comment by (K̇ash) - Liverpool 7-0 Man U (U1108)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by K7-0ptimus Primal (U1282)
posted 1 minute ago
Unless we get some sort of sugar daddy them falling behind clubs with sugar daddies is probably inevitable. We should have fallen behind ages ago actually if it wasn't for FSGs excellent running of the club, Klopp and our transfers being mostly spot on.
I'm surprised to see some using words like "poorly run". We are the best run club outside of the sugar daddy clubs. So just admit you want a sugar daddy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Arsenal are ran better than us. No sugar daddy
Brighton are run much better than us.
How many times do you have to look stupid before you wake up
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where their trophies? You'd have slit your wrists by now if we were Arsenal or Brighton.
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 8 seconds ago
comment by 19 + 6 > 20 + 3 (U22930)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 9 minutes ago
Are you really that desperate for our owners to do the same as City and Chelsea. I know which I’d rather have thanks.
If you want that type of owner you’ve got a choice of City, Chelsea, Newcastle and possibly even United to support. Their owners will buy everything you’ve been whinging on here about over the years.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Out of interest, why are you so against owners like the above when they give their managers the tools and resources to make them successful. Seems a tad silly don't you think?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A few reasons. Don’t like the ‘race to the top, richest sugar daddy/nation state wins’ road the game is going down/has already gone down. Also don’t like the spoilt brat fans it breeds, see the OP on here and others on the Tranny thread.
FSG have continually said they aren’t the sugar daddy type owners and are keeping things sustainable. The spend, both NET & Gross bears this out. We’ve competed and won the lot under them despite the wealth of City et al. We’ve seen the stadium capacity increased and redeveloped. This should be something to be proud of. Instead we get the likes of the OP and others having a child like fit and trying to see things that aren’t even there.
This type of fan can go and support City or one of the other nation state clubs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They'll never stop until we have a sugar daddy pouring endless money into the club, which going forward will not guarantee much success anyway as multiple other clubs also have bottomless pockets.
The trophies we've won under FSG are worth more than everything City and Chelsea have won put together.
comment by K7-0ptimus Primal (U1282)
posted 45 seconds ago
comment by Ul7ra KONa7e (U22043)
posted 12 seconds ago
comment by Aggers Right Elbow (U3402)
posted 3 minutes ago
It’s not just City, Chelsea and Newcastle that back their manager. United, Arsenal, Spurs, Villa and West Ham have all backed their managers more than Klopp has been backed.
——
We are being outspent by Nottingham Forest these days mate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That is true but I was looking over the past 5 years and they were a bit of an anomaly with what they spent last summer.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, it's not true FFS. This is how people end up voting for Brexit and Trump.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Great straw man there fella.
Last 5 season’s net spend:
Forrest -£184.83m
Liverpool -£182.83m
As I mentioned, Forrest are an anomaly and why I didn’t include them; but their net spend last over the past year’s transfer windows has been greater than ours over the past 5 years.
comment by There'sOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 21 seconds ago
comment by (K̇ash) - Liverpool 7-0 Man U (U1108)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by K7-0ptimus Primal (U1282)
posted 1 minute ago
Unless we get some sort of sugar daddy them falling behind clubs with sugar daddies is probably inevitable. We should have fallen behind ages ago actually if it wasn't for FSGs excellent running of the club, Klopp and our transfers being mostly spot on.
I'm surprised to see some using words like "poorly run". We are the best run club outside of the sugar daddy clubs. So just admit you want a sugar daddy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Arsenal are ran better than us. No sugar daddy
Brighton are run much better than us.
How many times do you have to look stupid before you wake up
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where their trophies? You'd have slit your wrists by now if we were Arsenal or Brighton.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
when you can't debate bring in the wrist slits line. Such a predictable sheep. Baaaa baaa
comment by 19 + 6 > 20 + 3 (U22930)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by K7-0ptimus Primal (U1282)
posted 1 minute ago
Unless we get some sort of sugar daddy them falling behind clubs with sugar daddies is probably inevitable. We should have fallen behind ages ago actually if it wasn't for FSGs excellent running of the club, Klopp and our transfers being mostly spot on.
I'm surprised to see some using words like "poorly run". We are the best run club outside of the sugar daddy clubs. So just admit you want a sugar daddy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I admit it. Nothing wrong with that. Imagine being able to buy any player. We could actually have sustained success.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://youtu.be/4sChsIaT8bQ?feature=shared
You mean basically this
How have they gone straight back to having Klopp run the pauper routine when we all saw the Caicedo bid?
They’re pretty much just spitting in Liverpool fans’ faces at this point. They hide behind stadium renovations that they’re only doing so they get a bigger fee when they eventually sell up.
They are an absolute disgrace.
comment by K7-0ptimus Primal (U1282)
posted 35 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 8 seconds ago
comment by 19 + 6 > 20 + 3 (U22930)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 9 minutes ago
Are you really that desperate for our owners to do the same as City and Chelsea. I know which I’d rather have thanks.
If you want that type of owner you’ve got a choice of City, Chelsea, Newcastle and possibly even United to support. Their owners will buy everything you’ve been whinging on here about over the years.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Out of interest, why are you so against owners like the above when they give their managers the tools and resources to make them successful. Seems a tad silly don't you think?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A few reasons. Don’t like the ‘race to the top, richest sugar daddy/nation state wins’ road the game is going down/has already gone down. Also don’t like the spoilt brat fans it breeds, see the OP on here and others on the Tranny thread.
FSG have continually said they aren’t the sugar daddy type owners and are keeping things sustainable. The spend, both NET & Gross bears this out. We’ve competed and won the lot under them despite the wealth of City et al. We’ve seen the stadium capacity increased and redeveloped. This should be something to be proud of. Instead we get the likes of the OP and others having a child like fit and trying to see things that aren’t even there.
