comment by The Wandering Greengrocer aka Mango Unchained (U17500)
posted 24 minutes ago
I’m a bit new here.

Do you have to be an illogical idiot to support the Baggies or is it optional?

And why are they spending more time over here than on their own place?


----------------------------------------------------------------------
You're obviously are new hear or just thick. This is also on the Albion board!

'here'

comment by ☠ Tube of Lies ☕ (U16473)
posted 43 minutes ago
comment by Boilerman (U1363)

You're so rich but you were outspent by Fulham
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Better value players though, as the respective league positions now illustrate. It will certainly be interesting to see who comes in in the next two transfer windows, I'll grant you that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah, Traore was great value for money!

Why isn't he? He destroyed the Arsenal defence when he came on, set up MGW who hot the bar!!!!! How's your record signing getting on in the Chump?

Fulham spent 100m and we spent 100m !!!!
We have uncle Mendes though 😎

comment by Boilerman (U1363)
posted 59 minutes ago
comment by The Wandering Greengrocer aka Mango Unchained (U17500)
posted 24 minutes ago
I’m a bit new here.

Do you have to be an illogical idiot to support the Baggies or is it optional?

And why are they spending more time over here than on their own place?


----------------------------------------------------------------------
You're obviously are new hear or just thick. This is also on the Albion board!
Reply | Add Comment | Complain
comment by Boilerman (U1363)
posted 58 minutes ago
'here'


^^^^ this made me laugh

comment by Boilerman (U1363)
posted 2 hours, 13 minutes ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 30 minutes ago
comment by Boilerman (U1363)
posted 39 minutes ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 1 hour, 10 minutes ago
comment by Boilerman (U1363)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by WOLVES55 (U10973)
posted 15 minutes ago
Newcastle would walk the Chump....that's how poor it is
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well they do have a decent striker. Better than any strikers Wolves have!
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Newcastle have scored less than Wolves. They don't have any players who have scored as many as Jimenez has for Wolves.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jimenez has scored 1 goal every 328 minutes.

Rondon has scored 1 goal every 206 minutes.

You were saying?!
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Rondon has only scored in one game which has skewed his stats. He had previously gone 6 games without a goal, which is longer than Jimenez has.

I will reiterate, no Newcastle player has scored more than Jimenez and Newcastle have scored less than Wolves.

Therefore your point about them having better strikers is redundant.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So Rondon scoring goals has skewed the figures?

Rondon's goals per minutes ration is better. The end!
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Better ratio at the minute, but yes it had been skewed by him scoring two at the weekend. Prior to that he hadn’t scored in six games this season so wouldn’t have even had a ratio.

Goals per minute over a small sample size doesn’t really give you much indication on who is a better player. Statistically speaking, you should have a sample size of 15-30 data points before assessing or determining a trend as less allows an anomolous result to skew the data. You also need to consider other important facets in a strikers game such as chance creation, assists etc. Obviously that doesn’t fit into wumming though.

Interestingly, Jimenez has been involved in 7 goals this season (3 scored and 4 assists), either scoring or assisting. That’s him being involved in a goal every 140 minutes.

Rondon has been involved in 3 goals, which makes it one in every 143 minutes. So not much between them at present, although Rondon has less data points making him more open to skewed trends.

I think of greater concern here though is your absolute obsession with all things Wolves and utter desperation for us to slip up. You post on here way too much and it can’t be healthy for you.

You’re wasting your time Tamworth....you can’t educate pork !!!

comment by Sir Halfy ...Premier League Thread Master (U11570)
posted 13 minutes ago
You’re wasting your time Tamworth....you can’t educate pork !!!

----------------------------------------------------------------------
As Rodney Marsh famously said about WBA, "You can put lipstick on a pig, but it's still a pig".

RIP Stan Lee 😔😔😔😔

comment by Boilerman (U1363)
posted 1 hour, 53 minutes ago
comment by The Wandering Greengrocer aka Mango Unchained (U17500)
posted 24 minutes ago
I’m a bit new here.

Do you have to be an illogical idiot to support the Baggies or is it optional?

And why are they spending more time over here than on their own place?


----------------------------------------------------------------------
You're obviously are new hear or just thick. This is also on the Albion board!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Blimey - this bloke has only gone and proven my ‘illogical idiot’ point for me and my guess is he’ll reinforce his stupidity by not understanding why.

Back when I used to go fishing, the average gudgeon had a higher IQ.

comment by The Wandering Greengrocer aka Mango Unchained (U17500)
posted 4 hours, 2 minutes ago
comment by Boilerman (U1363)
posted 1 hour, 53 minutes ago
comment by The Wandering Greengrocer aka Mango Unchained (U17500)
posted 24 minutes ago
I’m a bit new here.

Do you have to be an illogical idiot to support the Baggies or is it optional?

