Letting Greenwood leave for peanuts makes the window a one out of five.
3 goals and an assist in his first two matches.
£100m asset given away for nothing.
9 out of 10, needed another CM and LB.
comment by WeekendOffender (U22920)
posted 14 minutes ago
Letting Greenwood leave for peanuts makes the window a one out of five.
3 goals and an assist in his first two matches.
£100m asset given away for nothing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
50% sell on clause I think
comment by WeekendOffender (U22920)
posted 37 minutes ago
Letting Greenwood leave for peanuts makes the window a one out of five.
3 goals and an assist in his first two matches.
£100m asset given away for nothing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If it wasn't for him being a woman beating cant that united wanted to get rid of.........
7.5 out of 10 so can't complain.
A LB and another midfielder was needed
Excellent, the best since SAFs days.
Mind you it is a problem for ETH as they are all probably first teamers, which means intergrating four into the team immediately and five eventually.
He cannot know the nuances of their game right now so I'm not expecting great things until Christmas.
Depending on how injuries go I believe this should be a top 4 team and maybe better.
8/10 but would’ve been higher if we signed another body in midfield and LB.
comment by WeekendOffender (U22920)
posted 1 hour, 15 minutes ago
Letting Greenwood leave for peanuts makes the window a one out of five.
3 goals and an assist in his first two matches.
£100m asset given away for nothing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I do admire how often you are willing to make yourself look like an ignorant buffoon.
From the offloading aspect I will give it 8 out of 10.
From the incoming you can’t really rate it until mid season. It looks like we have signed the right side of players but it is unknown how they will perform.
We were all well happy with one of LVG’s summer windows but none of those he signed really lived up to the hope.
Getting rid of Sancho is 10/10 by itself. Maz is a United defender.
This season was one of addition by retraction. Hopefully this time next year, Eriksen, lindelof and Casemiro will be gone and Rashford will be worth his wages or we will be looking for a new club for him.
I'd go 9 out of 10.
Yes we could do with a LB and another CM but I wasn't expecting it to be done in one window, I'm actually surprised how much they have done in one window (incomings and outgoings). Sensible signings at decent prices (with negotiation).
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 43 minutes ago
From the offloading aspect I will give it 8 out of 10.
From the incoming you can’t really rate it until mid season. It looks like we have signed the right side of players but it is unknown how they will perform.
We were all well happy with one of LVG’s summer windows but none of those he signed really lived up to the hope.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Agreed. Quite similar to the summer we bought Sancho, Varane and Ronaldo.
I do like the age profile of our signings but far far too soon to judge any of them.
Mazraoui looks very good in the 180 mins we’ve seen but with his injury record you just feel the inevitable will happen.
8/10 for me.
Although we will have to see how the new signings pan out
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 1 hour, 50 minutes ago
comment by WeekendOffender (U22920)
posted 1 hour, 15 minutes ago
Letting Greenwood leave for peanuts makes the window a one out of five.
3 goals and an assist in his first two matches.
£100m asset given away for nothing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I do admire how often you are willing to make yourself look like an ignorant buffoon.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I see your familiar with the daft dingle VC
Most of the outgoings are also booked as 100% profit because they are academy products.
Overall good, but I'd have liked Ivan Toney at the price Brentford let him go and maybe have sold Eriksen and brought in a younger lesser known prospect to replace him.
Let's see how they do.
I think it's been as good as we could have hoped really.
Next year perhaps an elite attacker and left back will be brought in as well as a midfielder or two to replace Casemiro and Eriksen. I really wouldn't be that surprised to see us explore getting Rabiot in the next few weeks either.
comment by Diafol Coch 77 🏴 (U2462)
posted 2 minutes ago
I think it's been as good as we could have hoped really.
Next year perhaps an elite attacker and left back will be brought in as well as a midfielder or two to replace Casemiro and Eriksen. I really wouldn't be that surprised to see us explore getting Rabiot in the next few weeks either.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is he a free agent?
comment by Garnacho cheese (U5318)
posted 11 minutes ago
Most of the outgoings are also booked as 100% profit because they are academy products.
Overall good, but I'd have liked Ivan Toney at the price Brentford let him go and maybe have sold Eriksen and brought in a younger lesser known prospect to replace him.
Let's see how they do.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We already have 2 strikers. Why would we need another one?
comment by Garnacho cheese (U5318)
posted 9 minutes ago
Most of the outgoings are also booked as 100% profit because they are academy products.
Overall good, but I'd have liked Ivan Toney at the price Brentford let him go and maybe have sold Eriksen and brought in a younger lesser known prospect to replace him.
Let's see how they do.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't see us getting much of a fee for Erikson so may as well keep him, if only to give some players a rest in Europa/cup games.
