comment by Diafol Coch 77 (U2462)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by isembowel the libeals, an ink the bloo of thei chilen (U17054)
posted 25 seconds ago
Facking hell
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not me no?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, not you
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
I've never worked for prevent and I was never, ever in the Gestapo. You're having an absolute mare.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You're all saints compared to them.
Scholay reckons Wahhabism isn’t oppressive to women. This is what you are dealing with, Diafol.
comment by Lisandro The King Martinez (U10026)
posted 4 minutes ago
Scholay reckons Wahhabism isn’t oppressive to women. This is what you are dealing with, Diafol.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm always open to be educated but if a regime treats women different to men then that should be a red flag straight away. Even when it comes to United strong women have always played a big part (Mrs Fullaway etc)
There’s so many red flags. Unfortunately it won’t preclude them from football ownership.
comment by Lisandro The King Martinez (U10026)
posted 9 minutes ago
There’s so many red flags. Unfortunately it won’t preclude them from football ownership.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Perhaps we're in the wrong though eh!
Kung Fu, you have argued that everybody is morally corrupt and therefore it is both pointless differentiate between different potential owners, and hypocritical to object to one owner on moral grounds and not to all. We should therefore, in your view, focus only on the owner's impact on the sporting operations of the club.
I'm curious: would apply the same logic if the club were bought by an arm of the Israeli state, or by an Israeli conglomerate with extensive investments in its domestic arms industry, and thus profiting directly from the oppression of the Palestinian people?
Consistent with my stance on Qatari ownership, I would be very much opposed to this.
Just seen Avram Glazer on the cricket, as it happens. Watching his t20 team in Dubai.
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 53 minutes ago
Kung Fu, you have argued that everybody is morally corrupt and therefore it is both pointless differentiate between different potential owners, and hypocritical to object to one owner on moral grounds and not to all. We should therefore, in your view, focus only on the owner's impact on the sporting operations of the club.
I'm curious: would apply the same logic if the club were bought by an arm of the Israeli state, or by an Israeli conglomerate with extensive investments in its domestic arms industry, and thus profiting directly from the oppression of the Palestinian people?
Consistent with my stance on Qatari ownership, I would be very much opposed to this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This should be interesting.....
comment by scholayScholes (U13961)
posted 3 hours ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 2 hours, 11 minutes ago
comment by scholayScholes (U13961)
posted 30 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 1 hour, 1 minute ago
comment by (K̇ash) - FSG OUT (Get a move on!) - Free Palestine 🇵🇸 (U1108)
posted 52 seconds ago
In other words you don't want brown people owning your club?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeh, we are all racists. Nothing to do with conscience or morals or not wanting to be able to just buy success without generating our own money.
Go away you absolute plum and let the adults debate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What are you talking about you you muppet. If these guys bought us and just make us Debt free, we will go into any transfer market and financially will be able to outmuscle most teams on this planet based solely on the business activities of Manchester United.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, they would be able to do that. But is that what they will do? Lets have a look at the two PL clubs that have been owned by oil billionaires. Is that what they have done? Use your brain you angry little man.
You talk about the lack of respect on these boards, yet all you do is insult people on here. You have no self-awareness at all.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Maybe you should use your brain. Those two clubs needed massive cash injection, this is not the case at Manchester United. Looking at what is happening at city, I can tell you for free these are not stupid people seeing as they are billionaires and they will not be proceeding to repeating this City Farce. They are buying a club wherein all they need to do is clear our debt, build a 2 billion stadium and the rest our great club, as stated previously, can easily challenge any club in this world when it comes to transfers.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ah, just 2 billion? Well why didn't you say so?
Let the sports washing commence!
Sportswashing done commenced already and they haven't even put in a bid.
comment by Thorgen son of Kloppin - Mjolnir... To me! (U1282)
posted 15 seconds ago
Sportswashing done commenced already and they haven't even put in a bid.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Looking like there might actually be some legs in the story though, with more serious outlets starting to report it.
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 53 minutes ago
Kung Fu, you have argued that everybody is morally corrupt and therefore it is both pointless differentiate between different potential owners, and hypocritical to object to one owner on moral grounds and not to all. We should therefore, in your view, focus only on the owner's impact on the sporting operations of the club.
