Klopp on 26 points is the closest to challenging Pep since he arrived at City
comment by Pranks - Going for the JA LFC FF 3peat (U22336)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by Spurtle (U1608)
posted 13 minutes ago
I suppose it's an even fight now with Liverpool splashing the cash too. I think the difference between the 2 in the last few years in terms of the success rate is the manager.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
nothing to do with their massive budget and squad.
We operate on a spurs type budget.
Even
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You have both spent a lot in recent times, although in terms of the origins of your success yours has obviously been a lot more organic. That will always be a mark against City.
Still, ultimately I think the success between the 2 just boils down to Pep being slightly better than Klopp.
comment by Spurtle (U1608)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Pranks - Going for the JA LFC FF 3peat (U22336)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by Spurtle (U1608)
posted 13 minutes ago
I suppose it's an even fight now with Liverpool splashing the cash too. I think the difference between the 2 in the last few years in terms of the success rate is the manager.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
nothing to do with their massive budget and squad.
We operate on a spurs type budget.
Even
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You have both spent a lot in recent times, although in terms of the origins of your success yours has obviously been a lot more organic. That will always be a mark against City.
Still, ultimately I think the success between the 2 just boils down to Pep being slightly better than Klopp.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Absolute rubbish, since Klopp has been in charge we have a similar net spend to spurs if not less.
Stop talking shiiiiit, city operate on a different level and you know it.
Liverpool just spent 100m on an unproven striker whereas city spent less for haaland. Liverpool spend more money than anyone these days
comment by Wahl Koulibaly … Kalidou > Virgil (U22857)
posted 2 minutes ago
Liverpool just spent 100m on an unproven striker whereas city spent less for haaland. Liverpool spend more money than anyone these days
----------------------------------------------------------------------
65 million singing on fee ffs
comment by Pranks - Going for the JA LFC FF 3peat (U22336)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Spurtle (U1608)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Pranks - Going for the JA LFC FF 3peat (U22336)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by Spurtle (U1608)
posted 13 minutes ago
I suppose it's an even fight now with Liverpool splashing the cash too. I think the difference between the 2 in the last few years in terms of the success rate is the manager.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
nothing to do with their massive budget and squad.
We operate on a spurs type budget.
Even
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You have both spent a lot in recent times, although in terms of the origins of your success yours has obviously been a lot more organic. That will always be a mark against City.
Still, ultimately I think the success between the 2 just boils down to Pep being slightly better than Klopp.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Absolute rubbish, since Klopp has been in charge we have a similar net spend to spurs if not less.
Stop talking shiiiiit, city operate on a different level and you know it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sure but not every player that teams buy or sell is worth that value. You sold Coutinho for twice as much as he was worth which helped you a lot.
How has the net spend been lately? Can't be much in it between the 2 teams with what you've both bought and sold.
comment by Spurtle (U1608)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Pranks - Going for the JA LFC FF 3peat (U22336)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Spurtle (U1608)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Pranks - Going for the JA LFC FF 3peat (U22336)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by Spurtle (U1608)
posted 13 minutes ago
I suppose it's an even fight now with Liverpool splashing the cash too. I think the difference between the 2 in the last few years in terms of the success rate is the manager.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
nothing to do with their massive budget and squad.
We operate on a spurs type budget.
Even
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You have both spent a lot in recent times, although in terms of the origins of your success yours has obviously been a lot more organic. That will always be a mark against City.
Still, ultimately I think the success between the 2 just boils down to Pep being slightly better than Klopp.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Absolute rubbish, since Klopp has been in charge we have a similar net spend to spurs if not less.
Stop talking shiiiiit, city operate on a different level and you know it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sure but not every player that teams buy or sell is worth that value. You sold Coutinho for twice as much as he was worth which helped you a lot.
How has the net spend been lately? Can't be much in it between the 2 teams with what you've both bought and sold.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lately peps net spend is something like 5 times more than Klopps since they’ve been in the PL.
yeah ignore the billion prior
comment by Taki Minamino (U20650)
posted 33 seconds ago
yeah ignore the billion prior
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Init
No one. History ha staught me enough to know that any prejudgements on new signings tend to get thrown out of the window when they actually play for their new team.
