comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 58 seconds ago
comment by super phoenix rangers - I drank a lava lamp (U14864)
posted 53 seconds ago
comment by (U22371)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by super phoenix rangers - I drank a lava lamp (U14864)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Doggie Dog© (U22357)
posted 6 minutes ago
But yes, null and coos doesn't mean you don't get the money, it means you don't get SOME of the money.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
According to?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I don’t reckon the sponsors or tv companies will pay out 100% of the monies if they have not had 100% of the matches

----------------------------------------------------------------------
You reckon? Impeccable source

But you reckon they happily will if we call it now?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

It hasn’t been called
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I think the word ‘if’ comes into play

comment by (U22371)
posted 22 seconds ago
comment by super phoenix rangers - I drank a lava lamp (U14864)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by (U22371)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by super phoenix rangers - I drank a lava lamp (U14864)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Doggie Dog© (U22357)
posted 6 minutes ago
But yes, null and coos doesn't mean you don't get the money, it means you don't get SOME of the money.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
According to?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I don’t reckon the sponsors or tv companies will pay out 100% of the monies if they have not had 100% of the matches

----------------------------------------------------------------------
You reckon? Impeccable source

But you reckon they happily will if we call it now?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I don’t think they would be legally obliged to pay 100% of monies for something they have only had 70% of the benefit from!! I don’t think they would happily pay out if called now but legally they would not have a leg to stand on as they have benefitted from 70% of the matches!! So they cannot walk away from the deal but neither would they be obliged to meet their obligations in full!!

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Haha brilliant reasoning. Again take it you have no source for that

comment by super phoenix rangers - I drank a lava lamp (U14864)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by (U22371)
posted 22 seconds ago
comment by super phoenix rangers - I drank a lava lamp (U14864)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by (U22371)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by super phoenix rangers - I drank a lava lamp (U14864)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Doggie Dog© (U22357)
posted 6 minutes ago
But yes, null and coos doesn't mean you don't get the money, it means you don't get SOME of the money.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
According to?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I don’t reckon the sponsors or tv companies will pay out 100% of the monies if they have not had 100% of the matches

----------------------------------------------------------------------
You reckon? Impeccable source

But you reckon they happily will if we call it now?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I don’t think they would be legally obliged to pay 100% of monies for something they have only had 70% of the benefit from!! I don’t think they would happily pay out if called now but legally they would not have a leg to stand on as they have benefitted from 70% of the matches!! So they cannot walk away from the deal but neither would they be obliged to meet their obligations in full!!

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Haha brilliant reasoning. Again take it you have no source for that
----------------------------------------------------------------------

So what part do you not agree with? It’s all based on legal precedent!!

comment by (U22371)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by super phoenix rangers - I drank a lava lamp (U14864)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by (U22371)
posted 22 seconds ago
comment by super phoenix rangers - I drank a lava lamp (U14864)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by (U22371)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by super phoenix rangers - I drank a lava lamp (U14864)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Doggie Dog© (U22357)
posted 6 minutes ago
But yes, null and coos doesn't mean you don't get the money, it means you don't get SOME of the money.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
According to?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I don’t reckon the sponsors or tv companies will pay out 100% of the monies if they have not had 100% of the matches

----------------------------------------------------------------------
You reckon? Impeccable source

But you reckon they happily will if we call it now?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I don’t think they would be legally obliged to pay 100% of monies for something they have only had 70% of the benefit from!! I don’t think they would happily pay out if called now but legally they would not have a leg to stand on as they have benefitted from 70% of the matches!! So they cannot walk away from the deal but neither would they be obliged to meet their obligations in full!!

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Haha brilliant reasoning. Again take it you have no source for that
----------------------------------------------------------------------

So what part do you not agree with? It’s all based on legal precedent!!

----------------------------------------------------------------------
What precedent specifically?

comment by super phoenix rangers - I drank a lava lamp (U14864)
posted 5 seconds ago
comment by (U22371)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by super phoenix rangers - I drank a lava lamp (U14864)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by (U22371)
posted 22 seconds ago
comment by super phoenix rangers - I drank a lava lamp (U14864)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by (U22371)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by super phoenix rangers - I drank a lava lamp (U14864)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Doggie Dog© (U22357)
posted 6 minutes ago
But yes, null and coos doesn't mean you don't get the money, it means you don't get SOME of the money.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
According to?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I don’t reckon the sponsors or tv companies will pay out 100% of the monies if they have not had 100% of the matches

----------------------------------------------------------------------
You reckon? Impeccable source

But you reckon they happily will if we call it now?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I don’t think they would be legally obliged to pay 100% of monies for something they have only had 70% of the benefit from!! I don’t think they would happily pay out if called now but legally they would not have a leg to stand on as they have benefitted from 70% of the matches!! So they cannot walk away from the deal but neither would they be obliged to meet their obligations in full!!

