https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D_Zqg3jSt48
This was given offside so how could you argue Rashford didn't have more impact than the everton player there
comment by Loco Liverpool (U18018)
posted less than a minute ago
He was between Akanji and the ball which means he was blocking his vision, that alone means he should be given offside
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lol. No that's not how it works. The Wolves defender literally headed the ball to stop it getting to Salah last week. Was that offside?
Some bitter fans on here now united seem to be doing well
you can't block the goalkeepers vision from an offside position
at no point did Rashford block Ederson's vision
Well, was it Loco? It looked a lot like Salah influenced the Wolves defender. What say you?
comment by Ali - (U1192)
posted less than a minute ago
Some bitter fans on here now united seem to be doing well
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The games the game.
comment by merrysupersteve (relaxed about the situation) (U1132)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Loco Liverpool (U18018)
posted less than a minute ago
He was between Akanji and the ball which means he was blocking his vision, that alone means he should be given offside
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lol. No that's not how it works. The Wolves defender literally headed the ball to stop it getting to Salah last week. Was that offside?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Its should be but not as the rules are.
But the rules as they're currently written say
preventing an opponent from playing or being able to play the ball by clearly obstructing the opponent’s line of vision
so he obviously prevented Akanji by chasing the ball for 20 yards
comment by Loco Liverpool (U18018)
posted about a minute ago
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D_Zqg3jSt48
This was given offside so how could you argue Rashford didn't have more impact than the everton player there
----------------------------------------------------------------------
you guys seriously arguing this when the answer is fecking obvious
comment by Loco Liverpool (U18018)
posted 1 minute ago
He was between Akanji and the ball which means he was blocking his vision, that alone means he should be given offside
----------------------------------------------------------------------
After the Salah one last week the offside law clearly isn't what we all thought it was. Every team has benefitted from it at some point.
comment by Ali - (U1192)
posted 1 minute ago
Some bitter fans on here now united seem to be doing well
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You would be complaining if that goal had been scored against you and you know it.
Loco, should Salah's goal have stood? I seem to have lost you here? You there?
comment by merrysupersteve (relaxed about the situation) (U1132)
posted 1 second ago
Loco, should Salah's goal have stood? I seem to have lost you here? You there?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Curious case of pot..kettle..wolves
I know a goal that didn't stand in the exact some scenario yesterday. A wolves goal of course.
comment by Spurtle (U1608)
posted 4 seconds ago
comment by Ali - (U1192)
posted 1 minute ago
Some bitter fans on here now united seem to be doing well
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You would be complaining if that goal had been scored against you and you know it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Probably but after the ref and obvs VAR had a look at it it was given, all else is redundant other than this, righteous back and forth?
comment by merrysupersteve (relaxed about the situation) (U1132)
posted less than a minute ago
Loco, should Salah's goal have stood? I seem to have lost you here? You there?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've already said I don't think it should but according to the rules once a defender has played the ball it's a new phase of play.
Which City player played the ball before Rashford interfered with play?
comment by Spurtle (U1608)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Ali - (U1192)
posted 1 minute ago
Some bitter fans on here now united seem to be doing well
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You would be complaining if that goal had been scored against you and you know it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Personally, I would be complaining about the rule, definitely. Not the application of it
comment by Cinciwolf---A Scottish world champion and Messi the goat. (U11551)
posted less than a minute ago
I know a goal that didn't stand in the exact some scenario yesterday. A wolves goal of course.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
this is different
Wolves have very bizarrely been getting ripped off by the refs for ages - pretty much every type of decision has gone against them
A player in an offside position at the moment the ball is played or touched* by a team-mate is only penalised on becoming involved in active play by:
...
preventing an opponent from playing or being able to play the ball by clearly obstructing the opponent’s line of vision
...
making an obvious action which clearly impacts on the ability of an opponent to play the ball
https://www.thefa.com/football-rules-governance/lawsandrules/laws/football-11-11/law-11---offside
Like seriously if you care so much I said on this thread when Salah scored it shouldn't count, I don't know why some United fans would be so weird about benefiting from it bad referring decisions
comment by Loco Liverpool (U18018)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by merrysupersteve (relaxed about the situation) (U1132)
posted less than a minute ago
Loco, should Salah's goal have stood? I seem to have lost you here? You there?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've already said I don't think it should but according to the rules once a defender has played the ball it's a new phase of play.
