Just out of interest how are we going to manage all the people being born here in the next year?
I mean things sound really desperate on the numbers front.
comment by The Butcher (U22703)
posted 6 minutes ago
Id incentivise the French to stop them from crossing, and send those we cant accomodate, to Rwanda.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/france-dover-border-force-priti-patel-french-b959704.html?amp
The Rwandan scheme is a red herring to placate Tory party supporters. It was used in Israel, and scraped as was a complete failure.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-61882542.amp
Throwing millions of pounds (noting your comments on the cost of living crisis) towards a scheme destined to fail, is particularly smart is it?
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? Who do you think you are kidding Mr.... (U3126)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by The Butcher (U22703)
posted 6 minutes ago
Id incentivise the French to stop them from crossing, and send those we cant accomodate, to Rwanda.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/france-dover-border-force-priti-patel-french-b959704.html?amp
The Rwandan scheme is a red herring to placate Tory party supporters. It was used in Israel, and scraped as was a complete failure.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-61882542.amp
Throwing millions of pounds (noting your comments on the cost of living crisis) towards a scheme destined to fail, is particularly smart is it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Rwanda can srill happen.
And incentivising the French would be be far cheaper than the current cost.
comment by Robbing Hoody (U6374)
posted 29 minutes ago
comment by The Butcher (U22703)
posted 1 minute ago
Id incentivise the French to stop them from crossing, and send those we cant accomodate, to Rwanda.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fvcking lol
--------------------------------------------------------------------
comment by Robbing Hoody (U6374)
posted 32 minutes ago
comment by The Butcher (U22703)
posted 1 minute ago
Id incentivise the French to stop them from crossing, and send those we cant accomodate, to Rwanda.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fvcking lol
----------------------------------------------------------------------
comment by The Butcher (U22703)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? Who do you think you are kidding Mr.... (U3126)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by The Butcher (U22703)
posted 6 minutes ago
Id incentivise the French to stop them from crossing, and send those we cant accomodate, to Rwanda.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/france-dover-border-force-priti-patel-french-b959704.html?amp
The Rwandan scheme is a red herring to placate Tory party supporters. It was used in Israel, and scraped as was a complete failure.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-61882542.amp
Throwing millions of pounds (noting your comments on the cost of living crisis) towards a scheme destined to fail, is particularly smart is it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Rwanda can srill happen.
And incentivising the French would be be far cheaper than the current cost.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fvck that.
Why has France 3x less net immigration than UK? Why is nobody over there complaining they are living in squalid border camps rather than being put up in a hotel?
BTW, someone dismissed 1% earlier - our net immigration is 0.25-0.3% or c. 5-7% over a generation. That's a huge increase in public spending before other effects and that is assuming the incoming migrants work and pay an average tax take which is highly unlikely even if asylum seekers are a minority. Then there's housing shortage.
We need solutions. Pearcy - that doesn't necessarily mean rejoining your beloved EU. Could be a bold manifesto by Liberal or Labour but would probably mean yet another Con gov?
comment by The Butcher (U22703)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? Who do you think you are kidding Mr.... (U3126)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by The Butcher (U22703)
posted 6 minutes ago
Id incentivise the French to stop them from crossing, and send those we cant accomodate, to Rwanda.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/france-dover-border-force-priti-patel-french-b959704.html?amp
The Rwandan scheme is a red herring to placate Tory party supporters. It was used in Israel, and scraped as was a complete failure.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-61882542.amp
Throwing millions of pounds (noting your comments on the cost of living crisis) towards a scheme destined to fail, is particularly smart is it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Rwanda can srill happen.
And incentivising the French would be be far cheaper than the current cost.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Only a few posts ago you were claiming asking the French for help wouldn't nt happen. And throwing "£bns" at it during "a housing shortage, growing number of homeless and a cost of living crisis" was a nonsense.
Yet now you advocate throwing wads of money at the French (which was already attempted) as a solution.
Strange...
Normally such agreements between countries such are ratified by way of a binding treaty. Parliament however is required to scrutinise treaty agreements. So public money is being well spent etc etc. The Rwandan scheme was purposely constructed as a MOU (memorandum of understanding) to avoid parliamentary scrutiny.
