What you see is actually just a football fan sharing their relevant opinion of their former player on a multi team forum.

comment by De Zerbi Is Inevitable (U6489)
posted 22 seconds ago
What you see is actually just a football fan sharing their relevant opinion of their former player on a multi team forum.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you agree that Havertz is doing better at Arsenal than he did at Chelsea?

comment by De Zerbi Is Inevitable (U6489)
posted 4 hours, 35 minutes ago
Typical bitter United fan response
----------------------------------------------------------------------

comment by Jenius99 (U4918)
posted 3 hours, 22 minutes ago
comment by De Zerbi Is Inevitable (U6489)
posted 22 seconds ago
What you see is actually just a football fan sharing their relevant opinion of their former player on a multi team forum.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you agree that Havertz is doing better at Arsenal than he did at Chelsea?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
so let me guess.

If he agress = not bitter
if he doesn't agree = bitter



So basically we have to (despite complimenting arsenal and saying how good as a team they are), compliment every single one of their players, every time, or be deemed bitter.

Do you even realise that football is a team game, and Havertz has been a key performer for Arsenal? He replaced Jesus and benched him! Without Havertz we would have never run City so close! So what other reason would there be to criticise one of the best performers?

your over egging his importance, we're just bringing objectivity to the conversation.

Saliba, White, Gabriel, Rice, Saka, Odegaard were all much better and important.

If Arsenal bought a cf instead of havertz I'd wager you would have won it.

comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 4 hours, 15 minutes ago
your over egging his importance, we're just bringing objectivity to the conversation.

Saliba, White, Gabriel, Rice, Saka, Odegaard were all much better and important.

If Arsenal bought a cf instead of havertz I'd wager you would have won it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Or maybe played him in that position in the beginning and dumped Jesus, we would've been better off

comment by Passion Power - Make 1984 fiction again (U8398)
posted 54 minutes ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 4 hours, 15 minutes ago
your over egging his importance, we're just bringing objectivity to the conversation.

Saliba, White, Gabriel, Rice, Saka, Odegaard were all much better and important.

If Arsenal bought a cf instead of havertz I'd wager you would have won it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Or maybe played him in that position in the beginning and dumped Jesus, we would've been better off
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Maybe, and arsenal create more chances than chelsea did when he was there thats for sure. But he was never up to much as a number 9 for us.

Players look different in differing surroundings.

I mean, Maddison looked half decent for Leicester but now looks like just another expensive Spurs misfit.

comment by WeekendOffender (U22920)
posted 1 minute ago
Players look different in differing surroundings.

I mean, Maddison looked half decent for Leicester but now looks like just another expensive Spurs misfit.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Understand your point, but not the best example. Before his injury maddison was one of the best players in the league let alone at spurs. The injury looks to have knocked him.

I don’t think Havertz is getting significantly more chances for Arsenal than he did in his last two for Chelsea. He’s definitely finishing a lot better.

comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 2 hours, 58 minutes ago
comment by WeekendOffender (U22920)
posted 1 minute ago
Players look different in differing surroundings.

I mean, Maddison looked half decent for Leicester but now looks like just another expensive Spurs misfit.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Understand your point, but not the best example. Before his injury maddison was one of the best players in the league let alone at spurs. The injury looks to have knocked him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

He looked good in Spurs opening run of easy fixtures, as soon as they came up against any team of note he disappeared up his own ass.

Spurs should have signed Harvey Barnes 👍

Maddison did the exact same thing for Leicester. He’s the same player at both clubs.

comment by Darren The String Fletcher (U10026)
posted 1 hour, 11 minutes ago
Maddison did the exact same thing for Leicester. He’s the same player at both clubs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Agreed. Complete waste of £40m

Maddison was better than Odegaard at the start of the season and now he’s worse than Havertz who was the worst signing of the Summer when it happened