Winston is trying to justify dangerous cycling here because maybe the cycle lane isn't perfectly smooth.
Maybe ill drive on the path cause the road has a pothole.
Disgusting really
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 9 seconds ago
comment by 🏆🏆🏆Allison Chains🏆🏆🏆 (U3979)
posted 9 seconds ago
If a cycling lane exists, what reason would a cyclist have to not be using it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Full of debris, poorly maintained, potholes/drain covers, doesn't go where they need it too, dangerously narrow, stops at side roads, shared with pedestrians.
Shall I go on?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Deflection to try justify danberous road use.
Disgusting
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 1 minute ago
There are a lot of uninsured drivers, which is wrong. But nothing to do with uninsured cyclists.
Just as poor/reckless driving is not an excuse for not doing anything about poor/reckless cycling.
Whenever reckless cycling is mentioned out comes the poor drivers argument. One has nothing to do with the other in the debate, often they can be the same person, lots of people have a bike and a car.
If you are dangerous on a bike, and some are, then there should be some measures taken.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course it's relevant.
Why would the government set about creating laws to solve this mythical problem with cyclists when we can't get drivers under control?
Who do you think our police resource should be focused on?
It's prioritisation and perspective.
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 4 seconds ago
There are a lot of uninsured drivers, which is wrong. But nothing to do with uninsured cyclists.
Just as poor/reckless driving is not an excuse for not doing anything about poor/reckless cycling.
Whenever reckless cycling is mentioned out comes the poor drivers argument. One has nothing to do with the other in the debate, often they can be the same person, lots of people have a bike and a car.
If you are dangerous on a bike, and some are, then there should be some measures taken.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How about reckless pedestrians? Runners? Skateboarders?
comment by kneerash-23 Cara Gold (U6876)
posted 1 minute ago
Winston is trying to justify dangerous cycling here because maybe the cycle lane isn't perfectly smooth.
Maybe ill drive on the path cause the road has a pothole.
Disgusting really
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You need to work harder on your trolling skills.
Potholes in the cycle lanes?
I think its time Cyclists paid a road tax to fix the issues that they create in their lanes.
comment by _Viva_Vida (U6044)
posted 20 seconds ago
Potholes in the cycle lanes?
I think its time Cyclists paid a road tax to fix the issues that they create in their lanes.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you trolling as well now?
What has hit and run to do with it. The driver of the car in the accident I quoted, did not hit and run. He was later arrested and charged with reckless driving. The insurance company paid out to the victim.
If there is one similar with a bike it is enough.
Cars damaged by bikes, of course it happens, do you think we are simpletons, do we have to prove it to you to know it happens, are you blinded by your opinion?
You are entering the realmsof pretence if you think it never happens.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by kneerash-23 Cara Gold (U6876)
posted 1 minute ago
Winston is trying to justify dangerous cycling here because maybe the cycle lane isn't perfectly smooth.
Maybe ill drive on the path cause the road has a pothole.
Disgusting really
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You need to work harder on your trolling skills.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So becasue you disagree im a troll.
You need to research more and work on your debating skills
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 16 seconds ago
What has hit and run to do with it. The driver of the car in the accident I quoted, did not hit and run. He was later arrested and charged with reckless driving. The insurance company paid out to the victim.
If there is one similar with a bike it is enough.
Cars damaged by bikes, of course it happens, do you think we are simpletons, do we have to prove it to you to know it happens, are you blinded by your opinion?
You are entering the realmsof pretence if you think it never happens.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because people are saying they need to be licensed so they can be found.
I don't think you're a simpleton but you clearly don't understand the basis for law. You don't create a law because someone happens every now and then.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 47 seconds ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 16 seconds ago
What has hit and run to do with it. The driver of the car in the accident I quoted, did not hit and run. He was later arrested and charged with reckless driving. The insurance company paid out to the victim.
If there is one similar with a bike it is enough.
Cars damaged by bikes, of course it happens, do you think we are simpletons, do we have to prove it to you to know it happens, are you blinded by your opinion?
You are entering the realmsof pretence if you think it never happens.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because people are saying they need to be licensed so they can be found.
I don't think you're a simpleton but you clearly don't understand the basis for law. You don't create a law because someone happens every now and then.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As much as money Shouldn't be wasted on dedicated cycle paths that are only used now and again
How about reckless pedestrians? Runners? Skateboarders?
____________________________________
Yes, those too Declan.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 16 seconds ago
What has hit and run to do with it. The driver of the car in the accident I quoted, did not hit and run. He was later arrested and charged with reckless driving. The insurance company paid out to the victim.
