comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 54 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 second ago
“ PawlBawron has observed that he has seen female new readers who have admitted they have no interest in football are counting down the hours till kick off.”
As part of their job of reading the news. Or should they refuse on the basis that they just aren’t that into it usually?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've mentioned exactly that,it is their job and they have to do it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So bit of a weird thing for Pawl to bring up then no?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Here's what he wrote.
Yes I'm getting bored sh1tless of female news readers who by there own admission normally have no interest in football excitedly counting down the days/hours until kick off.
Why shouldn't he say that,if that is what he has observed?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why specify female newsreaders? Assume he’s not bored of make newsreaders doing the same. But weird.
Why is he bored shiiteless of someone doing their job? Not as if said female newsreaders are counting down to kick off because they’ve all of a sudden started linking football. As you’ve also said they are just doing their job, as instructed and paid to do so.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why are some people saying people doing their jobs are making them queasy then,after all they are all doing their jobs.
I'm not defending PawlBawron on what he said,but I am defending his right to say it.
If he said male newsreaders would you all be equally up in arms over it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That first paragraph is a massive straw man and you know it
The freedom of speech argument is also a weird one. Not seen a single person say he should stop saying it. Challenging the comment yes.
‘If he had said make newsreaders’
We all know he wouldn’t have assigned gender to the role had they been male. Evidenced by the fact he didn’t take exception to make newsreaders, who may or may not follow the game, doing the same thing as their female counterparts.
comment by Girøulski Alt-0216 forever (U14971)
posted 6 seconds ago
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So it's ok to say blonde chicks in this World that is moving on then?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Contexts. It's all about contexts. You're trying to nail down rules detached from their purposes so that you don't have to learn and understand those purposes yourself, and can just bash people over the head with the rules instead.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So it is then.So if he said some blonde chicks reading the news he'd be part of this brave new world,or would the contexts rule you've pulled out come in to it?
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 54 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 second ago
“ PawlBawron has observed that he has seen female new readers who have admitted they have no interest in football are counting down the hours till kick off.”
As part of their job of reading the news. Or should they refuse on the basis that they just aren’t that into it usually?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've mentioned exactly that,it is their job and they have to do it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So bit of a weird thing for Pawl to bring up then no?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Here's what he wrote.
Yes I'm getting bored sh1tless of female news readers who by there own admission normally have no interest in football excitedly counting down the days/hours until kick off.
Why shouldn't he say that,if that is what he has observed?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why specify female newsreaders? Assume he’s not bored of make newsreaders doing the same. But weird.
Why is he bored shiiteless of someone doing their job? Not as if said female newsreaders are counting down to kick off because they’ve all of a sudden started linking football. As you’ve also said they are just doing their job, as instructed and paid to do so.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why are some people saying people doing their jobs are making them queasy then,after all they are all doing their jobs.
I'm not defending PawlBawron on what he said,but I am defending his right to say it.
If he said male newsreaders would you all be equally up in arms over it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That first paragraph is a massive straw man and you know it
The freedom of speech argument is also a weird one. Not seen a single person say he should stop saying it. Challenging the comment yes.
‘If he had said make newsreaders’
We all know he wouldn’t have assigned gender to the role had they been male. Evidenced by the fact he didn’t take exception to make newsreaders, who may or may not follow the game, doing the same thing as their female counterparts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You are assuming the person who made the comment is male.
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Girøulski Alt-0216 forever (U14971)
posted 6 seconds ago
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So it's ok to say blonde chicks in this World that is moving on then?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Contexts. It's all about contexts. You're trying to nail down rules detached from their purposes so that you don't have to learn and understand those purposes yourself, and can just bash people over the head with the rules instead.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So it is then.So if he said some blonde chicks reading the news he'd be part of this brave new world,or would the contexts rule you've pulled out come in to it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You're doing the very thing I accused you of, quoting the thing accusing you of doing it. And your next comment does that same.
I was using the term ironically, in a comment making the argument that there's nothing wrong with them and what they're doing is good actually. Repeating that phrase back at Cinci was to further make that point.
Maybe it's too much for you. Maybe you find the rules in this "brave new world" are inscrutable, impossible to decipher and inconsistent. But they're not. It's just about treating people decently. That's it. You don't have to fight it because people are going to stand in your corner when you're being mistreated, too. It's not really that big a change, it's just listening to people we'd previously ignore, and realising that we've been acting like ärseholes this whole time.
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 54 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 second ago
“ PawlBawron has observed that he has seen female new readers who have admitted they have no interest in football are counting down the hours till kick off.”
As part of their job of reading the news. Or should they refuse on the basis that they just aren’t that into it usually?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've mentioned exactly that,it is their job and they have to do it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So bit of a weird thing for Pawl to bring up then no?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Here's what he wrote.
Yes I'm getting bored sh1tless of female news readers who by there own admission normally have no interest in football excitedly counting down the days/hours until kick off.
Why shouldn't he say that,if that is what he has observed?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why specify female newsreaders? Assume he’s not bored of make newsreaders doing the same. But weird.
Why is he bored shiiteless of someone doing their job? Not as if said female newsreaders are counting down to kick off because they’ve all of a sudden started linking football. As you’ve also said they are just doing their job, as instructed and paid to do so.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why are some people saying people doing their jobs are making them queasy then,after all they are all doing their jobs.