comment by Wahl Koulibaly … Kalidou > Virgil (U22857)
posted 43 minutes ago
Liverpool just spent 100m on an unproven striker whereas city spent less for haaland. Liverpool spend more money than anyone these days
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Liverpool still spending the £4.8bn they got for Coutinho
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 hour, 35 minutes ago
comment by Wahl Koulibaly … Kalidou > Virgil (U22857)
posted 43 minutes ago
Liverpool just spent 100m on an unproven striker whereas city spent less for haaland. Liverpool spend more money than anyone these days
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Liverpool still spending the £4.8bn they got for Coutinho
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Peps spent that just on lb''s and cb''s πππ
Chelsea getting Koulibaly is a big one. Sterling is a top player. They've still got lots to do, though. We've definitely improved most on paper so far.
comment by Spurtle (U1608)
posted 6 hours, 5 minutes ago
comment by Pranks - Going for the JA LFC FF 3peat (U22336)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by Spurtle (U1608)
posted 13 minutes ago
I suppose it's an even fight now with Liverpool splashing the cash too. I think the difference between the 2 in the last few years in terms of the success rate is the manager.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
nothing to do with their massive budget and squad.
We operate on a spurs type budget.
Even
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You have both spent a lot in recent times, although in terms of the origins of your success yours has obviously been a lot more organic. That will always be a mark against City.
Still, ultimately I think the success between the 2 just boils down to Pep being slightly better than Klopp.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't be bitter with your views.
The only two reasons Liverpool can compete with City are Jurgen Klopp and a transfer team/strategy that is levels above anything else in the world.
comment by FootyMcfootfoot (U21853)
posted 3 hours, 35 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 hour, 35 minutes ago
comment by Wahl Koulibaly … Kalidou > Virgil (U22857)
posted 43 minutes ago
Liverpool just spent 100m on an unproven striker whereas city spent less for haaland. Liverpool spend more money than anyone these days
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Liverpool still spending the £4.8bn they got for Coutinho
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Peps spent that just on lb''s and cb''s πππ
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We didn't spend 100m on a striker, and City still spent more on Haaland than we did on Nunez.
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 11 hours, 39 minutes ago
Chelsea would hand finished a lot higher than spurs if not for key injuries last year. With all teams fit chelsea will be much a bigger threat than utd and arsenal. It’s all moot though. Signings to be made and who cares unless we’re challenging for silverware
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We out performed you from Dec to May with an inferior squad. You cannot blame injuries too much, your squad is massive and your manager takes some blame for not making things work.
jeez, Liverpool fans and their Net Spend drum they keep banging...its more irritating than a listing to a vuvuzela
comment by Assassin Baby - (U1282)
posted 4 hours, 4 minutes ago
comment by FootyMcfootfoot (U21853)
posted 3 hours, 35 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 hour, 35 minutes ago
comment by Wahl Koulibaly … Kalidou > Virgil (U22857)
posted 43 minutes ago
Liverpool just spent 100m on an unproven striker whereas city spent less for haaland. Liverpool spend more money than anyone these days
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Liverpool still spending the £4.8bn they got for Coutinho
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Peps spent that just on lb''s and cb''s πππ
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We didn't spend 100m on a striker, and City still spent more on Haaland than we did on Nunez.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That is just a barefaced lie.
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 33 minutes ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 11 hours, 39 minutes ago
Chelsea would hand finished a lot higher than spurs if not for key injuries last year. With all teams fit chelsea will be much a bigger threat than utd and arsenal. It’s all moot though. Signings to be made and who cares unless we’re challenging for silverware
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We out performed you from Dec to May with an inferior squad. You cannot blame injuries too much, your squad is massive and your manager takes some blame for not making things work.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you outperformed us during the carefully selected period that you have chosen during which you played us 3 times home and away, you lost all three games without scoring a single goal, with your apparently superb manager while we were stuck with our blameworthy one and still didn't gain enough points to finish in front of us.
If we ever manage to outperform you then you will clearly be in very, very serious trouble.
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 9 hours, 14 minutes ago
jeez, Liverpool fans and their Net Spend drum they keep banging...its more irritating than a listing to a vuvuzela
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From a spurs fan ii thought you lot were the proud net spend champions
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 9 hours, 40 minutes ago
comment by Assassin Baby - (U1282)
posted 4 hours, 4 minutes ago
comment by FootyMcfootfoot (U21853)
posted 3 hours, 35 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 hour, 35 minutes ago
comment by Wahl Koulibaly … Kalidou > Virgil (U22857)
posted 43 minutes ago
Liverpool just spent 100m on an unproven striker whereas city spent less for haaland. Liverpool spend more money than anyone these days
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Liverpool still spending the £4.8bn they got for Coutinho
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Peps spent that just on lb''s and cb''s πππ
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We didn't spend 100m on a striker, and City still spent more on Haaland than we did on Nunez.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That is just a barefaced lie.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How so?
comment by Pranks - Going for the JA LFC FF 3peat (U22336)
posted 24 minutes ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 9 hours, 14 minutes ago
jeez, Liverpool fans and their Net Spend drum they keep banging...its more irritating than a listing to a vuvuzela
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From a spurs fanii thought you lot were the proud net spend champions
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Naah, Liverpool are still the net spend champs.
