comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 2 hours, 26 minutes ago
Brendan will be shouting he wants a bag of cans and Mick Beale back by the time Phil is done with him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

If you’d said Lennon I’d have had to agree.

I won't see our match on Sunday but expect a decent win v a tired Kilmarnock after their defeat on their travels last night

I sadly won't make the game but will get goal alerts

comment by Striketeam7 - haters gonna hate (U18109)
posted 4 hours, 42 minutes ago
comment by WeekendOffender (U22920)
posted 49 minutes ago
comment by Striketeam7 - haters gonna hate (U18109)
posted 19 minutes ago
comment by WeekendOffender (U22920)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Striketeam7 - haters gonna hate (U18109)
posted 40 minutes ago
Rangers best chance is Brenny schitting the bed - can’t see it though
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I see they wisely chose to ignore you the first time StrikeMug? Yet here you are back again desperate for attention with your Mystic Mug predictions.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Hi Weekend, I see Wolves were beaten by Palace yesterday - I could have predicted that
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Any other "Propheties" NostradaMug?



----------------------------------------------------------------------
Propherties

I know that’s how you backward folk from the Black Country talk, but the word is spelt Prophecy/prophecies
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Les Prophéties (The Prophecies) is a collection of prophecies by French physician Nostradamus, StrikeMug.

You might know this if you’d had even the most basic level education 😂😂

Thick as pig💩

comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 24 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 2 hours, 28 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 37 minutes ago


I’m just trying to make sense of St3vie’s post so had to ask twice
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well it's pretty obvious what I'm saying

Whether the boards hand was forced or not, the decision has been made to extend Clements contract

All you want to do is paint that in some sort of bad light, saying folk are sugar coating it as some sort of show of faith in Clement

I'm saying there could be an element of truth in that "sugar coating"....the board could have decided not to do this, but they did, and there is a need for stability at our club, this should provide it and it shows Clement that the board want him to stay

Does it make it more expensive to get rid of Clement if he fails...of course it does...but the same can be said anytime a manager extends his contract

There is of course the chance that he doesn't actually fail and we push on from where we are now under him
----------------------------------------------------------------------



Aye ok.

9 months into a 3 year contract. Ground is unusable for the first couple of months; half the deadwood gone for next to nothing; been told the goalposts haven’t been shifted but have been move away in terms of funding and new incomings all projects bar 1 or 2. No recognised style of play; haven’t beaten Celtic once and ended up worse off in points difference than his predecessor.

So they “award” him an even bigger contract.

ffs. I think there’s still tooth fairies in your world. Must be down to all those positives I suppose.

I’ll leave it there.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So please explain to me, which parts of everything that you have listed above....are actually down to Clement, his poor management skills, or lack of progression

We didn't need to beat Celtic to win the one trophy we did last season....we didn't need to beat Celtic to progress out of the groups of the Europa League either....and using your words, it's pretty much impossible for Clement to bridge the gap to Celtic given the financial advantages etc

So other than failing to claim an old firm win...(with pretty much Beales team let's remember), please tell me why Phil isn't worthy of a bit of faith being shown in him to progress this team

Goodness, some awfully well informed folk here regarding what goes in in private at Ibrox

comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 32 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 24 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 2 hours, 28 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 37 minutes ago


I’m just trying to make sense of St3vie’s post so had to ask twice
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well it's pretty obvious what I'm saying

Whether the boards hand was forced or not, the decision has been made to extend Clements contract

All you want to do is paint that in some sort of bad light, saying folk are sugar coating it as some sort of show of faith in Clement

I'm saying there could be an element of truth in that "sugar coating"....the board could have decided not to do this, but they did, and there is a need for stability at our club, this should provide it and it shows Clement that the board want him to stay

Does it make it more expensive to get rid of Clement if he fails...of course it does...but the same can be said anytime a manager extends his contract

There is of course the chance that he doesn't actually fail and we push on from where we are now under him
----------------------------------------------------------------------



Aye ok.

9 months into a 3 year contract. Ground is unusable for the first couple of months; half the deadwood gone for next to nothing; been told the goalposts haven’t been shifted but have been move away in terms of funding and new incomings all projects bar 1 or 2. No recognised style of play; haven’t beaten Celtic once and ended up worse off in points difference than his predecessor.

So they “award” him an even bigger contract.

ffs. I think there’s still tooth fairies in your world. Must be down to all those positives I suppose.

