comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 1 minute ago
It was bad enough last season with the goals disallowed with the stupid rule. Not content with that, they decided to tale it to another level.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
they stopped that now cause havertz handballed it for chelseas equaliser yesterday and the let it stand? so is that one done with? theyve moved on to penalise defending teams instead? Prob wont change this as it adds goals where as last season handball was ruling out goals.
Theyll prob get rid of offside next, more goals
I thought it was a good decision. Arm up in the air, penalty. Spurs players of all players should know this after the CL final. Bloody had Spurs in my bet too. Poor finishing to blame for the draw.
comment by I want to stuff this 8===D as far as it will go an squeal like a pig (U20589)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 1 minute ago
It was bad enough last season with the goals disallowed with the stupid rule. Not content with that, they decided to tale it to another level.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
they stopped that now cause havertz handballed it for chelseas equaliser yesterday and the let it stand? so is that one done with? theyve moved on to penalise defending teams instead? Prob wont change this as it adds goals where as last season handball was ruling out goals.
Theyll prob get rid of offside next, more goals
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who would be the best goal hanger if there were no offside rule? Sounds like a job someone like Fellaini was born for.
comment by KLS (U1695)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by palmers_spur (U8896)
posted 50 seconds ago
My only conclusion is that whoever has decided this crazy rule has done it as a marketing exercise, on the basis that they want more goals and more drama in the PL.
Perhaps because of the financial impact of Covid and they want greater viewing figures...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’ll go the other way for me though!
Maybe plastic fans from abroad will like it but the live blood fans wil turn off.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah possibly
But I don’t want spurs to benefit from ridiculous decisions like this as much as I’m angry about it being given against us.
Comment deleted by Article Creator
It needs scrapping and all goals voided off.
If you're an attacking player, you may as well just try to flick it onto a defenders arm now in the penalty area. Guaranteed penalty.
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 3 minutes ago
I thought it was a good decision. Arm up in the air, penalty. Spurs players of all players should know this after the CL final. Bloody had Spurs in my bet too. Poor finishing to blame for the draw.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
F*ck off Troll.
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 3 minutes ago
I thought it was a good decision. Arm up in the air, penalty. Spurs players of all players should know this after the CL final. Bloody had Spurs in my bet too. Poor finishing to blame for the draw.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Shut up you clown.
This annoyed me more than the pen. He literally jumps in to Højbjerg after losing the ball
https://twitter.com/henrikgranly9/status/1310233562998870017?s=21
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 3 seconds ago
If you're an attacking player, you may as well just try to flick it onto a defenders arm now in the penalty area. Guaranteed penalty.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Or at the very least taking lame chest height shots into a crowded box knowing you've got a chance of it hitting something
Comment deleted by Article Creator
comment by MKspur ツ - The Fountain of Knowledge (U9129)
posted 0 seconds ago
This annoyed me more than the pen. He literally jumps in to Højbjerg after losing the ball
https://twitter.com/henrikgranly9/status/1310233562998870017?s=21
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This!!! Thought it was just me who noticed it was never a facking foul in the first place. Why won't they talk about that
comment by Anne is ruled out on medical grounds (U8366)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by MKspur ツ - The Fountain of Knowledge (U9129)
posted 0 seconds ago
This annoyed me more than the pen. He literally jumps in to Højbjerg after losing the ball
https://twitter.com/henrikgranly9/status/1310233562998870017?s=21
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This!!! Thought it was just me who noticed it was never a facking foul in the first place. Why won't they talk about that
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Gurantee if that was against Liverpool or United the ref would never have stopped play.
Rule is exclusively enforcing arms behind back in box all the time when facing the ball
Very difficult to adapt
comment by ☼ Great_Red_Shark ☼ (U1711)
posted 8 seconds ago
Rule is exclusively enforcing arms behind back in box all the time when facing the ball
Very difficult to adapt
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He had his back to him, facking ridiculous.
anyone have a clip of the incident?
comment by Edward Elizabeth Hitler. (U14393)
posted 56 seconds ago
comment by ☼ Great_Red_Shark ☼ (U1711)
posted 8 seconds ago
Rule is exclusively enforcing arms behind back in box all the time when facing the ball
Very difficult to adapt
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He had his back to him, facking ridiculous.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To be frank - Dier had his back to the ball - never knew where the ball was ...and his momentum had his arm go up me think
This was a clear handball that was always gonna b given.