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 10 hours, 5 minutes ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 11 hours, 39 minutes ago
Chelsea would hand finished a lot higher than spurs if not for key injuries last year. With all teams fit chelsea will be much a bigger threat than utd and arsenal. It’s all moot though. Signings to be made and who cares unless we’re challenging for silverware
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We out performed you from Dec to May with an inferior squad. You cannot blame injuries too much, your squad is massive and your manager takes some blame for not making things work.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course I can blame injuries. I don’t rate the replacements.
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 58 seconds ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 10 hours, 5 minutes ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 11 hours, 39 minutes ago
Chelsea would hand finished a lot higher than spurs if not for key injuries last year. With all teams fit chelsea will be much a bigger threat than utd and arsenal. It’s all moot though. Signings to be made and who cares unless we’re challenging for silverware
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We out performed you from Dec to May with an inferior squad. You cannot blame injuries too much, your squad is massive and your manager takes some blame for not making things work.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course I can blame injuries. I don’t rate the replacements.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Spurs only managed to finish ahead of United and Arsenal because they had no European football. Spurs bottled and chickened out of the conference league. They were struggling badly with European commitments and are now in the Champions League. Doesn't bode well.
Well currently you don't have starters let alone upgraded the replacements....and it's a long season so you have to expect injuries and have to rely on the squad. Its hardly an excuse when the squad is so expensively assembled and these issues you perceived are not addressed.
Sign in if you want to comment
Which club worry you
Page 3 of 4
posted on 16/7/22
Klopp on 26 points is the closest to challenging Pep since he arrived at City
posted on 16/7/22
comment by Pranks - Going for the JA LFC FF 3peat (U22336)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by Spurtle (U1608)
posted 13 minutes ago
I suppose it's an even fight now with Liverpool splashing the cash too. I think the difference between the 2 in the last few years in terms of the success rate is the manager.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
nothing to do with their massive budget and squad.
We operate on a spurs type budget.
Even
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You have both spent a lot in recent times, although in terms of the origins of your success yours has obviously been a lot more organic. That will always be a mark against City.
Still, ultimately I think the success between the 2 just boils down to Pep being slightly better than Klopp.
posted on 16/7/22
comment by Spurtle (U1608)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Pranks - Going for the JA LFC FF 3peat (U22336)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by Spurtle (U1608)
posted 13 minutes ago
I suppose it's an even fight now with Liverpool splashing the cash too. I think the difference between the 2 in the last few years in terms of the success rate is the manager.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
nothing to do with their massive budget and squad.
We operate on a spurs type budget.
Even
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You have both spent a lot in recent times, although in terms of the origins of your success yours has obviously been a lot more organic. That will always be a mark against City.
Still, ultimately I think the success between the 2 just boils down to Pep being slightly better than Klopp.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Absolute rubbish, since Klopp has been in charge we have a similar net spend to spurs if not less.
Stop talking shiiiiit, city operate on a different level and you know it.
posted on 16/7/22
Liverpool just spent 100m on an unproven striker whereas city spent less for haaland. Liverpool spend more money than anyone these days
posted on 16/7/22
comment by Wahl Koulibaly … Kalidou > Virgil (U22857)
posted 2 minutes ago
Liverpool just spent 100m on an unproven striker whereas city spent less for haaland. Liverpool spend more money than anyone these days
----------------------------------------------------------------------
65 million singing on fee ffs
posted on 16/7/22
comment by Pranks - Going for the JA LFC FF 3peat (U22336)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Spurtle (U1608)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Pranks - Going for the JA LFC FF 3peat (U22336)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by Spurtle (U1608)
posted 13 minutes ago
I suppose it's an even fight now with Liverpool splashing the cash too. I think the difference between the 2 in the last few years in terms of the success rate is the manager.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
nothing to do with their massive budget and squad.
We operate on a spurs type budget.
Even
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You have both spent a lot in recent times, although in terms of the origins of your success yours has obviously been a lot more organic. That will always be a mark against City.