If the scheme had any merit the government would have undertaken and published impact/viability assessments. It would have been put to Parliament for scrutiny including committee.
The fact it was not (irrespective of its legal viability) should tell you all you need to know about it. Suggest also reading the BBC article on the Israeli Rwandan scheme.
My suggestion is cheaper than the current system, and far more beneficial to the French.
Virtually all European countries have been experiencing declining birth rates for years.
2.1 births per couple is the lowest possible growth rate. When Germany hit 1.4 in 2013 Merkel realised that she needed immigrants. And fast. She took a million. Yes, there were, and are, many problems bedding that down, but realistically had no choice if the Fatherland was to remain an economic powerhouse.
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by The Butcher (U22703)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? Who do you think you are kidding Mr.... (U3126)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by The Butcher (U22703)
posted 6 minutes ago
Id incentivise the French to stop them from crossing, and send those we cant accomodate, to Rwanda.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/france-dover-border-force-priti-patel-french-b959704.html?amp
The Rwandan scheme is a red herring to placate Tory party supporters. It was used in Israel, and scraped as was a complete failure.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-61882542.amp
Throwing millions of pounds (noting your comments on the cost of living crisis) towards a scheme destined to fail, is particularly smart is it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Rwanda can srill happen.
And incentivising the French would be be far cheaper than the current cost.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fvck that.
Why has France 3x less net immigration than UK? Why is nobody over there complaining they are living in squalid border camps rather than being put up in a hotel?
BTW, someone dismissed 1% earlier - our net immigration is 0.25-0.3% or c. 5-7% over a generation. That's a huge increase in public spending before other effects and that is assuming the incoming migrants work and pay an average tax take which is highly unlikely even if asylum seekers are a minority. Then there's housing shortage.
We need solutions. Pearcy - that doesn't necessarily mean rejoining your beloved EU. Could be a bold manifesto by Liberal or Labour but would probably mean yet another Con gov?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
France took in twice as many asylum seekers than the UK did last year.
Solutions will *have* to be with agreement with those on the other side of the border. Namely France. However as the UK no longer can rely on EU law to return asylum seekers, it's made the situation considerably more difficult. No matter how unpalatable that may be for the Brexiters.
comment by The Butcher (U22703)
posted 2 minutes ago
My suggestion is cheaper than the current system, and far more beneficial to the French.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ffs
Have a good evening chaps, I can't tolerate any more of this
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? Who do you think you are kidding Mr.... (U3126)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by The Butcher (U22703)
posted 2 minutes ago
My suggestion is cheaper than the current system, and far more beneficial to the French.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ffs
Have a good evening chaps, I can't tolerate any more of this
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I did warn you over five hours ago.
Have a good evening, mate.
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? Who do you think you are kidding Mr.... (U3126)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by The Butcher (U22703)
posted 2 minutes ago
My suggestion is cheaper than the current system, and far more beneficial to the French.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ffs
Have a good evening chaps, I can't tolerate any more of this
--------------------------------------------------------------------
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? Who do you think you are kidding Mr.... (U3126)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by The Butcher (U22703)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? Who do you think you are kidding Mr.... (U3126)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by The Butcher (U22703)
posted 6 minutes ago
Id incentivise the French to stop them from crossing, and send those we cant accomodate, to Rwanda.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/france-dover-border-force-priti-patel-french-b959704.html?amp
The Rwandan scheme is a red herring to placate Tory party supporters. It was used in Israel, and scraped as was a complete failure.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-61882542.amp
Throwing millions of pounds (noting your comments on the cost of living crisis) towards a scheme destined to fail, is particularly smart is it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Rwanda can srill happen.
And incentivising the French would be be far cheaper than the current cost.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fvck that.
Why has France 3x less net immigration than UK? Why is nobody over there complaining they are living in squalid border camps rather than being put up in a hotel?
BTW, someone dismissed 1% earlier - our net immigration is 0.25-0.3% or c. 5-7% over a generation. That's a huge increase in public spending before other effects and that is assuming the incoming migrants work and pay an average tax take which is highly unlikely even if asylum seekers are a minority. Then there's housing shortage.
We need solutions. Pearcy - that doesn't necessarily mean rejoining your beloved EU. Could be a bold manifesto by Liberal or Labour but would probably mean yet another Con gov?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
France took in twice as many asylum seekers than the UK did last year.