I'm not defending PawlBawron on what he said,but I am defending his right to say it.
If he said male newsreaders would you all be equally up in arms over it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That first paragraph is a massive straw man and you know it
The freedom of speech argument is also a weird one. Not seen a single person say he should stop saying it. Challenging the comment yes.
‘If he had said make newsreaders’
We all know he wouldn’t have assigned gender to the role had they been male. Evidenced by the fact he didn’t take exception to make newsreaders, who may or may not follow the game, doing the same thing as their female counterparts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You are assuming the person who made the comment is male.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Except it’s well known Pawl is a bloke
Still clutching those straws
comment by Girøulski Alt-0216 forever (U14971)
posted 48 seconds ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Girøulski Alt-0216 forever (U14971)
posted 6 seconds ago
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So it's ok to say blonde chicks in this World that is moving on then?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Contexts. It's all about contexts. You're trying to nail down rules detached from their purposes so that you don't have to learn and understand those purposes yourself, and can just bash people over the head with the rules instead.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So it is then.So if he said some blonde chicks reading the news he'd be part of this brave new world,or would the contexts rule you've pulled out come in to it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You're doing the very thing I accused you of, quoting the thing accusing you of doing it. And your next comment does that same.
I was using the term ironically, in a comment making the argument that there's nothing wrong with them and what they're doing is good actually. Repeating that phrase back at Cinci was to further make that point.
Maybe it's too much for you. Maybe you find the rules in this "brave new world" are inscrutable, impossible to decipher and inconsistent. But they're not. It's just about treating people decently. That's it. You don't have to fight it because people are going to stand in your corner when you're being mistreated, too. It's not really that big a change, it's just listening to people we'd previously ignore, and realising that we've been acting like ärseholes this whole time.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's not too much for me at all.
Perhaps PawlBawron was being ironic when he said female news readers,perhaps you are the one who has taken his comment 'out of context' .
Who knows eh
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 54 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 second ago
“ PawlBawron has observed that he has seen female new readers who have admitted they have no interest in football are counting down the hours till kick off.”
As part of their job of reading the news. Or should they refuse on the basis that they just aren’t that into it usually?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've mentioned exactly that,it is their job and they have to do it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So bit of a weird thing for Pawl to bring up then no?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Here's what he wrote.
Yes I'm getting bored sh1tless of female news readers who by there own admission normally have no interest in football excitedly counting down the days/hours until kick off.
Why shouldn't he say that,if that is what he has observed?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why specify female newsreaders? Assume he’s not bored of make newsreaders doing the same. But weird.
Why is he bored shiiteless of someone doing their job? Not as if said female newsreaders are counting down to kick off because they’ve all of a sudden started linking football. As you’ve also said they are just doing their job, as instructed and paid to do so.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why are some people saying people doing their jobs are making them queasy then,after all they are all doing their jobs.
I'm not defending PawlBawron on what he said,but I am defending his right to say it.
If he said male newsreaders would you all be equally up in arms over it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That first paragraph is a massive straw man and you know it
The freedom of speech argument is also a weird one. Not seen a single person say he should stop saying it. Challenging the comment yes.
‘If he had said make newsreaders’
We all know he wouldn’t have assigned gender to the role had they been male. Evidenced by the fact he didn’t take exception to make newsreaders, who may or may not follow the game, doing the same thing as their female counterparts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You are assuming the person who made the comment is male.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Except it’s well known Pawl is a bloke
Still clutching those straws
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Have you this person at all,or are going by the name chosen on here?
have you seen this person*
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 54 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 second ago
“ PawlBawron has observed that he has seen female new readers who have admitted they have no interest in football are counting down the hours till kick off.”
As part of their job of reading the news. Or should they refuse on the basis that they just aren’t that into it usually?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've mentioned exactly that,it is their job and they have to do it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So bit of a weird thing for Pawl to bring up then no?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Here's what he wrote.
Yes I'm getting bored sh1tless of female news readers who by there own admission normally have no interest in football excitedly counting down the days/hours until kick off.
Why shouldn't he say that,if that is what he has observed?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why specify female newsreaders? Assume he’s not bored of make newsreaders doing the same. But weird.
Why is he bored shiiteless of someone doing their job? Not as if said female newsreaders are counting down to kick off because they’ve all of a sudden started linking football. As you’ve also said they are just doing their job, as instructed and paid to do so.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why are some people saying people doing their jobs are making them queasy then,after all they are all doing their jobs.
I'm not defending PawlBawron on what he said,but I am defending his right to say it.
If he said male newsreaders would you all be equally up in arms over it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That first paragraph is a massive straw man and you know it
The freedom of speech argument is also a weird one. Not seen a single person say he should stop saying it. Challenging the comment yes.
‘If he had said make newsreaders’
We all know he wouldn’t have assigned gender to the role had they been male. Evidenced by the fact he didn’t take exception to make newsreaders, who may or may not follow the game, doing the same thing as their female counterparts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You are assuming the person who made the comment is male.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Except it’s well known Pawl is a bloke
Still clutching those straws
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Have you this person at all,or are going by the name chosen on here?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I need to have seen him to confirm his gender
Why would a woman be moaning about female newsreaders talking about football?
