comment by Bobby Dazzler (U1449)
posted 1 minute ago
Looks nothing like them
William, Charles, Andrew, Edward, that skinny one who does Wimbledon, all doppelgängers
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Henman?
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 48 seconds ago
comment by Bobby Dazzler (U1449)
posted 1 second ago
Looks nothing like them
William, Charles, Andrew, Edward, that skinny one who does Wimbledon, all doppelgängers
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We will never know, I don't remotely resemble my father.
It's just gossip, it's either true or false. False I think because Diana would think it a little revenge on Charles
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The spit of the milkman?
comment by RB&W - Whiteside has done it again (U21434)
posted 2 minutes ago
Anybody who has a go at the uk press is ok by me. I have a lot of sympathy for Harry. What happened to his mum must have affected him as a child. Not so much with Megan. I dont believe she didnt know much about the Royal family before she married into it. Google was her friend if true. And of course she knows what a walkabout is. They have those in America too. My sympathy is tested when they use footage of Jordan being hounded by the press and pretend its them. And literally edit the Queens speech when she became Queen to suit their own agenda.
They have to make a decision now. Go back to being royals and build new bridges with his family or breakaway completely and drop ALL the titles and all that goes with it. They are also still very wealthy which gives them the choice.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Good post, I agree, that's why it's good I suppose
comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 48 seconds ago
comment by Bobby Dazzler (U1449)
posted 1 second ago
Looks nothing like them
William, Charles, Andrew, Edward, that skinny one who does Wimbledon, all doppelgängers
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We will never know, I don't remotely resemble my father.
It's just gossip, it's either true or false. False I think because Diana would think it a little revenge on Charles
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The spit of the milkman?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No my mother
They are both legends and patriots because they are making the royal family look like a pile of shiiiiit
No matter what you think you have to admit he does look more Hewitt than Windsor.
Whoever his dad is, what do we think of them, and the documentary. We have two viewpoints so far
Meg wanted more money so they left, her haw dropped when she found out she wouldn’t receive a salary.
The income, titles, and land weren’t enough.
comment by Igòr; League 1, you’ve being Warne-D đđ¤đ¤ (U22200)
posted 18 minutes ago
No matter what you think you have to admit he does look more Hewitt than Windsor.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah he’s the spit of him.
Maybe she was asked by one of the royals where she was “really” from?
comment by The Gaffer (U22336)
posted 4 minutes ago
Meg wanted more money so they left, her haw dropped when she found out she wouldn’t receive a salary.
The income, titles, and land weren’t enough.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jaw*
They have chosen to fund their lifestyle with these shallow interviews with clickbait lines in them, hinting at further controversies to come
Couldn’t care less about them or their perceived ‘struggles’
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 1 hour, 49 minutes ago
comment by Diafol Coch 77 (U2462)
posted 6 minutes ago
I think Harry is the best of the Royals.
He's realised what they are and buggered off. I hope he brings the whole thing down.
The cynic in me can't help but think the Royals don't mind this as people are no longer talking about Handsy Andy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I said people would have different views Diafol, which is as it should be.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I won't fall out with you over this MU52. It's just my view that's all. I understand some like the Royals and that's OK too.
Not sure why people care so much? Obviously I have sympathy for the way Harry and William lost their mother but stop using the media yourself if you hate them that much and if you really have names you want to mention then name them, don't do multiple interviews/shows to drag it on.
I bet the Tory's are loving all the attention this pointless show is getting why they continue to screw over the country.
Harry is definitely the son of Charles.
He looks a lot like his Grandad (Prince Philip) and the Spencers on his mother's side have ginger/light hair.
Diana also is reported to have not met Hewitt until a few years after Harry was born.
I'd put all the Royals in the bin.
It's a preposterous set up.
Ooooh look at me, I was born and now I can sit on a gold chair and people should bow to me.
Get to fvck.
Not watched it and don't plan to, but they can't really win.
If they stay quiet they have to deal with rumours constantly and leaks by other Royal family members to the press that may not be true. If they tell their side like they are in this documentary, they get moaned at for not living a private life.
comment by Robbing Hoody (U6374)
posted 4 minutes ago
I'd put all the Royals in the bin.
It's a preposterous set up.
Ooooh look at me, I was born and now I can sit on a gold chair and people should bow to me.
Get to fvck.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dont think things being preposterous is a reason to dismiss them altogether.
Millions take satisfaction from wtaching grown men running around and kicking a ball into a net and this can even dictate their whole live, and see then spend vast sums and argue with strangers on the internet about it.
