comment by The Mighty Quinn (U4099)
posted 8 seconds ago

Were they not in contact with anyone then previous 14 days?


----------------------------------------------------------------------
We banished them while they were still at the party

Opposite of Boli who came back back, told no one, trained, played....

comment by lauders (U9757)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by The Mighty Quinn (U4099)
posted 8 seconds ago

Were they not in contact with anyone then previous 14 days?


----------------------------------------------------------------------
We banished them while they were still at the party

Opposite of Boli who came back back, told no one, trained, played....
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The 2 Rangers idiots got longer bans than both the Celtic and Aberdeen guys ffs

Lauders I hope the docked wages were donated to charity.

Otherwise Rangers would have profited from this outrage

I'm sure it's all above board otherwise Celtic moonhowlers wid be aw

ower it given the obsessive postings of a coupla Bears.

HNY to you anaw Duke.

My Q was about game postponements due to cross infection dangers.

comment by The Mighty Quinn (U4099)
posted 8 minutes ago


HNY to you anaw Duke.

My Q was about game postponements due to cross infection dangers.



----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes St M getting points deduction or forfeit match was severe when neither Celtic or Aberdeen received similar
I hope they win the appeal
Rangers were fortunate that no cross contamination occurred or they would/should have been in the same boat
That is either the St M boat or the Celtic Aberdeen boat as for some reason they were different

comment by lauders (U9757)
posted 17 minutes ago
comment by The Mighty Quinn (U4099)
posted 8 seconds ago

Were they not in contact with anyone then previous 14 days?


----------------------------------------------------------------------
We banished them while they were still at the party

Opposite of Boli who came back back, told no one, trained, played....
----------------------------------------------------------------------
‘played’ might be pushing it...

comment by The Duke (U10059)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by The Mighty Quinn (U4099)
posted 8 minutes ago


HNY to you anaw Duke.

My Q was about game postponements due to cross infection dangers.



----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes St M getting points deduction or forfeit match was severe when neither Celtic or Aberdeen received similar
I hope they win the appeal
Rangers were fortunate that no cross contamination occurred or they would/should have been in the same boat
That is either the St M boat or the Celtic Aberdeen boat as for some reason they were different
----------------------------------------------------------------------
St Mirren don't have a penny to pay good lawyers whereas Celtic can afford better ones than the SFA.

Secondly, Celtic & Rangers ARE Scottish football, unfortunately. To pretend otherwise is stupid.

That's the difference.

I'm sure I'll get this in the end

If the party was on Nov 2 how did they know there would be no

transmission from every attendees' previous 14 day behaviours, as well

as the following 14 day incubation period?

I know it's down to 10 now.

comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by The Duke (U10059)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by The Mighty Quinn (U4099)
posted 8 minutes ago


HNY to you anaw Duke.

My Q was about game postponements due to cross infection dangers.



----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes St M getting points deduction or forfeit match was severe when neither Celtic or Aberdeen received similar
I hope they win the appeal
Rangers were fortunate that no cross contamination occurred or they would/should have been in the same boat
That is either the St M boat or the Celtic Aberdeen boat as for some reason they were different
----------------------------------------------------------------------
St Mirren don't have a penny to pay good lawyers whereas Celtic can afford better ones than the SFA.

Secondly, Celtic & Rangers ARE Scottish football, unfortunately. To pretend otherwise is stupid.

That's the difference.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well that and the fact that Celtic and Aberdeen were judged to have proper protocols in place which were disregarded by individual players. As were kilmarnock btw.

St Mirren were judged not to have significant measures in place.

I'm not sure why people even think it's a discussion point.

Don't give a fvk about punishments.

Postponements.

Told a janny today I would go on a knowledgeable forum & answer his Q.

comment by The Mighty Quinn (U4099)
posted 1 minute ago



Don't give a fvk about punishments.

Postponements.

Told a janny today I would go on a knowledgeable forum & answer his Q.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A janny?

Thanks for your contribution Silver.

The ony wan to actually address what I posted.

comment by The Mighty Quinn (U4099)
posted 3 minutes ago
Thanks for your contribution Silver.

The ony wan to actually address what I posted.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
IOt's help the aged week, mate.

Gonna be me one day.

Wan last go

Getting a bit John Cleese here at the stoning in Life O'Brien.

Nobody say anything about car sharing, player bans, or points deduction.


WHY WERE NONE OF RANGERS GAMES POSTPONED?


No kvnt knows that awright.

I shall sadly report to said Janny that nobody knows.

He's a dour Coagie and a diehard Dee fan.

He also disn'ae like Rangers much from what I glean.

comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 42 minutes ago
comment by The Duke (U10059)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by The Mighty Quinn (U4099)
posted 8 minutes ago


HNY to you anaw Duke.

My Q was about game postponements due to cross infection dangers.



----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes St M getting points deduction or forfeit match was severe when neither Celtic or Aberdeen received similar
I hope they win the appeal
Rangers were fortunate that no cross contamination occurred or they would/should have been in the same boat
That is either the St M boat or the Celtic Aberdeen boat as for some reason they were different
----------------------------------------------------------------------
St Mirren don't have a penny to pay good lawyers whereas Celtic can afford better ones than the SFA.

Secondly, Celtic & Rangers ARE Scottish football, unfortunately. To pretend otherwise is stupid.

That's the difference.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I assumed the issues were different hence different punishments

comment by The Mighty Quinn (U4099)
posted 8 minutes ago
Wan last go

Getting a bit John Cleese here at the stoning in Life O'Brien.

Nobody say anything about car sharing, player bans, or points deduction.


WHY WERE NONE OF RANGERS GAMES POSTPONED?


No kvnt knows that awright.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because there was no cross contamination I assume
Unlike Celtic Aberdeen and ST M

<Rangers were fortunate that no cross contamination occurred or they would>

Aye.

But how would they have known that?

Approach as we know has to be cautiously Predictive & risk aware.

14 days' previous activities + 14 days' after.


This is what I don't get.

comment by The Mighty Quinn (U4099)
posted 17 seconds ago
<Rangers were fortunate that no cross contamination occurred or they would>

Aye.

But how would they have known that?

Approach as we know has to be cautiously Predictive & risk aware.

14 days' previous activities + 14 days' after.


This is what I don't get.







----------------------------------------------------------------------
No it’s not

<Because there was no cross contamination I assume
Unlike Celtic Aberdeen and ST M>

But those transmissions could have taken place anywhere.

Which part is 'not' Duke?

comment by The Mighty Quinn (U4099)
posted 5 seconds ago
<Because there was no cross contamination I assume
Unlike Celtic Aberdeen and ST M>

But those transmissions could have taken place anywhere.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
They could have as with all other instances
But that’s not the point
The point is where layers break protocol then go into what should be the protected bubble

It’s the bubble that’s being protected

As I said earlier I know the 14 is now 10.

comment by The Mighty Quinn (U4099)
posted 1 minute ago

Which part is 'not' Duke?


----------------------------------------------------------------------
It has nothing to do with 14 days prior
Only from the instance of breaking protocol

It had nothing to do with 14 days prior in any of the cases Rangers Celtic Aberdeen St M

comment by The Mighty Quinn (U4099)
posted 2 minutes ago
As I said earlier I know the 14 is now 10.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
All after the event
No idea where you got this prior stuff from