Just realised what a monumental task i've started here....2008 to present day is 15 years...i'd imagine a club like Spurs must've been competing for about four trophies a year here
That's a spreadsheet that could go on for 50+ lines
Bear with me...i've promised now - so i'll deliver
Chopper
https://www.ja606.co.uk/articles/viewLiveArticle/1103
Chelsea main thread...don't know if you're aware of this
comment by choppers new boots (U23059)
posted 43 minutes ago
Poor old Sandy, always ends up making himself look such a chaant always has always will
How many times has he gone missing afterwards lol.
Lets not forget Spurs have previous being docked 12 points before the fine being upgraded back in Sugars days so assuming that Sandy doesn't count the few Trophies that his club managed to "acquire" in and around that time.
As for "doping the fack out of football" being going on for ages, lets face it Liverpool would never have got out of the Second Division at the time without the Littlewoods money from Sawyer or whatever his name was.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Firstly, nothing has ever happened in the past at the level of Chelsea and City. Secondly nobody is saying all investment in football is wrong. Thirdly, was it against the rules back then? Football needed investment to grow and be competitive at the time. All the clubs have had investment at one time or another in the past. Situations have changed though, and doping the fack out of football now is ruination of the game. That's why they introduced the financial rules, because they were necessary to protect the game in it's modern form, but that wasn't always the case in the past.
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 3 hours, 9 minutes ago
comment by Tway (U1162)
posted 1 hour, 32 minutes ago
Sandy's earlier comments on Chelseas issues are now triply hilarious as a result of the latest developments.
Let's congratulate the old geezer for somehow always getting his timings spot on
1) Joe Lewis has been running Tottenham legally, that's all you need to know.
City and Chelsea owners are running their clubs by breaching the rules. Massive difference.
Both clubs will be rightfully thrown out of the Prem.
2) LOL your club is toast fella. Putin's plaything for a decade and more. Now it us all coming tumbling down.
I bet you are proud your club was being propped up by that murderous thug. And all you lot were lapping it up.
Don't start lecturing me on morality fella.
3) What Chelsea should do, is check out how you get to Barnet and Hartlepool.
Could not have been scripted better ....thanks for the laughs... can always depend on Sandy and Spurs to deliver joy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
OK but you can't act like what Chelsea did and what Spurs did are the same thing. They dealt with an unlicensed agent whereas Chelsea doped the fack out of football and ruined it. Massive difference.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Actually Chelsea haven't yet been charged with anything. There have been questions raised about some questionable payments but not as yet financial doping. So our case if there is one to snswer is more akin to Spurs than other clubs recently punished or being investigated.
comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 3 hours, 9 minutes ago
comment by Tway (U1162)
posted 1 hour, 32 minutes ago
Sandy's earlier comments on Chelseas issues are now triply hilarious as a result of the latest developments.
Let's congratulate the old geezer for somehow always getting his timings spot on
1) Joe Lewis has been running Tottenham legally, that's all you need to know.
City and Chelsea owners are running their clubs by breaching the rules. Massive difference.
Both clubs will be rightfully thrown out of the Prem.
2) LOL your club is toast fella. Putin's plaything for a decade and more. Now it us all coming tumbling down.
I bet you are proud your club was being propped up by that murderous thug. And all you lot were lapping it up.
Don't start lecturing me on morality fella.
3) What Chelsea should do, is check out how you get to Barnet and Hartlepool.
Could not have been scripted better ....thanks for the laughs... can always depend on Sandy and Spurs to deliver joy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
OK but you can't act like what Chelsea did and what Spurs did are the same thing. They dealt with an unlicensed agent whereas Chelsea doped the fack out of football and ruined it. Massive difference.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Actually Chelsea haven't yet been charged with anything. There have been questions raised about some questionable payments but not as yet financial doping. So our case if there is one to snswer is more akin to Spurs than other clubs recently punished or being investigated.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
OK.
