comment by CelticTornado (U4316)
posted 2 minutes ago
Apologies piffle, that josh was a bit uncalled for
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not at all mate it's what we do on here he's away to the Enemy gig, didn't even buy me a celebratory pint, that's why the youngest is getting it all when I pass
comment by Insufferable-Piffle, just in case, I'm sorry! (U4388)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by CelticTornado (U4316)
posted 9 seconds ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted less than a minute ago
The Hearts incidents were both penalties. The moaning about how Walsh didn’t give the first one instantly is laughable.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yip both pens
Walsh maybe thought it was a coming together so VArR helped
No idea why Neilson has any issues with that
Would like to see how he would have coped with no handball for our pen
Pwick
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Absolutely, would have liked the interviewer to have asked his opinion on the handball? Robbie is a whinging pwick at best anyway
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He is. Only one decision was wrong and Hearts benefited. We didn't do well. Hearts gifted us all 4 goals. He's a d!ck
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 9 minutes ago
Fair play piff, nice to have your kids hanging about the same places you do too. That’s nice.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He hates that I usually only pop in after we've beat Hearts, it's inevitable that I will though? Fck him
Haven't seen anything from the Celtic game but what I will say is penalties are often vastly over-compensate attacking teams. Awarding a penalty is basically awarding the team an 85% likelihood of getting a goal, but they're most often awarded in circumstances where the attacking team had a much, much lower likelihood of scoring before the infringement. Penalties should only be awarded if a goal for the attacking team was all-but-guaranteed. These ones where a penalty is awarded for things like ricochets flicking off a defender's hand or players going down near the touchline in a crowded box always strike me as being very, very harsh on the defending team.
Get that WPP but to change it would need an overhaul of the rules and end of the day it’s the same for both teams.
comment by Why the pallaver (a little more optimistic) (U10168)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Insufferable-Piffle, just in case, I'm sorry! (U4388)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by CelticTornado (U4316)
posted 9 seconds ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted less than a minute ago
The Hearts incidents were both penalties. The moaning about how Walsh didn’t give the first one instantly is laughable.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yip both pens
Walsh maybe thought it was a coming together so VArR helped
No idea why Neilson has any issues with that
Would like to see how he would have coped with no handball for our pen
Pwick
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Absolutely, would have liked the interviewer to have asked his opinion on the handball? Robbie is a whinging pwick at best anyway
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He is. Only one decision was wrong and Hearts benefited. We didn't do well. Hearts gifted us all 4 goals. He's a d!ck
----------------------------------------------------------------------
2 decisions wrong IMO (one ref howler blowing early for nothing on Ralston’s goal; one ref+VAR not asking the ref to look at Devlin’s blatant handball) … BOTH errors in Hearts favour. Yet moaning Robbie still bleating afterwards … while claiming his team had “battered” us. Seriously? We scored 4 away, 5 really + should have had a pen, and missed a sitter. Apart from that though …
comment by Dave The Jackal (U22179)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Why the pallaver (a little more optimistic) (U10168)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Insufferable-Piffle, just in case, I'm sorry! (U4388)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by CelticTornado (U4316)
posted 9 seconds ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted less than a minute ago
The Hearts incidents were both penalties. The moaning about how Walsh didn’t give the first one instantly is laughable.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yip both pens
Walsh maybe thought it was a coming together so VArR helped
No idea why Neilson has any issues with that
Would like to see how he would have coped with no handball for our pen
Pwick
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Absolutely, would have liked the interviewer to have asked his opinion on the handball? Robbie is a whinging pwick at best anyway
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He is. Only one decision was wrong and Hearts benefited. We didn't do well. Hearts gifted us all 4 goals. He's a d!ck
----------------------------------------------------------------------
2 decisions wrong IMO (one ref howler blowing early for nothing on Ralston’s goal; one ref+VAR not asking the ref to look at Devlin’s blatant handball) … BOTH errors in Hearts favour. Yet moaning Robbie still bleating afterwards … while claiming his team had “battered” us. Seriously? We scored 4 away, 5 really + should have had a pen, and missed a sitter. Apart from that though …
----------------------------------------------------------------------
True, but that wasn't VAR
I’ve figured out why Aberdeen won today-according to Sportscene, they started with a 3-4-4-2 formation.
Cheating bassas.
Always wondered why teams that miss out on lucrative wins/competitions, don't sue the officials or organisations that employ them, especially with VAR.
