Yep. The financial dopers win again. All whilst Arsenal, who’ve done things properly, get nothing. Who said cheaters never prosper?
To be fair they made a great signing with Haaland. This title was more down to a great signing and Pep relentlessness to win.
comment by Posh Mufc Great Hafi Not Arrogant Just Better (U6578)
posted 2 minutes ago
To be fair they made a great signing with Haaland. This title was more down to a great signing and Pep relentlessness to win.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I always said if City signed Haaland it was game over for everyone else.
The one thing I will never understand is how Saints knocked City out of the League Cup and stopped them winning the quadruple.
Man City were terrible that game and deserved to lose. Even when the big hitters came on they couldn’t do anything. Sometimes you get games like that. I can see Real Madrid knocking them out. I hope so anyway.😂
Thought you were talking about Everton
dont worry RAPyyy we'll do them again in the CL on Wednesday
comment by peks - 1974 (U6618)
posted 45 seconds ago
dont worry RAPyyy we'll do them again in the CL on Wednesday
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not this time
comment by peks - 1974 (U6618)
posted 4 seconds ago
dont worry RAPyyy we'll do them again in the CL on Wednesday
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Can't see it I'm afraid.
I'm saying 3-1 to City.
Liverpool won the league three times on the trott twice before 👍👍👍
Arsenal are the true champions this season, full of integrity, unlike cheaters City
The OP is a typical Liverpool fan! Crying about another team’s spending! If Liverpool were in the same boat as City he’d be chirping away from his perch! Instead he’s playing the victims card claiming City are ruining football!
The league is certainly losing its spark. They’re so dominant.
Had Arsenal won it, it would have been great for the chasing pack. Particularly given how they would have gone about it.
Arsenal have operated on a shoestring last 5 years;
https://www.football365.com/news/transfers-premier-league-five-year-net-spend-man-utd-man-city
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 47 seconds ago
The league is certainly losing its spark. They’re so dominant.
Had Arsenal won it, it would have been great for the chasing pack. Particularly given how they would have gone about it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
City are no more dominant than United were in the 90s and 2000’s, nor more dominant than Liverpool were in the 80s. It’s been over 40 years since there wasn’t a dominant force in top flight English football.
And there are several times before that when one team won more than others over the course of a decade.
Not only that, but compare it to Spain and Italy and Germany. Who the dominant teams in those leagues have been. Even Scotland for gods sake.
If City are a reason for league football losing its spark, then league football lost its spark a long time ago.
comment by RipleysCat (U1862)
posted 43 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 47 seconds ago
The league is certainly losing its spark. They’re so dominant.
Had Arsenal won it, it would have been great for the chasing pack. Particularly given how they would have gone about it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
City are no more dominant than United were in the 90s and 2000’s, nor more dominant than Liverpool were in the 80s. It’s been over 40 years since there wasn’t a dominant force in top flight English football.
And there are several times before that when one team won more than others over the course of a decade.
Not only that, but compare it to Spain and Italy and Germany. Who the dominant teams in those leagues have been. Even Scotland for gods sake.
If City are a reason for league football losing its spark, then league football lost its spark a long time ago.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yet.
Let’s see if you’re still right in three or four years time.
comment by gratedbean (U4885)
posted 18 minutes ago
Liverpool won the league three times on the trott twice before 👍👍👍
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Without cheating though and being bankrolled by a middle Eastern nation. I think it's important to add that important foot note.
We did it twice under Fergie too. 99-01 and 08-11.
City are a fantastic team there's no getting away from it but the fact it's a product of oil money and also blatant forging of financial figures it will never match that of the great Liverpool and Utd sides.
At least they win games fair and square on the pitch, even if they are doped to the eyeballs off it. They don`t play with a team of 13 men like some other clubs.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by RipleysCat (U1862)
posted 43 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 47 seconds ago
The league is certainly losing its spark. They’re so dominant.