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 42 minutes ago
comment by choppers new boots (U23059)
posted 43 minutes ago
Poor old Sandy, always ends up making himself look such a chaant always has always will
How many times has he gone missing afterwards lol.
Lets not forget Spurs have previous being docked 12 points before the fine being upgraded back in Sugars days so assuming that Sandy doesn't count the few Trophies that his club managed to "acquire" in and around that time.
As for "doping the fack out of football" being going on for ages, lets face it Liverpool would never have got out of the Second Division at the time without the Littlewoods money from Sawyer or whatever his name was.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Firstly, nothing has ever happened in the past at the level of Chelsea and City. Secondly nobody is saying all investment in football is wrong. Thirdly, was it against the rules back then? Football needed investment to grow and be competitive at the time. All the clubs have had investment at one time or another in the past. Situations have changed though, and doping the fack out of football now is ruination of the game. That's why they introduced the financial rules, because they were necessary to protect the game in it's modern form, but that wasn't always the case in the past.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wrong, it was introduced because those that did were incensed now that others could.
Three things that are terrible for football
1.Var
2. International breaks
3. Daniel levy
Seems levy’s incompetence now might result in a point’s penalty for spurs.
I’m sure the levy lovers will rally around though 👍
comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 42 minutes ago
comment by choppers new boots (U23059)
posted 43 minutes ago
Poor old Sandy, always ends up making himself look such a chaant always has always will
How many times has he gone missing afterwards lol.
Lets not forget Spurs have previous being docked 12 points before the fine being upgraded back in Sugars days so assuming that Sandy doesn't count the few Trophies that his club managed to "acquire" in and around that time.
As for "doping the fack out of football" being going on for ages, lets face it Liverpool would never have got out of the Second Division at the time without the Littlewoods money from Sawyer or whatever his name was.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Firstly, nothing has ever happened in the past at the level of Chelsea and City. Secondly nobody is saying all investment in football is wrong. Thirdly, was it against the rules back then? Football needed investment to grow and be competitive at the time. All the clubs have had investment at one time or another in the past. Situations have changed though, and doping the fack out of football now is ruination of the game. That's why they introduced the financial rules, because they were necessary to protect the game in it's modern form, but that wasn't always the case in the past.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wrong, it was introduced because those that did were incensed now that others could.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
OK
comment by vidicthelegend VIVA LA REVOLUTION (U8735)
posted 21 hours, 29 minutes ago
It would be so Spursy if you were about to win a trophy and a points deduction from something 15 years ago stopped you
----------------------------------------------------------------------
comment by (K̇ash) - Liverpool 7-0 Man U - Free Palestine 🇵🇸 (U1108)
posted 20 hours, 31 minutes ago
Spurs will have to hand back the 2008 league cup the last won as a result
----------------------------------------------------------------------
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 4 hours, 28 minutes ago
comment by choppers new boots (U23059)
posted 43 minutes ago
Poor old Sandy, always ends up making himself look such a chaant always has always will
How many times has he gone missing afterwards lol.
------------
Yeah...noticed that too... my guess he's out shopping for route maps to Barnet and Hartlepool before they run out with the inevitable coming rush for them.
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/arsenal-fined-over-unlicensed-agent-c2q6wd7clwc
https://www.theguardian.com/football/2015/oct/26/arsenal-fined-warned-breaching-agent-rules-calum-chambers-fa
I think we will be ok. Seems like we were the selling club anyway and not the buying club. And as the articles above a fine was dished out.
Do you want the 10 points off this season or next?
comment by HB Maybe Beale wasn't the mastermind (U21935)
posted 9 minutes ago
Do you want the 10 points off this season or next?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Can we do a deal?