The VAR errors could've cost us today.
comment by Zico 🏴 (U21900)
posted 40 seconds ago
Always wondered why teams that miss out on lucrative wins/competitions, don't sue the officials or organisations that employ them, especially with VAR.
The VAR errors could've cost us today.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Isn't there a FIFA rule that any club taking their association to court is instantly banned from competition, or something?
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 29 minutes ago
comment by Zico 🏴 (U21900)
posted 40 seconds ago
Always wondered why teams that miss out on lucrative wins/competitions, don't sue the officials or organisations that employ them, especially with VAR.
The VAR errors could've cost us today.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Isn't there a FIFA rule that any club taking their association to court is instantly banned from competition, or something?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah, they probably have a get out clause.
.Ireland had a great shout when Terry Henry handballed it into the goal.
See today for the Shankland penalty retake
What would have been awarded if only Hearts players had impeded at the initial penalty and not celtic as well ?
comment by CelticTornado (U4316)
posted 1 minute ago
See today for the Shankland penalty retake
What would have been awarded if only Hearts players had impeded at the initial penalty and not celtic as well ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Still a retake.
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by CelticTornado (U4316)
posted 1 minute ago
See today for the Shankland penalty retake
What would have been awarded if only Hearts players had impeded at the initial penalty and not celtic as well ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Still a retake.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah that's what I thought
Wondered why they made the point of it being a retake as both teams were encroaching
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by CelticTornado (U4316)
posted 1 minute ago
See today for the Shankland penalty retake
What would have been awarded if only Hearts players had impeded at the initial penalty and not celtic as well ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Still a retake.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Think that's only the case of they score from it?
https://www.thefa.com/football-rules-governance/lawsandrules/laws/football-11-11/law-14---the-penalty-kick#:~:text=the%20player%20taking%20the%20penalty%20kick%20or%20a%20team%2Dmate,with%20an%20indirect%20free%20kick
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 9 hours, 44 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by CelticTornado (U4316)
posted 1 minute ago
See today for the Shankland penalty retake
What would have been awarded if only Hearts players had impeded at the initial penalty and not celtic as well ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Still a retake.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Think that's only the case of they score from it?
https://www.thefa.com/football-rules-governance/lawsandrules/laws/football-11-11/law-14---the-penalty-kick#:~:text=the%20player%20taking%20the%20penalty%20kick%20or%20a%20team%2Dmate,with%20an%20indirect%20free%20kick
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don’t think so. If our defenders encroach and they miss, that’s also a retake.
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 1 hour, 28 minutes ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 9 hours, 44 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by CelticTornado (U4316)
posted 1 minute ago
See today for the Shankland penalty retake
What would have been awarded if only Hearts players had impeded at the initial penalty and not celtic as well ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Still a retake.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Think that's only the case of they score from it?
https://www.thefa.com/football-rules-governance/lawsandrules/laws/football-11-11/law-14---the-penalty-kick#:~:text=the%20player%20taking%20the%20penalty%20kick%20or%20a%20team%2Dmate,with%20an%20indirect%20free%20kick
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don’t think so. If our defenders encroach and they miss, that’s also a retake.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well the table at the end of that link is clear for CT - had only hearts players encroached and shankland missed then it would restart with an indirect FK to us.
Just seen the Livi red card - Pathetic, never a red.
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 1 hour, 10 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 1 hour, 28 minutes ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 9 hours, 44 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by CelticTornado (U4316)
posted 1 minute ago
See today for the Shankland penalty retake
What would have been awarded if only Hearts players had impeded at the initial penalty and not celtic as well ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Still a retake.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Think that's only the case of they score from it?
https://www.thefa.com/football-rules-governance/lawsandrules/laws/football-11-11/law-14---the-penalty-kick#:~:text=the%20player%20taking%20the%20penalty%20kick%20or%20a%20team%2Dmate,with%20an%20indirect%20free%20kick
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don’t think so. If our defenders encroach and they miss, that’s also a retake.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well the table at the end of that link is clear for CT - had only hearts players encroached and shankland missed then it would restart with an indirect FK to us.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh indeed. Only Hearts players encroach and they miss then it’s an indirect fk unless the ball flies straight out of play or directly into the keeper’s hands. In those cases either a bye kick or play on would be given I’d guess.
Sign in if you want to comment
Hearts v Celtic LIVE!
