or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 102 comments are related to an article called:

RIP football

Page 1 of 5

posted on 27/9/20

Yep pathetic

comment by Kano (U20144)

posted on 27/9/20

Comment deleted by Article Creator

posted on 27/9/20

posted on 27/9/20

I agree but that isn’t the worst one given this weekend, the one given to Everton yesterday was worse!

posted on 27/9/20

Agreed mate, it's finished with this ridiculous rule.

posted on 27/9/20

Absolute joke. Scrap it all. Referees and law makers are ruining sport.

posted on 27/9/20

It’s funny cos it’s Spurs but I did say yesterday football is dead. This is the worst rule change they’ve come up with yet

posted on 27/9/20

comment by KLS (U1695)
posted 12 seconds ago
I agree but that isn’t the worst one given this weekend, the one given to Everton yesterday was worse!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I agree entirely. It’s not even just my Spurs tinted glasses. They’ve taken all enjoyment out of football.

posted on 27/9/20

comment by KLS (U1695)
posted 20 seconds ago
I agree but that isn’t the worst one given this weekend, the one given to Everton yesterday was worse!
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You are joking of course. How is a player with his back to the ball supposed to get his arms out of the way.

posted on 27/9/20

comment by KLS (U1695)
posted 1 minute ago
I agree but that isn’t the worst one given this weekend, the one given to Everton yesterday was worse!
----------------------------------------------------------------------it was the same

posted on 27/9/20

This daft rule has to be binned sharpish

That’s two ridiculous penalties we’ve had given against us in two games

posted on 27/9/20

The new handball rule is a farce.

From what I saw spurs dominated, but you never got that all important second goal, which would have killed the game.

Very costly.

posted on 27/9/20

It was bad enough last season with the goals disallowed with the stupid rule. Not content with that, they decided to tale it to another level.

posted on 27/9/20

The fans and the players don't like the rule, why not do something about it? It is only psychopaths that accept this rule.

posted on 27/9/20

Never seen it, was it as bad as the one given against Lindelof last week?

comment by Admin1 (U1)

posted on 27/9/20

Just been having a football facetime with father in law, brother and law and myself.

I called a 95th min VAR penalty Newcastle at about 80mins, moreso after AC was subbed on. I appreciate Newcastle benefited today, but something is drastically wrong with the VAR situation IMO.

comment by Chronic (U3423)

posted on 27/9/20

Yeah I’ve had enough too I think. Pointless

posted on 27/9/20

comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 39 seconds ago
comment by KLS (U1695)
posted 20 seconds ago
I agree but that isn’t the worst one given this weekend, the one given to Everton yesterday was worse!
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You are joking of course. How is a player with his back to the ball supposed to get his arms out of the way.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did you miss the bit where I agreed?

At least Dier has his arm up in the air, the palace defenders arm was literally by his side!

posted on 27/9/20

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 27/9/20

Decent point for Spurs, onto the next game.

posted on 27/9/20

Why didn't we get the pen at the other end? It was just as much of a pen as the Dier one.

posted on 27/9/20

comment by Garry Brady (U1734)
posted 2 minutes ago
The fans and the players don't like the rule, why not do something about it? It is only psychopaths that accept this rule.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
all seven of them

posted on 27/9/20

My only conclusion is that whoever has decided this crazy rule has done it as a marketing exercise, on the basis that they want more goals and more drama in the PL.

Perhaps because of the financial impact of Covid and they want greater viewing figures...

posted on 27/9/20

We should just buy Carroll and lump the ball up to him for 90 mins. Kane will get a hat-trick of pens everytime.

posted on 27/9/20

comment by palmers_spur (U8896)
posted 50 seconds ago
My only conclusion is that whoever has decided this crazy rule has done it as a marketing exercise, on the basis that they want more goals and more drama in the PL.

Perhaps because of the financial impact of Covid and they want greater viewing figures...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’ll go the other way for me though!

Maybe plastic fans from abroad will like it but the live blood fans wil turn off.

Page 1 of 5

Sign in if you want to comment