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 54 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 second ago
“ PawlBawron has observed that he has seen female new readers who have admitted they have no interest in football are counting down the hours till kick off.”
As part of their job of reading the news. Or should they refuse on the basis that they just aren’t that into it usually?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've mentioned exactly that,it is their job and they have to do it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So bit of a weird thing for Pawl to bring up then no?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Here's what he wrote.
Yes I'm getting bored sh1tless of female news readers who by there own admission normally have no interest in football excitedly counting down the days/hours until kick off.
Why shouldn't he say that,if that is what he has observed?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why specify female newsreaders? Assume he’s not bored of make newsreaders doing the same. But weird.
Why is he bored shiiteless of someone doing their job? Not as if said female newsreaders are counting down to kick off because they’ve all of a sudden started linking football. As you’ve also said they are just doing their job, as instructed and paid to do so.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why are some people saying people doing their jobs are making them queasy then,after all they are all doing their jobs.
I'm not defending PawlBawron on what he said,but I am defending his right to say it.
If he said male newsreaders would you all be equally up in arms over it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That first paragraph is a massive straw man and you know it
The freedom of speech argument is also a weird one. Not seen a single person say he should stop saying it. Challenging the comment yes.
‘If he had said make newsreaders’
We all know he wouldn’t have assigned gender to the role had they been male. Evidenced by the fact he didn’t take exception to make newsreaders, who may or may not follow the game, doing the same thing as their female counterparts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You are assuming the person who made the comment is male.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Except it’s well known Pawl is a bloke
Still clutching those straws
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Have you this person at all,or are going by the name chosen on here?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I need to have seen him to confirm his gender
Why would a woman be moaning about female newsreaders talking about football?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's a very narrowminded view of women you have there.
Why wouldn't a woman have the right to moan about female newsreaders talking about football.Are you trying to tell me they shouldn't have a view and say on that.
What right do you have to say what women can and cannot say.
As regards PawlBawrons gender then that's a no you don't know the gender,but you are assuming it.Pretty poor that
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 54 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 second ago
“ PawlBawron has observed that he has seen female new readers who have admitted they have no interest in football are counting down the hours till kick off.”
As part of their job of reading the news. Or should they refuse on the basis that they just aren’t that into it usually?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've mentioned exactly that,it is their job and they have to do it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So bit of a weird thing for Pawl to bring up then no?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Here's what he wrote.
Yes I'm getting bored sh1tless of female news readers who by there own admission normally have no interest in football excitedly counting down the days/hours until kick off.
Why shouldn't he say that,if that is what he has observed?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why specify female newsreaders? Assume he’s not bored of make newsreaders doing the same. But weird.
Why is he bored shiiteless of someone doing their job? Not as if said female newsreaders are counting down to kick off because they’ve all of a sudden started linking football. As you’ve also said they are just doing their job, as instructed and paid to do so.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why are some people saying people doing their jobs are making them queasy then,after all they are all doing their jobs.
I'm not defending PawlBawron on what he said,but I am defending his right to say it.
If he said male newsreaders would you all be equally up in arms over it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That first paragraph is a massive straw man and you know it
The freedom of speech argument is also a weird one. Not seen a single person say he should stop saying it. Challenging the comment yes.
‘If he had said make newsreaders’
We all know he wouldn’t have assigned gender to the role had they been male. Evidenced by the fact he didn’t take exception to make newsreaders, who may or may not follow the game, doing the same thing as their female counterparts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You are assuming the person who made the comment is male.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Except it’s well known Pawl is a bloke
Still clutching those straws
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Have you this person at all,or are going by the name chosen on here?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I need to have seen him to confirm his gender
Why would a woman be moaning about female newsreaders talking about football?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's a very narrowminded view of women you have there.
Why wouldn't a woman have the right to moan about female newsreaders talking about football.Are you trying to tell me they shouldn't have a view and say on that.
What right do you have to say what women can and cannot say.
As regards PawlBawrons gender then that's a no you don't know the gender,but you are assuming it.Pretty poor that
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is it? Well apparently I’ve got a right to express that view haven’t I? Or at least that’s what you’ve been arguing on here for hours now
Tell you what, go and ask Pawl his/her gender then get back to me.
It’s a good thing. One of the best things about international tournaments is the buzz it creates around the whole country, be that people from England or elsewhere.
Major sporting events are a spectacle for everyone. I’m sure many complaining about this would watch the Olympics, despite not being fans of the majority of these sports, it any, the whole year round. Football is no different in that regard.
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 54 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 second ago
“ PawlBawron has observed that he has seen female new readers who have admitted they have no interest in football are counting down the hours till kick off.”
As part of their job of reading the news. Or should they refuse on the basis that they just aren’t that into it usually?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've mentioned exactly that,it is their job and they have to do it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So bit of a weird thing for Pawl to bring up then no?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Here's what he wrote.
Yes I'm getting bored sh1tless of female news readers who by there own admission normally have no interest in football excitedly counting down the days/hours until kick off.
Why shouldn't he say that,if that is what he has observed?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why specify female newsreaders? Assume he’s not bored of make newsreaders doing the same. But weird.