Had Arsenal won it, it would have been great for the chasing pack. Particularly given how they would have gone about it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
City are no more dominant than United were in the 90s and 2000’s, nor more dominant than Liverpool were in the 80s. It’s been over 40 years since there wasn’t a dominant force in top flight English football.
And there are several times before that when one team won more than others over the course of a decade.
Not only that, but compare it to Spain and Italy and Germany. Who the dominant teams in those leagues have been. Even Scotland for gods sake.
If City are a reason for league football losing its spark, then league football lost its spark a long time ago.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yet.
Let’s see if you’re still right in three or four years time.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not quite sure what you mean
comment by ●Billy The Spur● 20*21*22* ENIC OUT! (U3924)
posted 1 minute ago
At least they win games fair and square on the pitch, even if they are doped to the eyeballs off it. They don`t play with a team of 13 men like some other clubs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What they do on the pitch is because of what happened off it though. You've can't have it without the other.
They had a sheikh as owner with billions to spend and they could have stayed within the rules and still been successful such was their advantage. But they saw a shortcut and started making us sham companies and inflated sponsorship money.
City did this all to themselves.
comment by RipleysCat (U1862)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by RipleysCat (U1862)
posted 43 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 47 seconds ago
The league is certainly losing its spark. They’re so dominant.
Had Arsenal won it, it would have been great for the chasing pack. Particularly given how they would have gone about it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
City are no more dominant than United were in the 90s and 2000’s, nor more dominant than Liverpool were in the 80s. It’s been over 40 years since there wasn’t a dominant force in top flight English football.
And there are several times before that when one team won more than others over the course of a decade.
Not only that, but compare it to Spain and Italy and Germany. Who the dominant teams in those leagues have been. Even Scotland for gods sake.
If City are a reason for league football losing its spark, then league football lost its spark a long time ago.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yet.
Let’s see if you’re still right in three or four years time.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not quite sure what you mean
----------------------------------------------------------------------
With SAF’s teams you could see the life cycle coming to an end.
I don’t see that here. Every chance City will win 3 of the next 3.
comment by Culér (U9489)
posted 15 minutes ago
Arsenal are the true champions this season, full of integrity, unlike cheaters City
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Love your salty tears
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 16 minutes ago
The league is certainly losing its spark. They’re so dominant.
Had Arsenal won it, it would have been great for the chasing pack. Particularly given how they would have gone about it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Only when United dominate its interesting for all fans alike
comment by Cloggy (U1250)
posted 26 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 16 minutes ago
The league is certainly losing its spark. They’re so dominant.
Had Arsenal won it, it would have been great for the chasing pack. Particularly given how they would have gone about it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Only when United dominate its interesting for all fans alike
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I see you haven’t yet grown up.
Maybe leave the adults to chat?
comment by RipleysCat (U1862)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by RipleysCat (U1862)
posted 43 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 47 seconds ago
The league is certainly losing its spark. They’re so dominant.
Had Arsenal won it, it would have been great for the chasing pack. Particularly given how they would have gone about it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
City are no more dominant than United were in the 90s and 2000’s, nor more dominant than Liverpool were in the 80s. It’s been over 40 years since there wasn’t a dominant force in top flight English football.
And there are several times before that when one team won more than others over the course of a decade.
Not only that, but compare it to Spain and Italy and Germany. Who the dominant teams in those leagues have been. Even Scotland for gods sake.
If City are a reason for league football losing its spark, then league football lost its spark a long time ago.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yet.
Let’s see if you’re still right in three or four years time.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not quite sure what you mean
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He's saying you're actually not that dominant 😂
Sign in if you want to comment
Man City bang another nail
Page 1 of 5
posted on 14/5/23
Yep. The financial dopers win again. All whilst Arsenal, who’ve done things properly, get nothing. Who said cheaters never prosper?
posted on 14/5/23
To be fair they made a great signing with Haaland. This title was more down to a great signing and Pep relentlessness to win.
posted on 14/5/23
comment by Posh Mufc Great Hafi Not Arrogant Just Better (U6578)
posted 2 minutes ago
To be fair they made a great signing with Haaland. This title was more down to a great signing and Pep relentlessness to win.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I always said if City signed Haaland it was game over for everyone else.
