comment by The Duke (U10059)
posted 1 hour, 57 minutes ago
It’s all about Celtic
I think when offered the title which they will be
They will actually accept it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It would be rude not to.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by super phoenix rangers - I drank a lava lamp (U14864)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by super phoenix rangers - I drank a lava lamp (U14864)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 40 seconds ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 8 minutes ago
Rangers statement:
https://rangers.co.uk/news/headlines/club-statement-94
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hahahahaha.
Loony gits
----------------------------------------------------------------------
the questions in the resolution seem quite reasonable? Whats loony about it.
been backed by other clubs apparently
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No it doesn’t. It just tries to pour scorn over a democratic process.
80% of the vote. There’s been an enquiry but it doesn’t suit Rangers
Tough.
Imagine questioning the integrity of Deloitte ffs
Which clubs are backing Rangers again?
What’s this mystery evidence that only Rangers have?
Absolute tosh.
I hope they keep on making themselves look pathetic.
As for the league I genuinely couldn’t care less this season other than if we are awarded it, it’ll just cause more frothing at the mouth and continue to hide the shocking season Rangers have had.
Good. More of the same but with less money to spend. And much more bitter. .
----------------------------------------------------------------------
do you know what poured scorn over a democratic process?
The way the spfl handled that vote from start to finish. Thats kind of the point of the questions in the resolution.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nobody is denying that they made a pigs ear of it but Rangers should give it a rest with the sporting integrity ballacks and continual aspersions that this was in some way crooked.
It wasn’t. Everyone has moved on and they may well feel it wasn’t done very well but the only club bumping their guns continually is Rangers and it affects them not one single bit.
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 1 minute ago
New Brogues?
That the bond?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lauders' mate has new brogues.
They're Clark's.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This place has ruined that name for me.
Like every time I meet a real-life ‘Omar’.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
I take the opposite tack. Of course it was crooked! It is football. Self-interest, lying, coercion, deceit, cliques - football. Glass houses, stable doors and all the rest.
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 11 seconds ago
I take the opposite tack. Of course it was crooked! It is football. Self-interest, lying, coercion, deceit, cliques - football. Glass houses, stable doors and all the rest.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly.
Rangers need to fvck up.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 1 minute ago
I take the opposite tack. Of course it was crooked! It is football. Self-interest, lying, coercion, deceit, cliques - football. Glass houses, stable doors and all the rest.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But its beyond the belief of some that their could actually be some evidence of this, and Rangers are just making it up.
comment by Zachsda(change our mindset, treat this serious... (U1850)
posted 7 seconds ago
I’m nothing if not a Democrat
I get self interest but ffs they tell the last team to vote they have control that’s awful
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep.
Agreed. Amateur hour at best. Among other things they looked pathetic at.
But an 81% vote says it all.
comment by Zachsda(change our mindset, treat this seriously) (U1850)
posted 43 seconds ago
I’m nothing if not a Democrat
I get self interest but ffs they tell the last team to vote they have control that’s awful
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They see to have told Aberdeen your vote disnae matter
Which it didn't but hey ho, just tell them.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by The Duke (U10059)
posted 26 seconds ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 1 minute ago
I take the opposite tack. Of course it was crooked! It is football. Self-interest, lying, coercion, deceit, cliques - football. Glass houses, stable doors and all the rest.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But its beyond the belief of some that their could actually be some evidence of this, and Rangers are just making it up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The question is if any of it took place at SPFL board level that significantly impacted the outcome?
I'm open minded about there being 'something'. Smoking gun type stuff - I'd be surprised. TBH if it was that it would have been published already and we could have short-circuited the last week.
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by The Duke (U10059)
posted 26 seconds ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 1 minute ago
I take the opposite tack. Of course it was crooked! It is football. Self-interest, lying, coercion, deceit, cliques - football. Glass houses, stable doors and all the rest.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But its beyond the belief of some that their could actually be some evidence of this, and Rangers are just making it up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The question is if any of it took place at SPFL board level that significantly impacted the outcome?
I'm open minded about there being 'something'. Smoking gun type stuff - I'd be surprised. TBH if it was that it would have been published already and we could have short-circuited the last week.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Absolutely.
“Let’s have an investigation. We suspect foul play”
“Oh really? Can you give us more information?”
“No. But he’s to be suspended and him sacked”
“Quite right Rwnegrs”
“psst. Best check we’ve not done anything that could land us in hot water. Get a reputable company in like Deloitte”
“All good guv. Says we’ve been amateur and let the side down but that’s it”
“Phew”
“Ah but they chose the investigators”
ffs
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Personal opinion-i don’t think rangers have anything of any real substance. I think they’re now hoping they can throw as much scheidt at this as possible and hope that enough sticks.
I think any independent investigation that rangers would possibly get would throw up some stuff that you could possibly say wouldn’t have been best to have done (like Doncaster calling Aberdeen and saying that their vote was irrelevant), but nothing which would touch the sides of what they’re suggesting. There’s possibly a lot of anecdotal evidence, and conjecture, but not much else. Could be wrong.