Solutions will *have* to be with agreement with those on the other side of the border. Namely France. However as the UK no longer can rely on EU law to return asylum seekers, it's made the situation considerably more difficult. No matter how unpalatable that may be for the Brexiters.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Stop bombing the crap out of countries for no reason other than to test your bombs would surely be far more beneficial to all
But that's not the US way!
What I can't get my head around is why people would risk their lives leaving the nirvana(according to many on here)being the EU to live in the shiiithole which is here (same people).
Can anyone please explain thos to me?
You seem to be unable to get your head around a great many things.
comment by Beeb (U1841)
posted 44 seconds ago
You seem to be unable to get your head around a great many things.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is that your explanation?
We've got total control of our borders now.
The problem is that the Government doesn't know what to do when people cross them.
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 9 minutes ago
What I can't get my head around is why people would risk their lives leaving the nirvana(according to many on here)being the EU to live in the shiiithole which is here (same people).
Can anyone please explain thos to me?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Apparently, English is such a universal language (apart from in France it seems) they need to come here.
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 30 minutes ago
What I can't get my head around is why people would risk their lives leaving the nirvana(according to many on here)being the EU to live in the shiiithole which is here (same people).
Can anyone please explain thos to me?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Count how many European countries use English as their native language (don’t worry, you’ll only need the fingers on one hand) and that’ll give you one clue.
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 30 minutes ago
What I can't get my head around is why people would risk their lives leaving the nirvana(according to many on here)being the EU to live in the shiiithole which is here (same people).
Can anyone please explain thos to me?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I can explain it to you. Basically what you’ve done is come up with an entirely invented narrative and inserted words no one has ever said to fit said narrative. Hence leading to your confusion. Hope that helps champ 🤙
comment by Rosso out here drippin’ in finesse (U17054)
posted 40 seconds ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 30 minutes ago
What I can't get my head around is why people would risk their lives leaving the nirvana(according to many on here)being the EU to live in the shiiithole which is here (same people).
Can anyone please explain thos to me?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Count how many European countries use English as their native language (don’t worry, you’ll only need the fingers on one hand) and that’ll give you one clue.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So everyone coming across the Chanel only speaks English then?
comment by Robb - Anti Growth Coallition and Proud (U22716)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 30 minutes ago
What I can't get my head around is why people would risk their lives leaving the nirvana(according to many on here)being the EU to live in the shiiithole which is here (same people).
Can anyone please explain thos to me?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I can explain it to you. Basically what you’ve done is come up with an entirely invented narrative and inserted words no one has ever said to fit said narrative. Hence leading to your confusion. Hope that helps champ 🤙
----------------------------------------------------------------------
comment by Robb - Anti Growth Coallition and Proud (U22716)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 30 minutes ago
What I can't get my head around is why people would risk their lives leaving the nirvana(according to many on here)being the EU to live in the shiiithole which is here (same people).
Can anyone please explain thos to me?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I can explain it to you. Basically what you’ve done is come up with an entirely invented narrative and inserted words no one has ever said to fit said narrative. Hence leading to your confusion. Hope that helps champ 🤙
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tory in confused by straw man argument shocker.
comment by Robb - Anti Growth Coallition and Proud (U22716)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 30 minutes ago
What I can't get my head around is why people would risk their lives leaving the nirvana(according to many on here)being the EU to live in the shiiithole which is here (same people).
Can anyone please explain thos to me?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I can explain it to you. Basically what you’ve done is come up with an entirely invented narrative and inserted words no one has ever said to fit said narrative. Hence leading to your confusion. Hope that helps champ 🤙
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So that's you not coming up with an answer then.Coming from an Australian who unless he' s indigenous is basically an immigrant who destroyed the lives of people's who lived there for thousands of years.I won't take a morality lesson from the likes of you
Sign in if you want to comment
Cruella Braverman
Page 8 of 11
7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11
posted on 1/11/22
Just out of interest how are we going to manage all the people being born here in the next year?