Why is he bored shiiteless of someone doing their job? Not as if said female newsreaders are counting down to kick off because they’ve all of a sudden started linking football. As you’ve also said they are just doing their job, as instructed and paid to do so.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why are some people saying people doing their jobs are making them queasy then,after all they are all doing their jobs.
I'm not defending PawlBawron on what he said,but I am defending his right to say it.
If he said male newsreaders would you all be equally up in arms over it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That first paragraph is a massive straw man and you know it
The freedom of speech argument is also a weird one. Not seen a single person say he should stop saying it. Challenging the comment yes.
‘If he had said make newsreaders’
We all know he wouldn’t have assigned gender to the role had they been male. Evidenced by the fact he didn’t take exception to make newsreaders, who may or may not follow the game, doing the same thing as their female counterparts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You are assuming the person who made the comment is male.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Except it’s well known Pawl is a bloke
Still clutching those straws
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Have you this person at all,or are going by the name chosen on here?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I need to have seen him to confirm his gender
Why would a woman be moaning about female newsreaders talking about football?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's a very narrowminded view of women you have there.
Why wouldn't a woman have the right to moan about female newsreaders talking about football.Are you trying to tell me they shouldn't have a view and say on that.
What right do you have to say what women can and cannot say.
As regards PawlBawrons gender then that's a no you don't know the gender,but you are assuming it.Pretty poor that
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is it? Well apparently I’ve got a right to express that view haven’t I? Or at least that’s what you’ve been arguing on here for hours now
Tell you what, go and ask Pawl his/her gender then get back to me.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As I said at the start Pawl had the right earlier.I have an idea what your reply will be.
Also why are you assuming Pawl is one of only two genders,there are 100+ genders peoplw identify as these days,again that is very narrowminded of you and could cause upset to many people.
“ As I said at the start Pawl had the right earlier.I have an idea what your reply will be.
Also why are you assuming Pawl is one of only two genders,there are 100+ genders peoplw identify as these days,again that is very narrowminded of you and could cause upset to many people.”
Christ
Think I’ll wait for you to find out Pawl’s gender
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
“ As I said at the start Pawl had the right earlier.I have an idea what your reply will be.
Also why are you assuming Pawl is one of only two genders,there are 100+ genders peoplw identify as these days,again that is very narrowminded of you and could cause upset to many people.”
Christ
Think I’ll wait for you to find out Pawl’s gender
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't blaspheme either.you are not a very PC person at all are you.
I apologise if I seem judgemental,it must be horrible that everything you say or do will be judged and often criticsised by strangers isn't it.
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
“ As I said at the start Pawl had the right earlier.I have an idea what your reply will be.
Also why are you assuming Pawl is one of only two genders,there are 100+ genders peoplw identify as these days,again that is very narrowminded of you and could cause upset to many people.”
Christ
Think I’ll wait for you to find out Pawl’s gender
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't blaspheme either.you are not a very PC person at all are you.
I apologise if I seem judgemental,it must be horrible that everything you say or do will be judged and often criticsised by strangers isn't it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You’ve not taken this well have you.
Any news on Pawls gender yet?
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 12 seconds ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
“ As I said at the start Pawl had the right earlier.I have an idea what your reply will be.
Also why are you assuming Pawl is one of only two genders,there are 100+ genders peoplw identify as these days,again that is very narrowminded of you and could cause upset to many people.”
Christ
Think I’ll wait for you to find out Pawl’s gender
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't blaspheme either.you are not a very PC person at all are you.
I apologise if I seem judgemental,it must be horrible that everything you say or do will be judged and often criticsised by strangers isn't it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You’ve not taken this well have you.
Any news on Pawls gender yet?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You are the one who declared Pawl as male or should I say make.
Whatever gender Pawl identifies as I'm sure you took what Pawl said 'out of context'
“ You are the one who declared Pawl as male or should I say make.”
Oh a typo
“ Whatever gender Pawl identifies as I'm sure you took what Pawl said 'out of context'”
No I didn’t
It's like the fooking matrix in here.
Jesus, is Coleman still going? Boomers.
comment by Girøulski Alt-0216 forever (U14971)
posted 2 minutes ago
Jesus, is Coleman still going? Boomers.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He thinks he’s being clever bless him
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Girøulski Alt-0216 forever (U14971)
posted 2 minutes ago
Jesus, is Coleman still going? Boomers.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He thinks he’s being clever bless him
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's the insecurity of it. You can see it all spooks him. he went from stupidly defensive to pretending to not care. It's kind of sad, really. Something done to him by the media.
Hate to be a misery, but England just doesn’t get me the way club football does.
I hope we win and I’ll support the team but win or lose I won’t be upset or overjoyed.
As an outsider is absolute cringe to see all this over the top media coverage, on the BBC alone. Its like England diarrhea non stop.
Busby and One Love
Both echoing my thoughts.
Sign in if you want to comment
The coverage is making me queasy.
Page 5 of 6
6
posted on 10/7/21
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 54 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 second ago
“ PawlBawron has observed that he has seen female new readers who have admitted they have no interest in football are counting down the hours till kick off.”
As part of their job of reading the news. Or should they refuse on the basis that they just aren’t that into it usually?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've mentioned exactly that,it is their job and they have to do it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So bit of a weird thing for Pawl to bring up then no?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Here's what he wrote.