Still, ultimately I think the success between the 2 just boils down to Pep being slightly better than Klopp.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Absolute rubbish, since Klopp has been in charge we have a similar net spend to spurs if not less.
Stop talking shiiiiit, city operate on a different level and you know it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sure but not every player that teams buy or sell is worth that value. You sold Coutinho for twice as much as he was worth which helped you a lot.
How has the net spend been lately? Can't be much in it between the 2 teams with what you've both bought and sold.
posted on 16/7/22
comment by Spurtle (U1608)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Pranks - Going for the JA LFC FF 3peat (U22336)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Spurtle (U1608)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Pranks - Going for the JA LFC FF 3peat (U22336)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by Spurtle (U1608)
posted 13 minutes ago
I suppose it's an even fight now with Liverpool splashing the cash too. I think the difference between the 2 in the last few years in terms of the success rate is the manager.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
nothing to do with their massive budget and squad.
We operate on a spurs type budget.
Even
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You have both spent a lot in recent times, although in terms of the origins of your success yours has obviously been a lot more organic. That will always be a mark against City.
Still, ultimately I think the success between the 2 just boils down to Pep being slightly better than Klopp.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Absolute rubbish, since Klopp has been in charge we have a similar net spend to spurs if not less.
Stop talking shiiiiit, city operate on a different level and you know it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sure but not every player that teams buy or sell is worth that value. You sold Coutinho for twice as much as he was worth which helped you a lot.
How has the net spend been lately? Can't be much in it between the 2 teams with what you've both bought and sold.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lately peps net spend is something like 5 times more than Klopps since they’ve been in the PL.
posted on 16/7/22
yeah ignore the billion prior
posted on 16/7/22
comment by Taki Minamino (U20650)
posted 33 seconds ago
yeah ignore the billion prior
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Init
posted on 16/7/22
No one. History ha staught me enough to know that any prejudgements on new signings tend to get thrown out of the window when they actually play for their new team.
posted on 16/7/22
comment by Wahl Koulibaly … Kalidou > Virgil (U22857)
posted 43 minutes ago
Liverpool just spent 100m on an unproven striker whereas city spent less for haaland. Liverpool spend more money than anyone these days
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Liverpool still spending the £4.8bn they got for Coutinho
posted on 16/7/22
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 hour, 35 minutes ago
comment by Wahl Koulibaly … Kalidou > Virgil (U22857)
posted 43 minutes ago
Liverpool just spent 100m on an unproven striker whereas city spent less for haaland. Liverpool spend more money than anyone these days
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Liverpool still spending the £4.8bn they got for Coutinho
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Peps spent that just on lb''s and cb''s πππ
posted on 16/7/22
Chelsea getting Koulibaly is a big one. Sterling is a top player. They've still got lots to do, though. We've definitely improved most on paper so far.
posted on 16/7/22
comment by Spurtle (U1608)
posted 6 hours, 5 minutes ago
comment by Pranks - Going for the JA LFC FF 3peat (U22336)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by Spurtle (U1608)
posted 13 minutes ago
I suppose it's an even fight now with Liverpool splashing the cash too. I think the difference between the 2 in the last few years in terms of the success rate is the manager.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
nothing to do with their massive budget and squad.
We operate on a spurs type budget.
Even
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You have both spent a lot in recent times, although in terms of the origins of your success yours has obviously been a lot more organic. That will always be a mark against City.
Still, ultimately I think the success between the 2 just boils down to Pep being slightly better than Klopp.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't be bitter with your views.
The only two reasons Liverpool can compete with City are Jurgen Klopp and a transfer team/strategy that is levels above anything else in the world.
posted on 16/7/22
comment by FootyMcfootfoot (U21853)
posted 3 hours, 35 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 hour, 35 minutes ago
comment by Wahl Koulibaly … Kalidou > Virgil (U22857)
posted 43 minutes ago
Liverpool just spent 100m on an unproven striker whereas city spent less for haaland. Liverpool spend more money than anyone these days
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Liverpool still spending the £4.8bn they got for Coutinho
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Peps spent that just on lb''s and cb''s πππ
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We didn't spend 100m on a striker, and City still spent more on Haaland than we did on Nunez.
posted on 17/7/22
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 11 hours, 39 minutes ago
Chelsea would hand finished a lot higher than spurs if not for key injuries last year. With all teams fit chelsea will be much a bigger threat than utd and arsenal. It’s all moot though. Signings to be made and who cares unless we’re challenging for silverware
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We out performed you from Dec to May with an inferior squad. You cannot blame injuries too much, your squad is massive and your manager takes some blame for not making things work.