If there is one similar with a bike it is enough.
Cars damaged by bikes, of course it happens, do you think we are simpletons, do we have to prove it to you to know it happens, are you blinded by your opinion?
You are entering the realmsof pretence if you think it never happens.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because people are saying they need to be licensed so they can be found.
I don't think you're a simpleton but you clearly don't understand the basis for law. You don't create a law because someone happens every now and then.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If a cyclists hits somebody, they have absolute anonymity if they choose to leg it. Wrong?
kneerash-23 Cara Gold (U6876)
You're getting boring mate.
If you're genuinely bothered about it then campaign against the people who built it because clearly there's something wrong.
As London shows, the right infrastructure gets used and encourages more people to cycle.
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 16 seconds ago
How about reckless pedestrians? Runners? Skateboarders?
____________________________________
Yes, those too Declan.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So are you saying they should be licensed and insured?
comment by 🏆🏆🏆Allison Chains🏆🏆🏆 (U3979)
posted 2 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 16 seconds ago
What has hit and run to do with it. The driver of the car in the accident I quoted, did not hit and run. He was later arrested and charged with reckless driving. The insurance company paid out to the victim.
If there is one similar with a bike it is enough.
Cars damaged by bikes, of course it happens, do you think we are simpletons, do we have to prove it to you to know it happens, are you blinded by your opinion?
You are entering the realmsof pretence if you think it never happens.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because people are saying they need to be licensed so they can be found.
I don't think you're a simpleton but you clearly don't understand the basis for law. You don't create a law because someone happens every now and then.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If a cyclists hits somebody, they have absolute anonymity if they choose to leg it. Wrong?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Correct.
Same situation as pedestrians - if someone assaults someone in the street, they can leg it, can't they.
So, how big a problem is this? Are there many hit and run cyclists out there not being brought to account?
Have there been many unresolved deaths because the police can't find the cyclist?
Biggest problem I have with cyclists is near my work.
When the light is Red and Amber THIS DOES NOT MEAN GO FOR FACKS SAKE.
Also, pedestrians on the road have right of way. If cyclists would get this through their collective thick head then I'd be less bothered.
"If cyclists would get this through their collective thick head"
Yep, people who ride bikes are different to pedestrians and drivers aren't they.
Facking hell.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 minutes ago
kneerash-23 Cara Gold (U6876)
You're getting boring mate.
If you're genuinely bothered about it then campaign against the people who built it because clearly there's something wrong.
As London shows, the right infrastructure gets used and encourages more people to cycle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
More excuses skip.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 16 seconds ago
"If cyclists would get this through their collective thick head"
Yep, people who ride bikes are different to pedestrians and drivers aren't they.
Facking hell.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm talking about the general behaviour of people on bikes.
I don't give a flying fack how they act as a driver or pedestrian.
comment by kneerash-23 Cara Gold (U6876)
posted 43 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 minutes ago
kneerash-23 Cara Gold (U6876)
You're getting boring mate.
If you're genuinely bothered about it then campaign against the people who built it because clearly there's something wrong.
As London shows, the right infrastructure gets used and encourages more people to cycle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
More excuses skip.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Reasons, not excuses.
comment by 🏆🏆🏆Allison Chains🏆🏆🏆 (U3979)
posted 50 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 16 seconds ago
"If cyclists would get this through their collective thick head"
Yep, people who ride bikes are different to pedestrians and drivers aren't they.
Facking hell.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm talking about the general behaviour of people on bikes.
I don't give a flying fack how they act as a driver or pedestrian.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You're generalising cyclists in a way I would predict you don't do with pedestrians or drivers.
Winston if you're waiting at a light, do you go when it turns red and amber?
Winston did you donate to Robert Hazeldean's cause?
https://uk.gofundme.com/help-cover-rob-hazeldean039s-legal-fees
comment by 🏆🏆🏆Allison Chains🏆🏆🏆 (U3979)
posted 3 seconds ago
Winston if you're waiting at a light, do you go when it turns red and amber?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't cycle any more.
Sign in if you want to comment
Cyclists - part 2 (off topic)
Page 10 of 64
11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15
posted on 25/6/19
Winston is trying to justify dangerous cycling here because maybe the cycle lane isn't perfectly smooth.
Maybe ill drive on the path cause the road has a pothole.