Yes I'm getting bored sh1tless of female news readers who by there own admission normally have no interest in football excitedly counting down the days/hours until kick off.
Why shouldn't he say that,if that is what he has observed?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why specify female newsreaders? Assume he’s not bored of make newsreaders doing the same. But weird.
Why is he bored shiiteless of someone doing their job? Not as if said female newsreaders are counting down to kick off because they’ve all of a sudden started linking football. As you’ve also said they are just doing their job, as instructed and paid to do so.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why are some people saying people doing their jobs are making them queasy then,after all they are all doing their jobs.
I'm not defending PawlBawron on what he said,but I am defending his right to say it.
If he said male newsreaders would you all be equally up in arms over it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That first paragraph is a massive straw man and you know it
The freedom of speech argument is also a weird one. Not seen a single person say he should stop saying it. Challenging the comment yes.
‘If he had said make newsreaders’
We all know he wouldn’t have assigned gender to the role had they been male. Evidenced by the fact he didn’t take exception to make newsreaders, who may or may not follow the game, doing the same thing as their female counterparts.
posted on 10/7/21
comment by Girøulski Alt-0216 forever (U14971)
posted 6 seconds ago
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So it's ok to say blonde chicks in this World that is moving on then?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Contexts. It's all about contexts. You're trying to nail down rules detached from their purposes so that you don't have to learn and understand those purposes yourself, and can just bash people over the head with the rules instead.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So it is then.So if he said some blonde chicks reading the news he'd be part of this brave new world,or would the contexts rule you've pulled out come in to it?
posted on 10/7/21
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 54 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 second ago
“ PawlBawron has observed that he has seen female new readers who have admitted they have no interest in football are counting down the hours till kick off.”
As part of their job of reading the news. Or should they refuse on the basis that they just aren’t that into it usually?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've mentioned exactly that,it is their job and they have to do it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So bit of a weird thing for Pawl to bring up then no?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Here's what he wrote.
Yes I'm getting bored sh1tless of female news readers who by there own admission normally have no interest in football excitedly counting down the days/hours until kick off.
Why shouldn't he say that,if that is what he has observed?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why specify female newsreaders? Assume he’s not bored of make newsreaders doing the same. But weird.
Why is he bored shiiteless of someone doing their job? Not as if said female newsreaders are counting down to kick off because they’ve all of a sudden started linking football. As you’ve also said they are just doing their job, as instructed and paid to do so.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why are some people saying people doing their jobs are making them queasy then,after all they are all doing their jobs.
I'm not defending PawlBawron on what he said,but I am defending his right to say it.
If he said male newsreaders would you all be equally up in arms over it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That first paragraph is a massive straw man and you know it
The freedom of speech argument is also a weird one. Not seen a single person say he should stop saying it. Challenging the comment yes.
‘If he had said make newsreaders’
We all know he wouldn’t have assigned gender to the role had they been male. Evidenced by the fact he didn’t take exception to make newsreaders, who may or may not follow the game, doing the same thing as their female counterparts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You are assuming the person who made the comment is male.
posted on 10/7/21
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Girøulski Alt-0216 forever (U14971)
posted 6 seconds ago
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So it's ok to say blonde chicks in this World that is moving on then?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Contexts. It's all about contexts. You're trying to nail down rules detached from their purposes so that you don't have to learn and understand those purposes yourself, and can just bash people over the head with the rules instead.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So it is then.So if he said some blonde chicks reading the news he'd be part of this brave new world,or would the contexts rule you've pulled out come in to it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You're doing the very thing I accused you of, quoting the thing accusing you of doing it. And your next comment does that same.
I was using the term ironically, in a comment making the argument that there's nothing wrong with them and what they're doing is good actually. Repeating that phrase back at Cinci was to further make that point.
Maybe it's too much for you. Maybe you find the rules in this "brave new world" are inscrutable, impossible to decipher and inconsistent. But they're not. It's just about treating people decently. That's it. You don't have to fight it because people are going to stand in your corner when you're being mistreated, too. It's not really that big a change, it's just listening to people we'd previously ignore, and realising that we've been acting like ärseholes this whole time.
posted on 10/7/21
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 54 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 second ago
“ PawlBawron has observed that he has seen female new readers who have admitted they have no interest in football are counting down the hours till kick off.”
As part of their job of reading the news. Or should they refuse on the basis that they just aren’t that into it usually?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've mentioned exactly that,it is their job and they have to do it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So bit of a weird thing for Pawl to bring up then no?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Here's what he wrote.
Yes I'm getting bored sh1tless of female news readers who by there own admission normally have no interest in football excitedly counting down the days/hours until kick off.
Why shouldn't he say that,if that is what he has observed?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why specify female newsreaders? Assume he’s not bored of make newsreaders doing the same. But weird.
Why is he bored shiiteless of someone doing their job? Not as if said female newsreaders are counting down to kick off because they’ve all of a sudden started linking football. As you’ve also said they are just doing their job, as instructed and paid to do so.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why are some people saying people doing their jobs are making them queasy then,after all they are all doing their jobs.
I'm not defending PawlBawron on what he said,but I am defending his right to say it.