This type of fan can go and support City or one of the other nation state clubs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They'll never stop until we have a sugar daddy pouring endless money into the club, which going forward will not guarantee much success anyway as multiple other clubs also have bottomless pockets.
The trophies we've won under FSG are worth more than everything City and Chelsea have won put together.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You keep telling yourself that.
I'm sure City fans feel that their treble doesn't count.
What a silly comment.
comment by There'sOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by (K̇ash) - Liverpool 7-0 Man U (U1108)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by K7-0ptimus Primal (U1282)
posted 1 minute ago
Unless we get some sort of sugar daddy them falling behind clubs with sugar daddies is probably inevitable. We should have fallen behind ages ago actually if it wasn't for FSGs excellent running of the club, Klopp and our transfers being mostly spot on.
I'm surprised to see some using words like "poorly run". We are the best run club outside of the sugar daddy clubs. So just admit you want a sugar daddy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Arsenal are ran better than us. No sugar daddy
Brighton are run much better than us.
How many times do you have to look stupid before you wake up
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where their trophies? You'd have slit your wrists by now if we were Arsenal or Brighton.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Imagine that. So called Liverpool fan twisting facts, truth and common sense so as to have a pop at the club he claims to support.
Criticise the club all you want, but at least use facts and logical conclusions, not this madness.
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 36 seconds ago
comment by 19 + 6 > 20 + 3 (U22930)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by K7-0ptimus Primal (U1282)
posted 1 minute ago
Unless we get some sort of sugar daddy them falling behind clubs with sugar daddies is probably inevitable. We should have fallen behind ages ago actually if it wasn't for FSGs excellent running of the club, Klopp and our transfers being mostly spot on.
I'm surprised to see some using words like "poorly run". We are the best run club outside of the sugar daddy clubs. So just admit you want a sugar daddy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I admit it. Nothing wrong with that. Imagine being able to buy any player. We could actually have sustained success.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://youtu.be/4sChsIaT8bQ?feature=shared
You mean basically this
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If it means we have a chance of winning trophies each season then yes. Football is all about winning and trophies.
comment by Randomer (U5245)
posted 35 seconds ago
How have they gone straight back to having Klopp run the pauper routine when we all saw the Caicedo bid?
They’re pretty much just spitting in Liverpool fans’ faces at this point. They hide behind stadium renovations that they’re only doing so they get a bigger fee when they eventually sell up.
They are an absolute disgrace.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Get ready for the communist Merseyside abuse for this sensible comment
comment by 19 + 6 > 20 + 3 (U22930)
posted 36 seconds ago
comment by K7-0ptimus Primal (U1282)
posted 35 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 8 seconds ago
comment by 19 + 6 > 20 + 3 (U22930)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 9 minutes ago
Are you really that desperate for our owners to do the same as City and Chelsea. I know which I’d rather have thanks.
If you want that type of owner you’ve got a choice of City, Chelsea, Newcastle and possibly even United to support. Their owners will buy everything you’ve been whinging on here about over the years.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Out of interest, why are you so against owners like the above when they give their managers the tools and resources to make them successful. Seems a tad silly don't you think?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A few reasons. Don’t like the ‘race to the top, richest sugar daddy/nation state wins’ road the game is going down/has already gone down. Also don’t like the spoilt brat fans it breeds, see the OP on here and others on the Tranny thread.
FSG have continually said they aren’t the sugar daddy type owners and are keeping things sustainable. The spend, both NET & Gross bears this out. We’ve competed and won the lot under them despite the wealth of City et al. We’ve seen the stadium capacity increased and redeveloped. This should be something to be proud of. Instead we get the likes of the OP and others having a child like fit and trying to see things that aren’t even there.
This type of fan can go and support City or one of the other nation state clubs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They'll never stop until we have a sugar daddy pouring endless money into the club, which going forward will not guarantee much success anyway as multiple other clubs also have bottomless pockets.
The trophies we've won under FSG are worth more than everything City and Chelsea have won put together.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You keep telling yourself that.
I'm sure City fans feel that their treble doesn't count.
What a silly comment.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mamba's completely lost it.
Again.
comment by K7-0ptimus Primal (U1282)
posted 44 seconds ago
comment by There'sOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by (K̇ash) - Liverpool 7-0 Man U (U1108)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by K7-0ptimus Primal (U1282)
posted 1 minute ago
Unless we get some sort of sugar daddy them falling behind clubs with sugar daddies is probably inevitable. We should have fallen behind ages ago actually if it wasn't for FSGs excellent running of the club, Klopp and our transfers being mostly spot on.
I'm surprised to see some using words like "poorly run". We are the best run club outside of the sugar daddy clubs. So just admit you want a sugar daddy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Arsenal are ran better than us. No sugar daddy
Brighton are run much better than us.
How many times do you have to look stupid before you wake up
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where their trophies? You'd have slit your wrists by now if we were Arsenal or Brighton.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Imagine that. So called Liverpool fan twisting facts, truth and common sense so as to have a pop at the club he claims to support.
Criticise the club all you want, but at least use facts and logical conclusions, not this madness.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So Arsenal and Brighton are not "currently" ran better than us?
Like Klopp said where would we be without the Coutinho money.
Baaa baaa K7
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by 19 + 6 > 20 + 3 (U22930)
posted 36 seconds ago
comment by K7-0ptimus Primal (U1282)
posted 35 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 8 seconds ago
comment by 19 + 6 > 20 + 3 (U22930)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 9 minutes ago
Are you really that desperate for our owners to do the same as City and Chelsea. I know which I’d rather have thanks.
If you want that type of owner you’ve got a choice of City, Chelsea, Newcastle and possibly even United to support. Their owners will buy everything you’ve been whinging on here about over the years.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Out of interest, why are you so against owners like the above when they give their managers the tools and resources to make them successful. Seems a tad silly don't you think?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A few reasons. Don’t like the ‘race to the top, richest sugar daddy/nation state wins’ road the game is going down/has already gone down. Also don’t like the spoilt brat fans it breeds, see the OP on here and others on the Tranny thread.
