or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 146 comments are related to an article called:

Proof

Page 5 of 6

posted on 24/7/21

comment by JustCallMeTed (U21528)
posted 1 hour, 58 minutes ago
Sandy...one more time.....

100 mil is just a number.
It is not a sale price.
Deals can be done with multiple pay offs depending upon performance, time free of injury, etc etc.
And other players in the bargain.
A deal with Man City for Kane would probably be along those lines.
Get real.

And.......think of the player.
Hasn't Kane done enough for this club?
If he really wants to leave...would you say "no" to Harry kane?
Some "fan" you are!
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Ted, what part of Levy wants £160 million cash don`t you understand. A deal wouldn`t be along the lines you suggest at all. You are out on your own here.

posted on 24/7/21

comment by JustCallMeTed (U21528)
posted 1 hour, 40 minutes ago
My final word on this "discussion"...........

Perhaps Harry Kane should have a say?
He has done more than enough for this club.
If he really wants to leave, then Levy should do a deal.
Frankly, I think Kane has left it too late so he's hampered by an over-the-top valuation and the existence of younger players of the same class for the same price.......he should have left last season, or before.
Both Modric and Bale baled out of Spurs much earlier in their careers.

I'm of the mind to let this player do what he thinks is best for himself.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Harry Kane had a say, he signed a contract, and has three years left to complete, then he can have another say. Simple.

posted on 24/7/21

comment by CurrentlyStuckIntheUK (U11181)
posted 1 hour, 23 minutes ago
comment by Striketeam7 - Have you seen the Muffin Man #Wh... (U18109)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by CurrentlyStuckIntheUK (U11181)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Striketeam7 - Have you seen the Muffin Man #Wh... (U18109)
posted 6 seconds ago
comment by CurrentlyStuckIntheUK (U11181)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Striketeam7 - Have you seen the Muffin Man #Wh... (U18109)
posted 47 seconds ago
comment by CurrentlyStuckIntheUK (U11181)
posted 11 minutes ago
Did anyone take the Sun Seriously?

City, United, and Chelsea want Haaland. Younger, not injury prone, and won't cost as much as Kane. The wages probably be similar, and he could end up playing close to ten years.

Kane can look forward to more challenging for top 4 and being a nearly man. But at least he'd be a hero at Spurs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Yes, but there is only 1 of Haaland so what do the other 2 clubs do
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We have Greenwood.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Which basically means, that like us you are settling for not competing for the top trophies.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Kane wasn't anywhere near Greenwood's level at the same age. We also have Cavani and added Sancho.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Alli was brilliant for us at Greenwood’s age, not so great now. If Greenwood becomes as good as Kane the I will forever be known as Mason Greenwood.

You will be miles off city and Chelsea next year even with Sancho, you like us are settling for also ran status
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No we're not. We're improving every season since the PE teacher came in. We may not win the league next season, but we'll do better than the season gone. We actually have an aim to win the league. Same can not be said about those who run Spurs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

United win the league.

posted on 24/7/21

comment by Don_tottenham (U3372)
posted 59 minutes ago
comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 28 minutes ago
comment by Don_tottenham (U3372)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by Don_tottenham (U3372)
posted 11 minutes ago
City are playing a dangerous game here. They tapped him up clearly which resulted in Kane name checking City in that Neville interview. He was clearly tapped him during our season. They are trying their hardest to make Kane throw a strop and cause a scene. We all know Kane isn’t going to do this. But, City are trying to get him as cheap as possible which won’t happen. Put up City you bunch of blue moon c** or shut up!!!! If you don’t want to pay 160 mil, then no problem. Go and buy Danny Ings, you can get him for 10x less.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Clearly tapped up
----------------------------------------------------------------------


He name checked City. He was 100% tapped up. Grow up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

So you're saying City illegally made contact with him? Nothing to do with City contacting Spurs officially last year and Kane being asked directly about City when name dropping them.
You've lost it Don. A month ago he was 100% leaving. Then Nuno did his press conference said nothing aside from the usual patter of saying "he's our player" and that meant he's 100% staying. Now he's been tapped up
----------------------------------------------------------------------


I have always said he’s been tapped up you muppet. Check my previous comments. I only responded to that sun article thinking there might be some truth in it, but have since assessed the situation and seem some respectable journalists saying Spurs are adamant they want to keep Kane. You seem to think you know exactly what is going on at spurs and you haven’t got a scooby. Fact of the matter is, City have tried to unsettle Kane which means he’s been tapped up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