If he said male newsreaders would you all be equally up in arms over it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That first paragraph is a massive straw man and you know it
The freedom of speech argument is also a weird one. Not seen a single person say he should stop saying it. Challenging the comment yes.
‘If he had said make newsreaders’
We all know he wouldn’t have assigned gender to the role had they been male. Evidenced by the fact he didn’t take exception to make newsreaders, who may or may not follow the game, doing the same thing as their female counterparts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You are assuming the person who made the comment is male.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Except it’s well known Pawl is a bloke
Still clutching those straws
posted on 10/7/21
comment by Girøulski Alt-0216 forever (U14971)
posted 48 seconds ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Girøulski Alt-0216 forever (U14971)
posted 6 seconds ago
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So it's ok to say blonde chicks in this World that is moving on then?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Contexts. It's all about contexts. You're trying to nail down rules detached from their purposes so that you don't have to learn and understand those purposes yourself, and can just bash people over the head with the rules instead.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So it is then.So if he said some blonde chicks reading the news he'd be part of this brave new world,or would the contexts rule you've pulled out come in to it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You're doing the very thing I accused you of, quoting the thing accusing you of doing it. And your next comment does that same.
I was using the term ironically, in a comment making the argument that there's nothing wrong with them and what they're doing is good actually. Repeating that phrase back at Cinci was to further make that point.
Maybe it's too much for you. Maybe you find the rules in this "brave new world" are inscrutable, impossible to decipher and inconsistent. But they're not. It's just about treating people decently. That's it. You don't have to fight it because people are going to stand in your corner when you're being mistreated, too. It's not really that big a change, it's just listening to people we'd previously ignore, and realising that we've been acting like ärseholes this whole time.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's not too much for me at all.
Perhaps PawlBawron was being ironic when he said female news readers,perhaps you are the one who has taken his comment 'out of context' .
Who knows eh
posted on 10/7/21
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 54 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 second ago
“ PawlBawron has observed that he has seen female new readers who have admitted they have no interest in football are counting down the hours till kick off.”
As part of their job of reading the news. Or should they refuse on the basis that they just aren’t that into it usually?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've mentioned exactly that,it is their job and they have to do it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So bit of a weird thing for Pawl to bring up then no?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Here's what he wrote.
Yes I'm getting bored sh1tless of female news readers who by there own admission normally have no interest in football excitedly counting down the days/hours until kick off.
Why shouldn't he say that,if that is what he has observed?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why specify female newsreaders? Assume he’s not bored of make newsreaders doing the same. But weird.
Why is he bored shiiteless of someone doing their job? Not as if said female newsreaders are counting down to kick off because they’ve all of a sudden started linking football. As you’ve also said they are just doing their job, as instructed and paid to do so.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why are some people saying people doing their jobs are making them queasy then,after all they are all doing their jobs.
I'm not defending PawlBawron on what he said,but I am defending his right to say it.
If he said male newsreaders would you all be equally up in arms over it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That first paragraph is a massive straw man and you know it
The freedom of speech argument is also a weird one. Not seen a single person say he should stop saying it. Challenging the comment yes.
‘If he had said make newsreaders’
We all know he wouldn’t have assigned gender to the role had they been male. Evidenced by the fact he didn’t take exception to make newsreaders, who may or may not follow the game, doing the same thing as their female counterparts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You are assuming the person who made the comment is male.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Except it’s well known Pawl is a bloke
Still clutching those straws
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Have you this person at all,or are going by the name chosen on here?
posted on 10/7/21
have you seen this person*
posted on 10/7/21
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 54 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 second ago
“ PawlBawron has observed that he has seen female new readers who have admitted they have no interest in football are counting down the hours till kick off.”
As part of their job of reading the news. Or should they refuse on the basis that they just aren’t that into it usually?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've mentioned exactly that,it is their job and they have to do it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So bit of a weird thing for Pawl to bring up then no?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Here's what he wrote.
Yes I'm getting bored sh1tless of female news readers who by there own admission normally have no interest in football excitedly counting down the days/hours until kick off.
Why shouldn't he say that,if that is what he has observed?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why specify female newsreaders? Assume he’s not bored of make newsreaders doing the same. But weird.
Why is he bored shiiteless of someone doing their job? Not as if said female newsreaders are counting down to kick off because they’ve all of a sudden started linking football. As you’ve also said they are just doing their job, as instructed and paid to do so.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why are some people saying people doing their jobs are making them queasy then,after all they are all doing their jobs.
I'm not defending PawlBawron on what he said,but I am defending his right to say it.
If he said male newsreaders would you all be equally up in arms over it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That first paragraph is a massive straw man and you know it
The freedom of speech argument is also a weird one. Not seen a single person say he should stop saying it. Challenging the comment yes.
‘If he had said make newsreaders’
We all know he wouldn’t have assigned gender to the role had they been male. Evidenced by the fact he didn’t take exception to make newsreaders, who may or may not follow the game, doing the same thing as their female counterparts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You are assuming the person who made the comment is male.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Except it’s well known Pawl is a bloke
Still clutching those straws
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Have you this person at all,or are going by the name chosen on here?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I need to have seen him to confirm his gender
Why would a woman be moaning about female newsreaders talking about football?
posted on 10/7/21
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 54 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 second ago
“ PawlBawron has observed that he has seen female new readers who have admitted they have no interest in football are counting down the hours till kick off.”