If we had £40m spare, I'd have rather invest it elsewhere, we paid a lot for Hoijland and brought Zirkzee in, we will only ever play with 1 striker.
comment by Arctic Monkey (U14534)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Garnacho cheese (U5318)
posted 9 minutes ago
Most of the outgoings are also booked as 100% profit because they are academy products.
Overall good, but I'd have liked Ivan Toney at the price Brentford let him go and maybe have sold Eriksen and brought in a younger lesser known prospect to replace him.
Let's see how they do.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't see us getting much of a fee for Erikson so may as well keep him, if only to give some players a rest in Europa/cup games.
If we had £40m spare, I'd have rather invest it elsewhere, we paid a lot for Hoijland and brought Zirkzee in, we will only ever play with 1 striker.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We may be able to play Eriksen the odd time against lesser teams next to Ugarte to give Mainoo a rest.
Still worried about lack of goals.
How many weeks will it take for our squad to score more PL goals than Haaland? We are already 5 behind. 😂
comment by Garnacho cheese (U5318)
posted 34 minutes ago
Most of the outgoings are also booked as 100% profit because they are academy products.
Overall good, but I'd have liked Ivan Toney at the price Brentford let him go and maybe have sold Eriksen and brought in a younger lesser known prospect to replace him.
Let's see how they do.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Think there's only McT and Greenwood that will definitely have been 100% profit for United. The others are likely to have carried some form of figure on the balance sheet to deduct from the selling fees, even if it was only minimal.
Hard to know without seeing what they end up doing for us but potentially a very good window. In terms of sales we’ve done an incredible job and got rid of far more baggage than I ever imagined we would.
Arguably our best window post Ferguson when considering all ins and outs.
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 1 hour, 1 minute ago
comment by Diafol Coch 77 🏴 (U2462)
posted 2 minutes ago
I think it's been as good as we could have hoped really.
Next year perhaps an elite attacker and left back will be brought in as well as a midfielder or two to replace Casemiro and Eriksen. I really wouldn't be that surprised to see us explore getting Rabiot in the next few weeks either.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is he a free agent?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, and his Mum is a bit of a pain according to some reports.
I'm with Arctic Monkey, if the have 40 million to spare I can think of a deserving cause, email address available
Sign in if you want to comment
Rate our Transfer Window
Page 1 of 3
posted on 31/8/24
Letting Greenwood leave for peanuts makes the window a one out of five.
3 goals and an assist in his first two matches.
£100m asset given away for nothing.
posted on 31/8/24
9 out of 10, needed another CM and LB.
posted on 31/8/24
comment by WeekendOffender (U22920)
posted 14 minutes ago
Letting Greenwood leave for peanuts makes the window a one out of five.
3 goals and an assist in his first two matches.
£100m asset given away for nothing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
50% sell on clause I think
posted on 31/8/24
comment by WeekendOffender (U22920)
posted 37 minutes ago
Letting Greenwood leave for peanuts makes the window a one out of five.
3 goals and an assist in his first two matches.
£100m asset given away for nothing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If it wasn't for him being a woman beating cant that united wanted to get rid of.........
posted on 31/8/24
7.5 out of 10 so can't complain.
A LB and another midfielder was needed
posted on 31/8/24
Excellent, the best since SAFs days.
Mind you it is a problem for ETH as they are all probably first teamers, which means intergrating four into the team immediately and five eventually.
He cannot know the nuances of their game right now so I'm not expecting great things until Christmas.
Depending on how injuries go I believe this should be a top 4 team and maybe better.
posted on 31/8/24
8/10 but would’ve been higher if we signed another body in midfield and LB.
posted on 31/8/24
comment by WeekendOffender (U22920)
posted 1 hour, 15 minutes ago
Letting Greenwood leave for peanuts makes the window a one out of five.
3 goals and an assist in his first two matches.
£100m asset given away for nothing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I do admire how often you are willing to make yourself look like an ignorant buffoon.
posted on 31/8/24
From the offloading aspect I will give it 8 out of 10.
From the incoming you can’t really rate it until mid season. It looks like we have signed the right side of players but it is unknown how they will perform.
We were all well happy with one of LVG’s summer windows but none of those he signed really lived up to the hope.
posted on 31/8/24
Getting rid of Sancho is 10/10 by itself. Maz is a United defender.
This season was one of addition by retraction. Hopefully this time next year, Eriksen, lindelof and Casemiro will be gone and Rashford will be worth his wages or we will be looking for a new club for him.
posted on 31/8/24
I'd go 9 out of 10.
Yes we could do with a LB and another CM but I wasn't expecting it to be done in one window, I'm actually surprised how much they have done in one window (incomings and outgoings). Sensible signings at decent prices (with negotiation).
posted on 31/8/24
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 43 minutes ago
From the offloading aspect I will give it 8 out of 10.
From the incoming you can’t really rate it until mid season. It looks like we have signed the right side of players but it is unknown how they will perform.
We were all well happy with one of LVG’s summer windows but none of those he signed really lived up to the hope.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Agreed. Quite similar to the summer we bought Sancho, Varane and Ronaldo.