I mean things sound really desperate on the numbers front.
posted on 1/11/22
comment by The Butcher (U22703)
posted 6 minutes ago
Id incentivise the French to stop them from crossing, and send those we cant accomodate, to Rwanda.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/france-dover-border-force-priti-patel-french-b959704.html?amp
The Rwandan scheme is a red herring to placate Tory party supporters. It was used in Israel, and scraped as was a complete failure.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-61882542.amp
Throwing millions of pounds (noting your comments on the cost of living crisis) towards a scheme destined to fail, is particularly smart is it?
posted on 1/11/22
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? Who do you think you are kidding Mr.... (U3126)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by The Butcher (U22703)
posted 6 minutes ago
Id incentivise the French to stop them from crossing, and send those we cant accomodate, to Rwanda.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/france-dover-border-force-priti-patel-french-b959704.html?amp
The Rwandan scheme is a red herring to placate Tory party supporters. It was used in Israel, and scraped as was a complete failure.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-61882542.amp
Throwing millions of pounds (noting your comments on the cost of living crisis) towards a scheme destined to fail, is particularly smart is it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Rwanda can srill happen.
And incentivising the French would be be far cheaper than the current cost.
posted on 1/11/22
comment by Robbing Hoody (U6374)
posted 29 minutes ago
comment by The Butcher (U22703)
posted 1 minute ago
Id incentivise the French to stop them from crossing, and send those we cant accomodate, to Rwanda.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fvcking lol
--------------------------------------------------------------------
posted on 1/11/22
comment by Robbing Hoody (U6374)
posted 32 minutes ago
comment by The Butcher (U22703)
posted 1 minute ago
Id incentivise the French to stop them from crossing, and send those we cant accomodate, to Rwanda.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fvcking lol
----------------------------------------------------------------------
posted on 1/11/22
comment by The Butcher (U22703)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? Who do you think you are kidding Mr.... (U3126)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by The Butcher (U22703)
posted 6 minutes ago
Id incentivise the French to stop them from crossing, and send those we cant accomodate, to Rwanda.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/france-dover-border-force-priti-patel-french-b959704.html?amp
The Rwandan scheme is a red herring to placate Tory party supporters. It was used in Israel, and scraped as was a complete failure.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-61882542.amp
Throwing millions of pounds (noting your comments on the cost of living crisis) towards a scheme destined to fail, is particularly smart is it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Rwanda can srill happen.
And incentivising the French would be be far cheaper than the current cost.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fvck that.
Why has France 3x less net immigration than UK? Why is nobody over there complaining they are living in squalid border camps rather than being put up in a hotel?
BTW, someone dismissed 1% earlier - our net immigration is 0.25-0.3% or c. 5-7% over a generation. That's a huge increase in public spending before other effects and that is assuming the incoming migrants work and pay an average tax take which is highly unlikely even if asylum seekers are a minority. Then there's housing shortage.
We need solutions. Pearcy - that doesn't necessarily mean rejoining your beloved EU. Could be a bold manifesto by Liberal or Labour but would probably mean yet another Con gov?
posted on 1/11/22
comment by The Butcher (U22703)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? Who do you think you are kidding Mr.... (U3126)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by The Butcher (U22703)
posted 6 minutes ago
Id incentivise the French to stop them from crossing, and send those we cant accomodate, to Rwanda.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/france-dover-border-force-priti-patel-french-b959704.html?amp
The Rwandan scheme is a red herring to placate Tory party supporters. It was used in Israel, and scraped as was a complete failure.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-61882542.amp
Throwing millions of pounds (noting your comments on the cost of living crisis) towards a scheme destined to fail, is particularly smart is it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Rwanda can srill happen.
And incentivising the French would be be far cheaper than the current cost.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Only a few posts ago you were claiming asking the French for help wouldn't nt happen. And throwing "£bns" at it during "a housing shortage, growing number of homeless and a cost of living crisis" was a nonsense.
Yet now you advocate throwing wads of money at the French (which was already attempted) as a solution.
Strange...
Normally such agreements between countries such are ratified by way of a binding treaty. Parliament however is required to scrutinise treaty agreements. So public money is being well spent etc etc. The Rwandan scheme was purposely constructed as a MOU (memorandum of understanding) to avoid parliamentary scrutiny.
If the scheme had any merit the government would have undertaken and published impact/viability assessments. It would have been put to Parliament for scrutiny including committee.