As you say Don, it would make a change for financially doped City to try not to buy another league.

posted on 24/7/21

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 24/7/21

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by Spurtle (U1608)

posted on 24/7/21

Kane would be a bargain at £120m, especially for City. Would feel like a lack of ambition on their part if they don't want to spend that much on the best player in the PL who they'd get a good 5 years out of, at least.

posted on 24/7/21

comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by Don_tottenham (U3372)
posted 1 hour, 13 minutes ago
comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 28 minutes ago
comment by Don_tottenham (U3372)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by Don_tottenham (U3372)
posted 11 minutes ago
City are playing a dangerous game here. They tapped him up clearly which resulted in Kane name checking City in that Neville interview. He was clearly tapped him during our season. They are trying their hardest to make Kane throw a strop and cause a scene. We all know Kane isn’t going to do this. But, City are trying to get him as cheap as possible which won’t happen. Put up City you bunch of blue moon c** or shut up!!!! If you don’t want to pay 160 mil, then no problem. Go and buy Danny Ings, you can get him for 10x less.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Clearly tapped up
----------------------------------------------------------------------


He name checked City. He was 100% tapped up. Grow up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

So you're saying City illegally made contact with him? Nothing to do with City contacting Spurs officially last year and Kane being asked directly about City when name dropping them.
You've lost it Don. A month ago he was 100% leaving. Then Nuno did his press conference said nothing aside from the usual patter of saying "he's our player" and that meant he's 100% staying. Now he's been tapped up
----------------------------------------------------------------------


I have always said he’s been tapped up you muppet. Check my previous comments. I only responded to that sun article thinking there might be some truth in it, but have since assessed the situation and seem some respectable journalists saying Spurs are adamant they want to keep Kane. You seem to think you know exactly what is going on at spurs and you haven’t got a scooby. Fact of the matter is, City have tried to unsettle Kane which means he’s been tapped up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

No it doesn't. Tapping up is illegally contacting the player without the club who he is registered to giving permission.
----------------------------------------------------------------------


And what makes you think City officially went to Spurs last year then? You have zero evidence. So I would suggest you pipe down because you don’t have a clue mate. You are just a Liverpool fan with an opinion on ja606. Facts are somewhere along the way last season someone got the message to Kane they wanted him. No official bid was made so he’s been tapped. You are clueless.

posted on 24/7/21

Basically you are saying City went to Spurs officially last year which prompted Kane to wanting out. Pure speculation from yourself with zero evidence. I would suggest City getting the message to Kane, so they can unsettle him and try get the price down is highly more likely don’t you think ?

posted on 24/7/21

Kane has been tapped up there is no doubt about it. No official bid was made last year.

posted on 24/7/21

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 24/7/21

I reckon a compromise will be reached and he’ll be sold to City for a fee of around £100m this window

posted on 24/7/21

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 24/7/21

Agents exist.

posted on 24/7/21

comment by Jed Maxwell (U1449)
posted 6 minutes ago
I reckon a compromise will be reached and he’ll be sold to City for a fee of around £100m this window
----------------------------------------------------------------------

posted on 24/7/21

comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Jed Maxwell (U1449)
posted 6 minutes ago
I reckon a compromise will be reached and he’ll be sold to City for a fee of around £100m this window
----------------------------------------------------------------------


----------------------------------------------------------------------


posted on 24/7/21

comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Jed Maxwell (U1449)
posted 6 minutes ago
I reckon a compromise will be reached and he’ll be sold to City for a fee of around £100m this window
----------------------------------------------------------------------


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Darth Levy woild force choke you if he read this comment.

posted on 24/7/21

comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by Don_tottenham (U3372)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by Don_tottenham (U3372)
posted 1 hour, 13 minutes ago
comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 28 minutes ago
comment by Don_tottenham (U3372)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by Don_tottenham (U3372)
posted 11 minutes ago
City are playing a dangerous game here. They tapped him up clearly which resulted in Kane name checking City in that Neville interview. He was clearly tapped him during our season. They are trying their hardest to make Kane throw a strop and cause a scene. We all know Kane isn’t going to do this. But, City are trying to get him as cheap as possible which won’t happen. Put up City you bunch of blue moon c** or shut up!!!! If you don’t want to pay 160 mil, then no problem. Go and buy Danny Ings, you can get him for 10x less.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Clearly tapped up
----------------------------------------------------------------------


