Python you embarrassed yourself on this thread and in general on this site.

You have professionals journalists the pfa footballers all in agreement, you haven’t disproved anything, you do what you always do, ignore what’s been shown, ignore the people quoted who work on the industry and even reporters in the press who are agreeing with him.

And what have you added to back up your attitude on this subject, other similar newspaper stories but missing the point totally as usual.

Debating with you is tedious because just like stretty you ignore what’s been shown and refuse to accept that which you don’t agree with even when shown you are incorrect

Your even worse than stretty though as he was at least funny.

You have professionals journalists the pfa footballers all in agreement, you haven’t disproved anything, you do what you always do, ignore what’s been shown, ignore the people quoted who work on the industry and even reporters in the press who are agreeing with him
.......................
Funny that as when we are debating the best goalkeeper every football pro, pundit etc etc chooses ddg yet you choose to ignore that.
Yet a debate that footballers are NOT experts in you choose to use them to back your argument.

You are fecking so clueless its laughable

Tyrone mings has just pulled out of an interview on talkSPORT because they allowed Dave kitson to basically say the sort of things you have said and ignore the real problem of racism in media.

I imagine he’s wrong as well.

comment by Manc Python (U17527)
posted 1 minute ago
You have professionals journalists the pfa footballers all in agreement, you haven’t disproved anything, you do what you always do, ignore what’s been shown, ignore the people quoted who work on the industry and even reporters in the press who are agreeing with him
.......................
Funny that as when we are debating the best goalkeeper every football pro, pundit etc etc chooses ddg yet you choose to ignore that.
Yet a debate that footballers are NOT experts in you choose to use them to back your argument.

You are fecking so clueless its laughable
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You are comparing banter over a keeper to the very serious problem of racism.

Your a mess lad.

comment by MBL. (U6305)
posted 1 minute ago
Tyrone mings has just pulled out of an interview on talkSPORT because they allowed Dave kitson to basically say the sort of things you have said and ignore the real problem of racism in media.

I imagine he’s wrong as well.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh so tyrone mings is riggt because you agree with him and Dave Kitson is wrong because you don't.

You have given absolutely nothing...feck all proof of racism whatsoever

comment by MBL. (U6305)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Manc Python (U17527)
posted 1 minute ago
You have professionals journalists the pfa footballers all in agreement, you haven’t disproved anything, you do what you always do, ignore what’s been shown, ignore the people quoted who work on the industry and even reporters in the press who are agreeing with him
.......................
Funny that as when we are debating the best goalkeeper every football pro, pundit etc etc chooses ddg yet you choose to ignore that.
Yet a debate that footballers are NOT experts in you choose to use them to back your argument.

You are fecking so clueless its laughable
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You are comparing banter over a keeper to the very serious problem of racism.

Your a mess lad.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That is your go to line isn't it, when you have feck all else to say.

You have ignored everything said so far so what’s the point.

Ignorant beyond belief.

Never argue with an idiot.

They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.

comment by MBL. (U6305)
posted 18 seconds ago
You have ignored everything said so far so what’s the point.

Ignorant beyond belief.

Never argue with an idiot.

They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wrong AGAIN

I haven't ignored what was said at all.
Newspaper article about Poundworld...proved nothing negative.....oh rooney was pictured out shopping with his wife looking bored

Newspaper article about Primark.....proved nothing negative......oh and rooney was pictured holidaying in butlins

Raheem Sterling on a easyjet flight......oh rooney was a jet2 flight to ibiza in that same article

See it wasn't ignored. I can just come right back at you and you have feck all else to say. So is the consrant media attention on rooney racially fuelled

The articles showing 3 footballers buying houses

2 black

One white

All played for the same team, yet the reporting of the two black players was in stark contrast to Phil Foden the only white player.

Care to explain the disparity.

Harry Kane’s missus described as childhood sweetheart, sterlings missus described as long suffering fiancé.

Both players met their partners on the same day, care to explain the disparity?

https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/raheem-sterlings-girlfriend-paige-milian-12616610.amp

You mean like thus one where Sterlings girlfriend us described as.......oh childhood sweetheart

Secondly have youactually read the 2 articles on the houses bought by Tosin and Foden?
Or have you just read the headline and got outraged? I think the latter.
Neither article if you actually read the caaants are negative and secondly they are written by 2 completely different reporters

So basically we have narrowed it down to 2 articles. One a black male buying a house and the other a white male buying one and because of the disparity in the headlines the media are now fuelling racism.......oh the absolute joke

comment by Manc Python (U17527)
posted 19 minutes ago
https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/raheem-sterlings-girlfriend-paige-milian-12616610.amp

You mean like thus one where Sterlings girlfriend us described as.......oh childhood sweetheart
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yet in the other the long suffering, in the same paper as Kane’s missus was described as child hood sweetheart despite them both meeting on the same day.

Gary Neville has spoken about it as well.

I suppose he’s wrong.

https://twitter.com/fussballdan/status/1072162148456062977?s=21

Read that, it won’t change your mind but it’s what we are going on about.