2 points this season then a further 2 points off the next four seasons? So spread the points over five years, like a transfer deal 🙂
Fook me Daniel Levy has an account on here.
comment by HB Maybe Beale wasn't the mastermind (U21935)
posted 11 minutes ago
Fook me Daniel Levy has an account on here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
comment by HB Maybe Beale wasn't the mastermind (U21935)
posted 51 minutes ago
Fook me Daniel Levy has an account on here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
😄🧐
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 6 hours, 53 minutes ago
comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 42 minutes ago
comment by choppers new boots (U23059)
posted 43 minutes ago
Poor old Sandy, always ends up making himself look such a chaant always has always will
How many times has he gone missing afterwards lol.
Lets not forget Spurs have previous being docked 12 points before the fine being upgraded back in Sugars days so assuming that Sandy doesn't count the few Trophies that his club managed to "acquire" in and around that time.
As for "doping the fack out of football" being going on for ages, lets face it Liverpool would never have got out of the Second Division at the time without the Littlewoods money from Sawyer or whatever his name was.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Firstly, nothing has ever happened in the past at the level of Chelsea and City. Secondly nobody is saying all investment in football is wrong. Thirdly, was it against the rules back then? Football needed investment to grow and be competitive at the time. All the clubs have had investment at one time or another in the past. Situations have changed though, and doping the fack out of football now is ruination of the game. That's why they introduced the financial rules, because they were necessary to protect the game in it's modern form, but that wasn't always the case in the past.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wrong, it was introduced because those that did were incensed now that others could.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
OK
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Can't challenge it?
comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 6 hours, 53 minutes ago
comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 42 minutes ago
comment by choppers new boots (U23059)
posted 43 minutes ago
Poor old Sandy, always ends up making himself look such a chaant always has always will
How many times has he gone missing afterwards lol.
Lets not forget Spurs have previous being docked 12 points before the fine being upgraded back in Sugars days so assuming that Sandy doesn't count the few Trophies that his club managed to "acquire" in and around that time.
As for "doping the fack out of football" being going on for ages, lets face it Liverpool would never have got out of the Second Division at the time without the Littlewoods money from Sawyer or whatever his name was.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Firstly, nothing has ever happened in the past at the level of Chelsea and City. Secondly nobody is saying all investment in football is wrong. Thirdly, was it against the rules back then? Football needed investment to grow and be competitive at the time. All the clubs have had investment at one time or another in the past. Situations have changed though, and doping the fack out of football now is ruination of the game. That's why they introduced the financial rules, because they were necessary to protect the game in it's modern form, but that wasn't always the case in the past.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wrong, it was introduced because those that did were incensed now that others could.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
OK
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Can't challenge it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Challenge what?
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 1 hour, 26 minutes ago
comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 6 hours, 53 minutes ago
comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 42 minutes ago
comment by choppers new boots (U23059)
posted 43 minutes ago
Poor old Sandy, always ends up making himself look such a chaant always has always will
How many times has he gone missing afterwards lol.
Lets not forget Spurs have previous being docked 12 points before the fine being upgraded back in Sugars days so assuming that Sandy doesn't count the few Trophies that his club managed to "acquire" in and around that time.
As for "doping the fack out of football" being going on for ages, lets face it Liverpool would never have got out of the Second Division at the time without the Littlewoods money from Sawyer or whatever his name was.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Firstly, nothing has ever happened in the past at the level of Chelsea and City. Secondly nobody is saying all investment in football is wrong. Thirdly, was it against the rules back then? Football needed investment to grow and be competitive at the time. All the clubs have had investment at one time or another in the past. Situations have changed though, and doping the fack out of football now is ruination of the game. That's why they introduced the financial rules, because they were necessary to protect the game in it's modern form, but that wasn't always the case in the past.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wrong, it was introduced because those that did were incensed now that others could.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
OK
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Can't challenge it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Challenge what?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Whatever you were laughing at.
comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 8 hours, 36 minutes ago
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 1 hour, 26 minutes ago
comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 6 hours, 53 minutes ago
comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 42 minutes ago
comment by choppers new boots (U23059)
posted 43 minutes ago
Poor old Sandy, always ends up making himself look such a chaant always has always will
How many times has he gone missing afterwards lol.