I'm curious: would apply the same logic if the club were bought by an arm of the Israeli state, or by an Israeli conglomerate with extensive investments in its domestic arms industry, and thus profiting directly from the oppression of the Palestinian people?
Consistent with my stance on Qatari ownership, I would be very much opposed to this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This should be interesting.....
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If he replies.
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Thorgen son of Kloppin - Mjolnir... To me! (U1282)
posted 15 seconds ago
Sportswashing done commenced already and they haven't even put in a bid.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Looking like there might actually be some legs in the story though, with more serious outlets starting to report it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Then the sportswashing should pick up pace soon.
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 53 minutes ago
Kung Fu, you have argued that everybody is morally corrupt and therefore it is both pointless differentiate between different potential owners, and hypocritical to object to one owner on moral grounds and not to all. We should therefore, in your view, focus only on the owner's impact on the sporting operations of the club.
I'm curious: would apply the same logic if the club were bought by an arm of the Israeli state, or by an Israeli conglomerate with extensive investments in its domestic arms industry, and thus profiting directly from the oppression of the Palestinian people?
Consistent with my stance on Qatari ownership, I would be very much opposed to this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This should be interesting.....
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If he replies.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’ll be surprised if he does.
Perhaps he's busy and didn't notice my question
Probably busy frantically transferring money and shredding documents.
comment by isembowel the libeals, an ink the bloo of thei chilen (U17054)
posted 1 minute ago
Probably busy frantically transferring money and shredding documents.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He works for City?
comment by Thorgen son of Kloppin - Mjolnir... To me! (U1282)
posted 54 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Thorgen son of Kloppin - Mjolnir... To me! (U1282)
posted 15 seconds ago
Sportswashing done commenced already and they haven't even put in a bid.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Looking like there might actually be some legs in the story though, with more serious outlets starting to report it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Then the sportswashing should pick up pace soon.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm ready!
Sign in if you want to comment
Glazers In?
Page 4 of 4
posted on 8/2/23
comment by Diafol Coch 77 (U2462)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by isembowel the libeals, an ink the bloo of thei chilen (U17054)
posted 25 seconds ago
Facking hell
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not me no?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, not you
posted on 8/2/23
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
I've never worked for prevent and I was never, ever in the Gestapo. You're having an absolute mare.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You're all saints compared to them.
posted on 8/2/23
Scholay reckons Wahhabism isn’t oppressive to women. This is what you are dealing with, Diafol.
posted on 8/2/23
comment by Lisandro The King Martinez (U10026)
posted 4 minutes ago
Scholay reckons Wahhabism isn’t oppressive to women. This is what you are dealing with, Diafol.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm always open to be educated but if a regime treats women different to men then that should be a red flag straight away. Even when it comes to United strong women have always played a big part (Mrs Fullaway etc)
posted on 8/2/23
There’s so many red flags. Unfortunately it won’t preclude them from football ownership.
posted on 8/2/23
comment by Lisandro The King Martinez (U10026)
posted 9 minutes ago
There’s so many red flags. Unfortunately it won’t preclude them from football ownership.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Perhaps we're in the wrong though eh!
posted on 8/2/23
Kung Fu, you have argued that everybody is morally corrupt and therefore it is both pointless differentiate between different potential owners, and hypocritical to object to one owner on moral grounds and not to all. We should therefore, in your view, focus only on the owner's impact on the sporting operations of the club.
I'm curious: would apply the same logic if the club were bought by an arm of the Israeli state, or by an Israeli conglomerate with extensive investments in its domestic arms industry, and thus profiting directly from the oppression of the Palestinian people?
Consistent with my stance on Qatari ownership, I would be very much opposed to this.
posted on 8/2/23
Just seen Avram Glazer on the cricket, as it happens. Watching his t20 team in Dubai.
posted on 8/2/23
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 53 minutes ago
Kung Fu, you have argued that everybody is morally corrupt and therefore it is both pointless differentiate between different potential owners, and hypocritical to object to one owner on moral grounds and not to all. We should therefore, in your view, focus only on the owner's impact on the sporting operations of the club.
I'm curious: would apply the same logic if the club were bought by an arm of the Israeli state, or by an Israeli conglomerate with extensive investments in its domestic arms industry, and thus profiting directly from the oppression of the Palestinian people?