Disgusting really
posted on 25/6/19
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 9 seconds ago
comment by 🏆🏆🏆Allison Chains🏆🏆🏆 (U3979)
posted 9 seconds ago
If a cycling lane exists, what reason would a cyclist have to not be using it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Full of debris, poorly maintained, potholes/drain covers, doesn't go where they need it too, dangerously narrow, stops at side roads, shared with pedestrians.
Shall I go on?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Deflection to try justify danberous road use.
Disgusting
posted on 25/6/19
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 1 minute ago
There are a lot of uninsured drivers, which is wrong. But nothing to do with uninsured cyclists.
Just as poor/reckless driving is not an excuse for not doing anything about poor/reckless cycling.
Whenever reckless cycling is mentioned out comes the poor drivers argument. One has nothing to do with the other in the debate, often they can be the same person, lots of people have a bike and a car.
If you are dangerous on a bike, and some are, then there should be some measures taken.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course it's relevant.
Why would the government set about creating laws to solve this mythical problem with cyclists when we can't get drivers under control?
Who do you think our police resource should be focused on?
It's prioritisation and perspective.
posted on 25/6/19
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 4 seconds ago
There are a lot of uninsured drivers, which is wrong. But nothing to do with uninsured cyclists.
Just as poor/reckless driving is not an excuse for not doing anything about poor/reckless cycling.
Whenever reckless cycling is mentioned out comes the poor drivers argument. One has nothing to do with the other in the debate, often they can be the same person, lots of people have a bike and a car.
If you are dangerous on a bike, and some are, then there should be some measures taken.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How about reckless pedestrians? Runners? Skateboarders?
posted on 25/6/19
comment by kneerash-23 Cara Gold (U6876)
posted 1 minute ago
Winston is trying to justify dangerous cycling here because maybe the cycle lane isn't perfectly smooth.
Maybe ill drive on the path cause the road has a pothole.
Disgusting really
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You need to work harder on your trolling skills.
posted on 25/6/19
Potholes in the cycle lanes?
I think its time Cyclists paid a road tax to fix the issues that they create in their lanes.
posted on 25/6/19
comment by _Viva_Vida (U6044)
posted 20 seconds ago
Potholes in the cycle lanes?
I think its time Cyclists paid a road tax to fix the issues that they create in their lanes.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you trolling as well now?
posted on 25/6/19
What has hit and run to do with it. The driver of the car in the accident I quoted, did not hit and run. He was later arrested and charged with reckless driving. The insurance company paid out to the victim.
If there is one similar with a bike it is enough.
Cars damaged by bikes, of course it happens, do you think we are simpletons, do we have to prove it to you to know it happens, are you blinded by your opinion?
You are entering the realmsof pretence if you think it never happens.
posted on 25/6/19
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by kneerash-23 Cara Gold (U6876)
posted 1 minute ago
Winston is trying to justify dangerous cycling here because maybe the cycle lane isn't perfectly smooth.
Maybe ill drive on the path cause the road has a pothole.
Disgusting really
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You need to work harder on your trolling skills.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So becasue you disagree im a troll.
You need to research more and work on your debating skills
posted on 25/6/19
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 16 seconds ago
What has hit and run to do with it. The driver of the car in the accident I quoted, did not hit and run. He was later arrested and charged with reckless driving. The insurance company paid out to the victim.
If there is one similar with a bike it is enough.
Cars damaged by bikes, of course it happens, do you think we are simpletons, do we have to prove it to you to know it happens, are you blinded by your opinion?
You are entering the realmsof pretence if you think it never happens.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because people are saying they need to be licensed so they can be found.
I don't think you're a simpleton but you clearly don't understand the basis for law. You don't create a law because someone happens every now and then.
posted on 25/6/19
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 47 seconds ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 16 seconds ago
What has hit and run to do with it. The driver of the car in the accident I quoted, did not hit and run. He was later arrested and charged with reckless driving. The insurance company paid out to the victim.
If there is one similar with a bike it is enough.
Cars damaged by bikes, of course it happens, do you think we are simpletons, do we have to prove it to you to know it happens, are you blinded by your opinion?
You are entering the realmsof pretence if you think it never happens.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because people are saying they need to be licensed so they can be found.
I don't think you're a simpleton but you clearly don't understand the basis for law. You don't create a law because someone happens every now and then.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As much as money Shouldn't be wasted on dedicated cycle paths that are only used now and again
posted on 25/6/19
How about reckless pedestrians? Runners? Skateboarders?