Y r u fans not more mad about the Newcastle guy who was offside?
That was the bad decision, not the handball.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Honestly feel disgusted after that. Should probably be happy a rival has dropped points but it’s the sick feeling that our game is being ruined.
After being victims of this disgrace of a rule for two weeks in a row now, would Spurs fans prefer to see the rule change immediately, or at the end of the season when all teams will have suffered the same fate?
comment by Neo (U9135)
posted 39 seconds ago
Honestly feel disgusted after that. Should probably be happy a rival has dropped points but it’s the sick feeling that our game is being ruined.
After being victims of this disgrace of a rule for two weeks in a row now, would Spurs fans prefer to see the rule change immediately, or at the end of the season when all teams will have suffered the same fate?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Immediately Neo
I genuine would not want us to benefit from that. It’s daft
comment by ☼ Great_Red_Shark ☼ (U1711)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Edward Elizabeth Hitler. (U14393)
posted 56 seconds ago
comment by ☼ Great_Red_Shark ☼ (U1711)
posted 8 seconds ago
Rule is exclusively enforcing arms behind back in box all the time when facing the ball
Very difficult to adapt
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He had his back to him, facking ridiculous.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To be frank - Dier had his back to the ball - never knew where the ball was ...and his momentum had his arm go up me think
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly mate, he would have lost balance completely had his arms been by his side.
It's mental
Another issue: why wasn't there extra added on time to account for it??? The incident occurred in the 92nd minute, the penalty was taken in the 97th. So the game was delayed by 5mins. We had 5 mins originally added on. Wtf??
Sign in if you want to comment
RIP football
Page 2 of 5
posted on 27/9/20
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 1 minute ago
It was bad enough last season with the goals disallowed with the stupid rule. Not content with that, they decided to tale it to another level.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
they stopped that now cause havertz handballed it for chelseas equaliser yesterday and the let it stand? so is that one done with? theyve moved on to penalise defending teams instead? Prob wont change this as it adds goals where as last season handball was ruling out goals.
Theyll prob get rid of offside next, more goals
posted on 27/9/20
I thought it was a good decision. Arm up in the air, penalty. Spurs players of all players should know this after the CL final. Bloody had Spurs in my bet too. Poor finishing to blame for the draw.
posted on 27/9/20
Yes agree
posted on 27/9/20
comment by I want to stuff this 8===D as far as it will go an squeal like a pig (U20589)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 1 minute ago
It was bad enough last season with the goals disallowed with the stupid rule. Not content with that, they decided to tale it to another level.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
they stopped that now cause havertz handballed it for chelseas equaliser yesterday and the let it stand? so is that one done with? theyve moved on to penalise defending teams instead? Prob wont change this as it adds goals where as last season handball was ruling out goals.
Theyll prob get rid of offside next, more goals
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who would be the best goal hanger if there were no offside rule? Sounds like a job someone like Fellaini was born for.
posted on 27/9/20
comment by KLS (U1695)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by palmers_spur (U8896)
posted 50 seconds ago
My only conclusion is that whoever has decided this crazy rule has done it as a marketing exercise, on the basis that they want more goals and more drama in the PL.
Perhaps because of the financial impact of Covid and they want greater viewing figures...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’ll go the other way for me though!
Maybe plastic fans from abroad will like it but the live blood fans wil turn off.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah possibly
But I don’t want spurs to benefit from ridiculous decisions like this as much as I’m angry about it being given against us.
posted on 27/9/20
Comment deleted by Article Creator
posted on 27/9/20
It needs scrapping and all goals voided off.
posted on 27/9/20
If you're an attacking player, you may as well just try to flick it onto a defenders arm now in the penalty area. Guaranteed penalty.
posted on 27/9/20
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 3 minutes ago
I thought it was a good decision. Arm up in the air, penalty. Spurs players of all players should know this after the CL final. Bloody had Spurs in my bet too. Poor finishing to blame for the draw.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
F*ck off Troll.