The one thing I will never understand is how Saints knocked City out of the League Cup and stopped them winning the quadruple.
posted on 14/5/23
Give it a rest
posted on 14/5/23
Man City were terrible that game and deserved to lose. Even when the big hitters came on they couldn’t do anything. Sometimes you get games like that. I can see Real Madrid knocking them out. I hope so anyway.😂
posted on 14/5/23
Thought you were talking about Everton
posted on 14/5/23
dont worry RAPyyy we'll do them again in the CL on Wednesday
posted on 14/5/23
comment by peks - 1974 (U6618)
posted 45 seconds ago
dont worry RAPyyy we'll do them again in the CL on Wednesday
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not this time
posted on 14/5/23
comment by peks - 1974 (U6618)
posted 4 seconds ago
dont worry RAPyyy we'll do them again in the CL on Wednesday
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Can't see it I'm afraid.
I'm saying 3-1 to City.
posted on 14/5/23
Liverpool won the league three times on the trott twice before 👍👍👍
posted on 14/5/23
Arsenal are the true champions this season, full of integrity, unlike cheaters City
posted on 14/5/23
The OP is a typical Liverpool fan! Crying about another team’s spending! If Liverpool were in the same boat as City he’d be chirping away from his perch! Instead he’s playing the victims card claiming City are ruining football!
posted on 14/5/23
The league is certainly losing its spark. They’re so dominant.
Had Arsenal won it, it would have been great for the chasing pack. Particularly given how they would have gone about it.
posted on 14/5/23
Arsenal have operated on a shoestring last 5 years;
https://www.football365.com/news/transfers-premier-league-five-year-net-spend-man-utd-man-city
posted on 14/5/23
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 47 seconds ago
The league is certainly losing its spark. They’re so dominant.
Had Arsenal won it, it would have been great for the chasing pack. Particularly given how they would have gone about it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
City are no more dominant than United were in the 90s and 2000’s, nor more dominant than Liverpool were in the 80s. It’s been over 40 years since there wasn’t a dominant force in top flight English football.
And there are several times before that when one team won more than others over the course of a decade.
Not only that, but compare it to Spain and Italy and Germany. Who the dominant teams in those leagues have been. Even Scotland for gods sake.
If City are a reason for league football losing its spark, then league football lost its spark a long time ago.
posted on 14/5/23
comment by RipleysCat (U1862)
posted 43 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 47 seconds ago
The league is certainly losing its spark. They’re so dominant.
Had Arsenal won it, it would have been great for the chasing pack. Particularly given how they would have gone about it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
City are no more dominant than United were in the 90s and 2000’s, nor more dominant than Liverpool were in the 80s. It’s been over 40 years since there wasn’t a dominant force in top flight English football.
And there are several times before that when one team won more than others over the course of a decade.
Not only that, but compare it to Spain and Italy and Germany. Who the dominant teams in those leagues have been. Even Scotland for gods sake.
If City are a reason for league football losing its spark, then league football lost its spark a long time ago.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yet.
Let’s see if you’re still right in three or four years time.
posted on 14/5/23
comment by gratedbean (U4885)
posted 18 minutes ago
Liverpool won the league three times on the trott twice before 👍👍👍
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Without cheating though and being bankrolled by a middle Eastern nation. I think it's important to add that important foot note.
We did it twice under Fergie too. 99-01 and 08-11.
City are a fantastic team there's no getting away from it but the fact it's a product of oil money and also blatant forging of financial figures it will never match that of the great Liverpool and Utd sides.
posted on 14/5/23
At least they win games fair and square on the pitch, even if they are doped to the eyeballs off it. They don`t play with a team of 13 men like some other clubs.
posted on 14/5/23
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by RipleysCat (U1862)
posted 43 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 47 seconds ago
The league is certainly losing its spark. They’re so dominant.