Some people become national heroes for being the best at jumping into a sand pit or riding a horse.
The Royals have their purpose. Just because if you boil it down to simple a explanation like you have, it all sounds a bit stupid, so do most things in life!
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 15 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody (U6374)
posted 4 minutes ago
I'd put all the Royals in the bin.
It's a preposterous set up.
Ooooh look at me, I was born and now I can sit on a gold chair and people should bow to me.
Get to fvck.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dont think things being preposterous is a reason to dismiss them altogether.
Millions take satisfaction from wtaching grown men running around and kicking a ball into a net and this can even dictate their whole live, and see then spend vast sums and argue with strangers on the internet about it.
Some people become national heroes for being the best at jumping into a sand pit or riding a horse.
The Royals have their purpose. Just because if you boil it down to simple a explanation like you have, it all sounds a bit stupid, so do most things in life!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The difference is with the examples you've listed is that they're adored on merit. The Royals are just there because they just happened to be born into that family.
Being born into a purpose is preposterous, especially one that holds an elte status and commands being remunerated. Your analogy with skilled athletes is odd and reaching really, never heard that take before that's for sure.
But, just for banter, what is their purpose?
I haven't seen the series and do not intend to,I just get the impression that this couple are just grasping greedy hypocrites, feathering their own nest ! think how much they are making from these interviews and series !
The show was actually surprisingly interesting, I thought.
For example, Harry openly talks about how the Royal Family designate specific journalists as 'royal correspondents' and then the media can write favourable stories with the added feel of legitimacy that that title gives the reader.
People that think Meghan is some manipulative, evil witch that got her claws into our poor, vulnerable Prince Harry are idiots IMO. He was rebellious and clearly uncomfortable with the press and their role in Diana's life/death long before Meghan. Imagine falling in love with someone who is then subjected to the same thing your late mother was a victim of - I'd be out of there too!
The 'if they don't want attention, don't do a Netflix show' argument is stupid too. They don't want scuumbag paps snapping them and their kids, that's fair enough - they're entitled to share their lives willingly and on their own terms though.
People just can't handle that a prominent member of the Royal Family has voluntarily gone 'this is mental, I'm out' (and rightfully so IMO)- it is triggering people big time and that is hilarious to me. They just can't handle the idea that society might be moving on from bizarre bestowed-by-God power
The 'if they don't want attention, don't do a Netflix show' argument is stupid too. They don't want scuumbag paps snapping them and their kids, that's fair enough - they're entitled to share their lives willingly and on their own terms though.
=====
Do agree with this.
I'd quite like them to start naming names. Call out the individual members of the Royal Family and their flunkies, rather than just stating 'a family member' or 'the institution.'
comment by Henry Chinaski (U21800)
posted 50 minutes ago
The show was actually surprisingly interesting, I thought.
For example, Harry openly talks about how the Royal Family designate specific journalists as 'royal correspondents' and then the media can write favourable stories with the added feel of legitimacy that that title gives the reader.
People that think Meghan is some manipulative, evil witch that got her claws into our poor, vulnerable Prince Harry are idiots IMO. He was rebellious and clearly uncomfortable with the press and their role in Diana's life/death long before Meghan. Imagine falling in love with someone who is then subjected to the same thing your late mother was a victim of - I'd be out of there too!
The 'if they don't want attention, don't do a Netflix show' argument is stupid too. They don't want scuumbag paps snapping them and their kids, that's fair enough - they're entitled to share their lives willingly and on their own terms though.
People just can't handle that a prominent member of the Royal Family has voluntarily gone 'this is mental, I'm out' (and rightfully so IMO)- it is triggering people big time and that is hilarious to me. They just can't handle the idea that society might be moving on from bizarre bestowed-by-God power
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Except Harry isn't OUT, is he? Last time I checked they both still had their royal titles ... you know, the ones they're using to cash in via Netflix.
I've total sympathy for anyone who felt trapped in the royal institution ... less so for anyone who wants to have their cake and eat it. It also took most of the media 5 mins to pick out huge glaring holes and falsehoods in "their truth".
Sign in if you want to comment
So.. The Sussex's
Page 2 of 8
6 | 7 | 8
posted on 15/12/22
comment by Bobby Dazzler (U1449)
posted 1 minute ago
Looks nothing like them
William, Charles, Andrew, Edward, that skinny one who does Wimbledon, all doppelgängers
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Henman?
posted on 15/12/22
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 48 seconds ago
comment by Bobby Dazzler (U1449)
posted 1 second ago
Looks nothing like them
William, Charles, Andrew, Edward, that skinny one who does Wimbledon, all doppelgängers
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We will never know, I don't remotely resemble my father.