And the fact your in a minority on this might show you how wrong you are on this.

If you can’t see it that’s your problem.

Sterling was linked to other women and prostitutes. Obviously you will choose to ignore or disagree with that as it doesn't suit your agenda but choose to believe all the stories about rooney.

Just because its Gary Neville saying it doesn't mean he is right. Not sure how many articles i need to post for you. Just seems you din't really get it do you.

You are the sort of caaant that is wrong with the world. PC culture, throwing out race card etc etc

You're the type that's wrong. Blaming everything on PC culture and claiming others using the race card. Disregarding others opinions and only yours is right everyone else is wrong or too PC or calling out the racecard.

‪ https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/why-we-must-never-let-the-raheem-sterling-racism-storm-blow-over-6strbvjvd‬

Another good article explaining the press attitudes and need to change.

Written by a respected sports journalist and author not some tabloid muppet.

Feel free to read and ignore what’s been written about racism in journalism and how it needs to change.

Or just be a guy in Stockport in denial about a real problem.

comment by Manc Python (U17527)
posted 25 minutes ago
Sterling was linked to other women and prostitutes. Obviously you will choose to ignore or disagree with that as it doesn't suit your agenda but choose to believe all the stories about rooney.

Just because its Gary Neville saying it doesn't mean he is right. Not sure how many articles i need to post for you. Just seems you din't really get it do you.

You are the sort of caaant that is wrong with the world. PC culture, throwing out race card etc etc
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Those stories were lies and proven to be lies.

Excellent example numbnuts.

Rooney actualy did those things in his own bed whilst his wife was pregnant.

His Critiscm was justified the fact sterlings wasn’t proved what I’m saying.

But stick your fingers in your ears and ignore it.

comment by CurrentlyInChina (U11181)
posted 9 minutes ago
You're the type that's wrong. Blaming everything on PC culture and claiming others using the race card. Disregarding others opinions and only yours is right everyone else is wrong or too PC or calling out the racecard.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The real problem is that he refuses to see the very real problem.

Some attitudes can’t be changed even with education.

comment by Manc Python (U17527)
posted 16 hours, 52 minutes ago

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4090602/He-s-happy-splash-cash-500-000-Bentleys-comes-value-Poundworld-180-000-week-Premier-League-star-Raheem-Sterling-shows-eye-bargain-just-like-rest-us.html
----------------------------

Have you actually read that story?

It goes on about how he drove a different car to training every day, owns a 500k Bentley, has a swimming pool at his home and played poorly at Euro 2016. The suggestion being that his poor form in the Euros is down to all the money he has - perhaps he is just too flash? None of which has anything to do with him shopping at Poundland. So they have turned a story about him shopping at Piundland into a negative story about how much money he has/spends/how flash he is and then hinted at the fact that this might be the reason he doesn't/didn't perform for England. How can you not see how they have spun the story in an attempt to make him look bad?

comment by MBL. (U6305)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Manc Python (U17527)
posted 25 minutes ago
Sterling was linked to other women and prostitutes. Obviously you will choose to ignore or disagree with that as it doesn't suit your agenda but choose to believe all the stories about rooney.

Just because its Gary Neville saying it doesn't mean he is right. Not sure how many articles i need to post for you. Just seems you din't really get it do you.

You are the sort of caaant that is wrong with the world. PC culture, throwing out race card etc etc
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Those stories were lies and proven to be lies.

Excellent example numbnuts.

Rooney actualy did those things in his own bed whilst his wife was pregnant.

His Critiscm was justified the fact sterlings wasn’t proved what I’m saying.

But stick your fingers in your ears and ignore it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Proven to be lies....oh really. And the rooney rumours 100% happened. See believe what you want to believe

This is one of the most depressing threads I’ve seen for a while.

comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Manc Python (U17527)
posted 16 hours, 52 minutes ago

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4090602/He-s-happy-splash-cash-500-000-Bentleys-comes-value-Poundworld-180-000-week-Premier-League-star-Raheem-Sterling-shows-eye-bargain-just-like-rest-us.html
----------------------------

Have you actually read that story?

It goes on about how he drove a different car to training every day, owns a 500k Bentley, has a swimming pool at his home and played poorly at Euro 2016. The suggestion being that his poor form in the Euros is down to all the money he has - perhaps he is just too flash? None of which has anything to do with him shopping at Poundland. So they have turned a story about him shopping at Piundland into a negative story about how much money he has/spends/how flash he is and then hinted at the fact that this might be the reason he doesn't/didn't perform for England. How can you not see how they have spun the story in an attempt to make him look bad?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Suggestion that his poor form was down to his lavish lifestyle. Hahaha you have just completely made that up.
It says he was lambasted for his poor showing at the Euros. He was lambasted and he was poor. Love the way some of you twist stories in your own brain

comment by Manc Python (U17527)
posted 31 minutes ago

Sterling was linked to other women and prostitutes. Obviously you will choose to ignore or disagree with that as it doesn't suit your agenda but choose to believe all the stories about rooney.
----------------------

Well, Rooney came out and apologised for has behaviour, so......