Lets not forget Spurs have previous being docked 12 points before the fine being upgraded back in Sugars days so assuming that Sandy doesn't count the few Trophies that his club managed to "acquire" in and around that time.
As for "doping the fack out of football" being going on for ages, lets face it Liverpool would never have got out of the Second Division at the time without the Littlewoods money from Sawyer or whatever his name was.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Firstly, nothing has ever happened in the past at the level of Chelsea and City. Secondly nobody is saying all investment in football is wrong. Thirdly, was it against the rules back then? Football needed investment to grow and be competitive at the time. All the clubs have had investment at one time or another in the past. Situations have changed though, and doping the fack out of football now is ruination of the game. That's why they introduced the financial rules, because they were necessary to protect the game in it's modern form, but that wasn't always the case in the past.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wrong, it was introduced because those that did were incensed now that others could.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
OK
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Can't challenge it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Challenge what?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Whatever you were laughing at.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly.
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 4 hours, 13 minutes ago
comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 8 hours, 36 minutes ago
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 1 hour, 26 minutes ago
comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 6 hours, 53 minutes ago
comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 42 minutes ago
comment by choppers new boots (U23059)
posted 43 minutes ago
Poor old Sandy, always ends up making himself look such a chaant always has always will
How many times has he gone missing afterwards lol.
Lets not forget Spurs have previous being docked 12 points before the fine being upgraded back in Sugars days so assuming that Sandy doesn't count the few Trophies that his club managed to "acquire" in and around that time.
As for "doping the fack out of football" being going on for ages, lets face it Liverpool would never have got out of the Second Division at the time without the Littlewoods money from Sawyer or whatever his name was.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Firstly, nothing has ever happened in the past at the level of Chelsea and City. Secondly nobody is saying all investment in football is wrong. Thirdly, was it against the rules back then? Football needed investment to grow and be competitive at the time. All the clubs have had investment at one time or another in the past. Situations have changed though, and doping the fack out of football now is ruination of the game. That's why they introduced the financial rules, because they were necessary to protect the game in it's modern form, but that wasn't always the case in the past.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wrong, it was introduced because those that did were incensed now that others could.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
OK
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Can't challenge it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Challenge what?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Whatever you were laughing at.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't think so.
comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 3 hours, 43 minutes ago
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 4 hours, 13 minutes ago
comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 8 hours, 36 minutes ago
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 1 hour, 26 minutes ago
comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 6 hours, 53 minutes ago
comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 42 minutes ago
comment by choppers new boots (U23059)
posted 43 minutes ago
Poor old Sandy, always ends up making himself look such a chaant always has always will
How many times has he gone missing afterwards lol.
Lets not forget Spurs have previous being docked 12 points before the fine being upgraded back in Sugars days so assuming that Sandy doesn't count the few Trophies that his club managed to "acquire" in and around that time.
As for "doping the fack out of football" being going on for ages, lets face it Liverpool would never have got out of the Second Division at the time without the Littlewoods money from Sawyer or whatever his name was.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Firstly, nothing has ever happened in the past at the level of Chelsea and City. Secondly nobody is saying all investment in football is wrong. Thirdly, was it against the rules back then? Football needed investment to grow and be competitive at the time. All the clubs have had investment at one time or another in the past. Situations have changed though, and doping the fack out of football now is ruination of the game. That's why they introduced the financial rules, because they were necessary to protect the game in it's modern form, but that wasn't always the case in the past.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wrong, it was introduced because those that did were incensed now that others could.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
OK
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Can't challenge it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Challenge what?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Whatever you were laughing at.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't think so.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Neither did I.
Sign in if you want to comment
Oh no, what's Levy done now...?
