comment by Glen Bulb (U1449)
posted 6 seconds ago
It’s not just the club that’s disrespectful to Mo then, it appears the fans are too
----------------------------------------------------------------------

It’s mad how he’s not been offered but maybe there’s more to it? Really don’t know.

comment by Robbing Hoody - keepy up arbiter. Don’t ... (U6374)
posted 53 seconds ago
comment by Ali - 🇪🇦 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 (U1192)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - keepy up arbiter. Don’t ... (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Ali - 🇪🇦 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 (U1192)
posted 30 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - keepy up arbiter. Don’t ... (U6374)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Tyranny of the majority (SE85) (U21241)
posted 2 hours, 2 minutes ago
I'd Say Salah is personally. He's been involved in over 70% of their goals this season which is the highest percentage of any player in the league.

Just makes the contract talks stalling even more baffling to me. Without Salah they'd be bang average.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Given that we’ve played a massive amount of games over the years without Salah, are you actually basing this in anything?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If I'm reading correctly I think he is basing it on Salah being involved in over 70% of Liverpools goals this season which to anyone with a slight bit of common sense (I do realise I am talking to a Liverpool fan so this might be difficult for you), he is something of a talisman for you this season and without him you may struggle to get as many goals.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Well he’s played every game so how does he know we’re ‘bang average’ without him?

Our record without Salah is superb. It’s just a partisan and poorly thought out post.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lol

"He's played every game"

"Our record without him is superb"

Do you read what you post ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Yes, he’s played every game this season, so he can’t know.

The times we’ve have missed him, we’ve actually had a higher win percentage.

That’s why I asked if he’s basing it on anything… turns out he’s not.

That’s fine btw, people write stupid stuff online all the time.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The post said THIS SEASON.

I suggest you read before throwing toys out pram, etc.

comment by Peter O'Hanraha-hanrahan (U1217)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Ali - 🇪🇦 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 (U1192)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - keepy up arbiter. Don’t ... (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Ali - 🇪🇦 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 (U1192)
posted 30 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - keepy up arbiter. Don’t ... (U6374)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Tyranny of the majority (SE85) (U21241)
posted 2 hours, 2 minutes ago
I'd Say Salah is personally. He's been involved in over 70% of their goals this season which is the highest percentage of any player in the league.

Just makes the contract talks stalling even more baffling to me. Without Salah they'd be bang average.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Given that we’ve played a massive amount of games over the years without Salah, are you actually basing this in anything?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If I'm reading correctly I think he is basing it on Salah being involved in over 70% of Liverpools goals this season which to anyone with a slight bit of common sense (I do realise I am talking to a Liverpool fan so this might be difficult for you), he is something of a talisman for you this season and without him you may struggle to get as many goals.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Well he’s played every game so how does he know we’re ‘bang average’ without him?

Our record without Salah is superb. It’s just a partisan and poorly thought out post.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lol

"He's played every game"

"Our record without him is superb"

Do you read what you post ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He's played every game this season. Our record without him in general is great. Do you think before you post?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The post said THIS SEASON.

I suggest you read before throwing toys out pram, etc.

It’s quite funny that you accuse others of not having common sense.

comment by Ali - 🇪🇦 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 (U1192)
posted 51 seconds ago
comment by Peter O'Hanraha-hanrahan (U1217)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Ali - 🇪🇦 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 (U1192)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - keepy up arbiter. Don’t ... (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Ali - 🇪🇦 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 (U1192)
posted 30 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - keepy up arbiter. Don’t ... (U6374)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Tyranny of the majority (SE85) (U21241)
posted 2 hours, 2 minutes ago
I'd Say Salah is personally. He's been involved in over 70% of their goals this season which is the highest percentage of any player in the league.

Just makes the contract talks stalling even more baffling to me. Without Salah they'd be bang average.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Given that we’ve played a massive amount of games over the years without Salah, are you actually basing this in anything?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If I'm reading correctly I think he is basing it on Salah being involved in over 70% of Liverpools goals this season which to anyone with a slight bit of common sense (I do realise I am talking to a Liverpool fan so this might be difficult for you), he is something of a talisman for you this season and without him you may struggle to get as many goals.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Well he’s played every game so how does he know we’re ‘bang average’ without him?