He name checked City. He was 100% tapped up. Grow up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

So you're saying City illegally made contact with him? Nothing to do with City contacting Spurs officially last year and Kane being asked directly about City when name dropping them.
You've lost it Don. A month ago he was 100% leaving. Then Nuno did his press conference said nothing aside from the usual patter of saying "he's our player" and that meant he's 100% staying. Now he's been tapped up
----------------------------------------------------------------------


I have always said he’s been tapped up you muppet. Check my previous comments. I only responded to that sun article thinking there might be some truth in it, but have since assessed the situation and seem some respectable journalists saying Spurs are adamant they want to keep Kane. You seem to think you know exactly what is going on at spurs and you haven’t got a scooby. Fact of the matter is, City have tried to unsettle Kane which means he’s been tapped up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

No it doesn't. Tapping up is illegally contacting the player without the club who he is registered to giving permission.
----------------------------------------------------------------------


And what makes you think City officially went to Spurs last year then? You have zero evidence. So I would suggest you pipe down because you don’t have a clue mate. You are just a Liverpool fan with an opinion on ja606. Facts are somewhere along the way last season someone got the message to Kane they wanted him. No official bid was made so he’s been tapped. You are clueless.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

A pretty reliable journalist from.The Athletic has said that City enquired last summer. You saying it didn't happens means very little.
----------------------------------------------------------------------


Couldn’t give a flying f** what the athletic journalist says. Ally gold is by far the best Spurs journalists that gets pretty much all the info and there’s been no mention whatsoever of an official approach from City last year. Which pretty much confirms City tapped Kane up and somehow got the message to him, hence the Gary Neville. Also, you have no proof that Daniel Levy had a gentlemen’s agreement to sell him apart from rubbish sources. Like I said mate, wind your neck in. Your sources are crap.

posted on 24/7/21

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by Spurtle (U1608)

posted on 24/7/21

All I know is if Spurs still sell Kane then they facked up with the timing. They should have done this before tying Son to a new contract so they could bring that news out to soften the blow.

posted on 24/7/21

comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Don_tottenham (U3372)
posted 11 seconds ago
comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by Don_tottenham (U3372)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by Don_tottenham (U3372)
posted 1 hour, 13 minutes ago
comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 28 minutes ago
comment by Don_tottenham (U3372)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by Don_tottenham (U3372)
posted 11 minutes ago
City are playing a dangerous game here. They tapped him up clearly which resulted in Kane name checking City in that Neville interview. He was clearly tapped him during our season. They are trying their hardest to make Kane throw a strop and cause a scene. We all know Kane isn’t going to do this. But, City are trying to get him as cheap as possible which won’t happen. Put up City you bunch of blue moon c** or shut up!!!! If you don’t want to pay 160 mil, then no problem. Go and buy Danny Ings, you can get him for 10x less.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Clearly tapped up
----------------------------------------------------------------------


He name checked City. He was 100% tapped up. Grow up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

So you're saying City illegally made contact with him? Nothing to do with City contacting Spurs officially last year and Kane being asked directly about City when name dropping them.
You've lost it Don. A month ago he was 100% leaving. Then Nuno did his press conference said nothing aside from the usual patter of saying "he's our player" and that meant he's 100% staying. Now he's been tapped up
----------------------------------------------------------------------


I have always said he’s been tapped up you muppet. Check my previous comments. I only responded to that sun article thinking there might be some truth in it, but have since assessed the situation and seem some respectable journalists saying Spurs are adamant they want to keep Kane. You seem to think you know exactly what is going on at spurs and you haven’t got a scooby. Fact of the matter is, City have tried to unsettle Kane which means he’s been tapped up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

No it doesn't. Tapping up is illegally contacting the player without the club who he is registered to giving permission.
----------------------------------------------------------------------


And what makes you think City officially went to Spurs last year then? You have zero evidence. So I would suggest you pipe down because you don’t have a clue mate. You are just a Liverpool fan with an opinion on ja606. Facts are somewhere along the way last season someone got the message to Kane they wanted him. No official bid was made so he’s been tapped. You are clueless.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

A pretty reliable journalist from.The Athletic has said that City enquired last summer. You saying it didn't happens means very little.
----------------------------------------------------------------------


Couldn’t give a flying f** what the athletic journalist says. Ally gold is by far the best Spurs journalists that gets pretty much all the info and there’s been no mention whatsoever of an official approach from City last year. Which pretty much confirms City tapped Kane up and somehow got the message to him, hence the Gary Neville. Also, you have no proof that Daniel Levy had a gentlemen’s agreement to sell him apart from rubbish sources. Like I said mate, wind your neck in. Your sources are crap.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You literally spent 2 weeks crying about Kane was 100% leaving... all thus stuff was true then. You now have a change of heart and go completely the other way where everything is now BS.