Which City player played the ball before Rashford interfered with play?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you not see the inconsistency here? If Rashford was interfering with play then how was Salah not doing so? The Wolves player made that panicked header in an effort to intercept a cross to Salah. It's metal gymnastics here mate. You know I'm right 👍
comment by Forrr - Admin 4 (U18420)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Cinciwolf---A Scottish world champion and Messi the goat. (U11551)
posted less than a minute ago
I know a goal that didn't stand in the exact some scenario yesterday. A wolves goal of course.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
this is different
Wolves have very bizarrely been getting ripped off by the refs for ages - pretty much every type of decision has gone against them
----------------------------------------------------------------------
True story. Will be worse now we tried to make a stand as well. Shame all clubs didn't just join together after last weeks farce.
https://dubz.co/v/5vcs9w
watch the goal above in full speed - there is genuinely no phase where Rashford is shielding the ball
it is very lazy defending from Akanji
(it was also terrible defending by him for our 2nd goal)
comment by Loco Liverpool (U18018)
posted less than a minute ago
Like seriously if you care so much I said on this thread when Salah scored it shouldn't count, I don't know why some United fans would be so weird about benefiting from it bad referring decisions
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because the decision wasn't bad, the rule is bad
comment by Forrr - Admin 4 (U18420)
posted about a minute ago
comment by Cinciwolf---A Scottish world champion and Messi the goat. (U11551)
posted less than a minute ago
I know a goal that didn't stand in the exact some scenario yesterday. A wolves goal of course.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
this is different
Wolves have very bizarrely been getting ripped off by the refs for ages - pretty much every type of decision has gone against them
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Good, most pointless team. Hopefully they dump back in the championship where they belong
Sign in if you want to comment
Football Live!
Page 194 of 7926
195 | 196 | 197 | 198 | 199
posted on 15/1/23
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D_Zqg3jSt48
This was given offside so how could you argue Rashford didn't have more impact than the everton player there
posted on 15/1/23
comment by Loco Liverpool (U18018)
posted less than a minute ago
He was between Akanji and the ball which means he was blocking his vision, that alone means he should be given offside
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lol. No that's not how it works. The Wolves defender literally headed the ball to stop it getting to Salah last week. Was that offside?
posted on 15/1/23
Some bitter fans on here now united seem to be doing well
posted on 15/1/23
you can't block the goalkeepers vision from an offside position
at no point did Rashford block Ederson's vision
posted on 15/1/23
Well, was it Loco? It looked a lot like Salah influenced the Wolves defender. What say you?
posted on 15/1/23
comment by Ali - (U1192)
posted less than a minute ago
Some bitter fans on here now united seem to be doing well
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The games the game.
posted on 15/1/23
comment by merrysupersteve (relaxed about the situation) (U1132)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Loco Liverpool (U18018)
posted less than a minute ago
He was between Akanji and the ball which means he was blocking his vision, that alone means he should be given offside
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lol. No that's not how it works. The Wolves defender literally headed the ball to stop it getting to Salah last week. Was that offside?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Its should be but not as the rules are.
But the rules as they're currently written say
preventing an opponent from playing or being able to play the ball by clearly obstructing the opponent’s line of vision
so he obviously prevented Akanji by chasing the ball for 20 yards
posted on 15/1/23
comment by Loco Liverpool (U18018)
posted about a minute ago
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D_Zqg3jSt48
This was given offside so how could you argue Rashford didn't have more impact than the everton player there
----------------------------------------------------------------------
you guys seriously arguing this when the answer is fecking obvious
posted on 15/1/23
comment by Loco Liverpool (U18018)
posted 1 minute ago
He was between Akanji and the ball which means he was blocking his vision, that alone means he should be given offside
----------------------------------------------------------------------
After the Salah one last week the offside law clearly isn't what we all thought it was. Every team has benefitted from it at some point.
posted on 15/1/23
comment by Ali - (U1192)
posted 1 minute ago
Some bitter fans on here now united seem to be doing well
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You would be complaining if that goal had been scored against you and you know it.
posted on 15/1/23
Loco, should Salah's goal have stood? I seem to have lost you here? You there?
