Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by *GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 3 minutes ago
Loving the look of the squad Chelsea are putting together. With money spent and big names comes pressure though. Chelsea must surely be in the mix next season and if they're not....
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It would be crazy to expect Chelsea to compete for the title next season.
They might, but the idea they must?
Of course, Roman may well have that view, but it doesn’t make it a sensible one. Building title winning teams takes time.
Another £100m to add to the billion you already owe Abramovich.
Doped to the hilt.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by *GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by *GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 3 minutes ago
Loving the look of the squad Chelsea are putting together. With money spent and big names comes pressure though. Chelsea must surely be in the mix next season and if they're not....
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It would be crazy to expect Chelsea to compete for the title next season.
They might, but the idea they must?
Of course, Roman may well have that view, but it doesn’t make it a sensible one. Building title winning teams takes time.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Chelsea more than any other team in England have sacked managers for not winning titles, even winning smaller trophies hasn't cut it. Lampard got a free hit this season due to the transfer ban and a perceived move towards youth. Bringing in potentially 4 players for around 200 million raises expectations. If Chelsea were to finish 20 points plus behind the winners, would Lampard still have a job? At most clubs probably, at chelsea??
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I know. If you read my post you’ll see that’s basically what I said.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
£50m for Chilwell’s actually worse than £80m for Maguire.
comment by *GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by *GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by *GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 3 minutes ago
Loving the look of the squad Chelsea are putting together. With money spent and big names comes pressure though. Chelsea must surely be in the mix next season and if they're not....
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It would be crazy to expect Chelsea to compete for the title next season.
They might, but the idea they must?
Of course, Roman may well have that view, but it doesn’t make it a sensible one. Building title winning teams takes time.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Chelsea more than any other team in England have sacked managers for not winning titles, even winning smaller trophies hasn't cut it. Lampard got a free hit this season due to the transfer ban and a perceived move towards youth. Bringing in potentially 4 players for around 200 million raises expectations. If Chelsea were to finish 20 points plus behind the winners, would Lampard still have a job? At most clubs probably, at chelsea??
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I know. If you read my post you’ll see that’s basically what I said.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Which is what I basically said in my first post, so....
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And I added to it.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
And we aren't finished yet.
Oh dear, GT is in one of his moods... best left to it.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Havertz is a great signing. Chillwell is pretty crap
comment by Imran The King Khan (U10026)
posted 24 minutes ago
£50m for Chilwell’s actually worse than £80m for Maguire.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well this is nonsense but you’re entitled to believe it
Clearly is. Chilwell’s terrible.
Randomer is very defensive over this.
Do you think it’s a good signing, Randomer?
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 minutes ago
Randomer is very defensive over this.
Do you think it’s a good signing, Randomer?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jury’s out but automatically saying he’s worse than Maguire at the price he cost is mental. They’re probably similar level in their respective positions
comment by Imran The King Khan (U10026)
posted 4 minutes ago
Clearly is. Chilwell’s terrible.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Let me see. £30m+ cheaper, younger, doesn’t turn like a boat, can actually run, isn’t a thug who deliberately kicks players in the balls and fights with police while on holiday
Yeah I’m not seeing how he’s automatically a worse signing than £85m Maguire
comment by Randomer (U5245)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 minutes ago
Randomer is very defensive over this.
Do you think it’s a good signing, Randomer?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jury’s out but automatically saying he’s worse than Maguire at the price he cost is mental. They’re probably similar level in their respective positions
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But you pretty much said the opposite, didn’t you?
Maguire’s a much better player than Chilwell, though. Which is why this is actually worse. Chilwell’s really bad.
comment by Imran The King Khan (U10026)
posted 1 minute ago
Maguire’s a much better player than Chilwell, though. Which is why this is actually worse. Chilwell’s really bad.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If that’s how you feel then fair enough. Maguire is pretty average and cost £85m, Chilwell is pretty average as well and will cost £50m. Comfortably a better deal
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Randomer (U5245)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 minutes ago
Randomer is very defensive over this.
Do you think it’s a good signing, Randomer?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jury’s out but automatically saying he’s worse than Maguire at the price he cost is mental. They’re probably similar level in their respective positions
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But you pretty much said the opposite, didn’t you?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I was referring to the deal itself rather than the players. If they’re similar quality yet one cost £30m less it’s obviously not a worse deal is it?
comment by Randomer (U5245)
posted 21 seconds ago
comment by Imran The King Khan (U10026)
posted 1 minute ago
Maguire’s a much better player than Chilwell, though. Which is why this is actually worse. Chilwell’s really bad.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If that’s how you feel then fair enough. Maguire is pretty average and cost £85m, Chilwell is pretty average as well and will cost £50m. Comfortably a better deal
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s perfectly reasonable to think that Maguire is a better player with a bigger impact than Chilwell.
You may disagree but it’s not any more ‘mental’ as what you’ve said.
He was £80m. And is a much better player. I don’t even really rate Maguire but Leicester have taken you to the cleaners for a really poor left back.
Sign in if you want to comment
Manager that wholeheartedly deserves...
Page 1 of 5
posted on 21/8/20
posted on 21/8/20
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 21/8/20
comment by *GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 3 minutes ago
Loving the look of the squad Chelsea are putting together. With money spent and big names comes pressure though. Chelsea must surely be in the mix next season and if they're not....