And why are they spending more time over here than on their own place?


----------------------------------------------------------------------
You're obviously are new hear or just thick. This is also on the Albion board!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Blimey - this bloke has only gone and proven my ‘illogical idiot’ point for me and my guess is he’ll reinforce his stupidity by not understanding why.

Back when I used to go fishing, the average gudgeon had a higher IQ.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes he's quite dim, but not a threat. Seemingly friendly in fact, which is why he's warmly received generally on this board. As I've said before, to have a league structure in which to compete, you have to accommodate other sides, no matter how twatty.

Blimey, 1500+ posts!
Are we heading for a record here?

comment by BaggyMan (U21685)
posted 7 hours, 16 minutes ago

Blimey, 1500+ posts!
Are we heading for a record here?


----------------------------------------------------------------------
For your board yes, for our board..not even close !

Wolves....bigger and better

Was that the original ceefax baggiemon

Good morning to all from a fan of the top scorers in the Country.

Hope you all have a great day. Well, I hope my fellow Albion fans have a great day. As for you wulves fans, i hoe you tread on Lego.

Good morning from the Premier league 👍

comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 14 hours, 35 minutes ago
comment by Boilerman (U1363)
posted 2 hours, 13 minutes ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 30 minutes ago
comment by Boilerman (U1363)
posted 39 minutes ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 1 hour, 10 minutes ago
comment by Boilerman (U1363)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by WOLVES55 (U10973)
posted 15 minutes ago
Newcastle would walk the Chump....that's how poor it is
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well they do have a decent striker. Better than any strikers Wolves have!
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Newcastle have scored less than Wolves. They don't have any players who have scored as many as Jimenez has for Wolves.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jimenez has scored 1 goal every 328 minutes.

Rondon has scored 1 goal every 206 minutes.

You were saying?!
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Rondon has only scored in one game which has skewed his stats. He had previously gone 6 games without a goal, which is longer than Jimenez has.

I will reiterate, no Newcastle player has scored more than Jimenez and Newcastle have scored less than Wolves.

Therefore your point about them having better strikers is redundant.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So Rondon scoring goals has skewed the figures?

Rondon's goals per minutes ration is better. The end!
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Better ratio at the minute, but yes it had been skewed by him scoring two at the weekend. Prior to that he hadn’t scored in six games this season so wouldn’t have even had a ratio.

Goals per minute over a small sample size doesn’t really give you much indication on who is a better player. Statistically speaking, you should have a sample size of 15-30 data points before assessing or determining a trend as less allows an anomolous result to skew the data. You also need to consider other important facets in a strikers game such as chance creation, assists etc. Obviously that doesn’t fit into wumming though.

Interestingly, Jimenez has been involved in 7 goals this season (3 scored and 4 assists), either scoring or assisting. That’s him being involved in a goal every 140 minutes.

Rondon has been involved in 3 goals, which makes it one in every 143 minutes. So not much between them at present, although Rondon has less data points making him more open to skewed trends.

I think of greater concern here though is your absolute obsession with all things Wolves and utter desperation for us to slip up. You post on here way too much and it can’t be healthy for you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"Better ratio at the minute"

Jimenez's record is skew by the fact he's played more games this season.

There, we can both talk nonsense!

comment by Sir Halfy ...Premier League Thread Master (U11570)
posted 1 hour, 40 minutes ago
comment by BaggyMan (U21685)
posted 7 hours, 16 minutes ago

Blimey, 1500+ posts!
Are we heading for a record here?


----------------------------------------------------------------------
For your board yes, for our board..not even close !

Wolves....bigger and better

Was that the original ceefax baggiemon
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We've got 3 times as many Twitter followers than you.

You were saying?!

Your a mid table Chump team, were a point off the top 10 of the Premier league, and have more fans at games...we're bigger and better

comment by WOLVES55 (U10973)
posted 53 minutes ago
Your a mid table Chump team, were a point off the top 10 of the Premier league, and have more fans at games...we're bigger and better
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Your ground is bigger than ours so it's impossible for us to get bigger crowds.

Care to justify why your social media following is so pathetic? It seems nobody is interested in Wolves?!

Also, since when was 5th mid table you absolute plum!

No idea I don't use Twitter! Maybe because you were in the Premier for 12 years?

It is funny how football works, 3 years ago we were a mid table Chump football team, now we're one of the richest football teams in the world with an amazing young brilliant manager, the best team in my life time with world class players and the world's biggest football agent working for us! ......Our first season back in the Premier league and it's already going fantastic! ......The future has never looked so good!!! 😎

5th 12th who cares in the Chump 🤗

WBA vs Wolves - social media

Round 1 - Twitter

WBA - 915k followers
Wolves - 343k followers



That’s magical

Round 2 - Instagram

WBA - 222k followers
Wolves - 186k followers



That’s magical too.