I’ll leave it there.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So please explain to me, which parts of everything that you have listed above....are actually down to Clement, his poor management skills, or lack of progression

We didn't need to beat Celtic to win the one trophy we did last season....we didn't need to beat Celtic to progress out of the groups of the Europa League either....and using your words, it's pretty much impossible for Clement to bridge the gap to Celtic given the financial advantages etc

So other than failing to claim an old firm win...(with pretty much Beales team let's remember), please tell me why Phil isn't worthy of a bit of faith being shown in him to progress this team
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't forget soem extremely doggy VAR decisions

comment by I'm not as think as you drunk I am.......... (U2115)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 32 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 24 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 2 hours, 28 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 37 minutes ago


I’m just trying to make sense of St3vie’s post so had to ask twice
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well it's pretty obvious what I'm saying

Whether the boards hand was forced or not, the decision has been made to extend Clements contract

All you want to do is paint that in some sort of bad light, saying folk are sugar coating it as some sort of show of faith in Clement

I'm saying there could be an element of truth in that "sugar coating"....the board could have decided not to do this, but they did, and there is a need for stability at our club, this should provide it and it shows Clement that the board want him to stay

Does it make it more expensive to get rid of Clement if he fails...of course it does...but the same can be said anytime a manager extends his contract

There is of course the chance that he doesn't actually fail and we push on from where we are now under him
----------------------------------------------------------------------



Aye ok.

9 months into a 3 year contract. Ground is unusable for the first couple of months; half the deadwood gone for next to nothing; been told the goalposts haven’t been shifted but have been move away in terms of funding and new incomings all projects bar 1 or 2. No recognised style of play; haven’t beaten Celtic once and ended up worse off in points difference than his predecessor.

So they “award” him an even bigger contract.

ffs. I think there’s still tooth fairies in your world. Must be down to all those positives I suppose.

I’ll leave it there.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So please explain to me, which parts of everything that you have listed above....are actually down to Clement, his poor management skills, or lack of progression

We didn't need to beat Celtic to win the one trophy we did last season....we didn't need to beat Celtic to progress out of the groups of the Europa League either....and using your words, it's pretty much impossible for Clement to bridge the gap to Celtic given the financial advantages etc

So other than failing to claim an old firm win...(with pretty much Beales team let's remember), please tell me why Phil isn't worthy of a bit of faith being shown in him to progress this team
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't forget soem extremely doggy VAR decisions
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You’re not helping here

As for doggy decisions; well……

comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 42 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 24 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 2 hours, 28 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 37 minutes ago


I’m just trying to make sense of St3vie’s post so had to ask twice
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well it's pretty obvious what I'm saying

Whether the boards hand was forced or not, the decision has been made to extend Clements contract

All you want to do is paint that in some sort of bad light, saying folk are sugar coating it as some sort of show of faith in Clement

I'm saying there could be an element of truth in that "sugar coating"....the board could have decided not to do this, but they did, and there is a need for stability at our club, this should provide it and it shows Clement that the board want him to stay

Does it make it more expensive to get rid of Clement if he fails...of course it does...but the same can be said anytime a manager extends his contract

There is of course the chance that he doesn't actually fail and we push on from where we are now under him
----------------------------------------------------------------------



Aye ok.

9 months into a 3 year contract. Ground is unusable for the first couple of months; half the deadwood gone for next to nothing; been told the goalposts haven’t been shifted but have been move away in terms of funding and new incomings all projects bar 1 or 2. No recognised style of play; haven’t beaten Celtic once and ended up worse off in points difference than his predecessor.

So they “award” him an even bigger contract.

ffs. I think there’s still tooth fairies in your world. Must be down to all those positives I suppose.

I’ll leave it there.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So please explain to me, which parts of everything that you have listed above....are actually down to Clement, his poor management skills, or lack of progression

We didn't need to beat Celtic to win the one trophy we did last season....we didn't need to beat Celtic to progress out of the groups of the Europa League either....and using your words, it's pretty much impossible for Clement to bridge the gap to Celtic given the financial advantages etc

So other than failing to claim an old firm win...(with pretty much Beales team let's remember), please tell me why Phil isn't worthy of a bit of faith being shown in him to progress this team
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You’re simply not reading what I’ve said. I’ve never said this is down to Clement. I suspect he had a hand in being offered this contract extension but that’s it.

