She's launched an appeal now.

To counter that, the CPS think there are 3 more murders

I've read over the last week some serious doubts over the basis of the conviction of Letby raised by investigative journalist (publishing in Private Eye) Dr Phil Hammond. The crux of the argument seems to be that, in a case relying on circumstantial evidence, reliance on a statistical model that linked Letby to the deaths was significant, and that model was so flawed that it could have been used to demonstrate a link between the deaths and a number of individuals, while failing to identify a systemic issue with the ward.

I'm not equipped to assess the validity of this claim, nor of the conviction itself. But it's a reminder that humans and our institutions can make mistakes. I think important to keep this in mind when people in natural disgust advocate that someone deserves the death penalty.

Peter Hitchens has highlighted the doubts over the Letby conviction right from the go

Questions over the Letby trial was on C5 tonight

https://x.com/ClarkeMicah/status/1820565987009130711

Channel 5?

That means no other channel would touch it on the grounds that it was bollox.

https://x.com/hendopolis/status/1824549191730991135

quite likely I think there will be a re-trial

comment by Peks - Comanche Moon (U6618)
posted 23 minutes ago
https://x.com/hendopolis/status/1824549191730991135

quite likely I think there will be a re-trial
----------------------------------------------------------------------
These mistakes were already addressed in the retrial.

https://x.com/Telegraph/status/1824554607051264250