The fact it was not (irrespective of its legal viability) should tell you all you need to know about it. Suggest also reading the BBC article on the Israeli Rwandan scheme.
posted on 1/11/22
My suggestion is cheaper than the current system, and far more beneficial to the French.
posted on 1/11/22
Virtually all European countries have been experiencing declining birth rates for years.
2.1 births per couple is the lowest possible growth rate. When Germany hit 1.4 in 2013 Merkel realised that she needed immigrants. And fast. She took a million. Yes, there were, and are, many problems bedding that down, but realistically had no choice if the Fatherland was to remain an economic powerhouse.
posted on 1/11/22
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by The Butcher (U22703)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? Who do you think you are kidding Mr.... (U3126)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by The Butcher (U22703)
posted 6 minutes ago
Id incentivise the French to stop them from crossing, and send those we cant accomodate, to Rwanda.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/france-dover-border-force-priti-patel-french-b959704.html?amp
The Rwandan scheme is a red herring to placate Tory party supporters. It was used in Israel, and scraped as was a complete failure.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-61882542.amp
Throwing millions of pounds (noting your comments on the cost of living crisis) towards a scheme destined to fail, is particularly smart is it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Rwanda can srill happen.
And incentivising the French would be be far cheaper than the current cost.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fvck that.
Why has France 3x less net immigration than UK? Why is nobody over there complaining they are living in squalid border camps rather than being put up in a hotel?
BTW, someone dismissed 1% earlier - our net immigration is 0.25-0.3% or c. 5-7% over a generation. That's a huge increase in public spending before other effects and that is assuming the incoming migrants work and pay an average tax take which is highly unlikely even if asylum seekers are a minority. Then there's housing shortage.
We need solutions. Pearcy - that doesn't necessarily mean rejoining your beloved EU. Could be a bold manifesto by Liberal or Labour but would probably mean yet another Con gov?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
France took in twice as many asylum seekers than the UK did last year.
Solutions will *have* to be with agreement with those on the other side of the border. Namely France. However as the UK no longer can rely on EU law to return asylum seekers, it's made the situation considerably more difficult. No matter how unpalatable that may be for the Brexiters.
posted on 1/11/22
comment by The Butcher (U22703)
posted 2 minutes ago
My suggestion is cheaper than the current system, and far more beneficial to the French.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ffs
Have a good evening chaps, I can't tolerate any more of this
posted on 1/11/22
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? Who do you think you are kidding Mr.... (U3126)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by The Butcher (U22703)
posted 2 minutes ago
My suggestion is cheaper than the current system, and far more beneficial to the French.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ffs
Have a good evening chaps, I can't tolerate any more of this
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I did warn you over five hours ago.
Have a good evening, mate.
posted on 1/11/22
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? Who do you think you are kidding Mr.... (U3126)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by The Butcher (U22703)
posted 2 minutes ago
My suggestion is cheaper than the current system, and far more beneficial to the French.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ffs
Have a good evening chaps, I can't tolerate any more of this
--------------------------------------------------------------------
posted on 1/11/22
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? Who do you think you are kidding Mr.... (U3126)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by The Butcher (U22703)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? Who do you think you are kidding Mr.... (U3126)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by The Butcher (U22703)
posted 6 minutes ago
Id incentivise the French to stop them from crossing, and send those we cant accomodate, to Rwanda.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/france-dover-border-force-priti-patel-french-b959704.html?amp
The Rwandan scheme is a red herring to placate Tory party supporters. It was used in Israel, and scraped as was a complete failure.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-61882542.amp
Throwing millions of pounds (noting your comments on the cost of living crisis) towards a scheme destined to fail, is particularly smart is it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Rwanda can srill happen.
And incentivising the French would be be far cheaper than the current cost.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fvck that.
Why has France 3x less net immigration than UK? Why is nobody over there complaining they are living in squalid border camps rather than being put up in a hotel?
BTW, someone dismissed 1% earlier - our net immigration is 0.25-0.3% or c. 5-7% over a generation. That's a huge increase in public spending before other effects and that is assuming the incoming migrants work and pay an average tax take which is highly unlikely even if asylum seekers are a minority. Then there's housing shortage.