FSG have continually said they aren’t the sugar daddy type owners and are keeping things sustainable. The spend, both NET & Gross bears this out. We’ve competed and won the lot under them despite the wealth of City et al. We’ve seen the stadium capacity increased and redeveloped. This should be something to be proud of. Instead we get the likes of the OP and others having a child like fit and trying to see things that aren’t even there.
This type of fan can go and support City or one of the other nation state clubs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They'll never stop until we have a sugar daddy pouring endless money into the club, which going forward will not guarantee much success anyway as multiple other clubs also have bottomless pockets.
The trophies we've won under FSG are worth more than everything City and Chelsea have won put together.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You keep telling yourself that.
I'm sure City fans feel that their treble doesn't count.
What a silly comment.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mamba's completely lost it.
Again.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep
comment by Randomer (U5245)
posted 2 minutes ago
How have they gone straight back to having Klopp run the pauper routine when we all saw the Caicedo bid?
They’re pretty much just spitting in Liverpool fans’ faces at this point. They hide behind stadium renovations that they’re only doing so they get a bigger fee when they eventually sell up.
They are an absolute disgrace.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
'They' haven't. Words actually mean things. Of course people like the OP, Gash the Predictor of Doom and sock accounts can twist those words but it takes a real idiot to fall for that.
All Klopp has said is the same he has always said in response to certain questions, the club isn't ran like country owned and oil clubs, we do it differently and it's been successful with multiple trophies including the top two, in the most successful era of the club for over three decades.
comment by K7-0ptimus Primal (U1282)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by There'sOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by (K̇ash) - Liverpool 7-0 Man U (U1108)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by K7-0ptimus Primal (U1282)
posted 1 minute ago
Unless we get some sort of sugar daddy them falling behind clubs with sugar daddies is probably inevitable. We should have fallen behind ages ago actually if it wasn't for FSGs excellent running of the club, Klopp and our transfers being mostly spot on.
I'm surprised to see some using words like "poorly run". We are the best run club outside of the sugar daddy clubs. So just admit you want a sugar daddy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Arsenal are ran better than us. No sugar daddy
Brighton are run much better than us.
How many times do you have to look stupid before you wake up
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where their trophies? You'd have slit your wrists by now if we were Arsenal or Brighton.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Imagine that. So called Liverpool fan twisting facts, truth and common sense so as to have a pop at the club he claims to support.
Criticise the club all you want, but at least use facts and logical conclusions, not this madness.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And yet you have presented zero facts and zero logic. You just play the man and not the ball.
comment by Ul7ra KONa7e (U22043)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by K7-0ptimus Primal (U1282)
posted 45 seconds ago
comment by Ul7ra KONa7e (U22043)
posted 12 seconds ago
comment by Aggers Right Elbow (U3402)
posted 3 minutes ago
It’s not just City, Chelsea and Newcastle that back their manager. United, Arsenal, Spurs, Villa and West Ham have all backed their managers more than Klopp has been backed.
——
We are being outspent by Nottingham Forest these days mate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That is true but I was looking over the past 5 years and they were a bit of an anomaly with what they spent last summer.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, it's not true FFS. This is how people end up voting for Brexit and Trump.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Great straw man there fella.
Last 5 season’s net spend:
Forrest -£184.83m
Liverpool -£182.83m
As I mentioned, Forrest are an anomaly and why I didn’t include them; but their net spend last over the past year’s transfer windows has been greater than ours over the past 5 years.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
First of all, that net spend table doesn't account for agent fees and other expenditure. Secondly, does transfer net spend represent a club's entire expenditure?
Nottingham annual wage bill is £61m
Liverpool annual wage bill is £142m
That's without accounting for agent fees and sheet. Forest can buy a lot because their signings are paid peanuts compared to ours, their agent fees for their less regarded players are peanuts compared to Liverpool.
So over that 5 years you talk about we've outspent Forest by probably a billion or close to that. Why do I need to explain this to people that have been through school?
comment by K7-0ptimus Primal (U1282)
posted 43 seconds ago
comment by Ul7ra KONa7e (U22043)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by K7-0ptimus Primal (U1282)
posted 45 seconds ago
comment by Ul7ra KONa7e (U22043)
posted 12 seconds ago
comment by Aggers Right Elbow (U3402)
posted 3 minutes ago
It’s not just City, Chelsea and Newcastle that back their manager. United, Arsenal, Spurs, Villa and West Ham have all backed their managers more than Klopp has been backed.
——
We are being outspent by Nottingham Forest these days mate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That is true but I was looking over the past 5 years and they were a bit of an anomaly with what they spent last summer.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, it's not true FFS. This is how people end up voting for Brexit and Trump.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Great straw man there fella.
Last 5 season’s net spend:
Forrest -£184.83m
Liverpool -£182.83m
As I mentioned, Forrest are an anomaly and why I didn’t include them; but their net spend last over the past year’s transfer windows has been greater than ours over the past 5 years.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
First of all, that net spend table doesn't account for agent fees and other expenditure. Secondly, does transfer net spend represent a club's entire expenditure?
Nottingham annual wage bill is £61m
Liverpool annual wage bill is £142m
That's without accounting for agent fees and sheet. Forest can buy a lot because their signings are paid peanuts compared to ours, their agent fees for their less regarded players are peanuts compared to Liverpool.
So over that 5 years you talk about we've outspent Forest by probably a billion or close to that. Why do I need to explain this to people that have been through school?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Desperate K7 now moves on to wages after being humiliated again baaa baaa
comment by (K̇ash) - Liverpool 7-0 Man U (U1108)
posted 28 seconds ago
comment by Randomer (U5245)
posted 35 seconds ago
How have they gone straight back to having Klopp run the pauper routine when we all saw the Caicedo bid?