As part of their job of reading the news. Or should they refuse on the basis that they just aren’t that into it usually?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've mentioned exactly that,it is their job and they have to do it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So bit of a weird thing for Pawl to bring up then no?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Here's what he wrote.
Yes I'm getting bored sh1tless of female news readers who by there own admission normally have no interest in football excitedly counting down the days/hours until kick off.
Why shouldn't he say that,if that is what he has observed?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why specify female newsreaders? Assume he’s not bored of make newsreaders doing the same. But weird.
Why is he bored shiiteless of someone doing their job? Not as if said female newsreaders are counting down to kick off because they’ve all of a sudden started linking football. As you’ve also said they are just doing their job, as instructed and paid to do so.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why are some people saying people doing their jobs are making them queasy then,after all they are all doing their jobs.
I'm not defending PawlBawron on what he said,but I am defending his right to say it.
If he said male newsreaders would you all be equally up in arms over it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That first paragraph is a massive straw man and you know it
The freedom of speech argument is also a weird one. Not seen a single person say he should stop saying it. Challenging the comment yes.
‘If he had said make newsreaders’
We all know he wouldn’t have assigned gender to the role had they been male. Evidenced by the fact he didn’t take exception to make newsreaders, who may or may not follow the game, doing the same thing as their female counterparts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You are assuming the person who made the comment is male.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Except it’s well known Pawl is a bloke
Still clutching those straws
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Have you this person at all,or are going by the name chosen on here?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I need to have seen him to confirm his gender
Why would a woman be moaning about female newsreaders talking about football?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's a very narrowminded view of women you have there.
Why wouldn't a woman have the right to moan about female newsreaders talking about football.Are you trying to tell me they shouldn't have a view and say on that.
What right do you have to say what women can and cannot say.
As regards PawlBawrons gender then that's a no you don't know the gender,but you are assuming it.Pretty poor that
posted on 10/7/21
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 54 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 second ago
“ PawlBawron has observed that he has seen female new readers who have admitted they have no interest in football are counting down the hours till kick off.”
As part of their job of reading the news. Or should they refuse on the basis that they just aren’t that into it usually?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've mentioned exactly that,it is their job and they have to do it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So bit of a weird thing for Pawl to bring up then no?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Here's what he wrote.
Yes I'm getting bored sh1tless of female news readers who by there own admission normally have no interest in football excitedly counting down the days/hours until kick off.
Why shouldn't he say that,if that is what he has observed?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why specify female newsreaders? Assume he’s not bored of make newsreaders doing the same. But weird.
Why is he bored shiiteless of someone doing their job? Not as if said female newsreaders are counting down to kick off because they’ve all of a sudden started linking football. As you’ve also said they are just doing their job, as instructed and paid to do so.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why are some people saying people doing their jobs are making them queasy then,after all they are all doing their jobs.
I'm not defending PawlBawron on what he said,but I am defending his right to say it.
If he said male newsreaders would you all be equally up in arms over it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That first paragraph is a massive straw man and you know it
The freedom of speech argument is also a weird one. Not seen a single person say he should stop saying it. Challenging the comment yes.
‘If he had said make newsreaders’
We all know he wouldn’t have assigned gender to the role had they been male. Evidenced by the fact he didn’t take exception to make newsreaders, who may or may not follow the game, doing the same thing as their female counterparts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You are assuming the person who made the comment is male.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Except it’s well known Pawl is a bloke
Still clutching those straws
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Have you this person at all,or are going by the name chosen on here?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I need to have seen him to confirm his gender
Why would a woman be moaning about female newsreaders talking about football?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's a very narrowminded view of women you have there.
Why wouldn't a woman have the right to moan about female newsreaders talking about football.Are you trying to tell me they shouldn't have a view and say on that.
What right do you have to say what women can and cannot say.
As regards PawlBawrons gender then that's a no you don't know the gender,but you are assuming it.Pretty poor that
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is it? Well apparently I’ve got a right to express that view haven’t I? Or at least that’s what you’ve been arguing on here for hours now
Tell you what, go and ask Pawl his/her gender then get back to me.
posted on 10/7/21
It’s a good thing. One of the best things about international tournaments is the buzz it creates around the whole country, be that people from England or elsewhere.
Major sporting events are a spectacle for everyone. I’m sure many complaining about this would watch the Olympics, despite not being fans of the majority of these sports, it any, the whole year round. Football is no different in that regard.
posted on 10/7/21
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 54 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 second ago
“ PawlBawron has observed that he has seen female new readers who have admitted they have no interest in football are counting down the hours till kick off.”
As part of their job of reading the news. Or should they refuse on the basis that they just aren’t that into it usually?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've mentioned exactly that,it is their job and they have to do it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So bit of a weird thing for Pawl to bring up then no?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Here's what he wrote.
Yes I'm getting bored sh1tless of female news readers who by there own admission normally have no interest in football excitedly counting down the days/hours until kick off.
Why shouldn't he say that,if that is what he has observed?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why specify female newsreaders? Assume he’s not bored of make newsreaders doing the same. But weird.