The board are sugar coating it

There. I’m finished with this now as I can’t be rsed getting into one of your never ending cyclical arguments over not a lot.

comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by I'm not as think as you drunk I am.......... (U2115)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 32 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 24 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 2 hours, 28 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 37 minutes ago


I’m just trying to make sense of St3vie’s post so had to ask twice
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well it's pretty obvious what I'm saying

Whether the boards hand was forced or not, the decision has been made to extend Clements contract

All you want to do is paint that in some sort of bad light, saying folk are sugar coating it as some sort of show of faith in Clement

I'm saying there could be an element of truth in that "sugar coating"....the board could have decided not to do this, but they did, and there is a need for stability at our club, this should provide it and it shows Clement that the board want him to stay

Does it make it more expensive to get rid of Clement if he fails...of course it does...but the same can be said anytime a manager extends his contract

There is of course the chance that he doesn't actually fail and we push on from where we are now under him
----------------------------------------------------------------------



Aye ok.

9 months into a 3 year contract. Ground is unusable for the first couple of months; half the deadwood gone for next to nothing; been told the goalposts haven’t been shifted but have been move away in terms of funding and new incomings all projects bar 1 or 2. No recognised style of play; haven’t beaten Celtic once and ended up worse off in points difference than his predecessor.

So they “award” him an even bigger contract.

ffs. I think there’s still tooth fairies in your world. Must be down to all those positives I suppose.

I’ll leave it there.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So please explain to me, which parts of everything that you have listed above....are actually down to Clement, his poor management skills, or lack of progression

We didn't need to beat Celtic to win the one trophy we did last season....we didn't need to beat Celtic to progress out of the groups of the Europa League either....and using your words, it's pretty much impossible for Clement to bridge the gap to Celtic given the financial advantages etc

So other than failing to claim an old firm win...(with pretty much Beales team let's remember), please tell me why Phil isn't worthy of a bit of faith being shown in him to progress this team
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't forget soem extremely doggy VAR decisions
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You’re not helping here

As for doggy decisions; well……
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Woof Woof!

comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 42 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 24 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 2 hours, 28 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 37 minutes ago


I’m just trying to make sense of St3vie’s post so had to ask twice
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well it's pretty obvious what I'm saying

Whether the boards hand was forced or not, the decision has been made to extend Clements contract

All you want to do is paint that in some sort of bad light, saying folk are sugar coating it as some sort of show of faith in Clement

I'm saying there could be an element of truth in that "sugar coating"....the board could have decided not to do this, but they did, and there is a need for stability at our club, this should provide it and it shows Clement that the board want him to stay

Does it make it more expensive to get rid of Clement if he fails...of course it does...but the same can be said anytime a manager extends his contract

There is of course the chance that he doesn't actually fail and we push on from where we are now under him
----------------------------------------------------------------------



Aye ok.

9 months into a 3 year contract. Ground is unusable for the first couple of months; half the deadwood gone for next to nothing; been told the goalposts haven’t been shifted but have been move away in terms of funding and new incomings all projects bar 1 or 2. No recognised style of play; haven’t beaten Celtic once and ended up worse off in points difference than his predecessor.

So they “award” him an even bigger contract.

ffs. I think there’s still tooth fairies in your world. Must be down to all those positives I suppose.

I’ll leave it there.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So please explain to me, which parts of everything that you have listed above....are actually down to Clement, his poor management skills, or lack of progression

We didn't need to beat Celtic to win the one trophy we did last season....we didn't need to beat Celtic to progress out of the groups of the Europa League either....and using your words, it's pretty much impossible for Clement to bridge the gap to Celtic given the financial advantages etc

So other than failing to claim an old firm win...(with pretty much Beales team let's remember), please tell me why Phil isn't worthy of a bit of faith being shown in him to progress this team
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You’re simply not reading what I’ve said. I’ve never said this is down to Clement. I suspect he had a hand in being offered this contract extension but that’s it.

The board are sugar coating it

There. I’m finished with this now as I can’t be rsed getting into one of your never ending cyclical arguments over not a lot.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You also said the board were in the wrong for extending his contract, and you completely dodged the question when I straight out asked if you would have told Clement to bolt or not if it was you making the decision

So yeah.....arguments tend to become cyclical when folk don't actually answer the questions put to them

comment by I'm not as think as you drunk I am.......Schizophrenia was my idea!.....No it wasn't!.....You are never alone with a Schizo :D (U2115)
posted 1 hour, 21 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 3 minutes ago


You’re not helping here

As for doggy decisions; well……
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Woof Woof!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They tried twice to hound Collum. TBF he was half tarrier, half pointer.