It's just gossip, it's either true or false. False I think because Diana would think it a little revenge on Charles
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The spit of the milkman?
posted on 15/12/22
comment by RB&W - Whiteside has done it again (U21434)
posted 2 minutes ago
Anybody who has a go at the uk press is ok by me. I have a lot of sympathy for Harry. What happened to his mum must have affected him as a child. Not so much with Megan. I dont believe she didnt know much about the Royal family before she married into it. Google was her friend if true. And of course she knows what a walkabout is. They have those in America too. My sympathy is tested when they use footage of Jordan being hounded by the press and pretend its them. And literally edit the Queens speech when she became Queen to suit their own agenda.
They have to make a decision now. Go back to being royals and build new bridges with his family or breakaway completely and drop ALL the titles and all that goes with it. They are also still very wealthy which gives them the choice.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Good post, I agree, that's why it's good I suppose
posted on 15/12/22
comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 48 seconds ago
comment by Bobby Dazzler (U1449)
posted 1 second ago
Looks nothing like them
William, Charles, Andrew, Edward, that skinny one who does Wimbledon, all doppelgängers
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We will never know, I don't remotely resemble my father.
It's just gossip, it's either true or false. False I think because Diana would think it a little revenge on Charles
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The spit of the milkman?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No my mother
posted on 15/12/22
They are both legends and patriots because they are making the royal family look like a pile of shiiiiit
posted on 15/12/22
No matter what you think you have to admit he does look more Hewitt than Windsor.
posted on 15/12/22
Whoever his dad is, what do we think of them, and the documentary. We have two viewpoints so far
posted on 15/12/22
Meg wanted more money so they left, her haw dropped when she found out she wouldn’t receive a salary.
The income, titles, and land weren’t enough.
posted on 15/12/22
comment by Igòr; League 1, you’ve being Warne-D đđ¤đ¤ (U22200)
posted 18 minutes ago
No matter what you think you have to admit he does look more Hewitt than Windsor.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah he’s the spit of him.
posted on 15/12/22
Maybe she was asked by one of the royals where she was “really” from?
posted on 15/12/22
comment by The Gaffer (U22336)
posted 4 minutes ago
Meg wanted more money so they left, her haw dropped when she found out she wouldn’t receive a salary.
The income, titles, and land weren’t enough.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jaw*
posted on 15/12/22
They have chosen to fund their lifestyle with these shallow interviews with clickbait lines in them, hinting at further controversies to come
Couldn’t care less about them or their perceived ‘struggles’
posted on 15/12/22
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 1 hour, 49 minutes ago
comment by Diafol Coch 77 (U2462)
posted 6 minutes ago
I think Harry is the best of the Royals.
He's realised what they are and buggered off. I hope he brings the whole thing down.
The cynic in me can't help but think the Royals don't mind this as people are no longer talking about Handsy Andy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I said people would have different views Diafol, which is as it should be.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I won't fall out with you over this MU52. It's just my view that's all. I understand some like the Royals and that's OK too.
posted on 15/12/22
Not sure why people care so much? Obviously I have sympathy for the way Harry and William lost their mother but stop using the media yourself if you hate them that much and if you really have names you want to mention then name them, don't do multiple interviews/shows to drag it on.
I bet the Tory's are loving all the attention this pointless show is getting why they continue to screw over the country.
posted on 15/12/22
Harry is definitely the son of Charles.
He looks a lot like his Grandad (Prince Philip) and the Spencers on his mother's side have ginger/light hair.
Diana also is reported to have not met Hewitt until a few years after Harry was born.
posted on 15/12/22
I'd put all the Royals in the bin.
It's a preposterous set up.
Ooooh look at me, I was born and now I can sit on a gold chair and people should bow to me.
Get to fvck.
posted on 15/12/22
Not watched it and don't plan to, but they can't really win.
If they stay quiet they have to deal with rumours constantly and leaks by other Royal family members to the press that may not be true. If they tell their side like they are in this documentary, they get moaned at for not living a private life.
posted on 15/12/22
comment by Robbing Hoody (U6374)
posted 4 minutes ago
I'd put all the Royals in the bin.
It's a preposterous set up.
Ooooh look at me, I was born and now I can sit on a gold chair and people should bow to me.