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Haha brilliant reasoning. Again take it you have no source for that
----------------------------------------------------------------------

So what part do you not agree with? It’s all based on legal precedent!!

----------------------------------------------------------------------
What precedent specifically?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Contract law!! If you enter into contract with someone for ten bananas for ten pounds and they only deliver seven then you are are not legally obliged to pay the full price!! Neither are you legally allowed to keep the bananas and do t pay anything!! Should this go to court then have a guess at what the courts will award you to pay?

Contract law!! If you enter into contract with someone for ten bananas for ten pounds and they only deliver seven then you are are not legally obliged to pay the full price!! Neither are you legally allowed to keep the bananas and do t pay anything!! Should this go to court then have a guess at what the courts will award you to pay?
------
Except you missed out the willing litigator factor. Whereas this is all true, there is no guarantee that the seller will want their money back or to pursue the matter in court. It depends on the seller actually taking steps which may not happen in this case.

comment by Doggie Dog© (U22357)
posted 1 minute ago
Contract law!! If you enter into contract with someone for ten bananas for ten pounds and they only deliver seven then you are are not legally obliged to pay the full price!! Neither are you legally allowed to keep the bananas and do t pay anything!! Should this go to court then have a guess at what the courts will award you to pay?
------
Except you missed out the willing litigator factor. Whereas this is all true, there is no guarantee that the seller will want their money back or to pursue the matter in court. It depends on the seller actually taking steps which may not happen in this case.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Yet the threat remains.

As it does from fans who bought season books

As it does for every sponsor.

Want to take that risk?

comment by Doggie Dog© (U22357)
posted 5 minutes ago
Contract law!! If you enter into contract with someone for ten bananas for ten pounds and they only deliver seven then you are are not legally obliged to pay the full price!! Neither are you legally allowed to keep the bananas and do t pay anything!! Should this go to court then have a guess at what the courts will award you to pay?
------
Except you missed out the willing litigator factor. Whereas this is all true, there is no guarantee that the seller will want their money back or to pursue the matter in court. It depends on the seller actually taking steps which may not happen in this case.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Of course not everyone will want to pursue in court, that is a given surely!!

comment by (U22371)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by super phoenix rangers - I drank a lava lamp (U14864)
posted 5 seconds ago
comment by (U22371)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by super phoenix rangers - I drank a lava lamp (U14864)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by (U22371)
posted 22 seconds ago
comment by super phoenix rangers - I drank a lava lamp (U14864)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by (U22371)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by super phoenix rangers - I drank a lava lamp (U14864)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Doggie Dog© (U22357)
posted 6 minutes ago
But yes, null and coos doesn't mean you don't get the money, it means you don't get SOME of the money.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
According to?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I don’t reckon the sponsors or tv companies will pay out 100% of the monies if they have not had 100% of the matches

----------------------------------------------------------------------
You reckon? Impeccable source

But you reckon they happily will if we call it now?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I don’t think they would be legally obliged to pay 100% of monies for something they have only had 70% of the benefit from!! I don’t think they would happily pay out if called now but legally they would not have a leg to stand on as they have benefitted from 70% of the matches!! So they cannot walk away from the deal but neither would they be obliged to meet their obligations in full!!

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Haha brilliant reasoning. Again take it you have no source for that
----------------------------------------------------------------------

So what part do you not agree with? It’s all based on legal precedent!!

----------------------------------------------------------------------
What precedent specifically?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Contract law!! If you enter into contract with someone for ten bananas for ten pounds and they only deliver seven then you are are not legally obliged to pay the full price!! Neither are you legally allowed to keep the bananas and do t pay anything!! Should this go to court then have a guess at what the courts will award you to pay?

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ah the famous Banana judgement!

That's genuinely the funniest thing posted on here for ages

comment by super phoenix rangers - I drank a lava lamp (U14864)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by (U22371)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by super phoenix rangers - I drank a lava lamp (U14864)
posted 5 seconds ago
comment by (U22371)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by super phoenix rangers - I drank a lava lamp (U14864)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by (U22371)
posted 22 seconds ago
comment by super phoenix rangers - I drank a lava lamp (U14864)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by (U22371)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by super phoenix rangers - I drank a lava lamp (U14864)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Doggie Dog© (U22357)
posted 6 minutes ago
But yes, null and coos doesn't mean you don't get the money, it means you don't get SOME of the money.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
According to?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I don’t reckon the sponsors or tv companies will pay out 100% of the monies if they have not had 100% of the matches

----------------------------------------------------------------------
You reckon? Impeccable source

But you reckon they happily will if we call it now?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I don’t think they would be legally obliged to pay 100% of monies for something they have only had 70% of the benefit from!! I don’t think they would happily pay out if called now but legally they would not have a leg to stand on as they have benefitted from 70% of the matches!! So they cannot walk away from the deal but neither would they be obliged to meet their obligations in full!!

