More deflecting from Boris.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by tcruel87 (U11882)
posted 1 minute ago
It's great to see, the stats regarding Salah getting free kicks are a joke. He is in a league of his own. Once the refs stop discriminating against one player, the abuse can stop
https://tomkinstimes.com/2022/03/incredible-mo-salah-stats-that-suggest-something-is-very-very-wrong/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Great article.
comment by Serious Thorgen Kloppinson - No laughing matter (U1282)
posted 52 minutes ago
His point is that the "self sufficient" thing is irrelevant and most City fans know this when they bring it up. The "equity", aka billions of pounds was already invested and everything gained from it afterwards carries it's signature.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Irrelevant to what? It’s completely relevant to where we are now and the future. That we are isn’t just an indicative point to us either, it’s to football as whole, which is why Boehly at Chelsea is talking about the things he is and getting to a billion in revenue.
comment by Dr Tobias Fünke (U1217)
posted 55 minutes ago
comment by tcruel87 (U11882)
posted 1 minute ago
It's great to see, the stats regarding Salah getting free kicks are a joke. He is in a league of his own. Once the refs stop discriminating against one player, the abuse can stop
https://tomkinstimes.com/2022/03/incredible-mo-salah-stats-that-suggest-something-is-very-very-wrong/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Great article.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
does the article point out he has been sheit though since AFCON?
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 hour, 11 minutes ago
No outrage last season when Milner should have been sent off for fouling Bernardo
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There was outrage from City fans but there's only so much noise a handful of blokes can make.
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 40 minutes ago
comment by Serious Thorgen Kloppinson - No laughing matter (U1282)
posted 52 minutes ago
His point is that the "self sufficient" thing is irrelevant and most City fans know this when they bring it up. The "equity", aka billions of pounds was already invested and everything gained from it afterwards carries it's signature.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Irrelevant to what? It’s completely relevant to where we are now and the future. That we are isn’t just an indicative point to us either, it’s to football as whole, which is why Boehly at Chelsea is talking about the things he is and getting to a billion in revenue.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Irrelevant in that it's still the fruit of financial doping.
Just because you launder money doesn't make your new money legit, does it? Same principle applies here
comment by B10 - Boss (U22536)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by Dr Tobias Fünke (U1217)
posted 55 minutes ago
comment by tcruel87 (U11882)
posted 1 minute ago
It's great to see, the stats regarding Salah getting free kicks are a joke. He is in a league of his own. Once the refs stop discriminating against one player, the abuse can stop
https://tomkinstimes.com/2022/03/incredible-mo-salah-stats-that-suggest-something-is-very-very-wrong/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Great article.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
does the article point out he has been sheit though since AFCON?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why would it? It's an article about his lack of protection from officials, not about his form.
comment by Striketeam7 - the smartest person you know - Arsenal shat it on 16/01/22 - Todger (U18109)
posted 3 hours, 18 minutes ago
comment by Serious Thorgen Kloppinson - No laughing matter (U1282)
posted 11 minutes ago
I love Klopp. The officiating was clearly biased and I live that he let them have it instead of just being polite while being robbed like most managers do.
Failing to give that foul and allowing City to counter attack us, and also missing the fact that Silva tried to back into Salah and elbow him. And Klopp is the bad guy for protesting biased officiating. Not Pep also getting in the central refs face(Klopp was linesman)? Not Silva trying to elbow an opponent?
Fans are stupid. Actually backing City and Pep in this grudge with Liverpool and Klopp.
Failing to support Klopp in instances like this one is why your puny trophyless clubs will always be robbed by the bigger teams and forced to bankrupt yourselves to keep up with oil money, while you keep crying about corruption in the Prem year after year to console yourselves at the lack of success
Enjoy the mediocrity you nincompoops. You deserve every but of it for being stoopid, especially Spurs fans, some of whom are extremely thick.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I back the ref
He is having to make a decision, he got it wrong, but you have zero proof he is biased.
Both Pep and Klopp were well in the wrong. The biggest problem as usual is the authorities - give Pep and Klopp a 5 game ban for their reactions and this whole issue disappears over night
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What about Silva? He kicked out at salah off the ball. Root cause of klopps frustration. Why not ban silva?
comment by Serious Thorgen Kloppinson - No laughing matter (U1282)
posted 26 minutes ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 40 minutes ago
comment by Serious Thorgen Kloppinson - No laughing matter (U1282)
posted 52 minutes ago
His point is that the "self sufficient" thing is irrelevant and most City fans know this when they bring it up. The "equity", aka billions of pounds was already invested and everything gained from it afterwards carries it's signature.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Irrelevant to what? It’s completely relevant to where we are now and the future. That we are isn’t just an indicative point to us either, it’s to football as whole, which is why Boehly at Chelsea is talking about the things he is and getting to a billion in revenue.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Irrelevant in that it's still the fruit of financial doping.