But, they’ve went all in and can’t back down now. They’ve got an out though if there’s no independent investigation as that’s the benchmark for releasing the dossier.
comment by Zachsda(change our mindset, treat this serious... (U1850)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Zachsda(change our mindset, treat this serious... (U1850)
posted 7 seconds ago
I’m nothing if not a Democrat
I get self interest but ffs they tell the last team to vote they have control that’s awful
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep.
Agreed. Amateur hour at best. Among other things they looked pathetic at.
But an 81% vote says it all.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
In this vote the % was not the criteria it was the number of clubs
The process stank
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There was nothing wrong with the process.
The handling of it however ....
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Zachsda(change our mindset, treat this seriously) (U1850)
posted 32 seconds ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by The Duke (U10059)
posted 26 seconds ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 1 minute ago
I take the opposite tack. Of course it was crooked! It is football. Self-interest, lying, coercion, deceit, cliques - football. Glass houses, stable doors and all the rest.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But its beyond the belief of some that their could actually be some evidence of this, and Rangers are just making it up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The question is if any of it took place at SPFL board level that significantly impacted the outcome?
I'm open minded about there being 'something'. Smoking gun type stuff - I'd be surprised. TBH if it was that it would have been published already and we could have short-circuited the last week.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Absolutely.
“Let’s have an investigation. We suspect foul play”
“Oh really? Can you give us more information?”
“No. But he’s to be suspended and him sacked”
“Quite right Rwnegrs”
“psst. Best check we’ve not done anything that could land us in hot water. Get a reputable company in like Deloitte”
“All good guv. Says we’ve been amateur and let the side down but that’s it”
“Phew”
“Ah but they chose the investigators”
ffs
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ffs it’s Rumpled Of The Bailey
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But are they gonna be rumbled by the Billy?
More outbursts and outbreaks of anguish and gnashing of teeth. Empty vessels make the loudest noise. You’d think Rangers would have learned about the impact of their Statements.
The Ginger thread that runs through British justice
Pass the claret.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Sign in if you want to comment
Controversial Friday
Page 16 of 18
14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18
posted on 24/4/20
comment by The Duke (U10059)
posted 1 hour, 57 minutes ago
It’s all about Celtic
I think when offered the title which they will be
They will actually accept it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It would be rude not to.
posted on 24/4/20
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 24/4/20
comment by super phoenix rangers - I drank a lava lamp (U14864)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by super phoenix rangers - I drank a lava lamp (U14864)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 40 seconds ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 8 minutes ago
Rangers statement:
https://rangers.co.uk/news/headlines/club-statement-94
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hahahahaha.
Loony gits
----------------------------------------------------------------------
the questions in the resolution seem quite reasonable? Whats loony about it.
been backed by other clubs apparently
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No it doesn’t. It just tries to pour scorn over a democratic process.
80% of the vote. There’s been an enquiry but it doesn’t suit Rangers
Tough.
Imagine questioning the integrity of Deloitte ffs
Which clubs are backing Rangers again?
What’s this mystery evidence that only Rangers have?
Absolute tosh.
I hope they keep on making themselves look pathetic.
As for the league I genuinely couldn’t care less this season other than if we are awarded it, it’ll just cause more frothing at the mouth and continue to hide the shocking season Rangers have had.
Good. More of the same but with less money to spend. And much more bitter. .
----------------------------------------------------------------------
do you know what poured scorn over a democratic process?
The way the spfl handled that vote from start to finish. Thats kind of the point of the questions in the resolution.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nobody is denying that they made a pigs ear of it but Rangers should give it a rest with the sporting integrity ballacks and continual aspersions that this was in some way crooked.
It wasn’t. Everyone has moved on and they may well feel it wasn’t done very well but the only club bumping their guns continually is Rangers and it affects them not one single bit.
posted on 24/4/20
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 1 minute ago
New Brogues?
That the bond?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lauders' mate has new brogues.
They're Clark's.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This place has ruined that name for me.
Like every time I meet a real-life ‘Omar’.
posted on 24/4/20
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 24/4/20
I take the opposite tack. Of course it was crooked! It is football. Self-interest, lying, coercion, deceit, cliques - football. Glass houses, stable doors and all the rest.
posted on 24/4/20
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 11 seconds ago
I take the opposite tack. Of course it was crooked! It is football. Self-interest, lying, coercion, deceit, cliques - football. Glass houses, stable doors and all the rest.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly.
Rangers need to fvck up.
posted on 24/4/20
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 24/4/20
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 1 minute ago
I take the opposite tack. Of course it was crooked! It is football. Self-interest, lying, coercion, deceit, cliques - football. Glass houses, stable doors and all the rest.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But its beyond the belief of some that their could actually be some evidence of this, and Rangers are just making it up.
posted on 24/4/20
comment by Zachsda(change our mindset, treat this serious... (U1850)
posted 7 seconds ago
I’m nothing if not a Democrat
I get self interest but ffs they tell the last team to vote they have control that’s awful
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep.