Get to fvck.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dont think things being preposterous is a reason to dismiss them altogether.
Millions take satisfaction from wtaching grown men running around and kicking a ball into a net and this can even dictate their whole live, and see then spend vast sums and argue with strangers on the internet about it.
Some people become national heroes for being the best at jumping into a sand pit or riding a horse.
The Royals have their purpose. Just because if you boil it down to simple a explanation like you have, it all sounds a bit stupid, so do most things in life!
posted on 15/12/22
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 15 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody (U6374)
posted 4 minutes ago
I'd put all the Royals in the bin.
It's a preposterous set up.
Ooooh look at me, I was born and now I can sit on a gold chair and people should bow to me.
Get to fvck.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dont think things being preposterous is a reason to dismiss them altogether.
Millions take satisfaction from wtaching grown men running around and kicking a ball into a net and this can even dictate their whole live, and see then spend vast sums and argue with strangers on the internet about it.
Some people become national heroes for being the best at jumping into a sand pit or riding a horse.
The Royals have their purpose. Just because if you boil it down to simple a explanation like you have, it all sounds a bit stupid, so do most things in life!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The difference is with the examples you've listed is that they're adored on merit. The Royals are just there because they just happened to be born into that family.
posted on 15/12/22
Being born into a purpose is preposterous, especially one that holds an elte status and commands being remunerated. Your analogy with skilled athletes is odd and reaching really, never heard that take before that's for sure.
But, just for banter, what is their purpose?
posted on 15/12/22
I haven't seen the series and do not intend to,I just get the impression that this couple are just grasping greedy hypocrites, feathering their own nest ! think how much they are making from these interviews and series !
posted on 15/12/22
The show was actually surprisingly interesting, I thought.
For example, Harry openly talks about how the Royal Family designate specific journalists as 'royal correspondents' and then the media can write favourable stories with the added feel of legitimacy that that title gives the reader.
People that think Meghan is some manipulative, evil witch that got her claws into our poor, vulnerable Prince Harry are idiots IMO. He was rebellious and clearly uncomfortable with the press and their role in Diana's life/death long before Meghan. Imagine falling in love with someone who is then subjected to the same thing your late mother was a victim of - I'd be out of there too!
The 'if they don't want attention, don't do a Netflix show' argument is stupid too. They don't want scuumbag paps snapping them and their kids, that's fair enough - they're entitled to share their lives willingly and on their own terms though.
People just can't handle that a prominent member of the Royal Family has voluntarily gone 'this is mental, I'm out' (and rightfully so IMO)- it is triggering people big time and that is hilarious to me. They just can't handle the idea that society might be moving on from bizarre bestowed-by-God power
posted on 15/12/22
The 'if they don't want attention, don't do a Netflix show' argument is stupid too. They don't want scuumbag paps snapping them and their kids, that's fair enough - they're entitled to share their lives willingly and on their own terms though.
=====
Do agree with this.
posted on 15/12/22
I'd quite like them to start naming names. Call out the individual members of the Royal Family and their flunkies, rather than just stating 'a family member' or 'the institution.'
posted on 15/12/22
comment by Henry Chinaski (U21800)
posted 50 minutes ago
The show was actually surprisingly interesting, I thought.
For example, Harry openly talks about how the Royal Family designate specific journalists as 'royal correspondents' and then the media can write favourable stories with the added feel of legitimacy that that title gives the reader.
People that think Meghan is some manipulative, evil witch that got her claws into our poor, vulnerable Prince Harry are idiots IMO. He was rebellious and clearly uncomfortable with the press and their role in Diana's life/death long before Meghan. Imagine falling in love with someone who is then subjected to the same thing your late mother was a victim of - I'd be out of there too!
The 'if they don't want attention, don't do a Netflix show' argument is stupid too. They don't want scuumbag paps snapping them and their kids, that's fair enough - they're entitled to share their lives willingly and on their own terms though.
People just can't handle that a prominent member of the Royal Family has voluntarily gone 'this is mental, I'm out' (and rightfully so IMO)- it is triggering people big time and that is hilarious to me. They just can't handle the idea that society might be moving on from bizarre bestowed-by-God power
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Except Harry isn't OUT, is he? Last time I checked they both still had their royal titles ... you know, the ones they're using to cash in via Netflix.
I've total sympathy for anyone who felt trapped in the royal institution ... less so for anyone who wants to have their cake and eat it. It also took most of the media 5 mins to pick out huge glaring holes and falsehoods in "their truth".
Page 2 of 8
6 | 7 | 8