Had Arsenal won it, it would have been great for the chasing pack. Particularly given how they would have gone about it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
City are no more dominant than United were in the 90s and 2000’s, nor more dominant than Liverpool were in the 80s. It’s been over 40 years since there wasn’t a dominant force in top flight English football.
And there are several times before that when one team won more than others over the course of a decade.
Not only that, but compare it to Spain and Italy and Germany. Who the dominant teams in those leagues have been. Even Scotland for gods sake.
If City are a reason for league football losing its spark, then league football lost its spark a long time ago.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yet.
Let’s see if you’re still right in three or four years time.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not quite sure what you mean
posted on 14/5/23
comment by ●Billy The Spur● 20*21*22* ENIC OUT! (U3924)
posted 1 minute ago
At least they win games fair and square on the pitch, even if they are doped to the eyeballs off it. They don`t play with a team of 13 men like some other clubs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What they do on the pitch is because of what happened off it though. You've can't have it without the other.
They had a sheikh as owner with billions to spend and they could have stayed within the rules and still been successful such was their advantage. But they saw a shortcut and started making us sham companies and inflated sponsorship money.
City did this all to themselves.
posted on 14/5/23
comment by RipleysCat (U1862)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by RipleysCat (U1862)
posted 43 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 47 seconds ago
The league is certainly losing its spark. They’re so dominant.
Had Arsenal won it, it would have been great for the chasing pack. Particularly given how they would have gone about it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
City are no more dominant than United were in the 90s and 2000’s, nor more dominant than Liverpool were in the 80s. It’s been over 40 years since there wasn’t a dominant force in top flight English football.
And there are several times before that when one team won more than others over the course of a decade.
Not only that, but compare it to Spain and Italy and Germany. Who the dominant teams in those leagues have been. Even Scotland for gods sake.
If City are a reason for league football losing its spark, then league football lost its spark a long time ago.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yet.
Let’s see if you’re still right in three or four years time.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not quite sure what you mean
----------------------------------------------------------------------
With SAF’s teams you could see the life cycle coming to an end.
I don’t see that here. Every chance City will win 3 of the next 3.
posted on 14/5/23
comment by Culér (U9489)
posted 15 minutes ago
Arsenal are the true champions this season, full of integrity, unlike cheaters City
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Love your salty tears
posted on 14/5/23
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 16 minutes ago
The league is certainly losing its spark. They’re so dominant.
Had Arsenal won it, it would have been great for the chasing pack. Particularly given how they would have gone about it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Only when United dominate its interesting for all fans alike
posted on 14/5/23
comment by Cloggy (U1250)
posted 26 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 16 minutes ago
The league is certainly losing its spark. They’re so dominant.
Had Arsenal won it, it would have been great for the chasing pack. Particularly given how they would have gone about it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Only when United dominate its interesting for all fans alike
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I see you haven’t yet grown up.
Maybe leave the adults to chat?
posted on 14/5/23
comment by RipleysCat (U1862)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by RipleysCat (U1862)
posted 43 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 47 seconds ago
The league is certainly losing its spark. They’re so dominant.
Had Arsenal won it, it would have been great for the chasing pack. Particularly given how they would have gone about it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
City are no more dominant than United were in the 90s and 2000’s, nor more dominant than Liverpool were in the 80s. It’s been over 40 years since there wasn’t a dominant force in top flight English football.
And there are several times before that when one team won more than others over the course of a decade.
Not only that, but compare it to Spain and Italy and Germany. Who the dominant teams in those leagues have been. Even Scotland for gods sake.
If City are a reason for league football losing its spark, then league football lost its spark a long time ago.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yet.
Let’s see if you’re still right in three or four years time.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not quite sure what you mean
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He's saying you're actually not that dominant 😂
Page 1 of 5