They’re pretty much just spitting in Liverpool fans’ faces at this point. They hide behind stadium renovations that they’re only doing so they get a bigger fee when they eventually sell up.
They are an absolute disgrace.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Get ready for the communist Merseyside abuse for this sensible comment
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well done for outing yourself as the sad spoilt plassie that you are lad. Why would you even want to go the match and assimilate with us ‘commies’ when you can gob off on the internet about how a rich businessman you don’t know didn’t buy you the latest shiny toy.
Come up to Merseyside and gob off about commies
comment by There'sOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Randomer (U5245)
posted 2 minutes ago
How have they gone straight back to having Klopp run the pauper routine when we all saw the Caicedo bid?
They’re pretty much just spitting in Liverpool fans’ faces at this point. They hide behind stadium renovations that they’re only doing so they get a bigger fee when they eventually sell up.
They are an absolute disgrace.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
'They' haven't. Words actually mean things. Of course people like the OP, Gash the Predictor of Doom and sock accounts can twist those words but it takes a real idiot to fall for that.
All Klopp has said is the same he has always said in response to certain questions, the club isn't ran like country owned and oil clubs, we do it differently and it's been successful with multiple trophies including the top two, in the most successful era of the club for over three decades.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Now imagine how successful we would have been if we had ambitious owners who backed Klopp.
comment by Ul7ra KONa7e (U22043)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by K7-0ptimus Primal (U1282)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by There'sOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by (K̇ash) - Liverpool 7-0 Man U (U1108)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by K7-0ptimus Primal (U1282)
posted 1 minute ago
Unless we get some sort of sugar daddy them falling behind clubs with sugar daddies is probably inevitable. We should have fallen behind ages ago actually if it wasn't for FSGs excellent running of the club, Klopp and our transfers being mostly spot on.
I'm surprised to see some using words like "poorly run". We are the best run club outside of the sugar daddy clubs. So just admit you want a sugar daddy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Arsenal are ran better than us. No sugar daddy
Brighton are run much better than us.
How many times do you have to look stupid before you wake up
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where their trophies? You'd have slit your wrists by now if we were Arsenal or Brighton.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Imagine that. So called Liverpool fan twisting facts, truth and common sense so as to have a pop at the club he claims to support.
Criticise the club all you want, but at least use facts and logical conclusions, not this madness.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And yet you have presented zero facts and zero logic. You just play the man and not the ball.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why do I have to state the bleedin' obvious? Can't you think for yourself at the most basic level? Looking at media reports of transfer net spend and therefore concluding that Nottingham Forest are outspending Liverpool FC is one of the most stoopid tings I've ever seen, and I've seen a lotta stoopid things.
I'm genuinely embarrassed for people like you and after Brexit, the Tories and Trump, it worries and concerns me that too many people are stoopid like that.
comment by K7-0ptimus Primal (U1282)
posted 22 minutes ago
Unless we get some sort of sugar daddy them falling behind clubs with sugar daddies is probably inevitable. We should have fallen behind ages ago actually if it wasn't for FSGs excellent running of the club, Klopp and our transfers being mostly spot on.
I'm surprised to see some using words like "poorly run". We are the best run club outside of the sugar daddy clubs. So just admit you want a sugar daddy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For a long time we were the best run club but that is nowhere near the truth anymore. I’d say most clubs are run better than us at this moment.
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 23 seconds ago
comment by (K̇ash) - Liverpool 7-0 Man U (U1108)
posted 28 seconds ago
comment by Randomer (U5245)
posted 35 seconds ago
How have they gone straight back to having Klopp run the pauper routine when we all saw the Caicedo bid?
They’re pretty much just spitting in Liverpool fans’ faces at this point. They hide behind stadium renovations that they’re only doing so they get a bigger fee when they eventually sell up.
They are an absolute disgrace.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Get ready for the communist Merseyside abuse for this sensible comment
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well done for outing yourself as the sad spoilt plassie that you are lad. Why would you even want to go the match and assimilate with us ‘commies’ when you can gob off on the internet about how a rich businessman you don’t know didn’t buy you the latest shiny toy.
Come up to Merseyside and gob off about commies
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A plassie like me would rather see his team win trophies and compete with the best unlike a communist like you who is scared to call out the owners.
“ Now imagine how successful we would have been if we had ambitious owners who backed Klopp.”
Go on then, it’s a Saturday morning. For shiites and giggles tell us how this would’ve panned out.
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 17 minutes ago
comment by K7-0ptimus Primal (U1282)
posted 18 seconds ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 18 minutes ago
Are you really that desperate for our owners to do the same as City and Chelsea. I know which I’d rather have thanks.
If you want that type of owner you’ve got a choice of City, Chelsea, Newcastle and possibly even United to support. Their owners will buy everything you’ve been whinging on here about over the years.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Presumably you mean City pre 2016.
The club has been making a profit since then and has had zero financial input from the owners.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We've won 15 trophies since Pep rolled into town, 99.7% stadium capacity since Covid and made £100m surplus on player sales last season.
Do you honestly think we make a loss every year?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, your fake sponsorships, offshore deals, ambassadorial roles and a ton of other plain cheating keeps you from making a loss every year.
To get to where you are you made a loss of hundreds of millions per year for 3 years running. Your entire revenue couldn't pay the players alone leave alone the tea lady. The fruits of cheating is still cheating, doesn't matter how many years you've been "straight" and you know that.
And some Liverpool fans actually want that at Liverpool. My goodness!
Sign in if you want to comment
Klopp finally calls out FSG
Page 2 of 7
6 | 7
posted on 26/8/23
comment by (K̇ash) - Liverpool 7-0 Man U (U1108)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by K7-0ptimus Primal (U1282)
posted 1 minute ago
Unless we get some sort of sugar daddy them falling behind clubs with sugar daddies is probably inevitable. We should have fallen behind ages ago actually if it wasn't for FSGs excellent running of the club, Klopp and our transfers being mostly spot on.