Our record without Salah is superb. It’s just a partisan and poorly thought out post.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lol

"He's played every game"

"Our record without him is superb"

Do you read what you post ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He's played every game this season. Our record without him in general is great. Do you think before you post?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The post said THIS SEASON.

I suggest you read before throwing toys out pram, etc.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you're just unable to use common sense to apply context unless it's spelt out for you? Got it.

You're basing your current team on seasons in the past? Really?
You have a new manager too.

Gobsmacked. Tbh.

comment by Glen Bulb (U1449)
posted 3 minutes ago
It’s not just the club that’s disrespectful to Mo then, it appears the fans are too
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I wouldn't say it's disrespectful to be negotiating a contract with a player who will be 33 by the end of his current contract. Not many top clubs renew contracts of 33 year olds, yet Liverpool are in that process.

comment by Ali - 🇪🇦 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 (U1192)
posted 29 seconds ago
You're basing your current team on seasons in the past? Really?
You have a new manager too.

Gobsmacked. Tbh.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Which is why I asked whether he was basing it on anything.

You’ve had a proper mare here I’m afraid.

comment by Robbing Hoody - keepy up arbiter. Don’t ... (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Ali - 🇪🇦 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 (U1192)
posted 29 seconds ago
You're basing your current team on seasons in the past? Really?
You have a new manager too.

Gobsmacked. Tbh.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Which is why I asked whether he was basing it on anything.

You’ve had a proper mare here I’m afraid.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wtf?

Liverpool have the kind of offensive players utd only dream about. They have a great record without Salah because they have Gapko, Dias, Jota and Nunez to pick up the slack. All better than man utds best.

comment by Robbing Hoody - keepy up arbiter. Don’t talk to me unless you can do ten (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 12 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - keepy up arbiter. Don’t talk to me unless you can do ten (U6374)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Tyranny of the majority (SE85) (U21241)
posted 2 hours, 2 minutes ago
I'd Say Salah is personally. He's been involved in over 70% of their goals this season which is the highest percentage of any player in the league.

Just makes the contract talks stalling even more baffling to me. Without Salah they'd be bang average.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Given that we’ve played a massive amount of games over the years without Salah, are you actually basing this in anything?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I would imagine he is basing it on the second sentence of his comment.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

So he’s just simply guessing and passing it off as fact. Tbf that’s happening more and on here.

I’m guessing we’d just be playing with 10 men when Salah is out too then
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Well you wouldn’t be getting his 70% input would you?

This one is not hard for even you to understand what SE 85 is saying.

Now, whether that would equate in the grand scheme of things is debate-able.

For example Bruno is our most productive player but it has been suggested that if he didn’t play our attack might function better as we wouldn’t lose possession of the ball so much.

Again something not beyond the realms of possibility.

Another example of just one player being out of the team is look how poor your defence is without VVD.

comment by montleeds (U18330)
posted 20 seconds ago
Liverpool have the kind of offensive players utd only dream about. They have a great record without Salah because they have Gapko, Dias, Jota and Nunez to pick up the slack. All better than man utds best.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aye. Jota would do well from the injury bench wouldn't he.
Gakpo, spoonez, neither of these are carrying Liverpool to a title on their own. Diaz is good, but again, he's not as good as Salah.

comment by Ali - 🇪🇦 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 (U1192)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - keepy up arbiter. Don’t ... (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Ali - 🇪🇦 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 (U1192)
posted 29 seconds ago
You're basing your current team on seasons in the past? Really?
You have a new manager too.

Gobsmacked. Tbh.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Which is why I asked whether he was basing it on anything.

You’ve had a proper mare here I’m afraid.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wtf?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well we can't base it on Salah's absence this season because that hasn't happened, so all we can base it on is our record in general without him.

