comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 39 minutes ago
comment by JustCallMeTed (U21528)
posted 9 minutes ago
One way to deal with this stupid debate is to compute the cost of each goal scored in terms of what the players cost their clubs.
I.e., Player's cost / number of goals scored
Enjoy doing the simple arithmetic....and tell me which player has the lower ratio?
Between these two players only, that player is a better proposition for his clubs bank balance!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why not work out how many trophies have been won at what cost by each player?
Kane...one of their own,but countless millions in wages over the years
Haaland.....cost a few bob,won nothing trophy wise with City yet,but played fewer games than Kane has played seasons for Spurs.
I can virtually guarantee by the end of this season that Haaland will cost less per trophy than Kane.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Trophies are a result of eleven players (count them 1-2-3-..) in case you didn't know.
Goals are score by players, so that is what you count.
Got it now?
comment by JustCallMeTed (U21528)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 39 minutes ago
comment by JustCallMeTed (U21528)
posted 9 minutes ago
One way to deal with this stupid debate is to compute the cost of each goal scored in terms of what the players cost their clubs.
I.e., Player's cost / number of goals scored
Enjoy doing the simple arithmetic....and tell me which player has the lower ratio?
Between these two players only, that player is a better proposition for his clubs bank balance!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why not work out how many trophies have been won at what cost by each player?
Kane...one of their own,but countless millions in wages over the years
Haaland.....cost a few bob,won nothing trophy wise with City yet,but played fewer games than Kane has played seasons for Spurs.
I can virtually guarantee by the end of this season that Haaland will cost less per trophy than Kane.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Trophies are a result of eleven players (count them 1-2-3-..) in case you didn't know.
Goals are score by players, so that is what you count.
Got it now?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Even Shearer won a title whilst playing for non fashionable clubs,what excuse will 'one of our own' have when he ends his career potless?
comment by JustCallMeTed (U21528)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 39 minutes ago
comment by JustCallMeTed (U21528)
posted 9 minutes ago
One way to deal with this stupid debate is to compute the cost of each goal scored in terms of what the players cost their clubs.
I.e., Player's cost / number of goals scored
Enjoy doing the simple arithmetic....and tell me which player has the lower ratio?
Between these two players only, that player is a better proposition for his clubs bank balance!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why not work out how many trophies have been won at what cost by each player?
Kane...one of their own,but countless millions in wages over the years
Haaland.....cost a few bob,won nothing trophy wise with City yet,but played fewer games than Kane has played seasons for Spurs.
I can virtually guarantee by the end of this season that Haaland will cost less per trophy than Kane.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Trophies are a result of eleven players (count them 1-2-3-..) in case you didn't know.
Goals are score by players, so that is what you count.
Got it now?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
When Haaland breaks all records then don't start spouting about who he played with.
Got it now
Culer might be on the wind up, but he isn't completely wrong. Nobody would choose Kane ahead of Haaland for the long run, but right now, for a one-off season, I'd take Kane.
—
I wouldn’t.
comment by Ole dirty Baztard - penited and penandes (U19119)
posted 31 minutes ago
Culer might be on the wind up, but he isn't completely wrong. Nobody would choose Kane ahead of Haaland for the long run, but right now, for a one-off season, I'd take Kane.
—
I wouldn’t.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nobody with a brain would
comment by Blackpolespur (U9242)
posted 8 hours, 22 minutes ago
comment by bomdia (U13941)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Blackpolespur (U9242)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Vladimikel Artutin - committing war crimes against football since 2019 (U18355)
posted 2 minutes ago
Haaland scored 115 goals in 116 games for Salzburg and Dortmund, both teams you would argue are no better than Spurs, and before people say they played in inferior leagues, 23 of those goals came in 19 CL games. Why do people think he will struggle to score goals for Spurs when their game plan for years has been to sit deep and get the ball to their forwards as soon as possible?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We get the ball forward quick to guys who work outside the box
We do not play to haalands strengths at all
He plays for threaded passes or crosses ….we don’t do either well
Those teams he scored goals for before clearly played to his strengths
He would need to bring at least de bruyne with him
Kane can do it on his own
Not saying Haaland can’t but just not seen it yet ….he is (brilliantly) finishing moves off ….he doesn’t seem to be involved in any build up (yet)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Was involved with Foden's goal against Wolves, and set up a goal against Bournemouth. Drove forward for his goal against Wolves, please try harder.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That would need to be yourself that needs to try harder than give examples of goals scored against two of the worse teams so far this season in the league
I’m never going to argue Haaland isn’t a better striker than Kane cos he is already
A footballer he isn’t though and I doubt he ever will be , he isn’t that type of player but would be happy to be proven wrong as I think that would make him the best forward ever seen
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The best forward ever seen. Get a grip. I assume you have heard of Puskas, Di Stefano, Greaves, Best, Pele, Cruyff, Muller, Rush, Dalgleish, Rooney, Shearer, Ronaldo, Lewandowski, Messi etc, etc.
