Better question to ask the Liverpool scouts

I’m not sure Chelsea have any, they’ve gone back to the early Roman days of targeting anyone United wanted except this time it’s Liverpool

They aren't got no scouts. But what have they got?

They got Caicedo got Sanchez got Jackson got Disasi got Olise they got Lavia

What is this article?

I think the following are the criteria that Chelsea look for in their transfer targets:

- Human
- Alive
- Has played football at some level in the past

Strange article

OP has just watched "Get Out"

comment by (K̇ash) - Liverpool 7-0 Man U (U1108)
posted 18 minutes ago
OP has just watched "Get Out"
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’ve not said there’s anything wrong with the strategy. I’m just pointing out the common thread amongst all their signings and asking if it’s deliberate.

theyve just signed some brazilian called deivid Washington

comment by Loco Liverpool (U18018)
posted 4 hours, 31 minutes ago
What is this article?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A Liverpool WUM article and well done for responding to it! 🤣

OP

However you dress it up, Chelsea are cheating and fiddling the books somewhere. Just a matter of finding the evidence, and Chelsea FC and Boeley will be toast.

Chelsea are debt free which is a great position to be in with increasing interest rates.

Spurs are £1.3bill spiralling a sink hole.

Strange article but this made me laugh yesterday...

https://twitter.com/BabzJ1_14/status/1691457461373579267?t=GsNyPY5sA-ZyDvJRRU6weQ&s=19

comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 1 hour, 10 minutes ago
OP

However you dress it up, Chelsea are cheating and fiddling the books somewhere. Just a matter of finding the evidence, and Chelsea FC and Boeley will be toast.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
You never stop, do you?

Get a calculator, take away 250m from 1 billion ... I can give you a hint if you want. Then divide it by the length of the contracts given to the players, It comes to 140m a year. With revenues of over 400m even without Champions League and with the huge reductions the club has made in wages, Chelsea still have around 60m to play with after Lavia and Olise, more so when they sell Ziyech, Lukaku, CHO and Chalobah. Add to that the fact that Clearlake cleared all our debts when they bought the club, and they are an investment fund full of financial experts, I think they may know just a little more than you about finance.

It's a risky strategy which will work if 5 or 6 of the players turn out to be "perfect" investments and fulfill their promise. If they all fail, we will be screwed, I give you that much. However, you are p¡ssing up the wrong tree with your other accusations. Maybe you should be thinking of how your club are going to reinvest the 100m you made on Kane and hope they do a better job of it than they have in previous seasons.

Have one

Wtf

Arent most pro footballers Black ?

comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 2 hours, 13 minutes ago
OP

However you dress it up, Chelsea are cheating and fiddling the books somewhere. Just a matter of finding the evidence, and Chelsea FC and Boeley will be toast.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Just a matter of finding evidence?

The only evidence if irregularities found so far were reported by ourselves and relate to the previous regime but not necessarily to ffp.

So as yet there is zero evidence, yet you persist with your fantasy. I hope you never get jury service.

comment by Eric_Draven (U20260)
posted 35 minutes ago
comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 1 hour, 10 minutes ago
OP

However you dress it up, Chelsea are cheating and fiddling the books somewhere. Just a matter of finding the evidence, and Chelsea FC and Boeley will be toast.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
You never stop, do you?

Get a calculator, take away 250m from 1 billion ... I can give you a hint if you want. Then divide it by the length of the contracts given to the players, It comes to 140m a year. With revenues of over 400m even without Champions League and with the huge reductions the club has made in wages, Chelsea still have around 60m to play with after Lavia and Olise, more so when they sell Ziyech, Lukaku, CHO and Chalobah. Add to that the fact that Clearlake cleared all our debts when they bought the club, and they are an investment fund full of financial experts, I think they may know just a little more than you about finance.

It's a risky strategy which will work if 5 or 6 of the players turn out to be "perfect" investments and fulfill their promise. If they all fail, we will be screwed, I give you that much. However, you are p¡ssing up the wrong tree with your other accusations. Maybe you should be thinking of how your club are going to reinvest the 100m you made on Kane and hope they do a better job of it than they have in previous seasons.
----------------------------------------------------------------------



Your club is a joke right now. Completely clueless owner just throwing money around with absolutely no strategy.

Only a matter of time before he collapses the club. Over a billion spent on average players to finish 10th last season, and I suspect the same this season.

Feel sorry for you fella, you won`t have a club soon. You don`t have to be a financial expert to see the direction this is all going.

Remember when sandy said the club wouldn't spend anymore now Roman was gone

comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 12 seconds ago
Remember when sandy said the club wouldn't spend anymore now Roman was gone
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He's priceless, the problem is he does this so often now that I start to forget some of his classic predictions, thanks for the reminder.

Spending fckin loads man, I get the spreading of the contracts and FFP but it’s starting to smack of them knowing at some point they’re gonna be in for another transfer ban or something so get it all done now

comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 1 hour, 15 minutes ago
Arent most pro footballers Black ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

What? Fml

comment by FFS Mike. (U1170)
posted 17 minutes ago
Spending fckin loads man, I get the spreading of the contracts and FFP but it’s starting to smack of them knowing at some point they’re gonna be in for another transfer ban or something so get it all done now
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's the kind of reasoning that leaves you bewildered.

comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 28 minutes ago
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 1 hour, 15 minutes ago
Arent most pro footballers Black ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

What? Fml
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I think I was pretty clear in what I said.

And its true.

comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 28 minutes ago
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 1 hour, 15 minutes ago
Arent most pro footballers Black ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

What? Fml
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I think I was pretty clear in what I said.

And its true.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

No it isn't and it's just a weird thing to say regardless.