I understand what’s he’s saying, I just asked what he’s basing the bang average comment on. It’s turns out nothing whatsoever, and that’s fine. To be expected even.

I mean we’d just play Diaz there, who is a very good player.

You’re right on something for once imo though vidic, I feel VVD would be the bigger loss.

comment by Ali - 🇪🇦 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 (U1192)
posted 7 seconds ago
comment by montleeds (U18330)
posted 20 seconds ago
Liverpool have the kind of offensive players utd only dream about. They have a great record without Salah because they have Gapko, Dias, Jota and Nunez to pick up the slack. All better than man utds best.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aye. Jota would do well from the injury bench wouldn't he.
Gakpo, spoonez, neither of these are carrying Liverpool to a title on their own. Diaz is good, but again, he's not as good as Salah.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Salah not carrying them on his own though is he. Best midfield and defense helps.

comment by Ali - 🇪🇦 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 (U1192)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by montleeds (U18330)
posted 20 seconds ago
Liverpool have the kind of offensive players utd only dream about. They have a great record without Salah because they have Gapko, Dias, Jota and Nunez to pick up the slack. All better than man utds best.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aye. Jota would do well from the injury bench wouldn't he.
Gakpo, spoonez, neither of these are carrying Liverpool to a title on their own. Diaz is good, but again, he's not as good as Salah.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nobody is doing it on their own. We've got class goalkeepers, a solid defence, a dominant midfield and an excellent array of forwards.

comment by Peter O'Hanraha-hanrahan (U1217)
posted 29 seconds ago
comment by Ali - 🇪🇦 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 (U1192)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - keepy up arbiter. Don’t ... (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Ali - 🇪🇦 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 (U1192)
posted 29 seconds ago
You're basing your current team on seasons in the past? Really?
You have a new manager too.

Gobsmacked. Tbh.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Which is why I asked whether he was basing it on anything.

You’ve had a proper mare here I’m afraid.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wtf?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well we can't base it on Salah's absence this season because that hasn't happened, so all we can base it on is our record in general without him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ok. Fine.

But surely you can understand that if over 70% of your goals have gone through one player, it means that player is pretty important to your attacking play and if you lost him you may struggle to produce as much?

I don’t think we’d be ‘bang average’ without Salah at all personally. I’d go as far to say that someone suggesting that doesn’t know their football in fact.

Do others think SE85 knows his football? I see your fans call him out all the time.

comment by montleeds (U18330)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by Ali - 🇪🇦 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 (U1192)
posted 7 seconds ago
comment by montleeds (U18330)
posted 20 seconds ago
Liverpool have the kind of offensive players utd only dream about. They have a great record without Salah because they have Gapko, Dias, Jota and Nunez to pick up the slack. All better than man utds best.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aye. Jota would do well from the injury bench wouldn't he.
Gakpo, spoonez, neither of these are carrying Liverpool to a title on their own. Diaz is good, but again, he's not as good as Salah.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Salah not carrying them on his own though is he. Best midfield and defense helps.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You didn't mention midfield or defence you mentioned attackers and how the others would pick up the slack, so I just replied to that.

Are people struggling to understand English today?

Haven’t seen you post for a while montleeds, you can tell Liverpool are doing well

comment by Ali - 🇪🇦 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 (U1192)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Peter O'Hanraha-hanrahan (U1217)
posted 29 seconds ago
comment by Ali - 🇪🇦 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 (U1192)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - keepy up arbiter. Don’t ... (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Ali - 🇪🇦 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 (U1192)
posted 29 seconds ago
You're basing your current team on seasons in the past? Really?
You have a new manager too.

Gobsmacked. Tbh.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Which is why I asked whether he was basing it on anything.

You’ve had a proper mare here I’m afraid.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wtf?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well we can't base it on Salah's absence this season because that hasn't happened, so all we can base it on is our record in general without him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ok. Fine.