Consistent with my stance on Qatari ownership, I would be very much opposed to this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This should be interesting.....
posted on 8/2/23
comment by scholayScholes (U13961)
posted 3 hours ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 2 hours, 11 minutes ago
comment by scholayScholes (U13961)
posted 30 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 1 hour, 1 minute ago
comment by (K̇ash) - FSG OUT (Get a move on!) - Free Palestine 🇵🇸 (U1108)
posted 52 seconds ago
In other words you don't want brown people owning your club?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeh, we are all racists. Nothing to do with conscience or morals or not wanting to be able to just buy success without generating our own money.
Go away you absolute plum and let the adults debate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What are you talking about you you muppet. If these guys bought us and just make us Debt free, we will go into any transfer market and financially will be able to outmuscle most teams on this planet based solely on the business activities of Manchester United.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, they would be able to do that. But is that what they will do? Lets have a look at the two PL clubs that have been owned by oil billionaires. Is that what they have done? Use your brain you angry little man.
You talk about the lack of respect on these boards, yet all you do is insult people on here. You have no self-awareness at all.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Maybe you should use your brain. Those two clubs needed massive cash injection, this is not the case at Manchester United. Looking at what is happening at city, I can tell you for free these are not stupid people seeing as they are billionaires and they will not be proceeding to repeating this City Farce. They are buying a club wherein all they need to do is clear our debt, build a 2 billion stadium and the rest our great club, as stated previously, can easily challenge any club in this world when it comes to transfers.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ah, just 2 billion? Well why didn't you say so?
Let the sports washing commence!
posted on 8/2/23
Sportswashing done commenced already and they haven't even put in a bid.
posted on 8/2/23
comment by Thorgen son of Kloppin - Mjolnir... To me! (U1282)
posted 15 seconds ago
Sportswashing done commenced already and they haven't even put in a bid.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Looking like there might actually be some legs in the story though, with more serious outlets starting to report it.
posted on 8/2/23
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 53 minutes ago
Kung Fu, you have argued that everybody is morally corrupt and therefore it is both pointless differentiate between different potential owners, and hypocritical to object to one owner on moral grounds and not to all. We should therefore, in your view, focus only on the owner's impact on the sporting operations of the club.
I'm curious: would apply the same logic if the club were bought by an arm of the Israeli state, or by an Israeli conglomerate with extensive investments in its domestic arms industry, and thus profiting directly from the oppression of the Palestinian people?
Consistent with my stance on Qatari ownership, I would be very much opposed to this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This should be interesting.....
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If he replies.
posted on 8/2/23
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Thorgen son of Kloppin - Mjolnir... To me! (U1282)
posted 15 seconds ago
Sportswashing done commenced already and they haven't even put in a bid.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Looking like there might actually be some legs in the story though, with more serious outlets starting to report it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Then the sportswashing should pick up pace soon.
posted on 8/2/23
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 53 minutes ago
Kung Fu, you have argued that everybody is morally corrupt and therefore it is both pointless differentiate between different potential owners, and hypocritical to object to one owner on moral grounds and not to all. We should therefore, in your view, focus only on the owner's impact on the sporting operations of the club.
I'm curious: would apply the same logic if the club were bought by an arm of the Israeli state, or by an Israeli conglomerate with extensive investments in its domestic arms industry, and thus profiting directly from the oppression of the Palestinian people?
Consistent with my stance on Qatari ownership, I would be very much opposed to this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This should be interesting.....
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If he replies.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’ll be surprised if he does.
posted on 8/2/23
Perhaps he's busy and didn't notice my question
posted on 8/2/23
Probably busy frantically transferring money and shredding documents.
posted on 8/2/23
comment by isembowel the libeals, an ink the bloo of thei chilen (U17054)
posted 1 minute ago
Probably busy frantically transferring money and shredding documents.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He works for City?
posted on 8/2/23
comment by Thorgen son of Kloppin - Mjolnir... To me! (U1282)
posted 54 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Thorgen son of Kloppin - Mjolnir... To me! (U1282)
posted 15 seconds ago
Sportswashing done commenced already and they haven't even put in a bid.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Looking like there might actually be some legs in the story though, with more serious outlets starting to report it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Then the sportswashing should pick up pace soon.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm ready!
Page 4 of 4