____________________________________
Yes, those too Declan.
posted on 25/6/19
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 16 seconds ago
What has hit and run to do with it. The driver of the car in the accident I quoted, did not hit and run. He was later arrested and charged with reckless driving. The insurance company paid out to the victim.
If there is one similar with a bike it is enough.
Cars damaged by bikes, of course it happens, do you think we are simpletons, do we have to prove it to you to know it happens, are you blinded by your opinion?
You are entering the realmsof pretence if you think it never happens.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because people are saying they need to be licensed so they can be found.
I don't think you're a simpleton but you clearly don't understand the basis for law. You don't create a law because someone happens every now and then.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If a cyclists hits somebody, they have absolute anonymity if they choose to leg it. Wrong?
posted on 25/6/19
kneerash-23 Cara Gold (U6876)
You're getting boring mate.
If you're genuinely bothered about it then campaign against the people who built it because clearly there's something wrong.
As London shows, the right infrastructure gets used and encourages more people to cycle.
posted on 25/6/19
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 16 seconds ago
How about reckless pedestrians? Runners? Skateboarders?
____________________________________
Yes, those too Declan.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So are you saying they should be licensed and insured?
posted on 25/6/19
comment by 🏆🏆🏆Allison Chains🏆🏆🏆 (U3979)
posted 2 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 16 seconds ago
What has hit and run to do with it. The driver of the car in the accident I quoted, did not hit and run. He was later arrested and charged with reckless driving. The insurance company paid out to the victim.
If there is one similar with a bike it is enough.
Cars damaged by bikes, of course it happens, do you think we are simpletons, do we have to prove it to you to know it happens, are you blinded by your opinion?
You are entering the realmsof pretence if you think it never happens.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because people are saying they need to be licensed so they can be found.
I don't think you're a simpleton but you clearly don't understand the basis for law. You don't create a law because someone happens every now and then.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If a cyclists hits somebody, they have absolute anonymity if they choose to leg it. Wrong?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Correct.
Same situation as pedestrians - if someone assaults someone in the street, they can leg it, can't they.
So, how big a problem is this? Are there many hit and run cyclists out there not being brought to account?
Have there been many unresolved deaths because the police can't find the cyclist?
posted on 25/6/19
Biggest problem I have with cyclists is near my work.
When the light is Red and Amber THIS DOES NOT MEAN GO FOR FACKS SAKE.
Also, pedestrians on the road have right of way. If cyclists would get this through their collective thick head then I'd be less bothered.
posted on 25/6/19
"If cyclists would get this through their collective thick head"
Yep, people who ride bikes are different to pedestrians and drivers aren't they.
Facking hell.
posted on 25/6/19
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 minutes ago
kneerash-23 Cara Gold (U6876)
You're getting boring mate.
If you're genuinely bothered about it then campaign against the people who built it because clearly there's something wrong.
As London shows, the right infrastructure gets used and encourages more people to cycle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
More excuses skip.
posted on 25/6/19
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 16 seconds ago
"If cyclists would get this through their collective thick head"
Yep, people who ride bikes are different to pedestrians and drivers aren't they.
Facking hell.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm talking about the general behaviour of people on bikes.
I don't give a flying fack how they act as a driver or pedestrian.
posted on 25/6/19
comment by kneerash-23 Cara Gold (U6876)
posted 43 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 minutes ago
kneerash-23 Cara Gold (U6876)
You're getting boring mate.
If you're genuinely bothered about it then campaign against the people who built it because clearly there's something wrong.
As London shows, the right infrastructure gets used and encourages more people to cycle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
More excuses skip.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Reasons, not excuses.
posted on 25/6/19
comment by 🏆🏆🏆Allison Chains🏆🏆🏆 (U3979)
posted 50 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 16 seconds ago
"If cyclists would get this through their collective thick head"
Yep, people who ride bikes are different to pedestrians and drivers aren't they.
Facking hell.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm talking about the general behaviour of people on bikes.
I don't give a flying fack how they act as a driver or pedestrian.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You're generalising cyclists in a way I would predict you don't do with pedestrians or drivers.
posted on 25/6/19
Winston if you're waiting at a light, do you go when it turns red and amber?
posted on 25/6/19
Winston did you donate to Robert Hazeldean's cause?
https://uk.gofundme.com/help-cover-rob-hazeldean039s-legal-fees
posted on 25/6/19
comment by 🏆🏆🏆Allison Chains🏆🏆🏆 (U3979)
posted 3 seconds ago
Winston if you're waiting at a light, do you go when it turns red and amber?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't cycle any more.
Page 10 of 64
11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15