Page 3 of 3
posted on 22/11/23
Just realised what a monumental task i've started here....2008 to present day is 15 years...i'd imagine a club like Spurs must've been competing for about four trophies a year here
That's a spreadsheet that could go on for 50+ lines
Bear with me...i've promised now - so i'll deliver
posted on 22/11/23
Chopper
https://www.ja606.co.uk/articles/viewLiveArticle/1103
Chelsea main thread...don't know if you're aware of this
posted on 22/11/23
comment by choppers new boots (U23059)
posted 43 minutes ago
Poor old Sandy, always ends up making himself look such a chaant always has always will
How many times has he gone missing afterwards lol.
Lets not forget Spurs have previous being docked 12 points before the fine being upgraded back in Sugars days so assuming that Sandy doesn't count the few Trophies that his club managed to "acquire" in and around that time.
As for "doping the fack out of football" being going on for ages, lets face it Liverpool would never have got out of the Second Division at the time without the Littlewoods money from Sawyer or whatever his name was.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Firstly, nothing has ever happened in the past at the level of Chelsea and City. Secondly nobody is saying all investment in football is wrong. Thirdly, was it against the rules back then? Football needed investment to grow and be competitive at the time. All the clubs have had investment at one time or another in the past. Situations have changed though, and doping the fack out of football now is ruination of the game. That's why they introduced the financial rules, because they were necessary to protect the game in it's modern form, but that wasn't always the case in the past.
posted on 22/11/23
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 3 hours, 9 minutes ago
comment by Tway (U1162)
posted 1 hour, 32 minutes ago
Sandy's earlier comments on Chelseas issues are now triply hilarious as a result of the latest developments.
Let's congratulate the old geezer for somehow always getting his timings spot on
1) Joe Lewis has been running Tottenham legally, that's all you need to know.
City and Chelsea owners are running their clubs by breaching the rules. Massive difference.
Both clubs will be rightfully thrown out of the Prem.
2) LOL your club is toast fella. Putin's plaything for a decade and more. Now it us all coming tumbling down.
I bet you are proud your club was being propped up by that murderous thug. And all you lot were lapping it up.
Don't start lecturing me on morality fella.
3) What Chelsea should do, is check out how you get to Barnet and Hartlepool.
Could not have been scripted better ....thanks for the laughs... can always depend on Sandy and Spurs to deliver joy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
OK but you can't act like what Chelsea did and what Spurs did are the same thing. They dealt with an unlicensed agent whereas Chelsea doped the fack out of football and ruined it. Massive difference.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Actually Chelsea haven't yet been charged with anything. There have been questions raised about some questionable payments but not as yet financial doping. So our case if there is one to snswer is more akin to Spurs than other clubs recently punished or being investigated.
posted on 22/11/23
comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 3 hours, 9 minutes ago
comment by Tway (U1162)
posted 1 hour, 32 minutes ago
Sandy's earlier comments on Chelseas issues are now triply hilarious as a result of the latest developments.
Let's congratulate the old geezer for somehow always getting his timings spot on
1) Joe Lewis has been running Tottenham legally, that's all you need to know.
City and Chelsea owners are running their clubs by breaching the rules. Massive difference.
Both clubs will be rightfully thrown out of the Prem.
2) LOL your club is toast fella. Putin's plaything for a decade and more. Now it us all coming tumbling down.
I bet you are proud your club was being propped up by that murderous thug. And all you lot were lapping it up.
Don't start lecturing me on morality fella.
3) What Chelsea should do, is check out how you get to Barnet and Hartlepool.
Could not have been scripted better ....thanks for the laughs... can always depend on Sandy and Spurs to deliver joy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
OK but you can't act like what Chelsea did and what Spurs did are the same thing. They dealt with an unlicensed agent whereas Chelsea doped the fack out of football and ruined it. Massive difference.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Actually Chelsea haven't yet been charged with anything. There have been questions raised about some questionable payments but not as yet financial doping. So our case if there is one to snswer is more akin to Spurs than other clubs recently punished or being investigated.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
OK.
posted on 22/11/23
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 42 minutes ago
comment by choppers new boots (U23059)
posted 43 minutes ago
Poor old Sandy, always ends up making himself look such a chaant always has always will
How many times has he gone missing afterwards lol.