I'm surprised to see some using words like "poorly run". We are the best run club outside of the sugar daddy clubs. So just admit you want a sugar daddy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Arsenal are ran better than us. No sugar daddy
Brighton are run much better than us.
How many times do you have to look stupid before you wake up
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where their trophies? You'd have slit your wrists by now if we were Arsenal or Brighton.
posted on 26/8/23
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 8 seconds ago
comment by 19 + 6 > 20 + 3 (U22930)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 9 minutes ago
Are you really that desperate for our owners to do the same as City and Chelsea. I know which I’d rather have thanks.
If you want that type of owner you’ve got a choice of City, Chelsea, Newcastle and possibly even United to support. Their owners will buy everything you’ve been whinging on here about over the years.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Out of interest, why are you so against owners like the above when they give their managers the tools and resources to make them successful. Seems a tad silly don't you think?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A few reasons. Don’t like the ‘race to the top, richest sugar daddy/nation state wins’ road the game is going down/has already gone down. Also don’t like the spoilt brat fans it breeds, see the OP on here and others on the Tranny thread.
FSG have continually said they aren’t the sugar daddy type owners and are keeping things sustainable. The spend, both NET & Gross bears this out. We’ve competed and won the lot under them despite the wealth of City et al. We’ve seen the stadium capacity increased and redeveloped. This should be something to be proud of. Instead we get the likes of the OP and others having a child like fit and trying to see things that aren’t even there.
This type of fan can go and support City or one of the other nation state clubs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They'll never stop until we have a sugar daddy pouring endless money into the club, which going forward will not guarantee much success anyway as multiple other clubs also have bottomless pockets.
The trophies we've won under FSG are worth more than everything City and Chelsea have won put together.
posted on 26/8/23
comment by K7-0ptimus Primal (U1282)
posted 45 seconds ago
comment by Ul7ra KONa7e (U22043)
posted 12 seconds ago
comment by Aggers Right Elbow (U3402)
posted 3 minutes ago
It’s not just City, Chelsea and Newcastle that back their manager. United, Arsenal, Spurs, Villa and West Ham have all backed their managers more than Klopp has been backed.
——
We are being outspent by Nottingham Forest these days mate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That is true but I was looking over the past 5 years and they were a bit of an anomaly with what they spent last summer.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, it's not true FFS. This is how people end up voting for Brexit and Trump.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Great straw man there fella.
Last 5 season’s net spend:
Forrest -£184.83m
Liverpool -£182.83m
As I mentioned, Forrest are an anomaly and why I didn’t include them; but their net spend last over the past year’s transfer windows has been greater than ours over the past 5 years.
posted on 26/8/23
posted on 26/8/23
comment by There'sOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 21 seconds ago
comment by (K̇ash) - Liverpool 7-0 Man U (U1108)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by K7-0ptimus Primal (U1282)
posted 1 minute ago
Unless we get some sort of sugar daddy them falling behind clubs with sugar daddies is probably inevitable. We should have fallen behind ages ago actually if it wasn't for FSGs excellent running of the club, Klopp and our transfers being mostly spot on.
I'm surprised to see some using words like "poorly run". We are the best run club outside of the sugar daddy clubs. So just admit you want a sugar daddy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Arsenal are ran better than us. No sugar daddy
Brighton are run much better than us.
How many times do you have to look stupid before you wake up
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where their trophies? You'd have slit your wrists by now if we were Arsenal or Brighton.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
when you can't debate bring in the wrist slits line. Such a predictable sheep. Baaaa baaa
posted on 26/8/23
comment by 19 + 6 > 20 + 3 (U22930)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by K7-0ptimus Primal (U1282)
posted 1 minute ago
Unless we get some sort of sugar daddy them falling behind clubs with sugar daddies is probably inevitable. We should have fallen behind ages ago actually if it wasn't for FSGs excellent running of the club, Klopp and our transfers being mostly spot on.
I'm surprised to see some using words like "poorly run". We are the best run club outside of the sugar daddy clubs. So just admit you want a sugar daddy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I admit it. Nothing wrong with that. Imagine being able to buy any player. We could actually have sustained success.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://youtu.be/4sChsIaT8bQ?feature=shared
You mean basically this
posted on 26/8/23
How have they gone straight back to having Klopp run the pauper routine when we all saw the Caicedo bid?
They’re pretty much just spitting in Liverpool fans’ faces at this point. They hide behind stadium renovations that they’re only doing so they get a bigger fee when they eventually sell up.
They are an absolute disgrace.
posted on 26/8/23
comment by K7-0ptimus Primal (U1282)
posted 35 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 8 seconds ago
comment by 19 + 6 > 20 + 3 (U22930)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 9 minutes ago
Are you really that desperate for our owners to do the same as City and Chelsea. I know which I’d rather have thanks.
If you want that type of owner you’ve got a choice of City, Chelsea, Newcastle and possibly even United to support. Their owners will buy everything you’ve been whinging on here about over the years.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Out of interest, why are you so against owners like the above when they give their managers the tools and resources to make them successful. Seems a tad silly don't you think?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A few reasons. Don’t like the ‘race to the top, richest sugar daddy/nation state wins’ road the game is going down/has already gone down. Also don’t like the spoilt brat fans it breeds, see the OP on here and others on the Tranny thread.
FSG have continually said they aren’t the sugar daddy type owners and are keeping things sustainable. The spend, both NET & Gross bears this out. We’ve competed and won the lot under them despite the wealth of City et al. We’ve seen the stadium capacity increased and redeveloped. This should be something to be proud of. Instead we get the likes of the OP and others having a child like fit and trying to see things that aren’t even there.
This type of fan can go and support City or one of the other nation state clubs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They'll never stop until we have a sugar daddy pouring endless money into the club, which going forward will not guarantee much success anyway as multiple other clubs also have bottomless pockets.