Agreed. Amateur hour at best. Among other things they looked pathetic at.
But an 81% vote says it all.
posted on 24/4/20
comment by Zachsda(change our mindset, treat this seriously) (U1850)
posted 43 seconds ago
I’m nothing if not a Democrat
I get self interest but ffs they tell the last team to vote they have control that’s awful
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They see to have told Aberdeen your vote disnae matter
Which it didn't but hey ho, just tell them.
posted on 24/4/20
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 24/4/20
comment by The Duke (U10059)
posted 26 seconds ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 1 minute ago
I take the opposite tack. Of course it was crooked! It is football. Self-interest, lying, coercion, deceit, cliques - football. Glass houses, stable doors and all the rest.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But its beyond the belief of some that their could actually be some evidence of this, and Rangers are just making it up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The question is if any of it took place at SPFL board level that significantly impacted the outcome?
I'm open minded about there being 'something'. Smoking gun type stuff - I'd be surprised. TBH if it was that it would have been published already and we could have short-circuited the last week.
posted on 24/4/20
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by The Duke (U10059)
posted 26 seconds ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 1 minute ago
I take the opposite tack. Of course it was crooked! It is football. Self-interest, lying, coercion, deceit, cliques - football. Glass houses, stable doors and all the rest.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But its beyond the belief of some that their could actually be some evidence of this, and Rangers are just making it up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The question is if any of it took place at SPFL board level that significantly impacted the outcome?
I'm open minded about there being 'something'. Smoking gun type stuff - I'd be surprised. TBH if it was that it would have been published already and we could have short-circuited the last week.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Absolutely.
“Let’s have an investigation. We suspect foul play”
“Oh really? Can you give us more information?”
“No. But he’s to be suspended and him sacked”
“Quite right Rwnegrs”
“psst. Best check we’ve not done anything that could land us in hot water. Get a reputable company in like Deloitte”
“All good guv. Says we’ve been amateur and let the side down but that’s it”
“Phew”
“Ah but they chose the investigators”
ffs
posted on 24/4/20
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 24/4/20
Personal opinion-i don’t think rangers have anything of any real substance. I think they’re now hoping they can throw as much scheidt at this as possible and hope that enough sticks.
I think any independent investigation that rangers would possibly get would throw up some stuff that you could possibly say wouldn’t have been best to have done (like Doncaster calling Aberdeen and saying that their vote was irrelevant), but nothing which would touch the sides of what they’re suggesting. There’s possibly a lot of anecdotal evidence, and conjecture, but not much else. Could be wrong.
But, they’ve went all in and can’t back down now. They’ve got an out though if there’s no independent investigation as that’s the benchmark for releasing the dossier.
posted on 24/4/20
comment by Zachsda(change our mindset, treat this serious... (U1850)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Zachsda(change our mindset, treat this serious... (U1850)
posted 7 seconds ago
I’m nothing if not a Democrat
I get self interest but ffs they tell the last team to vote they have control that’s awful
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep.
Agreed. Amateur hour at best. Among other things they looked pathetic at.
But an 81% vote says it all.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
In this vote the % was not the criteria it was the number of clubs
The process stank
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There was nothing wrong with the process.
The handling of it however ....
posted on 24/4/20
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 24/4/20
comment by Zachsda(change our mindset, treat this seriously) (U1850)
posted 32 seconds ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by The Duke (U10059)
posted 26 seconds ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 1 minute ago
I take the opposite tack. Of course it was crooked! It is football. Self-interest, lying, coercion, deceit, cliques - football. Glass houses, stable doors and all the rest.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But its beyond the belief of some that their could actually be some evidence of this, and Rangers are just making it up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The question is if any of it took place at SPFL board level that significantly impacted the outcome?
I'm open minded about there being 'something'. Smoking gun type stuff - I'd be surprised. TBH if it was that it would have been published already and we could have short-circuited the last week.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Absolutely.
“Let’s have an investigation. We suspect foul play”
“Oh really? Can you give us more information?”
“No. But he’s to be suspended and him sacked”
“Quite right Rwnegrs”
“psst. Best check we’ve not done anything that could land us in hot water. Get a reputable company in like Deloitte”
“All good guv. Says we’ve been amateur and let the side down but that’s it”
“Phew”
“Ah but they chose the investigators”
ffs
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ffs it’s Rumpled Of The Bailey
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But are they gonna be rumbled by the Billy?
posted on 24/4/20
More outbursts and outbreaks of anguish and gnashing of teeth. Empty vessels make the loudest noise. You’d think Rangers would have learned about the impact of their Statements.
posted on 24/4/20
The Ginger thread that runs through British justice
Pass the claret.
posted on 24/4/20
posted on 24/4/20
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 24/4/20
Mind if I join you chaps
posted on 24/4/20
400
Page 16 of 18
14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18