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 8 hours, 48 minutes ago
comment by JustCallMeTed (U21528)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 39 minutes ago
comment by JustCallMeTed (U21528)
posted 9 minutes ago
One way to deal with this stupid debate is to compute the cost of each goal scored in terms of what the players cost their clubs.
I.e., Player's cost / number of goals scored
Enjoy doing the simple arithmetic....and tell me which player has the lower ratio?
Between these two players only, that player is a better proposition for his clubs bank balance!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why not work out how many trophies have been won at what cost by each player?
Kane...one of their own,but countless millions in wages over the years
Haaland.....cost a few bob,won nothing trophy wise with City yet,but played fewer games than Kane has played seasons for Spurs.
I can virtually guarantee by the end of this season that Haaland will cost less per trophy than Kane.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Trophies are a result of eleven players (count them 1-2-3-..) in case you didn't know.
Goals are score by players, so that is what you count.
Got it now?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Even Shearer won a title whilst playing for non fashionable clubs,what excuse will 'one of our own' have when he ends his career potless?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Weird having a Everton fan discussing this, can you even remember 1995?
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 8 hours, 48 minutes ago
comment by JustCallMeTed (U21528)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 39 minutes ago
comment by JustCallMeTed (U21528)
posted 9 minutes ago
One way to deal with this stupid debate is to compute the cost of each goal scored in terms of what the players cost their clubs.
I.e., Player's cost / number of goals scored
Enjoy doing the simple arithmetic....and tell me which player has the lower ratio?
Between these two players only, that player is a better proposition for his clubs bank balance!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why not work out how many trophies have been won at what cost by each player?
Kane...one of their own,but countless millions in wages over the years
Haaland.....cost a few bob,won nothing trophy wise with City yet,but played fewer games than Kane has played seasons for Spurs.
I can virtually guarantee by the end of this season that Haaland will cost less per trophy than Kane.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Trophies are a result of eleven players (count them 1-2-3-..) in case you didn't know.
Goals are score by players, so that is what you count.
Got it now?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
When Haaland breaks all records then don't start spouting about who he played with.
Got it now
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But that is important, John Stones will likely end his career with more trophies than VVD, I know which one is better though.
I get you are still butt hurt that little old Spurs were able to take your best player this summer, but that should show you how far you have fallen as a club and that you should be holding your owners to account given the way they have wasted half a billion
"but overall as a footballer there are many deficiencies to his game; these will hinder City badly when he stops scoring or encounters bad form, "
here is the crux of this post....not going to happen...is he a one trick pony - maybe, hell of a trick though
Yes it will happen Sheriff. Name me one great player, striker/forward, who hasn't gone on a drought? They all have pal.
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 9 hours, 25 minutes ago
comment by JustCallMeTed (U21528)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 39 minutes ago
comment by JustCallMeTed (U21528)
posted 9 minutes ago
One way to deal with this stupid debate is to compute the cost of each goal scored in terms of what the players cost their clubs.
I.e., Player's cost / number of goals scored
Enjoy doing the simple arithmetic....and tell me which player has the lower ratio?
Between these two players only, that player is a better proposition for his clubs bank balance!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why not work out how many trophies have been won at what cost by each player?
Kane...one of their own,but countless millions in wages over the years
Haaland.....cost a few bob,won nothing trophy wise with City yet,but played fewer games than Kane has played seasons for Spurs.
I can virtually guarantee by the end of this season that Haaland will cost less per trophy than Kane.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Trophies are a result of eleven players (count them 1-2-3-..) in case you didn't know.
Goals are score by players, so that is what you count.
Got it now?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
When Haaland breaks all records then don't start spouting about who he played with.
Got it now
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why not? He has KDB, B Silva, Rodri, et al setting him up!