We need solutions. Pearcy - that doesn't necessarily mean rejoining your beloved EU. Could be a bold manifesto by Liberal or Labour but would probably mean yet another Con gov?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
France took in twice as many asylum seekers than the UK did last year.
Solutions will *have* to be with agreement with those on the other side of the border. Namely France. However as the UK no longer can rely on EU law to return asylum seekers, it's made the situation considerably more difficult. No matter how unpalatable that may be for the Brexiters.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Stop bombing the crap out of countries for no reason other than to test your bombs would surely be far more beneficial to all
But that's not the US way!
posted on 1/11/22
What I can't get my head around is why people would risk their lives leaving the nirvana(according to many on here)being the EU to live in the shiiithole which is here (same people).
Can anyone please explain thos to me?
posted on 1/11/22
You seem to be unable to get your head around a great many things.
posted on 1/11/22
comment by Beeb (U1841)
posted 44 seconds ago
You seem to be unable to get your head around a great many things.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is that your explanation?
posted on 1/11/22
We've got total control of our borders now.
The problem is that the Government doesn't know what to do when people cross them.
posted on 1/11/22
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 9 minutes ago
What I can't get my head around is why people would risk their lives leaving the nirvana(according to many on here)being the EU to live in the shiiithole which is here (same people).
Can anyone please explain thos to me?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Apparently, English is such a universal language (apart from in France it seems) they need to come here.
posted on 1/11/22
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 30 minutes ago
What I can't get my head around is why people would risk their lives leaving the nirvana(according to many on here)being the EU to live in the shiiithole which is here (same people).
Can anyone please explain thos to me?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Count how many European countries use English as their native language (don’t worry, you’ll only need the fingers on one hand) and that’ll give you one clue.
posted on 1/11/22
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 30 minutes ago
What I can't get my head around is why people would risk their lives leaving the nirvana(according to many on here)being the EU to live in the shiiithole which is here (same people).
Can anyone please explain thos to me?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I can explain it to you. Basically what you’ve done is come up with an entirely invented narrative and inserted words no one has ever said to fit said narrative. Hence leading to your confusion. Hope that helps champ 🤙
posted on 1/11/22
comment by Rosso out here drippin’ in finesse (U17054)
posted 40 seconds ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 30 minutes ago
What I can't get my head around is why people would risk their lives leaving the nirvana(according to many on here)being the EU to live in the shiiithole which is here (same people).
Can anyone please explain thos to me?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Count how many European countries use English as their native language (don’t worry, you’ll only need the fingers on one hand) and that’ll give you one clue.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So everyone coming across the Chanel only speaks English then?
posted on 1/11/22
comment by Robb - Anti Growth Coallition and Proud (U22716)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 30 minutes ago
What I can't get my head around is why people would risk their lives leaving the nirvana(according to many on here)being the EU to live in the shiiithole which is here (same people).
Can anyone please explain thos to me?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I can explain it to you. Basically what you’ve done is come up with an entirely invented narrative and inserted words no one has ever said to fit said narrative. Hence leading to your confusion. Hope that helps champ 🤙
----------------------------------------------------------------------
posted on 1/11/22
comment by Robb - Anti Growth Coallition and Proud (U22716)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 30 minutes ago
What I can't get my head around is why people would risk their lives leaving the nirvana(according to many on here)being the EU to live in the shiiithole which is here (same people).
Can anyone please explain thos to me?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I can explain it to you. Basically what you’ve done is come up with an entirely invented narrative and inserted words no one has ever said to fit said narrative. Hence leading to your confusion. Hope that helps champ 🤙
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tory in confused by straw man argument shocker.
posted on 1/11/22
comment by Robb - Anti Growth Coallition and Proud (U22716)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 30 minutes ago
What I can't get my head around is why people would risk their lives leaving the nirvana(according to many on here)being the EU to live in the shiiithole which is here (same people).
Can anyone please explain thos to me?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I can explain it to you. Basically what you’ve done is come up with an entirely invented narrative and inserted words no one has ever said to fit said narrative. Hence leading to your confusion. Hope that helps champ 🤙
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So that's you not coming up with an answer then.Coming from an Australian who unless he' s indigenous is basically an immigrant who destroyed the lives of people's who lived there for thousands of years.I won't take a morality lesson from the likes of you
Page 8 of 11
7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11