Just because you launder money doesn't make your new money legit, does it? Same principle applies here
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ah. Well given he hasn’t done anything illegal, then that doesn’t matter either. Whether you call it financial doping or not, we still are where we are.
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Serious Thorgen Kloppinson - No laughing matter (U1282)
posted 26 minutes ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 40 minutes ago
comment by Serious Thorgen Kloppinson - No laughing matter (U1282)
posted 52 minutes ago
His point is that the "self sufficient" thing is irrelevant and most City fans know this when they bring it up. The "equity", aka billions of pounds was already invested and everything gained from it afterwards carries it's signature.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Irrelevant to what? It’s completely relevant to where we are now and the future. That we are isn’t just an indicative point to us either, it’s to football as whole, which is why Boehly at Chelsea is talking about the things he is and getting to a billion in revenue.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Irrelevant in that it's still the fruit of financial doping.
Just because you launder money doesn't make your new money legit, does it? Same principle applies here
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ah. Well given he hasn’t done anything illegal, then that doesn’t matter either. Whether you call it financial doping or not, we still are where we are.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly, there's no point denying it or beating around the bush.
If you steal money to start a business then the proceeds thereof are tainted forever, no matter how profitable and self sustaining the business becomes in future. Same principle applies here.
Eh? How does that principle apply at all when it’s his own money?
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 1 hour, 40 minutes ago
Eh? How does that principle apply at all when it’s his own money?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
lols.
cos its against the so called rules. simple concept.
comment by moreinjuredthanowen (U9641)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 1 hour, 40 minutes ago
Eh? How does that principle apply at all when it’s his own money?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
lols.
cos its against the so called rules. simple concept.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What is?
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 1 hour, 53 minutes ago
Eh? How does that principle apply at all when it’s his own money?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The principle isn't to do with that. It's that if you got where you are by doping, then anything gained from that will always carry that signature. No matter how "self sustained" you become.
I'm sure you know this
comment by Wahl Icht/ (U22857)
posted 16 hours, 59 minutes ago
How can a 'great' manager win one league title in eight years
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ask Jose
comment by Serious Thorgen Kloppinson - No laughing matter (U1282)
posted 2 hours, 40 minutes ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Serious Thorgen Kloppinson - No laughing matter (U1282)
posted 26 minutes ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 40 minutes ago
comment by Serious Thorgen Kloppinson - No laughing matter (U1282)
posted 52 minutes ago
His point is that the "self sufficient" thing is irrelevant and most City fans know this when they bring it up. The "equity", aka billions of pounds was already invested and everything gained from it afterwards carries it's signature.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Irrelevant to what? It’s completely relevant to where we are now and the future. That we are isn’t just an indicative point to us either, it’s to football as whole, which is why Boehly at Chelsea is talking about the things he is and getting to a billion in revenue.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Irrelevant in that it's still the fruit of financial doping.
Just because you launder money doesn't make your new money legit, does it? Same principle applies here
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ah. Well given he hasn’t done anything illegal, then that doesn’t matter either. Whether you call it financial doping or not, we still are where we are.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly, there's no point denying it or beating around the bush.
If you steal money to start a business then the proceeds thereof are tainted forever, no matter how profitable and self sustaining the business becomes in future. Same principle applies here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Chelsea have form for this type of behaviour too
comment by tcruel87 (U11882)
posted 4 hours, 53 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 12 hours, 43 minutes ago
comment by Dr Tobias Fünke (U1217)
posted 38 minutes ago
comment by Wahl Icht/ (U22857)
posted 1 minute ago
How can a 'great' manager win one league title in eight years
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because he's up against a state-funded oil club
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He's just bought an £85m striker.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Funded by selling £85M worth of players, not funded by slave labour.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Everything in Liverpool is based on slave labour.
comment by Serious Thorgen Kloppinson - No laughing matter (U1282)
posted 3 hours, 44 minutes ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 1 hour, 53 minutes ago
Eh? How does that principle apply at all when it’s his own money?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The principle isn't to do with that. It's that if you got where you are by doping, then anything gained from that will always carry that signature. No matter how "self sustained" you become.