Page 31 of 31
27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31
posted on 22/10/22
comment by CelticTornado (U4316)
posted 2 minutes ago
Apologies piffle, that josh was a bit uncalled for
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not at all mate it's what we do on here he's away to the Enemy gig, didn't even buy me a celebratory pint, that's why the youngest is getting it all when I pass
posted on 22/10/22
comment by Insufferable-Piffle, just in case, I'm sorry! (U4388)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by CelticTornado (U4316)
posted 9 seconds ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted less than a minute ago
The Hearts incidents were both penalties. The moaning about how Walsh didn’t give the first one instantly is laughable.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yip both pens
Walsh maybe thought it was a coming together so VArR helped
No idea why Neilson has any issues with that
Would like to see how he would have coped with no handball for our pen
Pwick
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Absolutely, would have liked the interviewer to have asked his opinion on the handball? Robbie is a whinging pwick at best anyway
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He is. Only one decision was wrong and Hearts benefited. We didn't do well. Hearts gifted us all 4 goals. He's a d!ck
posted on 22/10/22
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 9 minutes ago
Fair play piff, nice to have your kids hanging about the same places you do too. That’s nice.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He hates that I usually only pop in after we've beat Hearts, it's inevitable that I will though? Fck him
posted on 22/10/22
Haven't seen anything from the Celtic game but what I will say is penalties are often vastly over-compensate attacking teams. Awarding a penalty is basically awarding the team an 85% likelihood of getting a goal, but they're most often awarded in circumstances where the attacking team had a much, much lower likelihood of scoring before the infringement. Penalties should only be awarded if a goal for the attacking team was all-but-guaranteed. These ones where a penalty is awarded for things like ricochets flicking off a defender's hand or players going down near the touchline in a crowded box always strike me as being very, very harsh on the defending team.
posted on 22/10/22
Get that WPP but to change it would need an overhaul of the rules and end of the day it’s the same for both teams.
posted on 22/10/22
comment by Why the pallaver (a little more optimistic) (U10168)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Insufferable-Piffle, just in case, I'm sorry! (U4388)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by CelticTornado (U4316)
posted 9 seconds ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted less than a minute ago
The Hearts incidents were both penalties. The moaning about how Walsh didn’t give the first one instantly is laughable.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yip both pens
Walsh maybe thought it was a coming together so VArR helped
No idea why Neilson has any issues with that
Would like to see how he would have coped with no handball for our pen
Pwick
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Absolutely, would have liked the interviewer to have asked his opinion on the handball? Robbie is a whinging pwick at best anyway
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He is. Only one decision was wrong and Hearts benefited. We didn't do well. Hearts gifted us all 4 goals. He's a d!ck
----------------------------------------------------------------------
2 decisions wrong IMO (one ref howler blowing early for nothing on Ralston’s goal; one ref+VAR not asking the ref to look at Devlin’s blatant handball) … BOTH errors in Hearts favour. Yet moaning Robbie still bleating afterwards … while claiming his team had “battered” us. Seriously? We scored 4 away, 5 really + should have had a pen, and missed a sitter. Apart from that though …
posted on 22/10/22
comment by Dave The Jackal (U22179)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Why the pallaver (a little more optimistic) (U10168)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Insufferable-Piffle, just in case, I'm sorry! (U4388)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by CelticTornado (U4316)
posted 9 seconds ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted less than a minute ago
The Hearts incidents were both penalties. The moaning about how Walsh didn’t give the first one instantly is laughable.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yip both pens
Walsh maybe thought it was a coming together so VArR helped
No idea why Neilson has any issues with that
Would like to see how he would have coped with no handball for our pen
Pwick
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Absolutely, would have liked the interviewer to have asked his opinion on the handball? Robbie is a whinging pwick at best anyway
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He is. Only one decision was wrong and Hearts benefited. We didn't do well. Hearts gifted us all 4 goals. He's a d!ck
----------------------------------------------------------------------
2 decisions wrong IMO (one ref howler blowing early for nothing on Ralston’s goal; one ref+VAR not asking the ref to look at Devlin’s blatant handball) … BOTH errors in Hearts favour. Yet moaning Robbie still bleating afterwards … while claiming his team had “battered” us. Seriously? We scored 4 away, 5 really + should have had a pen, and missed a sitter. Apart from that though …
----------------------------------------------------------------------
True, but that wasn't VAR
posted on 22/10/22
I’ve figured out why Aberdeen won today-according to Sportscene, they started with a 3-4-4-2 formation.
Cheating bassas.
posted on 22/10/22
Always wondered why teams that miss out on lucrative wins/competitions, don't sue the officials or organisations that employ them, especially with VAR.