Haaland has it easy ffs... I could score 20 goals a season stood about up top for this City team. Kane is far superior.
comment by Culèr: Mr Brand ✅ (U9489)
posted 3 minutes ago
Haaland has it easy ffs... I could score 20 goals a season stood about up top for this City team. Kane is far superior.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Only 20
comment by Striketeam7 - the smartest person you know - Arsenal shat it on 16/01/22 - Todger (U18109)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Culèr: Mr Brand ✅ (U9489)
posted 3 minutes ago
Haaland has it easy ffs... I could score 20 goals a season stood about up top for this City team. Kane is far superior.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Only 20
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lol yeah for someone who is more used to a boardroom table than league table that is good.
"Culèr: Mr Brand ✅ (U9489)
posted 12 hours, 3 minutes ago
Blackpole are you ok?? You’re actually talking sense for once so I am concerned.
In fact I may just filter you because something ain’t right here. Just kidding.
Haaland will get a bad injury and when he does I will laugh."
That's not a nice thing to say, fans hate player's from other clubs, but wishing them harm isn't the way to do things!..
You'd best hope that that doesn't come back and kick you with a serious injury to any off your main player's, because its remarks like that that people come back on and laugh while you cry!..
Seem's like a Manchester United or Barcelona fan wishing Haaland was at one off his clubs!..
comment by Culèr: Mr Brand ✅ (U9489)
posted 49 minutes ago
comment by Striketeam7 - the smartest person you know - Arsenal shat it on 16/01/22 - Todger (U18109)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Culèr: Mr Brand ✅ (U9489)
posted 3 minutes ago
Haaland has it easy ffs... I could score 20 goals a season stood about up top for this City team. Kane is far superior.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Only 20
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lol yeah for someone who is more used to a boardroom table than league table that is good.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Culer... You live in the ironing board room son... Just under the stairs
Are you sure that's the right room?..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PoJEetU0O64
comment by LufcGermany (U6066)
posted 32 minutes ago
"Culèr: Mr Brand ✅ (U9489)
posted 12 hours, 3 minutes ago
Blackpole are you ok?? You’re actually talking sense for once so I am concerned.
In fact I may just filter you because something ain’t right here. Just kidding.
Haaland will get a bad injury and when he does I will laugh."
That's not a nice thing to say, fans hate player's from other clubs, but wishing them harm isn't the way to do things!..
You'd best hope that that doesn't come back and kick you with a serious injury to any off your main player's, because its remarks like that that people come back on and laugh while you cry!..
Seem's like a Manchester United or Barcelona fan wishing Haaland was at one off his clubs!..
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No I don't mean I want Haaland to be attacked or assaulted etc I just want him to get an injury so I am proved right. Be great if Lisandro just smashes him in the derby and does his ligaments in I would be buzzing.
comment by Culèr: Mr Brand ✅ (U9489)
posted 32 minutes ago
comment by LufcGermany (U6066)
posted 32 minutes ago
"Culèr: Mr Brand ✅ (U9489)
posted 12 hours, 3 minutes ago
Blackpole are you ok?? You’re actually talking sense for once so I am concerned.
In fact I may just filter you because something ain’t right here. Just kidding.
Haaland will get a bad injury and when he does I will laugh."
That's not a nice thing to say, fans hate player's from other clubs, but wishing them harm isn't the way to do things!..
You'd best hope that that doesn't come back and kick you with a serious injury to any off your main player's, because its remarks like that that people come back on and laugh while you cry!..
Seem's like a Manchester United or Barcelona fan wishing Haaland was at one off his clubs!..
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No I don't mean I want Haaland to be attacked or assaulted etc I just want him to get an injury so I am proved right. Be great if Lisandro just smashes him in the derby and does his ligaments in I would be buzzing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You didn’t mean it so you said it again, more clearly?
No no people misunderstand me
comment by Culèr: Mr Brand ✅ (U9489)
posted 48 minutes ago
comment by LufcGermany (U6066)
posted 32 minutes ago
"Culèr: Mr Brand ✅ (U9489)
posted 12 hours, 3 minutes ago
Blackpole are you ok?? You’re actually talking sense for once so I am concerned.
In fact I may just filter you because something ain’t right here. Just kidding.
Haaland will get a bad injury and when he does I will laugh."
That's not a nice thing to say, fans hate player's from other clubs, but wishing them harm isn't the way to do things!..
You'd best hope that that doesn't come back and kick you with a serious injury to any off your main player's, because its remarks like that that people come back on and laugh while you cry!..