I'm sure you know this
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Right, but that’s not stealing, there’s nothing wrong with what he did aside from your view on it. Whether you want to call it doping or not is up to you, it’s still meaningless, we are where we are,
comment by der kloppites Hi, wie geht es dir * (U13373)
posted 3 hours, 33 minutes ago
comment by Serious Thorgen Kloppinson - No laughing matter (U1282)
posted 2 hours, 40 minutes ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Serious Thorgen Kloppinson - No laughing matter (U1282)
posted 26 minutes ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 40 minutes ago
comment by Serious Thorgen Kloppinson - No laughing matter (U1282)
posted 52 minutes ago
His point is that the "self sufficient" thing is irrelevant and most City fans know this when they bring it up. The "equity", aka billions of pounds was already invested and everything gained from it afterwards carries it's signature.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Irrelevant to what? It’s completely relevant to where we are now and the future. That we are isn’t just an indicative point to us either, it’s to football as whole, which is why Boehly at Chelsea is talking about the things he is and getting to a billion in revenue.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Irrelevant in that it's still the fruit of financial doping.
Just because you launder money doesn't make your new money legit, does it? Same principle applies here
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ah. Well given he hasn’t done anything illegal, then that doesn’t matter either. Whether you call it financial doping or not, we still are where we are.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly, there's no point denying it or beating around the bush.
If you steal money to start a business then the proceeds thereof are tainted forever, no matter how profitable and self sustaining the business becomes in future. Same principle applies here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Chelsea have form for this type of behaviour too
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Literally every club has form for the underlying behaviour, all that changes is the levels. In fact pre the eighties, that type of behaviour (as in owners having to cover losses through their own pockets) was literally in the rules.
comment by Robbing Hoody (U6374)
posted 22 hours, 14 minutes ago
comment by Wahl Icht/ (U22857)
posted 16 hours, 59 minutes ago
How can a 'great' manager win one league title in eight years
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ask Jose
----------------------------------------------------------------------
😂
Ultimately we all follow a sport where the clubs we follow at top level are run by and played by multi millionaires. To people on the outside, the constant bickering and one upmanship about who is the most virtuous must seem so contrived.
Sign in if you want to comment
The photos of Klopp
Page 4 of 4
posted on 18/10/22
More deflecting from Boris.
posted on 18/10/22
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 18/10/22
comment by tcruel87 (U11882)
posted 1 minute ago
It's great to see, the stats regarding Salah getting free kicks are a joke. He is in a league of his own. Once the refs stop discriminating against one player, the abuse can stop
https://tomkinstimes.com/2022/03/incredible-mo-salah-stats-that-suggest-something-is-very-very-wrong/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Great article.
posted on 18/10/22
comment by Serious Thorgen Kloppinson - No laughing matter (U1282)
posted 52 minutes ago
His point is that the "self sufficient" thing is irrelevant and most City fans know this when they bring it up. The "equity", aka billions of pounds was already invested and everything gained from it afterwards carries it's signature.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Irrelevant to what? It’s completely relevant to where we are now and the future. That we are isn’t just an indicative point to us either, it’s to football as whole, which is why Boehly at Chelsea is talking about the things he is and getting to a billion in revenue.
posted on 18/10/22
comment by Dr Tobias Fünke (U1217)
posted 55 minutes ago
comment by tcruel87 (U11882)
posted 1 minute ago
It's great to see, the stats regarding Salah getting free kicks are a joke. He is in a league of his own. Once the refs stop discriminating against one player, the abuse can stop
https://tomkinstimes.com/2022/03/incredible-mo-salah-stats-that-suggest-something-is-very-very-wrong/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Great article.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
does the article point out he has been sheit though since AFCON?
posted on 18/10/22
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 hour, 11 minutes ago
No outrage last season when Milner should have been sent off for fouling Bernardo
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There was outrage from City fans but there's only so much noise a handful of blokes can make.
posted on 18/10/22
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 40 minutes ago
comment by Serious Thorgen Kloppinson - No laughing matter (U1282)
posted 52 minutes ago
His point is that the "self sufficient" thing is irrelevant and most City fans know this when they bring it up. The "equity", aka billions of pounds was already invested and everything gained from it afterwards carries it's signature.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Irrelevant to what? It’s completely relevant to where we are now and the future. That we are isn’t just an indicative point to us either, it’s to football as whole, which is why Boehly at Chelsea is talking about the things he is and getting to a billion in revenue.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Irrelevant in that it's still the fruit of financial doping.
