Got_Better you got money on a Villa win?

comment by Diafol Coch 77 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 JA606 Class Act (U2462)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Tyranny of the majority (SE85) (U21241)
posted less than a minute ago
It's not just Erik anymore. This is one INEOS too. They signed up for another go with this guy. You could say they sort of predicted it though by bringing in Ruud to take his job after 2 months.

Erik knew he wasn't really wanted. The players knew he wasn't either and once again it's the fans who have to suffer.

This new era won't last long with bad decisions like they showed over the summer. They should have sacked him and started a new project ahead of the season. Trying to do that now is going to cost them another £10m or so and with a season that is already in ruins.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'd counter that with this.

I think Ineos have bought themselves some time with keeping Erik. They knew the fans would be OK with it and, if they needed to change mid season, they'd still have an element of time because no one would expect too much from an interim..
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Had they changed in the Summer and it had gone wrong like this then they'd have nowhere to run.

comment by Diafol Coch 77 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 JA... (U2462)
posted 2 minutes ago
This line up from Ten Hag just screams "I know I'm getting fired so I'm not going to play the majority of your signings Ineos".

I think he's gone no matter what.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Was delicious ligt really their signing?
He managed him at Ajax, he's Dutch.. etc..
Highly unlikely we would have been in for de ligt if we didn't have ETH as manager. Let's be honest now.

Were going to win 3-1

comment by Posh Mufc Great Hafi Not Arrogant Just Better (U6578)
posted less than a minute ago
Got_Better you got money on a Villa win?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes £150 straight win

comment by Franko Cantona (U22187)
posted 52 seconds ago
Were going to win 3-1
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The fack have you been pops

comment by Pun (a.k.a Piranha) (U21588)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Franko Cantona (U22187)
posted 52 seconds ago
Were going to win 3-1
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The fack have you been pops
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The pub and I’m piissed

comment by Franko Cantona (U22187)
posted 29 seconds ago
comment by Pun (a.k.a Piranha) (U21588)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Franko Cantona (U22187)
posted 52 seconds ago
Were going to win 3-1
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The fack have you been pops
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The pub and I’m piissed
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's the only way to watch us these days

comment by Diafol Coch 77 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 JA606 Class Act (U2462)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Tyranny of the majority (SE85) (U21241)
posted less than a minute ago
It's not just Erik anymore. This is one INEOS too. They signed up for another go with this guy. You could say they sort of predicted it though by bringing in Ruud to take his job after 2 months.

Erik knew he wasn't really wanted. The players knew he wasn't either and once again it's the fans who have to suffer.

This new era won't last long with bad decisions like they showed over the summer. They should have sacked him and started a new project ahead of the season. Trying to do that now is going to cost them another £10m or so and with a season that is already in ruins.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'd counter that with this.

I think Ineos have bought themselves some time with keeping Erik. They knew the fans would be OK with it and, if they needed to change mid season, they'd still have an element of time because no one would expect too much from an interim..
----------------------------------------------------------------------

His pay off is now reported to be £17m instead of 9m and the league season will be as good as over if we lose this.

I think it shows they haven't got a backbone personally. He was being sacked had City won that final. I have absolutely no doubt. The bottled it big time.

ETH last game so going with the players that he trust and the ones that back him

£17M pay off...ok, then Ten Hag is a fkn genius😂

comment by Posh Mufc Great Hafi Not Arrogant Just Better (U6578)
posted 2 minutes ago
Got_Better you got money on a Villa win?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No he’s betting on us, he’s hoping his big investment in stocks also pays off, a real buzz about those Irish chocolate fireguards, GB -super investor- is all in on that

Man Utd most likely will win this imo. Probably chose to bet at the worst time as ten hag needs a win.

You fkn better not win....first time I bet £150 outside of liverpool...c'mon villa🙏🙏

comment by Posh Mufc Great Hafi Not Arrogant Just Better (U6578)
posted 46 seconds ago
Man Utd most likely will win this imo. Probably chose to bet at the worst time as ten hag needs a win.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Reckon we do too 4.445xg to 3.2xg

We have a great record at Villa Park but I don't think even that will count for anything today.

comment by Tyranny of the majority (SE85) (U21241)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Diafol Coch 77 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 JA606 Class Act (U2462)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Tyranny of the majority (SE85) (U21241)
posted less than a minute ago
It's not just Erik anymore. This is one INEOS too. They signed up for another go with this guy. You could say they sort of predicted it though by bringing in Ruud to take his job after 2 months.