You're a mess.
----------------------------------------------------------------------


Don’t try and change the subject just because I completely schooled your opinion. Nice try though you are an embarrassment, move along now before you make yourself look even more ridiculous

posted on 24/7/21

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 24/7/21

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 24/7/21

We are not talking about Kane leaving or not. We are talking about him being tapped him which ridiculously you laughed at and tried to provide proof from an athletic journalist that City officially approached Kane last year if you going to express an opinion, come at me with a reputable source you clown. Ally Gold is the Spurs mouth piece made no sounds of this happening, so as far as I’m concerned City have illegally approached Kane to try and unsettle him, hence the tapping up. Schooled.

posted on 24/7/21

comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 50 seconds ago
comment by Don_tottenham (U3372)
posted 49 seconds ago
comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Don_tottenham (U3372)
posted 11 seconds ago
comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by Don_tottenham (U3372)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by Don_tottenham (U3372)
posted 1 hour, 13 minutes ago
comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 28 minutes ago
comment by Don_tottenham (U3372)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by Don_tottenham (U3372)
posted 11 minutes ago
City are playing a dangerous game here. They tapped him up clearly which resulted in Kane name checking City in that Neville interview. He was clearly tapped him during our season. They are trying their hardest to make Kane throw a strop and cause a scene. We all know Kane isn’t going to do this. But, City are trying to get him as cheap as possible which won’t happen. Put up City you bunch of blue moon c** or shut up!!!! If you don’t want to pay 160 mil, then no problem. Go and buy Danny Ings, you can get him for 10x less.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Clearly tapped up
----------------------------------------------------------------------


He name checked City. He was 100% tapped up. Grow up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

So you're saying City illegally made contact with him? Nothing to do with City contacting Spurs officially last year and Kane being asked directly about City when name dropping them.
You've lost it Don. A month ago he was 100% leaving. Then Nuno did his press conference said nothing aside from the usual patter of saying "he's our player" and that meant he's 100% staying. Now he's been tapped up
----------------------------------------------------------------------


I have always said he’s been tapped up you muppet. Check my previous comments. I only responded to that sun article thinking there might be some truth in it, but have since assessed the situation and seem some respectable journalists saying Spurs are adamant they want to keep Kane. You seem to think you know exactly what is going on at spurs and you haven’t got a scooby. Fact of the matter is, City have tried to unsettle Kane which means he’s been tapped up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

No it doesn't. Tapping up is illegally contacting the player without the club who he is registered to giving permission.
----------------------------------------------------------------------


And what makes you think City officially went to Spurs last year then? You have zero evidence. So I would suggest you pipe down because you don’t have a clue mate. You are just a Liverpool fan with an opinion on ja606. Facts are somewhere along the way last season someone got the message to Kane they wanted him. No official bid was made so he’s been tapped. You are clueless.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

A pretty reliable journalist from.The Athletic has said that City enquired last summer. You saying it didn't happens means very little.
----------------------------------------------------------------------


Couldn’t give a flying f** what the athletic journalist says. Ally gold is by far the best Spurs journalists that gets pretty much all the info and there’s been no mention whatsoever of an official approach from City last year. Which pretty much confirms City tapped Kane up and somehow got the message to him, hence the Gary Neville. Also, you have no proof that Daniel Levy had a gentlemen’s agreement to sell him apart from rubbish sources. Like I said mate, wind your neck in. Your sources are crap.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You literally spent 2 weeks crying about Kane was 100% leaving... all thus stuff was true then. You now have a change of heart and go completely the other way where everything is now BS.

You're a mess.
----------------------------------------------------------------------


Don’t try and change the subject just because I completely schooled your opinion. Nice try thoughyou are an embarrassment, move along now before you make yourself look even more ridiculous
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You told me you didn't believe a journalist that I believe... schooled.

You're a mess.
----------------------------------------------------------------------


Stop crying because I have schooled your opinion. You don’t like it do you your an embarrassment

Page 5 of 6

Sign in if you want to comment