I do like the age profile of our signings but far far too soon to judge any of them.
Mazraoui looks very good in the 180 mins we’ve seen but with his injury record you just feel the inevitable will happen.
posted on 31/8/24
8/10 for me.
Although we will have to see how the new signings pan out
posted on 31/8/24
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 1 hour, 50 minutes ago
comment by WeekendOffender (U22920)
posted 1 hour, 15 minutes ago
Letting Greenwood leave for peanuts makes the window a one out of five.
3 goals and an assist in his first two matches.
£100m asset given away for nothing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I do admire how often you are willing to make yourself look like an ignorant buffoon.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I see your familiar with the daft dingle VC
posted on 31/8/24
Most of the outgoings are also booked as 100% profit because they are academy products.
Overall good, but I'd have liked Ivan Toney at the price Brentford let him go and maybe have sold Eriksen and brought in a younger lesser known prospect to replace him.
Let's see how they do.
posted on 31/8/24
I think it's been as good as we could have hoped really.
Next year perhaps an elite attacker and left back will be brought in as well as a midfielder or two to replace Casemiro and Eriksen. I really wouldn't be that surprised to see us explore getting Rabiot in the next few weeks either.
posted on 31/8/24
comment by Diafol Coch 77 🏴 (U2462)
posted 2 minutes ago
I think it's been as good as we could have hoped really.
Next year perhaps an elite attacker and left back will be brought in as well as a midfielder or two to replace Casemiro and Eriksen. I really wouldn't be that surprised to see us explore getting Rabiot in the next few weeks either.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is he a free agent?
posted on 31/8/24
comment by Garnacho cheese (U5318)
posted 11 minutes ago
Most of the outgoings are also booked as 100% profit because they are academy products.
Overall good, but I'd have liked Ivan Toney at the price Brentford let him go and maybe have sold Eriksen and brought in a younger lesser known prospect to replace him.
Let's see how they do.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We already have 2 strikers. Why would we need another one?
posted on 31/8/24
comment by Garnacho cheese (U5318)
posted 9 minutes ago
Most of the outgoings are also booked as 100% profit because they are academy products.
Overall good, but I'd have liked Ivan Toney at the price Brentford let him go and maybe have sold Eriksen and brought in a younger lesser known prospect to replace him.
Let's see how they do.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't see us getting much of a fee for Erikson so may as well keep him, if only to give some players a rest in Europa/cup games.
If we had £40m spare, I'd have rather invest it elsewhere, we paid a lot for Hoijland and brought Zirkzee in, we will only ever play with 1 striker.
posted on 31/8/24
comment by Arctic Monkey (U14534)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Garnacho cheese (U5318)
posted 9 minutes ago
Most of the outgoings are also booked as 100% profit because they are academy products.
Overall good, but I'd have liked Ivan Toney at the price Brentford let him go and maybe have sold Eriksen and brought in a younger lesser known prospect to replace him.
Let's see how they do.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't see us getting much of a fee for Erikson so may as well keep him, if only to give some players a rest in Europa/cup games.
If we had £40m spare, I'd have rather invest it elsewhere, we paid a lot for Hoijland and brought Zirkzee in, we will only ever play with 1 striker.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We may be able to play Eriksen the odd time against lesser teams next to Ugarte to give Mainoo a rest.
posted on 31/8/24
Still worried about lack of goals.
How many weeks will it take for our squad to score more PL goals than Haaland? We are already 5 behind. 😂
posted on 31/8/24
comment by Garnacho cheese (U5318)
posted 34 minutes ago
Most of the outgoings are also booked as 100% profit because they are academy products.
Overall good, but I'd have liked Ivan Toney at the price Brentford let him go and maybe have sold Eriksen and brought in a younger lesser known prospect to replace him.
Let's see how they do.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Think there's only McT and Greenwood that will definitely have been 100% profit for United. The others are likely to have carried some form of figure on the balance sheet to deduct from the selling fees, even if it was only minimal.
posted on 31/8/24
Hard to know without seeing what they end up doing for us but potentially a very good window. In terms of sales we’ve done an incredible job and got rid of far more baggage than I ever imagined we would.
Arguably our best window post Ferguson when considering all ins and outs.
posted on 31/8/24
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 1 hour, 1 minute ago
comment by Diafol Coch 77 🏴 (U2462)
posted 2 minutes ago
I think it's been as good as we could have hoped really.
Next year perhaps an elite attacker and left back will be brought in as well as a midfielder or two to replace Casemiro and Eriksen. I really wouldn't be that surprised to see us explore getting Rabiot in the next few weeks either.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is he a free agent?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, and his Mum is a bit of a pain according to some reports.
posted on 31/8/24
I'm with Arctic Monkey, if the have 40 million to spare I can think of a deserving cause, email address available
Page 1 of 3