Erik knew he wasn't really wanted. The players knew he wasn't either and once again it's the fans who have to suffer.

This new era won't last long with bad decisions like they showed over the summer. They should have sacked him and started a new project ahead of the season. Trying to do that now is going to cost them another £10m or so and with a season that is already in ruins.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'd counter that with this.

I think Ineos have bought themselves some time with keeping Erik. They knew the fans would be OK with it and, if they needed to change mid season, they'd still have an element of time because no one would expect too much from an interim..
----------------------------------------------------------------------

His pay off is now reported to be £17m instead of 9m and the league season will be as good as over if we lose this.

I think it shows they haven't got a backbone personally. He was being sacked had City won that final. I have absolutely no doubt. The bottled it big time.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Let's see how it goes. Best case scenario today is we win and that makes no difference to any decision Ineos make.

comment by Tyranny of the majority (SE85) (U21241)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Diafol Coch 77 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 JA606 Class Act (U2462)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Tyranny of the majority (SE85) (U21241)
posted less than a minute ago
It's not just Erik anymore. This is one INEOS too. They signed up for another go with this guy. You could say they sort of predicted it though by bringing in Ruud to take his job after 2 months.

Erik knew he wasn't really wanted. The players knew he wasn't either and once again it's the fans who have to suffer.

This new era won't last long with bad decisions like they showed over the summer. They should have sacked him and started a new project ahead of the season. Trying to do that now is going to cost them another £10m or so and with a season that is already in ruins.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'd counter that with this.

I think Ineos have bought themselves some time with keeping Erik. They knew the fans would be OK with it and, if they needed to change mid season, they'd still have an element of time because no one would expect too much from an interim..
----------------------------------------------------------------------

His pay off is now reported to be £17m instead of 9m and the league season will be as good as over if we lose this.

I think it shows they haven't got a backbone personally. He was being sacked had City won that final. I have absolutely no doubt. The bottled it big time.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Southgate will work wonders with limited funds

How we play today is as important as the result IMO.

If we don't get stuck in, go for every 50/50 and leave everything out there then it's serious problems

Only thing missing is Anthony, but I guess that would have been too obvious I guess?

Build up from the back is gonna be absolutely fckin horrific today ain’t it, like painful the amount of time we see the CBs taking 4 or 5 touches then passing sideways to each other before eventually going long and losing it

Today’s game is a win-win situation. Either we beat Villa or get rid of this stubborn and resentful manager.

If we win we're then only three points behind "high flying Villa" though.

https://x.com/saharagamesKE/status/1842902949640405278/photo/1
Lol

comment by Baz tard - Ineos your face (U19119)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Tyranny of the majority (SE85) (U21241)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Diafol Coch 77 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 JA606 Class Act (U2462)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Tyranny of the majority (SE85) (U21241)
posted less than a minute ago
It's not just Erik anymore. This is one INEOS too. They signed up for another go with this guy. You could say they sort of predicted it though by bringing in Ruud to take his job after 2 months.

Erik knew he wasn't really wanted. The players knew he wasn't either and once again it's the fans who have to suffer.

This new era won't last long with bad decisions like they showed over the summer. They should have sacked him and started a new project ahead of the season. Trying to do that now is going to cost them another £10m or so and with a season that is already in ruins.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'd counter that with this.

I think Ineos have bought themselves some time with keeping Erik. They knew the fans would be OK with it and, if they needed to change mid season, they'd still have an element of time because no one would expect too much from an interim..
----------------------------------------------------------------------

His pay off is now reported to be £17m instead of 9m and the league season will be as good as over if we lose this.

I think it shows they haven't got a backbone personally. He was being sacked had City won that final. I have absolutely no doubt. The bottled it big time.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Southgate will work wonders with limited funds
----------------------------------------------------------------------

If they appointment Southgate I will already be INEOS
out. 😂