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It would be crazy to expect Chelsea to compete for the title next season.
They might, but the idea they must?
Of course, Roman may well have that view, but it doesn’t make it a sensible one. Building title winning teams takes time.
posted on 21/8/20
Another £100m to add to the billion you already owe Abramovich.
Doped to the hilt.
posted on 21/8/20
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 21/8/20
comment by *GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by *GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 3 minutes ago
Loving the look of the squad Chelsea are putting together. With money spent and big names comes pressure though. Chelsea must surely be in the mix next season and if they're not....
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It would be crazy to expect Chelsea to compete for the title next season.
They might, but the idea they must?
Of course, Roman may well have that view, but it doesn’t make it a sensible one. Building title winning teams takes time.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Chelsea more than any other team in England have sacked managers for not winning titles, even winning smaller trophies hasn't cut it. Lampard got a free hit this season due to the transfer ban and a perceived move towards youth. Bringing in potentially 4 players for around 200 million raises expectations. If Chelsea were to finish 20 points plus behind the winners, would Lampard still have a job? At most clubs probably, at chelsea??
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I know. If you read my post you’ll see that’s basically what I said.
posted on 21/8/20
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 21/8/20
£50m for Chilwell’s actually worse than £80m for Maguire.
posted on 21/8/20
comment by *GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by *GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by *GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 3 minutes ago
Loving the look of the squad Chelsea are putting together. With money spent and big names comes pressure though. Chelsea must surely be in the mix next season and if they're not....
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It would be crazy to expect Chelsea to compete for the title next season.
They might, but the idea they must?
Of course, Roman may well have that view, but it doesn’t make it a sensible one. Building title winning teams takes time.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Chelsea more than any other team in England have sacked managers for not winning titles, even winning smaller trophies hasn't cut it. Lampard got a free hit this season due to the transfer ban and a perceived move towards youth. Bringing in potentially 4 players for around 200 million raises expectations. If Chelsea were to finish 20 points plus behind the winners, would Lampard still have a job? At most clubs probably, at chelsea??
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I know. If you read my post you’ll see that’s basically what I said.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Which is what I basically said in my first post, so....
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And I added to it.
posted on 21/8/20
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 21/8/20
And we aren't finished yet.
posted on 21/8/20
Oh dear, GT is in one of his moods... best left to it.
posted on 21/8/20
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 21/8/20
Havertz is a great signing. Chillwell is pretty crap
posted on 21/8/20
comment by Imran The King Khan (U10026)
posted 24 minutes ago
£50m for Chilwell’s actually worse than £80m for Maguire.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well this is nonsense but you’re entitled to believe it
posted on 21/8/20
Clearly is. Chilwell’s terrible.
posted on 21/8/20
Randomer is very defensive over this.
Do you think it’s a good signing, Randomer?
posted on 21/8/20
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 minutes ago
Randomer is very defensive over this.
Do you think it’s a good signing, Randomer?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jury’s out but automatically saying he’s worse than Maguire at the price he cost is mental. They’re probably similar level in their respective positions
posted on 21/8/20
comment by Imran The King Khan (U10026)
posted 4 minutes ago
Clearly is. Chilwell’s terrible.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Let me see. £30m+ cheaper, younger, doesn’t turn like a boat, can actually run, isn’t a thug who deliberately kicks players in the balls and fights with police while on holiday
Yeah I’m not seeing how he’s automatically a worse signing than £85m Maguire
posted on 21/8/20
comment by Randomer (U5245)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 minutes ago
Randomer is very defensive over this.
Do you think it’s a good signing, Randomer?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jury’s out but automatically saying he’s worse than Maguire at the price he cost is mental. They’re probably similar level in their respective positions
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But you pretty much said the opposite, didn’t you?
posted on 21/8/20
Maguire’s a much better player than Chilwell, though. Which is why this is actually worse. Chilwell’s really bad.
posted on 21/8/20
comment by Imran The King Khan (U10026)
posted 1 minute ago
Maguire’s a much better player than Chilwell, though. Which is why this is actually worse. Chilwell’s really bad.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If that’s how you feel then fair enough. Maguire is pretty average and cost £85m, Chilwell is pretty average as well and will cost £50m. Comfortably a better deal
posted on 21/8/20
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Randomer (U5245)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 minutes ago
Randomer is very defensive over this.
Do you think it’s a good signing, Randomer?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jury’s out but automatically saying he’s worse than Maguire at the price he cost is mental. They’re probably similar level in their respective positions
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But you pretty much said the opposite, didn’t you?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I was referring to the deal itself rather than the players. If they’re similar quality yet one cost £30m less it’s obviously not a worse deal is it?
posted on 21/8/20
comment by Randomer (U5245)
posted 21 seconds ago
comment by Imran The King Khan (U10026)
posted 1 minute ago
Maguire’s a much better player than Chilwell, though. Which is why this is actually worse. Chilwell’s really bad.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If that’s how you feel then fair enough. Maguire is pretty average and cost £85m, Chilwell is pretty average as well and will cost £50m. Comfortably a better deal
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s perfectly reasonable to think that Maguire is a better player with a bigger impact than Chilwell.
You may disagree but it’s not any more ‘mental’ as what you’ve said.
posted on 21/8/20
He was £80m. And is a much better player. I don’t even really rate Maguire but Leicester have taken you to the cleaners for a really poor left back.
Page 1 of 5