The trophies we've won under FSG are worth more than everything City and Chelsea have won put together.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You keep telling yourself that.
I'm sure City fans feel that their treble doesn't count.
What a silly comment.
posted on 26/8/23
comment by There'sOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by (K̇ash) - Liverpool 7-0 Man U (U1108)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by K7-0ptimus Primal (U1282)
posted 1 minute ago
Unless we get some sort of sugar daddy them falling behind clubs with sugar daddies is probably inevitable. We should have fallen behind ages ago actually if it wasn't for FSGs excellent running of the club, Klopp and our transfers being mostly spot on.
I'm surprised to see some using words like "poorly run". We are the best run club outside of the sugar daddy clubs. So just admit you want a sugar daddy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Arsenal are ran better than us. No sugar daddy
Brighton are run much better than us.
How many times do you have to look stupid before you wake up
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where their trophies? You'd have slit your wrists by now if we were Arsenal or Brighton.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Imagine that. So called Liverpool fan twisting facts, truth and common sense so as to have a pop at the club he claims to support.
Criticise the club all you want, but at least use facts and logical conclusions, not this madness.
posted on 26/8/23
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 36 seconds ago
comment by 19 + 6 > 20 + 3 (U22930)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by K7-0ptimus Primal (U1282)
posted 1 minute ago
Unless we get some sort of sugar daddy them falling behind clubs with sugar daddies is probably inevitable. We should have fallen behind ages ago actually if it wasn't for FSGs excellent running of the club, Klopp and our transfers being mostly spot on.
I'm surprised to see some using words like "poorly run". We are the best run club outside of the sugar daddy clubs. So just admit you want a sugar daddy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I admit it. Nothing wrong with that. Imagine being able to buy any player. We could actually have sustained success.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://youtu.be/4sChsIaT8bQ?feature=shared
You mean basically this
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If it means we have a chance of winning trophies each season then yes. Football is all about winning and trophies.
posted on 26/8/23
comment by Randomer (U5245)
posted 35 seconds ago
How have they gone straight back to having Klopp run the pauper routine when we all saw the Caicedo bid?
They’re pretty much just spitting in Liverpool fans’ faces at this point. They hide behind stadium renovations that they’re only doing so they get a bigger fee when they eventually sell up.
They are an absolute disgrace.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Get ready for the communist Merseyside abuse for this sensible comment
posted on 26/8/23
comment by 19 + 6 > 20 + 3 (U22930)
posted 36 seconds ago
comment by K7-0ptimus Primal (U1282)
posted 35 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 8 seconds ago
comment by 19 + 6 > 20 + 3 (U22930)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 9 minutes ago
Are you really that desperate for our owners to do the same as City and Chelsea. I know which I’d rather have thanks.
If you want that type of owner you’ve got a choice of City, Chelsea, Newcastle and possibly even United to support. Their owners will buy everything you’ve been whinging on here about over the years.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Out of interest, why are you so against owners like the above when they give their managers the tools and resources to make them successful. Seems a tad silly don't you think?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A few reasons. Don’t like the ‘race to the top, richest sugar daddy/nation state wins’ road the game is going down/has already gone down. Also don’t like the spoilt brat fans it breeds, see the OP on here and others on the Tranny thread.
FSG have continually said they aren’t the sugar daddy type owners and are keeping things sustainable. The spend, both NET & Gross bears this out. We’ve competed and won the lot under them despite the wealth of City et al. We’ve seen the stadium capacity increased and redeveloped. This should be something to be proud of. Instead we get the likes of the OP and others having a child like fit and trying to see things that aren’t even there.
This type of fan can go and support City or one of the other nation state clubs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They'll never stop until we have a sugar daddy pouring endless money into the club, which going forward will not guarantee much success anyway as multiple other clubs also have bottomless pockets.
The trophies we've won under FSG are worth more than everything City and Chelsea have won put together.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You keep telling yourself that.
I'm sure City fans feel that their treble doesn't count.
What a silly comment.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mamba's completely lost it.
Again.
posted on 26/8/23
comment by K7-0ptimus Primal (U1282)
posted 44 seconds ago
comment by There'sOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by (K̇ash) - Liverpool 7-0 Man U (U1108)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by K7-0ptimus Primal (U1282)
posted 1 minute ago
Unless we get some sort of sugar daddy them falling behind clubs with sugar daddies is probably inevitable. We should have fallen behind ages ago actually if it wasn't for FSGs excellent running of the club, Klopp and our transfers being mostly spot on.
I'm surprised to see some using words like "poorly run". We are the best run club outside of the sugar daddy clubs. So just admit you want a sugar daddy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Arsenal are ran better than us. No sugar daddy
Brighton are run much better than us.
How many times do you have to look stupid before you wake up
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where their trophies? You'd have slit your wrists by now if we were Arsenal or Brighton.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Imagine that. So called Liverpool fan twisting facts, truth and common sense so as to have a pop at the club he claims to support.
Criticise the club all you want, but at least use facts and logical conclusions, not this madness.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So Arsenal and Brighton are not "currently" ran better than us?
Like Klopp said where would we be without the Coutinho money.
Baaa baaa K7
posted on 26/8/23
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by 19 + 6 > 20 + 3 (U22930)
posted 36 seconds ago
comment by K7-0ptimus Primal (U1282)
posted 35 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 8 seconds ago
comment by 19 + 6 > 20 + 3 (U22930)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 9 minutes ago
Are you really that desperate for our owners to do the same as City and Chelsea. I know which I’d rather have thanks.
If you want that type of owner you’ve got a choice of City, Chelsea, Newcastle and possibly even United to support. Their owners will buy everything you’ve been whinging on here about over the years.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Out of interest, why are you so against owners like the above when they give their managers the tools and resources to make them successful. Seems a tad silly don't you think?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A few reasons. Don’t like the ‘race to the top, richest sugar daddy/nation state wins’ road the game is going down/has already gone down. Also don’t like the spoilt brat fans it breeds, see the OP on here and others on the Tranny thread.
