spend and 39m the following year, so it will catch up with clubs who do that
posted on 11/9/18
comment by Adam 'The interview' Lallana (U20650)
posted 39 minutes ago
comment by Robbing_Hoody (U6374)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by Firmino's Brightest Tooth (U1217)
posted 9 minutes ago
I was thinking Spurs, they could do with spending a bit. But with all the stadium delays and extra costs etc. I'm not sure.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They had a bit of money and I reckon they may try and pick someone up from a CL drop out team or someone like Rabiot as they did Moura.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
rabiot is coming to us, im itk
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I would like that!
posted on 11/9/18
comment by (Kash) I'm the Mane (U1108)
posted 2 hours, 3 minutes ago
Doesn't stop Sanchez earning 850k a week though
----------------------------------------------------------------------
£425 a week each for Sanchez and the imaginary friend he passes to
posted on 11/9/18
comment by Benji Veniamin (U19953)
posted 2 hours, 49 minutes ago
im not sure you could limit an individuals wages. you could probably create a club wide salary cap.
i think the target is 100m euro which ironically is 89m quid at todays exchange
----------------------------------------------------------------------
LaLiga's had a salary cap for a few seasons now.
Not sure of the exact details, but I believe the total outlay on players' wages is a % linked to the club's turnover.
In principle it benefits the clubs with the biggest revenues, of course, but press reports over the past couple of years have suggested that the big 2 are both operating extremely close to that cap, which has been to have hamstringed Real Madrid's ability to make new big-name signings.
That said, Ronaldo's departure seemed mainly to be aimed at reducing the wage bill in preparation for one or two big summer signings, but they never materialised, no idea why.
posted on 12/9/18
comment by Paulpowersleftfoot (U1037)
posted 12 hours, 43 minutes ago
comment by (Kash) I'm the Mane (U1108)
posted 2 hours, 3 minutes ago
Doesn't stop Sanchez earning 850k a week though
----------------------------------------------------------------------
£425 a week each for Sanchez and the imaginary friend he passes to
----------------------------------------------------------------------
His passing was pretty good on derby day where you fecked it up.
posted on 12/9/18
Will not make the slightest difference, the chequebook clubs always find a way around it. Unless you have a complete wage cap, and spending cap across the board, then nothing will change.
posted on 12/9/18
comment by Tommy Egan (U11781)
posted 14 hours, 49 minutes ago
comment by Firmino's Brightest Tooth (U1217)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by pingpong (U18972)
posted 47 minutes ago
Well hopefully it can prevent clubs paying circa £65m for a clown type GK
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nobody has done that. Weird comment.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No offence but man you’re a boring poster
----------------------------------------------------------------------
posted on 12/9/18
comment by pingpong (U18972)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Tommy Egan (U11781)
posted 14 hours, 49 minutes ago
comment by Firmino's Brightest Tooth (U1217)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by pingpong (U18972)
posted 47 minutes ago
Well hopefully it can prevent clubs paying circa £65m for a clown type GK
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nobody has done that. Weird comment.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No offence but man you’re a boring poster
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't know what you're laughing at, you're one of the most boring on the site.
posted on 12/9/18
comment by Firmino's Brightest Tooth (U1217)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by pingpong (U18972)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Tommy Egan (U11781)
posted 14 hours, 49 minutes ago
comment by Firmino's Brightest Tooth (U1217)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by pingpong (U18972)
posted 47 minutes ago
Well hopefully it can prevent clubs paying circa £65m for a clown type GK
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nobody has done that. Weird comment.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No offence but man you’re a boring poster
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't know what you're laughing at, you're one of the most boring on the site.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 2 of 2