Seem's like a Manchester United or Barcelona fan wishing Haaland was at one off his clubs!..
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No I don't mean I want Haaland to be attacked or assaulted etc I just want him to get an injury so I am proved right. Be great if Lisandro just smashes him in the derby and does his ligaments in I would be buzzing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Christ on a bike
I’d rather have Haaland than Kane,now…
About 5 years ago, Kane was incredible…. But now he’s lost at least a half a yard of pace..
Haaland is a monster!
Nah Kane is no slower now than 2018... he's never been fast
comment by Sheriff JW Pepper (U1007)
posted 2 hours, 55 minutes ago
comment by Culèr: Mr Brand ✅ (U9489)
posted 48 minutes ago
comment by LufcGermany (U6066)
posted 32 minutes ago
"Culèr: Mr Brand ✅ (U9489)
posted 12 hours, 3 minutes ago
Blackpole are you ok?? You’re actually talking sense for once so I am concerned.
In fact I may just filter you because something ain’t right here. Just kidding.
Haaland will get a bad injury and when he does I will laugh."
That's not a nice thing to say, fans hate player's from other clubs, but wishing them harm isn't the way to do things!..
You'd best hope that that doesn't come back and kick you with a serious injury to any off your main player's, because its remarks like that that people come back on and laugh while you cry!..
Seem's like a Manchester United or Barcelona fan wishing Haaland was at one off his clubs!..
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No I don't mean I want Haaland to be attacked or assaulted etc I just want him to get an injury so I am proved right. Be great if Lisandro just smashes him in the derby and does his ligaments in I would be buzzing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Christ on a bike
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Barry is pushing it here isn't he
"Culèr: Mr Brand ✅ (U9489)
posted 3 hours, 20 minutes ago
No no people misunderstand me"
Don't think there's anything for anyone to missunderstand!..
Sign in if you want to comment
Why Kane Is Better Than Haaland
Page 6 of 8
6 | 7 | 8
posted on 20/9/22
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 39 minutes ago
comment by JustCallMeTed (U21528)
posted 9 minutes ago
One way to deal with this stupid debate is to compute the cost of each goal scored in terms of what the players cost their clubs.
I.e., Player's cost / number of goals scored
Enjoy doing the simple arithmetic....and tell me which player has the lower ratio?
Between these two players only, that player is a better proposition for his clubs bank balance!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why not work out how many trophies have been won at what cost by each player?
Kane...one of their own,but countless millions in wages over the years
Haaland.....cost a few bob,won nothing trophy wise with City yet,but played fewer games than Kane has played seasons for Spurs.
I can virtually guarantee by the end of this season that Haaland will cost less per trophy than Kane.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Trophies are a result of eleven players (count them 1-2-3-..) in case you didn't know.
Goals are score by players, so that is what you count.
Got it now?
posted on 20/9/22
comment by JustCallMeTed (U21528)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 39 minutes ago
comment by JustCallMeTed (U21528)
posted 9 minutes ago
One way to deal with this stupid debate is to compute the cost of each goal scored in terms of what the players cost their clubs.
I.e., Player's cost / number of goals scored
Enjoy doing the simple arithmetic....and tell me which player has the lower ratio?
Between these two players only, that player is a better proposition for his clubs bank balance!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why not work out how many trophies have been won at what cost by each player?
Kane...one of their own,but countless millions in wages over the years
Haaland.....cost a few bob,won nothing trophy wise with City yet,but played fewer games than Kane has played seasons for Spurs.
I can virtually guarantee by the end of this season that Haaland will cost less per trophy than Kane.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Trophies are a result of eleven players (count them 1-2-3-..) in case you didn't know.
Goals are score by players, so that is what you count.
Got it now?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Even Shearer won a title whilst playing for non fashionable clubs,what excuse will 'one of our own' have when he ends his career potless?
posted on 20/9/22
comment by JustCallMeTed (U21528)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 39 minutes ago
comment by JustCallMeTed (U21528)
posted 9 minutes ago
One way to deal with this stupid debate is to compute the cost of each goal scored in terms of what the players cost their clubs.
I.e., Player's cost / number of goals scored
Enjoy doing the simple arithmetic....and tell me which player has the lower ratio?
Between these two players only, that player is a better proposition for his clubs bank balance!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why not work out how many trophies have been won at what cost by each player?
Kane...one of their own,but countless millions in wages over the years
Haaland.....cost a few bob,won nothing trophy wise with City yet,but played fewer games than Kane has played seasons for Spurs.