posted on 17/7/22
jeez, Liverpool fans and their Net Spend drum they keep banging...its more irritating than a listing to a vuvuzela
posted on 17/7/22
comment by Assassin Baby - (U1282)
posted 4 hours, 4 minutes ago
comment by FootyMcfootfoot (U21853)
posted 3 hours, 35 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 hour, 35 minutes ago
comment by Wahl Koulibaly … Kalidou > Virgil (U22857)
posted 43 minutes ago
Liverpool just spent 100m on an unproven striker whereas city spent less for haaland. Liverpool spend more money than anyone these days
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Liverpool still spending the £4.8bn they got for Coutinho
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Peps spent that just on lb''s and cb''s πππ
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We didn't spend 100m on a striker, and City still spent more on Haaland than we did on Nunez.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That is just a barefaced lie.
posted on 17/7/22
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 33 minutes ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 11 hours, 39 minutes ago
Chelsea would hand finished a lot higher than spurs if not for key injuries last year. With all teams fit chelsea will be much a bigger threat than utd and arsenal. It’s all moot though. Signings to be made and who cares unless we’re challenging for silverware
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We out performed you from Dec to May with an inferior squad. You cannot blame injuries too much, your squad is massive and your manager takes some blame for not making things work.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you outperformed us during the carefully selected period that you have chosen during which you played us 3 times home and away, you lost all three games without scoring a single goal, with your apparently superb manager while we were stuck with our blameworthy one and still didn't gain enough points to finish in front of us.
If we ever manage to outperform you then you will clearly be in very, very serious trouble.
posted on 17/7/22
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 9 hours, 14 minutes ago
jeez, Liverpool fans and their Net Spend drum they keep banging...its more irritating than a listing to a vuvuzela
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From a spurs fan ii thought you lot were the proud net spend champions
posted on 17/7/22
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 9 hours, 40 minutes ago
comment by Assassin Baby - (U1282)
posted 4 hours, 4 minutes ago
comment by FootyMcfootfoot (U21853)
posted 3 hours, 35 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 hour, 35 minutes ago
comment by Wahl Koulibaly … Kalidou > Virgil (U22857)
posted 43 minutes ago
Liverpool just spent 100m on an unproven striker whereas city spent less for haaland. Liverpool spend more money than anyone these days
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Liverpool still spending the £4.8bn they got for Coutinho
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Peps spent that just on lb''s and cb''s πππ
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We didn't spend 100m on a striker, and City still spent more on Haaland than we did on Nunez.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That is just a barefaced lie.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How so?
posted on 17/7/22
comment by Pranks - Going for the JA LFC FF 3peat (U22336)
posted 24 minutes ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 9 hours, 14 minutes ago
jeez, Liverpool fans and their Net Spend drum they keep banging...its more irritating than a listing to a vuvuzela
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From a spurs fanii thought you lot were the proud net spend champions
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Naah, Liverpool are still the net spend champs.
posted on 17/7/22
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 10 hours, 5 minutes ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 11 hours, 39 minutes ago
Chelsea would hand finished a lot higher than spurs if not for key injuries last year. With all teams fit chelsea will be much a bigger threat than utd and arsenal. It’s all moot though. Signings to be made and who cares unless we’re challenging for silverware
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We out performed you from Dec to May with an inferior squad. You cannot blame injuries too much, your squad is massive and your manager takes some blame for not making things work.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course I can blame injuries. I don’t rate the replacements.
posted on 17/7/22
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 58 seconds ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 10 hours, 5 minutes ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 11 hours, 39 minutes ago
Chelsea would hand finished a lot higher than spurs if not for key injuries last year. With all teams fit chelsea will be much a bigger threat than utd and arsenal. It’s all moot though. Signings to be made and who cares unless we’re challenging for silverware
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We out performed you from Dec to May with an inferior squad. You cannot blame injuries too much, your squad is massive and your manager takes some blame for not making things work.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course I can blame injuries. I don’t rate the replacements.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Spurs only managed to finish ahead of United and Arsenal because they had no European football. Spurs bottled and chickened out of the conference league. They were struggling badly with European commitments and are now in the Champions League. Doesn't bode well.
posted on 17/7/22
Well currently you don't have starters let alone upgraded the replacements....and it's a long season so you have to expect injuries and have to rely on the squad. Its hardly an excuse when the squad is so expensively assembled and these issues you perceived are not addressed.
Page 3 of 4