Just because you launder money doesn't make your new money legit, does it? Same principle applies here
posted on 18/10/22
comment by B10 - Boss (U22536)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by Dr Tobias Fünke (U1217)
posted 55 minutes ago
comment by tcruel87 (U11882)
posted 1 minute ago
It's great to see, the stats regarding Salah getting free kicks are a joke. He is in a league of his own. Once the refs stop discriminating against one player, the abuse can stop
https://tomkinstimes.com/2022/03/incredible-mo-salah-stats-that-suggest-something-is-very-very-wrong/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Great article.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
does the article point out he has been sheit though since AFCON?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why would it? It's an article about his lack of protection from officials, not about his form.
posted on 18/10/22
Some real mongs on here.
posted on 18/10/22
comment by Striketeam7 - the smartest person you know - Arsenal shat it on 16/01/22 - Todger (U18109)
posted 3 hours, 18 minutes ago
comment by Serious Thorgen Kloppinson - No laughing matter (U1282)
posted 11 minutes ago
I love Klopp. The officiating was clearly biased and I live that he let them have it instead of just being polite while being robbed like most managers do.
Failing to give that foul and allowing City to counter attack us, and also missing the fact that Silva tried to back into Salah and elbow him. And Klopp is the bad guy for protesting biased officiating. Not Pep also getting in the central refs face(Klopp was linesman)? Not Silva trying to elbow an opponent?
Fans are stupid. Actually backing City and Pep in this grudge with Liverpool and Klopp.
Failing to support Klopp in instances like this one is why your puny trophyless clubs will always be robbed by the bigger teams and forced to bankrupt yourselves to keep up with oil money, while you keep crying about corruption in the Prem year after year to console yourselves at the lack of success
Enjoy the mediocrity you nincompoops. You deserve every but of it for being stoopid, especially Spurs fans, some of whom are extremely thick.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I back the ref
He is having to make a decision, he got it wrong, but you have zero proof he is biased.
Both Pep and Klopp were well in the wrong. The biggest problem as usual is the authorities - give Pep and Klopp a 5 game ban for their reactions and this whole issue disappears over night
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What about Silva? He kicked out at salah off the ball. Root cause of klopps frustration. Why not ban silva?
posted on 18/10/22
comment by Serious Thorgen Kloppinson - No laughing matter (U1282)
posted 26 minutes ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 40 minutes ago
comment by Serious Thorgen Kloppinson - No laughing matter (U1282)
posted 52 minutes ago
His point is that the "self sufficient" thing is irrelevant and most City fans know this when they bring it up. The "equity", aka billions of pounds was already invested and everything gained from it afterwards carries it's signature.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Irrelevant to what? It’s completely relevant to where we are now and the future. That we are isn’t just an indicative point to us either, it’s to football as whole, which is why Boehly at Chelsea is talking about the things he is and getting to a billion in revenue.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Irrelevant in that it's still the fruit of financial doping.
Just because you launder money doesn't make your new money legit, does it? Same principle applies here
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ah. Well given he hasn’t done anything illegal, then that doesn’t matter either. Whether you call it financial doping or not, we still are where we are.
posted on 18/10/22
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Serious Thorgen Kloppinson - No laughing matter (U1282)
posted 26 minutes ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 40 minutes ago
comment by Serious Thorgen Kloppinson - No laughing matter (U1282)
posted 52 minutes ago
His point is that the "self sufficient" thing is irrelevant and most City fans know this when they bring it up. The "equity", aka billions of pounds was already invested and everything gained from it afterwards carries it's signature.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Irrelevant to what? It’s completely relevant to where we are now and the future. That we are isn’t just an indicative point to us either, it’s to football as whole, which is why Boehly at Chelsea is talking about the things he is and getting to a billion in revenue.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Irrelevant in that it's still the fruit of financial doping.
Just because you launder money doesn't make your new money legit, does it? Same principle applies here
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ah. Well given he hasn’t done anything illegal, then that doesn’t matter either. Whether you call it financial doping or not, we still are where we are.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly, there's no point denying it or beating around the bush.
If you steal money to start a business then the proceeds thereof are tainted forever, no matter how profitable and self sustaining the business becomes in future. Same principle applies here.
posted on 18/10/22
Eh? How does that principle apply at all when it’s his own money?
posted on 18/10/22
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 1 hour, 40 minutes ago
Eh? How does that principle apply at all when it’s his own money?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
lols.
cos its against the so called rules. simple concept.
posted on 18/10/22
comment by moreinjuredthanowen (U9641)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 1 hour, 40 minutes ago
Eh? How does that principle apply at all when it’s his own money?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
lols.
cos its against the so called rules. simple concept.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What is?
posted on 18/10/22
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 1 hour, 53 minutes ago
Eh? How does that principle apply at all when it’s his own money?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The principle isn't to do with that. It's that if you got where you are by doping, then anything gained from that will always carry that signature. No matter how "self sustained" you become.