I can virtually guarantee by the end of this season that Haaland will cost less per trophy than Kane.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Trophies are a result of eleven players (count them 1-2-3-..) in case you didn't know.
Goals are score by players, so that is what you count.
Got it now?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
When Haaland breaks all records then don't start spouting about who he played with.
Got it now
posted on 20/9/22
Culer might be on the wind up, but he isn't completely wrong. Nobody would choose Kane ahead of Haaland for the long run, but right now, for a one-off season, I'd take Kane.
—
I wouldn’t.
posted on 21/9/22
comment by Ole dirty Baztard - penited and penandes (U19119)
posted 31 minutes ago
Culer might be on the wind up, but he isn't completely wrong. Nobody would choose Kane ahead of Haaland for the long run, but right now, for a one-off season, I'd take Kane.
—
I wouldn’t.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nobody with a brain would
posted on 21/9/22
comment by Blackpolespur (U9242)
posted 8 hours, 22 minutes ago
comment by bomdia (U13941)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Blackpolespur (U9242)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Vladimikel Artutin - committing war crimes against football since 2019 (U18355)
posted 2 minutes ago
Haaland scored 115 goals in 116 games for Salzburg and Dortmund, both teams you would argue are no better than Spurs, and before people say they played in inferior leagues, 23 of those goals came in 19 CL games. Why do people think he will struggle to score goals for Spurs when their game plan for years has been to sit deep and get the ball to their forwards as soon as possible?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We get the ball forward quick to guys who work outside the box
We do not play to haalands strengths at all
He plays for threaded passes or crosses ….we don’t do either well
Those teams he scored goals for before clearly played to his strengths
He would need to bring at least de bruyne with him
Kane can do it on his own
Not saying Haaland can’t but just not seen it yet ….he is (brilliantly) finishing moves off ….he doesn’t seem to be involved in any build up (yet)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Was involved with Foden's goal against Wolves, and set up a goal against Bournemouth. Drove forward for his goal against Wolves, please try harder.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That would need to be yourself that needs to try harder than give examples of goals scored against two of the worse teams so far this season in the league
I’m never going to argue Haaland isn’t a better striker than Kane cos he is already
A footballer he isn’t though and I doubt he ever will be , he isn’t that type of player but would be happy to be proven wrong as I think that would make him the best forward ever seen
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The best forward ever seen. Get a grip. I assume you have heard of Puskas, Di Stefano, Greaves, Best, Pele, Cruyff, Muller, Rush, Dalgleish, Rooney, Shearer, Ronaldo, Lewandowski, Messi etc, etc.
posted on 21/9/22
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 8 hours, 48 minutes ago
comment by JustCallMeTed (U21528)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 39 minutes ago
comment by JustCallMeTed (U21528)
posted 9 minutes ago
One way to deal with this stupid debate is to compute the cost of each goal scored in terms of what the players cost their clubs.
I.e., Player's cost / number of goals scored
Enjoy doing the simple arithmetic....and tell me which player has the lower ratio?
Between these two players only, that player is a better proposition for his clubs bank balance!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why not work out how many trophies have been won at what cost by each player?
Kane...one of their own,but countless millions in wages over the years
Haaland.....cost a few bob,won nothing trophy wise with City yet,but played fewer games than Kane has played seasons for Spurs.
I can virtually guarantee by the end of this season that Haaland will cost less per trophy than Kane.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Trophies are a result of eleven players (count them 1-2-3-..) in case you didn't know.
Goals are score by players, so that is what you count.
Got it now?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Even Shearer won a title whilst playing for non fashionable clubs,what excuse will 'one of our own' have when he ends his career potless?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Weird having a Everton fan discussing this, can you even remember 1995?
posted on 21/9/22
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 8 hours, 48 minutes ago
comment by JustCallMeTed (U21528)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 39 minutes ago
comment by JustCallMeTed (U21528)
posted 9 minutes ago
One way to deal with this stupid debate is to compute the cost of each goal scored in terms of what the players cost their clubs.
I.e., Player's cost / number of goals scored
Enjoy doing the simple arithmetic....and tell me which player has the lower ratio?
Between these two players only, that player is a better proposition for his clubs bank balance!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why not work out how many trophies have been won at what cost by each player?
Kane...one of their own,but countless millions in wages over the years
Haaland.....cost a few bob,won nothing trophy wise with City yet,but played fewer games than Kane has played seasons for Spurs.