FSG have continually said they aren’t the sugar daddy type owners and are keeping things sustainable. The spend, both NET & Gross bears this out. We’ve competed and won the lot under them despite the wealth of City et al. We’ve seen the stadium capacity increased and redeveloped. This should be something to be proud of. Instead we get the likes of the OP and others having a child like fit and trying to see things that aren’t even there.
This type of fan can go and support City or one of the other nation state clubs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They'll never stop until we have a sugar daddy pouring endless money into the club, which going forward will not guarantee much success anyway as multiple other clubs also have bottomless pockets.
The trophies we've won under FSG are worth more than everything City and Chelsea have won put together.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You keep telling yourself that.
I'm sure City fans feel that their treble doesn't count.
What a silly comment.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mamba's completely lost it.
Again.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep
posted on 26/8/23
comment by Randomer (U5245)
posted 2 minutes ago
How have they gone straight back to having Klopp run the pauper routine when we all saw the Caicedo bid?
They’re pretty much just spitting in Liverpool fans’ faces at this point. They hide behind stadium renovations that they’re only doing so they get a bigger fee when they eventually sell up.
They are an absolute disgrace.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
'They' haven't. Words actually mean things. Of course people like the OP, Gash the Predictor of Doom and sock accounts can twist those words but it takes a real idiot to fall for that.
All Klopp has said is the same he has always said in response to certain questions, the club isn't ran like country owned and oil clubs, we do it differently and it's been successful with multiple trophies including the top two, in the most successful era of the club for over three decades.
posted on 26/8/23
comment by K7-0ptimus Primal (U1282)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by There'sOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by (K̇ash) - Liverpool 7-0 Man U (U1108)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by K7-0ptimus Primal (U1282)
posted 1 minute ago
Unless we get some sort of sugar daddy them falling behind clubs with sugar daddies is probably inevitable. We should have fallen behind ages ago actually if it wasn't for FSGs excellent running of the club, Klopp and our transfers being mostly spot on.
I'm surprised to see some using words like "poorly run". We are the best run club outside of the sugar daddy clubs. So just admit you want a sugar daddy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Arsenal are ran better than us. No sugar daddy
Brighton are run much better than us.
How many times do you have to look stupid before you wake up
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where their trophies? You'd have slit your wrists by now if we were Arsenal or Brighton.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Imagine that. So called Liverpool fan twisting facts, truth and common sense so as to have a pop at the club he claims to support.
Criticise the club all you want, but at least use facts and logical conclusions, not this madness.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And yet you have presented zero facts and zero logic. You just play the man and not the ball.
posted on 26/8/23
comment by Ul7ra KONa7e (U22043)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by K7-0ptimus Primal (U1282)
posted 45 seconds ago
comment by Ul7ra KONa7e (U22043)
posted 12 seconds ago
comment by Aggers Right Elbow (U3402)
posted 3 minutes ago
It’s not just City, Chelsea and Newcastle that back their manager. United, Arsenal, Spurs, Villa and West Ham have all backed their managers more than Klopp has been backed.
——
We are being outspent by Nottingham Forest these days mate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That is true but I was looking over the past 5 years and they were a bit of an anomaly with what they spent last summer.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, it's not true FFS. This is how people end up voting for Brexit and Trump.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Great straw man there fella.
Last 5 season’s net spend:
Forrest -£184.83m
Liverpool -£182.83m
As I mentioned, Forrest are an anomaly and why I didn’t include them; but their net spend last over the past year’s transfer windows has been greater than ours over the past 5 years.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
First of all, that net spend table doesn't account for agent fees and other expenditure. Secondly, does transfer net spend represent a club's entire expenditure?
Nottingham annual wage bill is £61m
Liverpool annual wage bill is £142m
That's without accounting for agent fees and sheet. Forest can buy a lot because their signings are paid peanuts compared to ours, their agent fees for their less regarded players are peanuts compared to Liverpool.
So over that 5 years you talk about we've outspent Forest by probably a billion or close to that. Why do I need to explain this to people that have been through school?
posted on 26/8/23
comment by K7-0ptimus Primal (U1282)
posted 43 seconds ago
comment by Ul7ra KONa7e (U22043)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by K7-0ptimus Primal (U1282)
posted 45 seconds ago
comment by Ul7ra KONa7e (U22043)
posted 12 seconds ago
comment by Aggers Right Elbow (U3402)
posted 3 minutes ago
It’s not just City, Chelsea and Newcastle that back their manager. United, Arsenal, Spurs, Villa and West Ham have all backed their managers more than Klopp has been backed.
——
We are being outspent by Nottingham Forest these days mate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That is true but I was looking over the past 5 years and they were a bit of an anomaly with what they spent last summer.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, it's not true FFS. This is how people end up voting for Brexit and Trump.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Great straw man there fella.
Last 5 season’s net spend:
Forrest -£184.83m
Liverpool -£182.83m
As I mentioned, Forrest are an anomaly and why I didn’t include them; but their net spend last over the past year’s transfer windows has been greater than ours over the past 5 years.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
First of all, that net spend table doesn't account for agent fees and other expenditure. Secondly, does transfer net spend represent a club's entire expenditure?
Nottingham annual wage bill is £61m
Liverpool annual wage bill is £142m
That's without accounting for agent fees and sheet. Forest can buy a lot because their signings are paid peanuts compared to ours, their agent fees for their less regarded players are peanuts compared to Liverpool.
So over that 5 years you talk about we've outspent Forest by probably a billion or close to that. Why do I need to explain this to people that have been through school?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Desperate K7 now moves on to wages after being humiliated again baaa baaa
posted on 26/8/23
comment by (K̇ash) - Liverpool 7-0 Man U (U1108)
posted 28 seconds ago
comment by Randomer (U5245)
posted 35 seconds ago
How have they gone straight back to having Klopp run the pauper routine when we all saw the Caicedo bid?
