comment by Galvs...Friend of Reason (U10415)
posted 54 seconds ago
Lucky you're 7ft J
Coz I tell ya....if you didn't LOOK like you could handle yourself the chances are you'd be dead by now.

Keep doing what you're doing tho
I look forward to being interviewed over it.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

(sits back down on the sofa)

"I've had it with that idiot....Could I borra the woman's weekly for a bit ?"

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by Galvs...Friend of Reason (U10415)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by King Jear - Laughing so hard at the girl with the 8 day spell(U1059)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Galvs...Friend of Reason (U10415)
posted 7 minutes ago
So your summary is no one is a victim and no one is to blame.
Pretty pointless bringing it up then
----------------------------------------------------------------------

The man lost his career and was given a criminal conviction. He is not a criminal. He was a man who was involved in a drunken breakup argument. That is the point.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He was a mental baby who couldn't get his own way so thought he'd just do what he liked anyway...because he was clearly brought up to think it's acceptable to degrade people.
Sounds familiar

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Your obsession with being both feminstic AND reactionary is really showing you up now.

You wrote seversl posts expressing an "opinion" on this, and criticising mine, without having picked up the very basic fact that the two had been in a relationship for a year.


You were so keen to jump up and down shouting, "oh. Woman abuser. Sort him out, sort him out", that you missed what the whole episode was about.


You still appear not to have read the sequence of events now, so keen are you to portray any man who has an argument with a woman as being a sxe pest, a

Take a moment to read what happened, and calmly consider the situation that took place, and the actions and feelings of the parties involved. Then make a considered and balanced comment


You cant do that if you fly off the handle before even getting to the bit where it says theyd been going out for a year, because youre so keen to be seen to be doing another man down

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by Galvs...Friend of Reason (U10415)
posted 1 minute ago
The fact they were in a relationship has NOTHING to do with it, either morally, or legally.

Is that why you yearn so much for this relationship that never comes?
To allow you to harrass, abuse (either verbally or physically) molest without condemnation under the misguided opinion of some backwards view on 'ownership' ?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

you talk so much shti, it's unbelievable.

You think a man who slaps his girlfriend on the ass should lose his job ?

Christ almighty.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by Galvs...Friend of Reason (U10415)
posted 1 hour, 41 minutes ago
Admin will be pleased
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

There could be a simple test for this kind of incident.

How would the reasonable third party react after the event.

If it's

"Oh my god. Ive just seen a guy attack a woman. I think hetried to rpae her. It was a race AND sxe attack. It was so frightening. The poor girl's distraught. Im so worried about her having been subjected to that."

then the guy should be found and prosecuted.


If it's

"How was the party ?"

"Yesh, good fun. Toby was a dkic. Finally broken up with that aussie sltu thogh so probably best all round"

"What happened ?"

"Oh, they had a row and she hit him, so - being the dkic that toby is - instead of just asking for her to be thrown out, he poured his beer on her, then tried to say sorry and started trying to get frisky"

"And..."

"What do you mean and ?"

"What happened ?"

"Nothing happened. She wasnt having it and she left. Went out with the girls I think"

"You think it's actually over ?"

"Blodoy hope so. Are we still going round to kate and tim's tomorrow ?"

"Yeah"


It should be left at that.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Oh my good god

Girls lose faith in their own talents by the age of six

"
Girls start to see themselves as less innately talented than boys do when they are only six years old, a group of US researchers has said.
They said the "disheartening" results suggested the problem could snowball to affect future careers.

...

The team from Princeton University, New York University and the University of Illinois said it appeared stereotypes were starting to show.
Suspected influences include exposure to media, teachers, parents and other children.
The study put sets of five, six and seven-year-olds through different experiments.
In one, the children were read a story about someone who is "really, really smart" but it is not clear who the story is about.
They then had to guess the protagonist from four pictures - two of men and two of women.
At age five, boys pick men and girls pick women around 75% of the time. But fast-forward a year to age six and boys are still picking men while girls are now slightly more likely to pick men too.
In another scenario, groups of children played a new board game.
But for some it was branded as "for children who are really, really smart" and for others it was described as "for children who try really, really hard".
Six and seven-year old girls were as likely as boys to enjoy the game for those who try, but much less likely to say they enjoy the game for smart children.
"



Pppppppppppplllllleaaaaaaasssse

comment by Galvs...Friend of Reason (U10415)
posted 24 seconds ago
Nah....simply put, people are responsible for their own actions

He degraded her, molested her (or attempted to several times) when his advances were unwanted.
(I'm being very generous here)

I don't care if they'd never met or it was on their wedding night.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

This is absolute rubbish.

When in france, a girl wanted to come home with me after she had a row with her boyfriend.

The guy took her to one side and phayically held her for around a minute, talking to her, as she asked him to let her go, telling him she wanted to be with me.


5 minutes later they left togethor hand in hand.


It was borderline, but just about ok, and worked out for them both.

What this guy did was less than that.

He had a row with his girlfriend. In trying to make up he slapper her bum. They then walked out togethor, before having a row outside.

Probably 90 percent of this isnwhat 90 percent of guys would do.

Women behave far far worse to men during rows than this every single day in every single town in the world, and noone would ever even think to intervene.


Your prejudice against men frankly disgusts me.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by Galvs...Friend of Reason (U10415)
posted 52 seconds ago
So scientific research is not to be listened to if it doesn't suit your agenda?
I'm not sure what conclusions we can draw from it....certainly you would hope their outlook would change on reaching an age where they might realise there ARE equal opportunities to be had.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

The point is that this pathetic, pointless research has been done in the first place, that it is then published innan attempt to demonstrate some kind of prejudice against females when it does no such thing, and that it is then published by our national broadcaster in an attempt to perpetuate the myth currently strangling our society, that females are prejudiced against.

We are being systematically brainwashed. And you are one of the victims, me old sann.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Comment deleted by Site Moderator