Arsenal should have won at Stamford bridge and if they had won that game they’d be above Chelsea in the table. They’ve been better in the Europa league as well

comment by Erik (U21750)
posted 36 seconds ago
Arsenal should have won at Stamford bridge
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Arsenal "should" have been beaten at home by West Ham, Leicester and Everton.

comment by Erik (U21750)
posted 29 seconds ago
Arsenal should have won at Stamford bridge and if they had won that game they’d be above Chelsea in the table. They’ve been better in the Europa league as well
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Newcastle should have won at old trafford but they didn't!

Your dad should have pulled out, but he didn’t

According to Erik's logic a team who only created two chances against us dominated and a team who were crap for all but 15 minutes against us deserved to win

Erik, have a day off mate, utd will come good one day

No shame, can you take off those Chelsea blue tinted glasses for one second and look at things impartially?

comment by Erik (U21750)
posted 10 seconds ago
No shame, can you take off those Chelsea blue tinted glasses for one second and look at things impartially?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A United fan pretending to be a Chelsea fan online saying i have no shame

You think having two chances in 90 minutes equals dominating and that DDG is better than Neuer, you are as biased as they come

comment by Erik (U21750)
posted 9 seconds ago
No shame, can you take off those Chelsea blue tinted glasses for one second and look at things impartially?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I look at all things Chelsea logically.
You talk cr@p!

I AN NOT A UNITED FAN FOR LIKE THE THOUSANDTH TIME

comment by West London Express (U5874)
posted 16 seconds ago
comment by Erik (U21750)
posted 9 seconds ago
No shame, can you take off those Chelsea blue tinted glasses for one second and look at things impartially?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I look at all things Chelsea logically.
You talk cr@p!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No you don’t, your too stupid to even understand any kind of logic

comment by Erik (U21750)
posted 15 seconds ago
I AN NOT A UNITED FAN FOR LIKE THE THOUSANDTH TIME
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Then stop acting like one

By being fair and not biased towards Chelsea I’m acting like a united fan?

Why talk about united anyway? We are discussing Chelsea

comment by Erik (U21750)
posted 6 seconds ago
By being fair and not biased towards Chelsea I’m acting like a united fan?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fair

Claiming United dominated a game they created two clear cut chances in is fair

Saying DDG is better than Neuer is fair

Implying drawing at home to Liverpool is worse than losing at home to Spurs is fair

You have a very strange notion of being fair and unbiased

comment by Erik (U21750)
posted 16 seconds ago
comment by West London Express (U5874)
posted 16 seconds ago
comment by Erik (U21750)
posted 9 seconds ago
No shame, can you take off those Chelsea blue tinted glasses for one second and look at things impartially?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I look at all things Chelsea logically.
You talk cr@p!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No you don’t, your too stupid to even understand any kind of logic
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Erik, you are good value mate and always good for a laugh, but it's time you came out.
No shame in supporting utd

comment by West London Express (U5874)
posted 6 seconds ago
Erik, you are good value mate and always good for a laugh, but it's time you came out.
No shame in supporting utd

----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's truly bizarre how he makes is so obvious but refuses to admit it!!!

Why mention united at all? This is about Chelsea. If you have to keep deflecting attention onto United, then clearly you can't defend Chelsea properly.

comment by Erik (U21750)
posted 24 seconds ago
Why mention united at all? This is about Chelsea. If you have to keep deflecting attention onto United, then clearly you can't defend Chelsea properly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You brought up United by claiming they dominated a game that they only created two chances in and they also help expose your hypocrisy.

Oh and another beauty from you, Klopp being a failure for finishing runner up but Jose doing the same thing is supposedly a mark of his true greatness

I don't understand why you're deflecting

You are the one that first brought up United not me

You keep talking about them though. Maybe you're a United fan considering how much you like talking about them.

You first brought up United by claiming they dominated a game they only created two chances in, and then had the cheek to say i can't be impartial

And now you are trying to turn it around on me because i exposed you as a hypocrite for the 4,000th time, im surprised you haven't put up an article claiming i said something i didn't again

I want to talk about Chelsea, stop deflecting.

If that's the case then explain how the hell we were dominated in a match we only gave the opposition two clear cut chances........