The VAR errors could've cost us today.
posted on 22/10/22
comment by Zico 🏴 (U21900)
posted 40 seconds ago
Always wondered why teams that miss out on lucrative wins/competitions, don't sue the officials or organisations that employ them, especially with VAR.
The VAR errors could've cost us today.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Isn't there a FIFA rule that any club taking their association to court is instantly banned from competition, or something?
posted on 22/10/22
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 29 minutes ago
comment by Zico 🏴 (U21900)
posted 40 seconds ago
Always wondered why teams that miss out on lucrative wins/competitions, don't sue the officials or organisations that employ them, especially with VAR.
The VAR errors could've cost us today.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Isn't there a FIFA rule that any club taking their association to court is instantly banned from competition, or something?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah, they probably have a get out clause.
.Ireland had a great shout when Terry Henry handballed it into the goal.
posted on 22/10/22
See today for the Shankland penalty retake
What would have been awarded if only Hearts players had impeded at the initial penalty and not celtic as well ?
posted on 22/10/22
comment by CelticTornado (U4316)
posted 1 minute ago
See today for the Shankland penalty retake
What would have been awarded if only Hearts players had impeded at the initial penalty and not celtic as well ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Still a retake.
posted on 22/10/22
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by CelticTornado (U4316)
posted 1 minute ago
See today for the Shankland penalty retake
What would have been awarded if only Hearts players had impeded at the initial penalty and not celtic as well ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Still a retake.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah that's what I thought
Wondered why they made the point of it being a retake as both teams were encroaching
posted on 22/10/22
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by CelticTornado (U4316)
posted 1 minute ago
See today for the Shankland penalty retake
What would have been awarded if only Hearts players had impeded at the initial penalty and not celtic as well ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Still a retake.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Think that's only the case of they score from it?
https://www.thefa.com/football-rules-governance/lawsandrules/laws/football-11-11/law-14---the-penalty-kick#:~:text=the%20player%20taking%20the%20penalty%20kick%20or%20a%20team%2Dmate,with%20an%20indirect%20free%20kick
posted on 23/10/22
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 9 hours, 44 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by CelticTornado (U4316)
posted 1 minute ago
See today for the Shankland penalty retake
What would have been awarded if only Hearts players had impeded at the initial penalty and not celtic as well ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Still a retake.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Think that's only the case of they score from it?
https://www.thefa.com/football-rules-governance/lawsandrules/laws/football-11-11/law-14---the-penalty-kick#:~:text=the%20player%20taking%20the%20penalty%20kick%20or%20a%20team%2Dmate,with%20an%20indirect%20free%20kick
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don’t think so. If our defenders encroach and they miss, that’s also a retake.
posted on 23/10/22
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 1 hour, 28 minutes ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 9 hours, 44 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by CelticTornado (U4316)
posted 1 minute ago
See today for the Shankland penalty retake
What would have been awarded if only Hearts players had impeded at the initial penalty and not celtic as well ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Still a retake.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Think that's only the case of they score from it?
https://www.thefa.com/football-rules-governance/lawsandrules/laws/football-11-11/law-14---the-penalty-kick#:~:text=the%20player%20taking%20the%20penalty%20kick%20or%20a%20team%2Dmate,with%20an%20indirect%20free%20kick
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don’t think so. If our defenders encroach and they miss, that’s also a retake.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well the table at the end of that link is clear for CT - had only hearts players encroached and shankland missed then it would restart with an indirect FK to us.
posted on 23/10/22
Just seen the Livi red card - Pathetic, never a red.
posted on 23/10/22
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 1 hour, 10 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 1 hour, 28 minutes ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 9 hours, 44 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by CelticTornado (U4316)
posted 1 minute ago
See today for the Shankland penalty retake
What would have been awarded if only Hearts players had impeded at the initial penalty and not celtic as well ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Still a retake.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Think that's only the case of they score from it?
https://www.thefa.com/football-rules-governance/lawsandrules/laws/football-11-11/law-14---the-penalty-kick#:~:text=the%20player%20taking%20the%20penalty%20kick%20or%20a%20team%2Dmate,with%20an%20indirect%20free%20kick
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don’t think so. If our defenders encroach and they miss, that’s also a retake.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well the table at the end of that link is clear for CT - had only hearts players encroached and shankland missed then it would restart with an indirect FK to us.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh indeed. Only Hearts players encroach and they miss then it’s an indirect fk unless the ball flies straight out of play or directly into the keeper’s hands. In those cases either a bye kick or play on would be given I’d guess.
posted on 23/10/22
We got there
posted on 24/10/22
pleasing
Page 31 of 31
27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31