Lets not forget Spurs have previous being docked 12 points before the fine being upgraded back in Sugars days so assuming that Sandy doesn't count the few Trophies that his club managed to "acquire" in and around that time.
As for "doping the fack out of football" being going on for ages, lets face it Liverpool would never have got out of the Second Division at the time without the Littlewoods money from Sawyer or whatever his name was.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Firstly, nothing has ever happened in the past at the level of Chelsea and City. Secondly nobody is saying all investment in football is wrong. Thirdly, was it against the rules back then? Football needed investment to grow and be competitive at the time. All the clubs have had investment at one time or another in the past. Situations have changed though, and doping the fack out of football now is ruination of the game. That's why they introduced the financial rules, because they were necessary to protect the game in it's modern form, but that wasn't always the case in the past.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wrong, it was introduced because those that did were incensed now that others could.
posted on 22/11/23
Three things that are terrible for football
1.Var
2. International breaks
3. Daniel levy
Seems levy’s incompetence now might result in a point’s penalty for spurs.
I’m sure the levy lovers will rally around though 👍
posted on 22/11/23
comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 42 minutes ago
comment by choppers new boots (U23059)
posted 43 minutes ago
Poor old Sandy, always ends up making himself look such a chaant always has always will
How many times has he gone missing afterwards lol.
Lets not forget Spurs have previous being docked 12 points before the fine being upgraded back in Sugars days so assuming that Sandy doesn't count the few Trophies that his club managed to "acquire" in and around that time.
As for "doping the fack out of football" being going on for ages, lets face it Liverpool would never have got out of the Second Division at the time without the Littlewoods money from Sawyer or whatever his name was.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Firstly, nothing has ever happened in the past at the level of Chelsea and City. Secondly nobody is saying all investment in football is wrong. Thirdly, was it against the rules back then? Football needed investment to grow and be competitive at the time. All the clubs have had investment at one time or another in the past. Situations have changed though, and doping the fack out of football now is ruination of the game. That's why they introduced the financial rules, because they were necessary to protect the game in it's modern form, but that wasn't always the case in the past.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wrong, it was introduced because those that did were incensed now that others could.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
OK
posted on 22/11/23
comment by vidicthelegend VIVA LA REVOLUTION (U8735)
posted 21 hours, 29 minutes ago
It would be so Spursy if you were about to win a trophy and a points deduction from something 15 years ago stopped you
----------------------------------------------------------------------
posted on 22/11/23
comment by (K̇ash) - Liverpool 7-0 Man U - Free Palestine 🇵🇸 (U1108)
posted 20 hours, 31 minutes ago
Spurs will have to hand back the 2008 league cup the last won as a result
----------------------------------------------------------------------
posted on 22/11/23
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 4 hours, 28 minutes ago
comment by choppers new boots (U23059)
posted 43 minutes ago
Poor old Sandy, always ends up making himself look such a chaant always has always will
How many times has he gone missing afterwards lol.
------------
Yeah...noticed that too... my guess he's out shopping for route maps to Barnet and Hartlepool before they run out with the inevitable coming rush for them.
posted on 22/11/23
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/arsenal-fined-over-unlicensed-agent-c2q6wd7clwc
https://www.theguardian.com/football/2015/oct/26/arsenal-fined-warned-breaching-agent-rules-calum-chambers-fa
I think we will be ok. Seems like we were the selling club anyway and not the buying club. And as the articles above a fine was dished out.
posted on 22/11/23
Do you want the 10 points off this season or next?
posted on 22/11/23
comment by HB Maybe Beale wasn't the mastermind (U21935)
posted 9 minutes ago
Do you want the 10 points off this season or next?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Can we do a deal?