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Haha brilliant reasoning. Again take it you have no source for that
----------------------------------------------------------------------

So what part do you not agree with? It’s all based on legal precedent!!

----------------------------------------------------------------------
What precedent specifically?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Contract law!! If you enter into contract with someone for ten bananas for ten pounds and they only deliver seven then you are are not legally obliged to pay the full price!! Neither are you legally allowed to keep the bananas and do t pay anything!! Should this go to court then have a guess at what the courts will award you to pay?

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ah the famous Banana judgement!

That's genuinely the funniest thing posted on here for ages
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I’m sorry if you cannot grasp the basics of contract law!! Why don’t you tell me what part you disagree with, is it that you are not obliged to pay 100% of something you only received 70% of benefit from or that you cannot walk away from a contract that you have received 70% of benefit from?!!

comment by (U22371)
posted 21 seconds ago
comment by super phoenix rangers - I drank a lava lamp (U14864)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by (U22371)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by super phoenix rangers - I drank a lava lamp (U14864)
posted 5 seconds ago
comment by (U22371)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by super phoenix rangers - I drank a lava lamp (U14864)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by (U22371)
posted 22 seconds ago
comment by super phoenix rangers - I drank a lava lamp (U14864)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by (U22371)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by super phoenix rangers - I drank a lava lamp (U14864)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Doggie Dog© (U22357)
posted 6 minutes ago
But yes, null and coos doesn't mean you don't get the money, it means you don't get SOME of the money.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
According to?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I don’t reckon the sponsors or tv companies will pay out 100% of the monies if they have not had 100% of the matches

----------------------------------------------------------------------
You reckon? Impeccable source

But you reckon they happily will if we call it now?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I don’t think they would be legally obliged to pay 100% of monies for something they have only had 70% of the benefit from!! I don’t think they would happily pay out if called now but legally they would not have a leg to stand on as they have benefitted from 70% of the matches!! So they cannot walk away from the deal but neither would they be obliged to meet their obligations in full!!

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Haha brilliant reasoning. Again take it you have no source for that
----------------------------------------------------------------------

So what part do you not agree with? It’s all based on legal precedent!!

----------------------------------------------------------------------
What precedent specifically?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Contract law!! If you enter into contract with someone for ten bananas for ten pounds and they only deliver seven then you are are not legally obliged to pay the full price!! Neither are you legally allowed to keep the bananas and do t pay anything!! Should this go to court then have a guess at what the courts will award you to pay?

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ah the famous Banana judgement!

That's genuinely the funniest thing posted on here for ages
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I’m sorry if you cannot grasp the basics of contract law!! Why don’t you tell me what part you disagree with, is it that you are not obliged to pay 100% of something you only received 70% of benefit from or that you cannot walk away from a contract that you have received 70% of benefit from?!!

----------------------------------------------------------------------
i actually hurt myself laughing

i actually hurt myself laughing

++++

Bless

Not sure how anyone can trust Nicola when the SNP have been so incompetent in power.
The SNP are being extremely irresponsible going against all scientific evidence and risking lives for political gain.
The UK government needs to act quickly and take emergency powers to save Scottish lives.
Lock Sturgeon up so she can't do any more harm. Temporarily remove all devolved powers until this crisis is over. The SNP have proved they are not up to it. Leave it to the very best scientific and medical minds the UK has and the UK government.

comment by neutralfootballfan (U21589)
posted 23 minutes ago
Not sure how anyone can trust Nicola when the SNP have been so incompetent in power.
The SNP are being extremely irresponsible going against all scientific evidence and risking lives for political gain.
The UK government needs to act quickly and take emergency powers to save Scottish lives.
Lock Sturgeon up so she can't do any more harm. Temporarily remove all devolved powers until this crisis is over. The SNP have proved they are not up to it. Leave it to the very best scientific and medical minds the UK has and the UK government.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Any proof to back up your nonsense that didn't come from Facebook or Twitter or your own personal dislike

This might help you decide, call sign

https://www.ja606.co.uk/articles/viewArticle/409235