I'll say, son.

comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 3 hours, 5 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 42 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 24 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 2 hours, 28 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 37 minutes ago


I’m just trying to make sense of St3vie’s post so had to ask twice
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well it's pretty obvious what I'm saying

Whether the boards hand was forced or not, the decision has been made to extend Clements contract

All you want to do is paint that in some sort of bad light, saying folk are sugar coating it as some sort of show of faith in Clement

I'm saying there could be an element of truth in that "sugar coating"....the board could have decided not to do this, but they did, and there is a need for stability at our club, this should provide it and it shows Clement that the board want him to stay

Does it make it more expensive to get rid of Clement if he fails...of course it does...but the same can be said anytime a manager extends his contract

There is of course the chance that he doesn't actually fail and we push on from where we are now under him
----------------------------------------------------------------------



Aye ok.

9 months into a 3 year contract. Ground is unusable for the first couple of months; half the deadwood gone for next to nothing; been told the goalposts haven’t been shifted but have been move away in terms of funding and new incomings all projects bar 1 or 2. No recognised style of play; haven’t beaten Celtic once and ended up worse off in points difference than his predecessor.

So they “award” him an even bigger contract.

ffs. I think there’s still tooth fairies in your world. Must be down to all those positives I suppose.

I’ll leave it there.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So please explain to me, which parts of everything that you have listed above....are actually down to Clement, his poor management skills, or lack of progression

We didn't need to beat Celtic to win the one trophy we did last season....we didn't need to beat Celtic to progress out of the groups of the Europa League either....and using your words, it's pretty much impossible for Clement to bridge the gap to Celtic given the financial advantages etc

So other than failing to claim an old firm win...(with pretty much Beales team let's remember), please tell me why Phil isn't worthy of a bit of faith being shown in him to progress this team
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You’re simply not reading what I’ve said. I’ve never said this is down to Clement. I suspect he had a hand in being offered this contract extension but that’s it.

The board are sugar coating it

There. I’m finished with this now as I can’t be rsed getting into one of your never ending cyclical arguments over not a lot.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You also said the board were in the wrong for extending his contract, and you completely dodged the question when I straight out asked if you would have told Clement to bolt or not if it was you making the decision

So yeah.....arguments tend to become cyclical when folk don't actually answer the questions put to them
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Yawn.

Waiting on bags in Krakow. There was no question to answer. I gave a scenario and answered your earlier nonsense. Have a pleasant weekend 😎

comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 1 hour, 49 minutes ago


Yawn.

Waiting on bags in Krakow. There was no question to answer. I gave a scenario and answered your earlier nonsense. Have a pleasant weekend 😎
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Yass! Ginger wants us to win and Celtic to drop points, I knew it

comment by I'm not as think as you drunk I am.......... (U2115)
posted 9 hours, 16 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 1 hour, 49 minutes ago


Yawn.

Waiting on bags in Krakow. There was no question to answer. I gave a scenario and answered your earlier nonsense. Have a pleasant weekend 😎
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Yass! Ginger wants us to win and Celtic to drop points, I knew it
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Yep, a tough start for the Gers.

Butland, Tavernier, Souttar, Davies, Ridvan, Barron, Diomande, Lawrence, Wright, Cortes, Dessers

Subs: Kelly, Matondo, Cerny, Dowell, Jefte, Balogun, King, McKinnon, Danilo.

Live @ https://www.ja606.co.uk/articles/viewLiveArticle/463144
One match ban enabled

Good job Admin

"Hearts manager Steven Naismith tells BBC Scotland: "You get to the point where you just want the season to start and I think we're all at that point"

No kiddin

Tavernier to score a penalty 11/2

Lawrence body check - No foul.
Hearts player body check - Foul.

Well.. it's Groundhog day.. again...

comment by Zico - Celtic Double Winners 23/24 (U21900)
posted less than a minute ago
Lawrence body check - No foul.
Hearts player body check - Foul.

Well.. it's Groundhog day.. again...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Haha, starting early mate

This is a very open game

Could have had a few goals already

2 great chances in a row for Hearts and off the bar

Agreed

Well we've been rank rotten this first 20 or so mins

Dessers offering the square root of fck all up top