2 points this season then a further 2 points off the next four seasons? So spread the points over five years, like a transfer deal 🙂
posted on 22/11/23
Fook me Daniel Levy has an account on here.
posted on 22/11/23
comment by HB Maybe Beale wasn't the mastermind (U21935)
posted 11 minutes ago
Fook me Daniel Levy has an account on here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
posted on 22/11/23
comment by HB Maybe Beale wasn't the mastermind (U21935)
posted 51 minutes ago
Fook me Daniel Levy has an account on here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
😄🧐
posted on 22/11/23
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 6 hours, 53 minutes ago
comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 42 minutes ago
comment by choppers new boots (U23059)
posted 43 minutes ago
Poor old Sandy, always ends up making himself look such a chaant always has always will
How many times has he gone missing afterwards lol.
Lets not forget Spurs have previous being docked 12 points before the fine being upgraded back in Sugars days so assuming that Sandy doesn't count the few Trophies that his club managed to "acquire" in and around that time.
As for "doping the fack out of football" being going on for ages, lets face it Liverpool would never have got out of the Second Division at the time without the Littlewoods money from Sawyer or whatever his name was.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Firstly, nothing has ever happened in the past at the level of Chelsea and City. Secondly nobody is saying all investment in football is wrong. Thirdly, was it against the rules back then? Football needed investment to grow and be competitive at the time. All the clubs have had investment at one time or another in the past. Situations have changed though, and doping the fack out of football now is ruination of the game. That's why they introduced the financial rules, because they were necessary to protect the game in it's modern form, but that wasn't always the case in the past.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wrong, it was introduced because those that did were incensed now that others could.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
OK
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Can't challenge it?
posted on 22/11/23
comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 6 hours, 53 minutes ago
comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 42 minutes ago
comment by choppers new boots (U23059)
posted 43 minutes ago
Poor old Sandy, always ends up making himself look such a chaant always has always will
How many times has he gone missing afterwards lol.
Lets not forget Spurs have previous being docked 12 points before the fine being upgraded back in Sugars days so assuming that Sandy doesn't count the few Trophies that his club managed to "acquire" in and around that time.
As for "doping the fack out of football" being going on for ages, lets face it Liverpool would never have got out of the Second Division at the time without the Littlewoods money from Sawyer or whatever his name was.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Firstly, nothing has ever happened in the past at the level of Chelsea and City. Secondly nobody is saying all investment in football is wrong. Thirdly, was it against the rules back then? Football needed investment to grow and be competitive at the time. All the clubs have had investment at one time or another in the past. Situations have changed though, and doping the fack out of football now is ruination of the game. That's why they introduced the financial rules, because they were necessary to protect the game in it's modern form, but that wasn't always the case in the past.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wrong, it was introduced because those that did were incensed now that others could.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
OK
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Can't challenge it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Challenge what?
posted on 22/11/23
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 1 hour, 26 minutes ago
comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 6 hours, 53 minutes ago
comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 42 minutes ago
comment by choppers new boots (U23059)
posted 43 minutes ago
Poor old Sandy, always ends up making himself look such a chaant always has always will
How many times has he gone missing afterwards lol.
Lets not forget Spurs have previous being docked 12 points before the fine being upgraded back in Sugars days so assuming that Sandy doesn't count the few Trophies that his club managed to "acquire" in and around that time.
As for "doping the fack out of football" being going on for ages, lets face it Liverpool would never have got out of the Second Division at the time without the Littlewoods money from Sawyer or whatever his name was.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Firstly, nothing has ever happened in the past at the level of Chelsea and City. Secondly nobody is saying all investment in football is wrong. Thirdly, was it against the rules back then? Football needed investment to grow and be competitive at the time. All the clubs have had investment at one time or another in the past. Situations have changed though, and doping the fack out of football now is ruination of the game. That's why they introduced the financial rules, because they were necessary to protect the game in it's modern form, but that wasn't always the case in the past.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wrong, it was introduced because those that did were incensed now that others could.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
OK
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Can't challenge it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Challenge what?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Whatever you were laughing at.
posted on 23/11/23
comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 8 hours, 36 minutes ago
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 1 hour, 26 minutes ago
comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 6 hours, 53 minutes ago
comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 42 minutes ago
comment by choppers new boots (U23059)
posted 43 minutes ago
Poor old Sandy, always ends up making himself look such a chaant always has always will
How many times has he gone missing afterwards lol.