They’re pretty much just spitting in Liverpool fans’ faces at this point. They hide behind stadium renovations that they’re only doing so they get a bigger fee when they eventually sell up.
They are an absolute disgrace.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Get ready for the communist Merseyside abuse for this sensible comment
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well done for outing yourself as the sad spoilt plassie that you are lad. Why would you even want to go the match and assimilate with us ‘commies’ when you can gob off on the internet about how a rich businessman you don’t know didn’t buy you the latest shiny toy.
Come up to Merseyside and gob off about commies
posted on 26/8/23
comment by There'sOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Randomer (U5245)
posted 2 minutes ago
How have they gone straight back to having Klopp run the pauper routine when we all saw the Caicedo bid?
They’re pretty much just spitting in Liverpool fans’ faces at this point. They hide behind stadium renovations that they’re only doing so they get a bigger fee when they eventually sell up.
They are an absolute disgrace.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
'They' haven't. Words actually mean things. Of course people like the OP, Gash the Predictor of Doom and sock accounts can twist those words but it takes a real idiot to fall for that.
All Klopp has said is the same he has always said in response to certain questions, the club isn't ran like country owned and oil clubs, we do it differently and it's been successful with multiple trophies including the top two, in the most successful era of the club for over three decades.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Now imagine how successful we would have been if we had ambitious owners who backed Klopp.
posted on 26/8/23
comment by Ul7ra KONa7e (U22043)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by K7-0ptimus Primal (U1282)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by There'sOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by (K̇ash) - Liverpool 7-0 Man U (U1108)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by K7-0ptimus Primal (U1282)
posted 1 minute ago
Unless we get some sort of sugar daddy them falling behind clubs with sugar daddies is probably inevitable. We should have fallen behind ages ago actually if it wasn't for FSGs excellent running of the club, Klopp and our transfers being mostly spot on.
I'm surprised to see some using words like "poorly run". We are the best run club outside of the sugar daddy clubs. So just admit you want a sugar daddy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Arsenal are ran better than us. No sugar daddy
Brighton are run much better than us.
How many times do you have to look stupid before you wake up
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where their trophies? You'd have slit your wrists by now if we were Arsenal or Brighton.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Imagine that. So called Liverpool fan twisting facts, truth and common sense so as to have a pop at the club he claims to support.
Criticise the club all you want, but at least use facts and logical conclusions, not this madness.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And yet you have presented zero facts and zero logic. You just play the man and not the ball.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why do I have to state the bleedin' obvious? Can't you think for yourself at the most basic level? Looking at media reports of transfer net spend and therefore concluding that Nottingham Forest are outspending Liverpool FC is one of the most stoopid tings I've ever seen, and I've seen a lotta stoopid things.
I'm genuinely embarrassed for people like you and after Brexit, the Tories and Trump, it worries and concerns me that too many people are stoopid like that.
posted on 26/8/23
comment by K7-0ptimus Primal (U1282)
posted 22 minutes ago
Unless we get some sort of sugar daddy them falling behind clubs with sugar daddies is probably inevitable. We should have fallen behind ages ago actually if it wasn't for FSGs excellent running of the club, Klopp and our transfers being mostly spot on.
I'm surprised to see some using words like "poorly run". We are the best run club outside of the sugar daddy clubs. So just admit you want a sugar daddy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For a long time we were the best run club but that is nowhere near the truth anymore. I’d say most clubs are run better than us at this moment.
posted on 26/8/23
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 23 seconds ago
comment by (K̇ash) - Liverpool 7-0 Man U (U1108)
posted 28 seconds ago
comment by Randomer (U5245)
posted 35 seconds ago
How have they gone straight back to having Klopp run the pauper routine when we all saw the Caicedo bid?
They’re pretty much just spitting in Liverpool fans’ faces at this point. They hide behind stadium renovations that they’re only doing so they get a bigger fee when they eventually sell up.
They are an absolute disgrace.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Get ready for the communist Merseyside abuse for this sensible comment
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well done for outing yourself as the sad spoilt plassie that you are lad. Why would you even want to go the match and assimilate with us ‘commies’ when you can gob off on the internet about how a rich businessman you don’t know didn’t buy you the latest shiny toy.
Come up to Merseyside and gob off about commies
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A plassie like me would rather see his team win trophies and compete with the best unlike a communist like you who is scared to call out the owners.
posted on 26/8/23
“ Now imagine how successful we would have been if we had ambitious owners who backed Klopp.”
Go on then, it’s a Saturday morning. For shiites and giggles tell us how this would’ve panned out.
posted on 26/8/23
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 17 minutes ago
comment by K7-0ptimus Primal (U1282)
posted 18 seconds ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 18 minutes ago
Are you really that desperate for our owners to do the same as City and Chelsea. I know which I’d rather have thanks.
If you want that type of owner you’ve got a choice of City, Chelsea, Newcastle and possibly even United to support. Their owners will buy everything you’ve been whinging on here about over the years.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Presumably you mean City pre 2016.
The club has been making a profit since then and has had zero financial input from the owners.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We've won 15 trophies since Pep rolled into town, 99.7% stadium capacity since Covid and made £100m surplus on player sales last season.
Do you honestly think we make a loss every year?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, your fake sponsorships, offshore deals, ambassadorial roles and a ton of other plain cheating keeps you from making a loss every year.
To get to where you are you made a loss of hundreds of millions per year for 3 years running. Your entire revenue couldn't pay the players alone leave alone the tea lady. The fruits of cheating is still cheating, doesn't matter how many years you've been "straight" and you know that.
And some Liverpool fans actually want that at Liverpool. My goodness!
Page 2 of 7
6 | 7