I can virtually guarantee by the end of this season that Haaland will cost less per trophy than Kane.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Trophies are a result of eleven players (count them 1-2-3-..) in case you didn't know.
Goals are score by players, so that is what you count.
Got it now?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
When Haaland breaks all records then don't start spouting about who he played with.
Got it now
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But that is important, John Stones will likely end his career with more trophies than VVD, I know which one is better though.
I get you are still butt hurt that little old Spurs were able to take your best player this summer, but that should show you how far you have fallen as a club and that you should be holding your owners to account given the way they have wasted half a billion
posted on 21/9/22
"but overall as a footballer there are many deficiencies to his game; these will hinder City badly when he stops scoring or encounters bad form, "
here is the crux of this post....not going to happen...is he a one trick pony - maybe, hell of a trick though
posted on 21/9/22
Yes it will happen Sheriff. Name me one great player, striker/forward, who hasn't gone on a drought? They all have pal.
posted on 21/9/22
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 9 hours, 25 minutes ago
comment by JustCallMeTed (U21528)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 39 minutes ago
comment by JustCallMeTed (U21528)
posted 9 minutes ago
One way to deal with this stupid debate is to compute the cost of each goal scored in terms of what the players cost their clubs.
I.e., Player's cost / number of goals scored
Enjoy doing the simple arithmetic....and tell me which player has the lower ratio?
Between these two players only, that player is a better proposition for his clubs bank balance!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why not work out how many trophies have been won at what cost by each player?
Kane...one of their own,but countless millions in wages over the years
Haaland.....cost a few bob,won nothing trophy wise with City yet,but played fewer games than Kane has played seasons for Spurs.
I can virtually guarantee by the end of this season that Haaland will cost less per trophy than Kane.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Trophies are a result of eleven players (count them 1-2-3-..) in case you didn't know.
Goals are score by players, so that is what you count.
Got it now?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
When Haaland breaks all records then don't start spouting about who he played with.
Got it now
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why not? He has KDB, B Silva, Rodri, et al setting him up!
posted on 21/9/22
Haaland has it easy ffs... I could score 20 goals a season stood about up top for this City team. Kane is far superior.
posted on 21/9/22
comment by Culèr: Mr Brand ✅ (U9489)
posted 3 minutes ago
Haaland has it easy ffs... I could score 20 goals a season stood about up top for this City team. Kane is far superior.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Only 20
posted on 21/9/22
comment by Striketeam7 - the smartest person you know - Arsenal shat it on 16/01/22 - Todger (U18109)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Culèr: Mr Brand ✅ (U9489)
posted 3 minutes ago
Haaland has it easy ffs... I could score 20 goals a season stood about up top for this City team. Kane is far superior.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Only 20
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lol yeah for someone who is more used to a boardroom table than league table that is good.
posted on 21/9/22
"Culèr: Mr Brand ✅ (U9489)
posted 12 hours, 3 minutes ago
Blackpole are you ok?? You’re actually talking sense for once so I am concerned.
In fact I may just filter you because something ain’t right here. Just kidding.
Haaland will get a bad injury and when he does I will laugh."
That's not a nice thing to say, fans hate player's from other clubs, but wishing them harm isn't the way to do things!..
You'd best hope that that doesn't come back and kick you with a serious injury to any off your main player's, because its remarks like that that people come back on and laugh while you cry!..
Seem's like a Manchester United or Barcelona fan wishing Haaland was at one off his clubs!..
posted on 21/9/22
comment by Culèr: Mr Brand ✅ (U9489)
posted 49 minutes ago
comment by Striketeam7 - the smartest person you know - Arsenal shat it on 16/01/22 - Todger (U18109)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Culèr: Mr Brand ✅ (U9489)
posted 3 minutes ago
Haaland has it easy ffs... I could score 20 goals a season stood about up top for this City team. Kane is far superior.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Only 20
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lol yeah for someone who is more used to a boardroom table than league table that is good.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Culer... You live in the ironing board room son... Just under the stairs
posted on 21/9/22
Are you sure that's the right room?..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PoJEetU0O64
posted on 21/9/22
comment by LufcGermany (U6066)
posted 32 minutes ago
"Culèr: Mr Brand ✅ (U9489)
posted 12 hours, 3 minutes ago
Blackpole are you ok?? You’re actually talking sense for once so I am concerned.