posted on 15/1/23
comment by merrysupersteve (relaxed about the situation) (U1132)
posted 1 second ago
Loco, should Salah's goal have stood? I seem to have lost you here? You there?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Curious case of pot..kettle..wolves
posted on 15/1/23
I know a goal that didn't stand in the exact some scenario yesterday. A wolves goal of course.
posted on 15/1/23
comment by Spurtle (U1608)
posted 4 seconds ago
comment by Ali - (U1192)
posted 1 minute ago
Some bitter fans on here now united seem to be doing well
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You would be complaining if that goal had been scored against you and you know it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Probably but after the ref and obvs VAR had a look at it it was given, all else is redundant other than this, righteous back and forth?
posted on 15/1/23
comment by merrysupersteve (relaxed about the situation) (U1132)
posted less than a minute ago
Loco, should Salah's goal have stood? I seem to have lost you here? You there?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've already said I don't think it should but according to the rules once a defender has played the ball it's a new phase of play.
Which City player played the ball before Rashford interfered with play?
posted on 15/1/23
comment by Spurtle (U1608)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Ali - (U1192)
posted 1 minute ago
Some bitter fans on here now united seem to be doing well
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You would be complaining if that goal had been scored against you and you know it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Personally, I would be complaining about the rule, definitely. Not the application of it
posted on 15/1/23
comment by Cinciwolf---A Scottish world champion and Messi the goat. (U11551)
posted less than a minute ago
I know a goal that didn't stand in the exact some scenario yesterday. A wolves goal of course.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
this is different
Wolves have very bizarrely been getting ripped off by the refs for ages - pretty much every type of decision has gone against them
posted on 15/1/23
A player in an offside position at the moment the ball is played or touched* by a team-mate is only penalised on becoming involved in active play by:
...
preventing an opponent from playing or being able to play the ball by clearly obstructing the opponent’s line of vision
...
making an obvious action which clearly impacts on the ability of an opponent to play the ball
https://www.thefa.com/football-rules-governance/lawsandrules/laws/football-11-11/law-11---offside
posted on 15/1/23
Like seriously if you care so much I said on this thread when Salah scored it shouldn't count, I don't know why some United fans would be so weird about benefiting from it bad referring decisions
posted on 15/1/23
comment by Loco Liverpool (U18018)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by merrysupersteve (relaxed about the situation) (U1132)
posted less than a minute ago
Loco, should Salah's goal have stood? I seem to have lost you here? You there?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've already said I don't think it should but according to the rules once a defender has played the ball it's a new phase of play.
Which City player played the ball before Rashford interfered with play?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you not see the inconsistency here? If Rashford was interfering with play then how was Salah not doing so? The Wolves player made that panicked header in an effort to intercept a cross to Salah. It's metal gymnastics here mate. You know I'm right 👍
posted on 15/1/23
*mental
posted on 15/1/23
comment by Forrr - Admin 4 (U18420)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Cinciwolf---A Scottish world champion and Messi the goat. (U11551)
posted less than a minute ago
I know a goal that didn't stand in the exact some scenario yesterday. A wolves goal of course.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
this is different
Wolves have very bizarrely been getting ripped off by the refs for ages - pretty much every type of decision has gone against them
----------------------------------------------------------------------
True story. Will be worse now we tried to make a stand as well. Shame all clubs didn't just join together after last weeks farce.
posted on 15/1/23
https://dubz.co/v/5vcs9w
watch the goal above in full speed - there is genuinely no phase where Rashford is shielding the ball
it is very lazy defending from Akanji
(it was also terrible defending by him for our 2nd goal)
posted on 15/1/23
comment by Loco Liverpool (U18018)
posted less than a minute ago
Like seriously if you care so much I said on this thread when Salah scored it shouldn't count, I don't know why some United fans would be so weird about benefiting from it bad referring decisions
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because the decision wasn't bad, the rule is bad
posted on 15/1/23
comment by Forrr - Admin 4 (U18420)
posted about a minute ago
comment by Cinciwolf---A Scottish world champion and Messi the goat. (U11551)
posted less than a minute ago
I know a goal that didn't stand in the exact some scenario yesterday. A wolves goal of course.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
this is different
Wolves have very bizarrely been getting ripped off by the refs for ages - pretty much every type of decision has gone against them
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Good, most pointless team. Hopefully they dump back in the championship where they belong
Page 194 of 7926
195 | 196 | 197 | 198 | 199