Lets not forget Spurs have previous being docked 12 points before the fine being upgraded back in Sugars days so assuming that Sandy doesn't count the few Trophies that his club managed to "acquire" in and around that time.
As for "doping the fack out of football" being going on for ages, lets face it Liverpool would never have got out of the Second Division at the time without the Littlewoods money from Sawyer or whatever his name was.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Firstly, nothing has ever happened in the past at the level of Chelsea and City. Secondly nobody is saying all investment in football is wrong. Thirdly, was it against the rules back then? Football needed investment to grow and be competitive at the time. All the clubs have had investment at one time or another in the past. Situations have changed though, and doping the fack out of football now is ruination of the game. That's why they introduced the financial rules, because they were necessary to protect the game in it's modern form, but that wasn't always the case in the past.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wrong, it was introduced because those that did were incensed now that others could.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
OK
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Can't challenge it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Challenge what?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Whatever you were laughing at.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly.
posted on 23/11/23
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 4 hours, 13 minutes ago
comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 8 hours, 36 minutes ago
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 1 hour, 26 minutes ago
comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 6 hours, 53 minutes ago
comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 42 minutes ago
comment by choppers new boots (U23059)
posted 43 minutes ago
Poor old Sandy, always ends up making himself look such a chaant always has always will
How many times has he gone missing afterwards lol.
Lets not forget Spurs have previous being docked 12 points before the fine being upgraded back in Sugars days so assuming that Sandy doesn't count the few Trophies that his club managed to "acquire" in and around that time.
As for "doping the fack out of football" being going on for ages, lets face it Liverpool would never have got out of the Second Division at the time without the Littlewoods money from Sawyer or whatever his name was.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Firstly, nothing has ever happened in the past at the level of Chelsea and City. Secondly nobody is saying all investment in football is wrong. Thirdly, was it against the rules back then? Football needed investment to grow and be competitive at the time. All the clubs have had investment at one time or another in the past. Situations have changed though, and doping the fack out of football now is ruination of the game. That's why they introduced the financial rules, because they were necessary to protect the game in it's modern form, but that wasn't always the case in the past.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wrong, it was introduced because those that did were incensed now that others could.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
OK
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Can't challenge it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Challenge what?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Whatever you were laughing at.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't think so.
posted on 23/11/23
comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 3 hours, 43 minutes ago
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 4 hours, 13 minutes ago
comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 8 hours, 36 minutes ago
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 1 hour, 26 minutes ago
comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 6 hours, 53 minutes ago
comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 42 minutes ago
comment by choppers new boots (U23059)
posted 43 minutes ago
Poor old Sandy, always ends up making himself look such a chaant always has always will
How many times has he gone missing afterwards lol.
Lets not forget Spurs have previous being docked 12 points before the fine being upgraded back in Sugars days so assuming that Sandy doesn't count the few Trophies that his club managed to "acquire" in and around that time.
As for "doping the fack out of football" being going on for ages, lets face it Liverpool would never have got out of the Second Division at the time without the Littlewoods money from Sawyer or whatever his name was.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Firstly, nothing has ever happened in the past at the level of Chelsea and City. Secondly nobody is saying all investment in football is wrong. Thirdly, was it against the rules back then? Football needed investment to grow and be competitive at the time. All the clubs have had investment at one time or another in the past. Situations have changed though, and doping the fack out of football now is ruination of the game. That's why they introduced the financial rules, because they were necessary to protect the game in it's modern form, but that wasn't always the case in the past.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wrong, it was introduced because those that did were incensed now that others could.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
OK
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Can't challenge it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Challenge what?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Whatever you were laughing at.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't think so.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Neither did I.
Page 3 of 3