I'm sure you know this
posted on 18/10/22
comment by Wahl Icht/ (U22857)
posted 16 hours, 59 minutes ago
How can a 'great' manager win one league title in eight years
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ask Jose
posted on 18/10/22
comment by Serious Thorgen Kloppinson - No laughing matter (U1282)
posted 2 hours, 40 minutes ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Serious Thorgen Kloppinson - No laughing matter (U1282)
posted 26 minutes ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 40 minutes ago
comment by Serious Thorgen Kloppinson - No laughing matter (U1282)
posted 52 minutes ago
His point is that the "self sufficient" thing is irrelevant and most City fans know this when they bring it up. The "equity", aka billions of pounds was already invested and everything gained from it afterwards carries it's signature.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Irrelevant to what? It’s completely relevant to where we are now and the future. That we are isn’t just an indicative point to us either, it’s to football as whole, which is why Boehly at Chelsea is talking about the things he is and getting to a billion in revenue.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Irrelevant in that it's still the fruit of financial doping.
Just because you launder money doesn't make your new money legit, does it? Same principle applies here
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ah. Well given he hasn’t done anything illegal, then that doesn’t matter either. Whether you call it financial doping or not, we still are where we are.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly, there's no point denying it or beating around the bush.
If you steal money to start a business then the proceeds thereof are tainted forever, no matter how profitable and self sustaining the business becomes in future. Same principle applies here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Chelsea have form for this type of behaviour too
posted on 18/10/22
comment by tcruel87 (U11882)
posted 4 hours, 53 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 12 hours, 43 minutes ago
comment by Dr Tobias Fünke (U1217)
posted 38 minutes ago
comment by Wahl Icht/ (U22857)
posted 1 minute ago
How can a 'great' manager win one league title in eight years
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because he's up against a state-funded oil club
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He's just bought an £85m striker.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Funded by selling £85M worth of players, not funded by slave labour.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Everything in Liverpool is based on slave labour.
posted on 18/10/22
comment by Serious Thorgen Kloppinson - No laughing matter (U1282)
posted 3 hours, 44 minutes ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 1 hour, 53 minutes ago
Eh? How does that principle apply at all when it’s his own money?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The principle isn't to do with that. It's that if you got where you are by doping, then anything gained from that will always carry that signature. No matter how "self sustained" you become.
I'm sure you know this
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Right, but that’s not stealing, there’s nothing wrong with what he did aside from your view on it. Whether you want to call it doping or not is up to you, it’s still meaningless, we are where we are,
posted on 18/10/22
comment by der kloppites Hi, wie geht es dir * (U13373)
posted 3 hours, 33 minutes ago
comment by Serious Thorgen Kloppinson - No laughing matter (U1282)
posted 2 hours, 40 minutes ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Serious Thorgen Kloppinson - No laughing matter (U1282)
posted 26 minutes ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 40 minutes ago
comment by Serious Thorgen Kloppinson - No laughing matter (U1282)
posted 52 minutes ago
His point is that the "self sufficient" thing is irrelevant and most City fans know this when they bring it up. The "equity", aka billions of pounds was already invested and everything gained from it afterwards carries it's signature.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Irrelevant to what? It’s completely relevant to where we are now and the future. That we are isn’t just an indicative point to us either, it’s to football as whole, which is why Boehly at Chelsea is talking about the things he is and getting to a billion in revenue.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Irrelevant in that it's still the fruit of financial doping.
Just because you launder money doesn't make your new money legit, does it? Same principle applies here
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ah. Well given he hasn’t done anything illegal, then that doesn’t matter either. Whether you call it financial doping or not, we still are where we are.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly, there's no point denying it or beating around the bush.
If you steal money to start a business then the proceeds thereof are tainted forever, no matter how profitable and self sustaining the business becomes in future. Same principle applies here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Chelsea have form for this type of behaviour too
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Literally every club has form for the underlying behaviour, all that changes is the levels. In fact pre the eighties, that type of behaviour (as in owners having to cover losses through their own pockets) was literally in the rules.
posted on 19/10/22
comment by Robbing Hoody (U6374)
posted 22 hours, 14 minutes ago
comment by Wahl Icht/ (U22857)
posted 16 hours, 59 minutes ago
How can a 'great' manager win one league title in eight years
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ask Jose
----------------------------------------------------------------------
😂
posted on 19/10/22
Ultimately we all follow a sport where the clubs we follow at top level are run by and played by multi millionaires. To people on the outside, the constant bickering and one upmanship about who is the most virtuous must seem so contrived.
Page 4 of 4