But surely you can understand that if over 70% of your goals have gone through one player, it means that player is pretty important to your attacking play and if you lost him you may struggle to produce as much?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We don't know that until it happens. I'm sure others would step up. But given every other aspect of our team is looking excellent, it's foolish to say we would be bang average without Salah.

comment by Ali - 🇪🇦 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 (U1192)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by montleeds (U18330)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by Ali - 🇪🇦 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 (U1192)
posted 7 seconds ago
comment by montleeds (U18330)
posted 20 seconds ago
Liverpool have the kind of offensive players utd only dream about. They have a great record without Salah because they have Gapko, Dias, Jota and Nunez to pick up the slack. All better than man utds best.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aye. Jota would do well from the injury bench wouldn't he.
Gakpo, spoonez, neither of these are carrying Liverpool to a title on their own. Diaz is good, but again, he's not as good as Salah.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Salah not carrying them on his own though is he. Best midfield and defense helps.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You didn't mention midfield or defence you mentioned attackers and how the others would pick up the slack, so I just replied to that.

Are people struggling to understand English today?

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Coming from somebody who is claiming that people should surely see that losing somebody with 70% goal involvements means you'd struggle to produce as much and equating that to being bang average is hilarious.

comment by TheresOnlyOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by Ali - 🇪🇦 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 (U1192)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by montleeds (U18330)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by Ali - 🇪🇦 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 (U1192)
posted 7 seconds ago
comment by montleeds (U18330)
posted 20 seconds ago
Liverpool have the kind of offensive players utd only dream about. They have a great record without Salah because they have Gapko, Dias, Jota and Nunez to pick up the slack. All better than man utds best.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aye. Jota would do well from the injury bench wouldn't he.
Gakpo, spoonez, neither of these are carrying Liverpool to a title on their own. Diaz is good, but again, he's not as good as Salah.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Salah not carrying them on his own though is he. Best midfield and defense helps.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You didn't mention midfield or defence you mentioned attackers and how the others would pick up the slack, so I just replied to that.

Are people struggling to understand English today?

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Coming from somebody who is claiming that people should surely see that losing somebody with 70% goal involvements means you'd struggle to produce as much and equating that to being bang average is hilarious.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't say bang average, that was someone else. Again another Scouser with reading difficulties

I just said it's not difficult to realise that if you lost your best attacking player you would likely struggle to produce as many goals and assists.

Fack me. This is ridiculous.

I mean we’d just play Diaz there, who is a very good player.

...............

Yes he is, But no where near as productive as Salah.

I do agree with you though in that you wouldn't be bang average without Salah. I doubt you would be so far ahead in the league though.

comment by Ali - 🇪🇦 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 (U1192)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by TheresOnlyOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by Ali - 🇪🇦 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 (U1192)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by montleeds (U18330)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by Ali - 🇪🇦 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 (U1192)
posted 7 seconds ago
comment by montleeds (U18330)
posted 20 seconds ago
Liverpool have the kind of offensive players utd only dream about. They have a great record without Salah because they have Gapko, Dias, Jota and Nunez to pick up the slack. All better than man utds best.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aye. Jota would do well from the injury bench wouldn't he.
Gakpo, spoonez, neither of these are carrying Liverpool to a title on their own. Diaz is good, but again, he's not as good as Salah.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Salah not carrying them on his own though is he. Best midfield and defense helps.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You didn't mention midfield or defence you mentioned attackers and how the others would pick up the slack, so I just replied to that.

Are people struggling to understand English today?

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Coming from somebody who is claiming that people should surely see that losing somebody with 70% goal involvements means you'd struggle to produce as much and equating that to being bang average is hilarious.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't say bang average, that was someone else. Again another Scouser with reading difficulties

I just said it's not difficult to realise that if you lost your best attacking player you would likely struggle to produce as many goals and assists.

Fack me. This is ridiculous.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You really are this stupid, wow. Look back through the comments you replied to with your drivel. I'm not going to spoonfeed you everything.

The idea that Liverpool wouldn't have less of an impact without Salah wasn't up for debate. The whole debate was around being bang average without Salah.