Why is he bored shiiteless of someone doing their job? Not as if said female newsreaders are counting down to kick off because they’ve all of a sudden started linking football. As you’ve also said they are just doing their job, as instructed and paid to do so.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why are some people saying people doing their jobs are making them queasy then,after all they are all doing their jobs.
I'm not defending PawlBawron on what he said,but I am defending his right to say it.
If he said male newsreaders would you all be equally up in arms over it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That first paragraph is a massive straw man and you know it
The freedom of speech argument is also a weird one. Not seen a single person say he should stop saying it. Challenging the comment yes.
‘If he had said make newsreaders’
We all know he wouldn’t have assigned gender to the role had they been male. Evidenced by the fact he didn’t take exception to make newsreaders, who may or may not follow the game, doing the same thing as their female counterparts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You are assuming the person who made the comment is male.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Except it’s well known Pawl is a bloke
Still clutching those straws
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Have you this person at all,or are going by the name chosen on here?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I need to have seen him to confirm his gender
Why would a woman be moaning about female newsreaders talking about football?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's a very narrowminded view of women you have there.
Why wouldn't a woman have the right to moan about female newsreaders talking about football.Are you trying to tell me they shouldn't have a view and say on that.
What right do you have to say what women can and cannot say.
As regards PawlBawrons gender then that's a no you don't know the gender,but you are assuming it.Pretty poor that
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is it? Well apparently I’ve got a right to express that view haven’t I? Or at least that’s what you’ve been arguing on here for hours now
Tell you what, go and ask Pawl his/her gender then get back to me.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As I said at the start Pawl had the right earlier.I have an idea what your reply will be.
Also why are you assuming Pawl is one of only two genders,there are 100+ genders peoplw identify as these days,again that is very narrowminded of you and could cause upset to many people.
posted on 10/7/21
“ As I said at the start Pawl had the right earlier.I have an idea what your reply will be.
Also why are you assuming Pawl is one of only two genders,there are 100+ genders peoplw identify as these days,again that is very narrowminded of you and could cause upset to many people.”
Christ
Think I’ll wait for you to find out Pawl’s gender
posted on 10/7/21
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
“ As I said at the start Pawl had the right earlier.I have an idea what your reply will be.
Also why are you assuming Pawl is one of only two genders,there are 100+ genders peoplw identify as these days,again that is very narrowminded of you and could cause upset to many people.”
Christ
Think I’ll wait for you to find out Pawl’s gender
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't blaspheme either.you are not a very PC person at all are you.
I apologise if I seem judgemental,it must be horrible that everything you say or do will be judged and often criticsised by strangers isn't it.
posted on 10/7/21
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
“ As I said at the start Pawl had the right earlier.I have an idea what your reply will be.
Also why are you assuming Pawl is one of only two genders,there are 100+ genders peoplw identify as these days,again that is very narrowminded of you and could cause upset to many people.”
Christ
Think I’ll wait for you to find out Pawl’s gender
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't blaspheme either.you are not a very PC person at all are you.
I apologise if I seem judgemental,it must be horrible that everything you say or do will be judged and often criticsised by strangers isn't it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You’ve not taken this well have you.
Any news on Pawls gender yet?
posted on 10/7/21
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 12 seconds ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
“ As I said at the start Pawl had the right earlier.I have an idea what your reply will be.
Also why are you assuming Pawl is one of only two genders,there are 100+ genders peoplw identify as these days,again that is very narrowminded of you and could cause upset to many people.”
Christ
Think I’ll wait for you to find out Pawl’s gender
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't blaspheme either.you are not a very PC person at all are you.
I apologise if I seem judgemental,it must be horrible that everything you say or do will be judged and often criticsised by strangers isn't it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You’ve not taken this well have you.
Any news on Pawls gender yet?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You are the one who declared Pawl as male or should I say make.
Whatever gender Pawl identifies as I'm sure you took what Pawl said 'out of context'
posted on 10/7/21
“ You are the one who declared Pawl as male or should I say make.”
Oh a typo
“ Whatever gender Pawl identifies as I'm sure you took what Pawl said 'out of context'”
No I didn’t
posted on 10/7/21
It's like the fooking matrix in here.
posted on 10/7/21
Jesus, is Coleman still going? Boomers.
posted on 10/7/21
comment by Girøulski Alt-0216 forever (U14971)
posted 2 minutes ago
Jesus, is Coleman still going? Boomers.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He thinks he’s being clever bless him
posted on 10/7/21
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Girøulski Alt-0216 forever (U14971)
posted 2 minutes ago
Jesus, is Coleman still going? Boomers.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He thinks he’s being clever bless him
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's the insecurity of it. You can see it all spooks him. he went from stupidly defensive to pretending to not care. It's kind of sad, really. Something done to him by the media.
posted on 10/7/21
Hate to be a misery, but England just doesn’t get me the way club football does.
I hope we win and I’ll support the team but win or lose I won’t be upset or overjoyed.
posted on 10/7/21
As an outsider is absolute cringe to see all this over the top media coverage, on the BBC alone. Its like England diarrhea non stop.
posted on 10/7/21
Busby and One Love
Both echoing my thoughts.
Page 5 of 6
6