In fact I may just filter you because something ain’t right here. Just kidding.
Haaland will get a bad injury and when he does I will laugh."
That's not a nice thing to say, fans hate player's from other clubs, but wishing them harm isn't the way to do things!..
You'd best hope that that doesn't come back and kick you with a serious injury to any off your main player's, because its remarks like that that people come back on and laugh while you cry!..
Seem's like a Manchester United or Barcelona fan wishing Haaland was at one off his clubs!..
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No I don't mean I want Haaland to be attacked or assaulted etc I just want him to get an injury so I am proved right. Be great if Lisandro just smashes him in the derby and does his ligaments in I would be buzzing.
posted on 21/9/22
comment by Culèr: Mr Brand ✅ (U9489)
posted 32 minutes ago
comment by LufcGermany (U6066)
posted 32 minutes ago
"Culèr: Mr Brand ✅ (U9489)
posted 12 hours, 3 minutes ago
Blackpole are you ok?? You’re actually talking sense for once so I am concerned.
In fact I may just filter you because something ain’t right here. Just kidding.
Haaland will get a bad injury and when he does I will laugh."
That's not a nice thing to say, fans hate player's from other clubs, but wishing them harm isn't the way to do things!..
You'd best hope that that doesn't come back and kick you with a serious injury to any off your main player's, because its remarks like that that people come back on and laugh while you cry!..
Seem's like a Manchester United or Barcelona fan wishing Haaland was at one off his clubs!..
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No I don't mean I want Haaland to be attacked or assaulted etc I just want him to get an injury so I am proved right. Be great if Lisandro just smashes him in the derby and does his ligaments in I would be buzzing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You didn’t mean it so you said it again, more clearly?
posted on 21/9/22
No no people misunderstand me
posted on 21/9/22
comment by Culèr: Mr Brand ✅ (U9489)
posted 48 minutes ago
comment by LufcGermany (U6066)
posted 32 minutes ago
"Culèr: Mr Brand ✅ (U9489)
posted 12 hours, 3 minutes ago
Blackpole are you ok?? You’re actually talking sense for once so I am concerned.
In fact I may just filter you because something ain’t right here. Just kidding.
Haaland will get a bad injury and when he does I will laugh."
That's not a nice thing to say, fans hate player's from other clubs, but wishing them harm isn't the way to do things!..
You'd best hope that that doesn't come back and kick you with a serious injury to any off your main player's, because its remarks like that that people come back on and laugh while you cry!..
Seem's like a Manchester United or Barcelona fan wishing Haaland was at one off his clubs!..
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No I don't mean I want Haaland to be attacked or assaulted etc I just want him to get an injury so I am proved right. Be great if Lisandro just smashes him in the derby and does his ligaments in I would be buzzing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Christ on a bike
posted on 21/9/22
I’d rather have Haaland than Kane,now…
About 5 years ago, Kane was incredible…. But now he’s lost at least a half a yard of pace..
Haaland is a monster!
posted on 21/9/22
Nah Kane is no slower now than 2018... he's never been fast
posted on 21/9/22
comment by Sheriff JW Pepper (U1007)
posted 2 hours, 55 minutes ago
comment by Culèr: Mr Brand ✅ (U9489)
posted 48 minutes ago
comment by LufcGermany (U6066)
posted 32 minutes ago
"Culèr: Mr Brand ✅ (U9489)
posted 12 hours, 3 minutes ago
Blackpole are you ok?? You’re actually talking sense for once so I am concerned.
In fact I may just filter you because something ain’t right here. Just kidding.
Haaland will get a bad injury and when he does I will laugh."
That's not a nice thing to say, fans hate player's from other clubs, but wishing them harm isn't the way to do things!..
You'd best hope that that doesn't come back and kick you with a serious injury to any off your main player's, because its remarks like that that people come back on and laugh while you cry!..
Seem's like a Manchester United or Barcelona fan wishing Haaland was at one off his clubs!..
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No I don't mean I want Haaland to be attacked or assaulted etc I just want him to get an injury so I am proved right. Be great if Lisandro just smashes him in the derby and does his ligaments in I would be buzzing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Christ on a bike
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Barry is pushing it here isn't he
posted on 21/9/22
"Culèr: Mr Brand ✅ (U9489)
posted 3 hours, 20 minutes ago
No no people misunderstand me"
Don't think there's anything for anyone to missunderstand!..
Page 6 of 8
6 | 7 | 8