posted on 27/9/20
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 3 minutes ago
I thought it was a good decision. Arm up in the air, penalty. Spurs players of all players should know this after the CL final. Bloody had Spurs in my bet too. Poor finishing to blame for the draw.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Shut up you clown.
posted on 27/9/20
This annoyed me more than the pen. He literally jumps in to Højbjerg after losing the ball
https://twitter.com/henrikgranly9/status/1310233562998870017?s=21
posted on 27/9/20
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 3 seconds ago
If you're an attacking player, you may as well just try to flick it onto a defenders arm now in the penalty area. Guaranteed penalty.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Or at the very least taking lame chest height shots into a crowded box knowing you've got a chance of it hitting something
posted on 27/9/20
Comment deleted by Article Creator
posted on 27/9/20
comment by MKspur ツ - The Fountain of Knowledge (U9129)
posted 0 seconds ago
This annoyed me more than the pen. He literally jumps in to Højbjerg after losing the ball
https://twitter.com/henrikgranly9/status/1310233562998870017?s=21
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This!!! Thought it was just me who noticed it was never a facking foul in the first place. Why won't they talk about that
posted on 27/9/20
comment by Anne is ruled out on medical grounds (U8366)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by MKspur ツ - The Fountain of Knowledge (U9129)
posted 0 seconds ago
This annoyed me more than the pen. He literally jumps in to Højbjerg after losing the ball
https://twitter.com/henrikgranly9/status/1310233562998870017?s=21
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This!!! Thought it was just me who noticed it was never a facking foul in the first place. Why won't they talk about that
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Gurantee if that was against Liverpool or United the ref would never have stopped play.
posted on 27/9/20
Rule is exclusively enforcing arms behind back in box all the time when facing the ball
Very difficult to adapt
posted on 27/9/20
comment by ☼ Great_Red_Shark ☼ (U1711)
posted 8 seconds ago
Rule is exclusively enforcing arms behind back in box all the time when facing the ball
Very difficult to adapt
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He had his back to him, facking ridiculous.
posted on 27/9/20
anyone have a clip of the incident?
posted on 27/9/20
comment by Edward Elizabeth Hitler. (U14393)
posted 56 seconds ago
comment by ☼ Great_Red_Shark ☼ (U1711)
posted 8 seconds ago
Rule is exclusively enforcing arms behind back in box all the time when facing the ball
Very difficult to adapt
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He had his back to him, facking ridiculous.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To be frank - Dier had his back to the ball - never knew where the ball was ...and his momentum had his arm go up me think
posted on 27/9/20
This was a clear handball that was always gonna b given.
Y r u fans not more mad about the Newcastle guy who was offside?
That was the bad decision, not the handball.
posted on 27/9/20
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 27/9/20
Honestly feel disgusted after that. Should probably be happy a rival has dropped points but it’s the sick feeling that our game is being ruined.
After being victims of this disgrace of a rule for two weeks in a row now, would Spurs fans prefer to see the rule change immediately, or at the end of the season when all teams will have suffered the same fate?
posted on 27/9/20
comment by Neo (U9135)
posted 39 seconds ago
Honestly feel disgusted after that. Should probably be happy a rival has dropped points but it’s the sick feeling that our game is being ruined.
After being victims of this disgrace of a rule for two weeks in a row now, would Spurs fans prefer to see the rule change immediately, or at the end of the season when all teams will have suffered the same fate?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Immediately Neo
I genuine would not want us to benefit from that. It’s daft
posted on 27/9/20
comment by ☼ Great_Red_Shark ☼ (U1711)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Edward Elizabeth Hitler. (U14393)
posted 56 seconds ago
comment by ☼ Great_Red_Shark ☼ (U1711)
posted 8 seconds ago
Rule is exclusively enforcing arms behind back in box all the time when facing the ball
Very difficult to adapt
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He had his back to him, facking ridiculous.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To be frank - Dier had his back to the ball - never knew where the ball was ...and his momentum had his arm go up me think
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly mate, he would have lost balance completely had his arms been by his side.
It's mental
posted on 27/9/20
Another issue: why wasn't there extra added on time to account for it??? The incident occurred in the 92nd minute, the penalty was taken in the 97th. So the game was delayed by 5mins. We had 5 mins originally added on. Wtf??
Page 2 of 5