posted 1 second ago
comment by Galvs...Friend of Reason (U10415)
posted 1 minute ago
And btw....even though I've already said it wasn't feminism (but rather not accepting that kind of behaviour towards anyone in any status) and linked that other story where I said they were animals, I wonder why you even need to ask what my response would be if the roles were reversed: I have already made myself clear on that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

So just to be clear then.

- a woman asks her boyfriend for a hug
- the boyfriend says no
- they have an argument and the boyfriend slaps the woman in the face
- she pours her drink on him
- she tries to make it up, and comes on to him
- he walks out
- she walks with him, but he walks off

You would advocate criminal charges are brought against the woman, and that she is at least threatened with phsycial violence ?

Galv, you're a clever old fecker.

Gotta work on a Saturday so what do you do to kill time, start a debate with the thread chameleon.

comment by ®åρtor✡ (U1071)
posted 38 minutes ago
You ok Wayne?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Peachy mate. Hope your team make you happy later.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by nWo, making GN great again (U20092)
posted 1 minute ago
like listening to a fish talk about rugby.
----------------------------------------------------------------------



Galv and J, I think your respective credentials need to be stated.

List, in years and months, your age, and the longest 3 relationships you've been involved in.
----------------------------------------------------------------------


My crednetials are as follows :

- i have never supported a person for hitting their partner in the face

- i have never condoned criminal sanctions against a person who has tried to initiate a sxeual encounter with their partner after a row

- i have never advocated a physicalmand sxeual attack upon a person for trying to initiate a sxeual encounter with their partner after a row

- i have never condoned the use of the criminal justice system for revenge by women who have been upset by their ex

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by Galvs...Friend of Reason (U10415)
posted 25 minutes ago
Are we talking about you again or him?
Just so I know...
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Don't think I've ever seen J talk about anyone or anything else apart from him.

Does he do that now?

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by Galvs...Friend of Reason (U10415)
posted 1 second ago
And once again you make big leaps and embellish what I've said for your own means.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Could you clarify what your views are in this reverse sceanario, if i have not stated them accurately ?

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by ®åρtor✡ (U1071)
posted 20 minutes ago
Their firm are in ere actually. Coul get messy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Both of them?

comment by nWo, making GN great again (U20092)
posted about a minute ago
comment by ®åρtor✡ (U1071)
posted 20 minutes ago
Their firm are in ere actually. Coul get messy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Both of them?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Those ducks shiet all over the place.

comment by Galvs...Friend of Reason (U10415)
posted 35 seconds ago
Huge deflection from J
----------------------------------------------------------------------



I think youve realised youre wrong now.


Even if you arent woman enough to admit it, I think youve realised it.


Which is a positive step innthe right direction.


The next step, would be to remember how your anti male prejudice misled you on this occassion, the next time you consider a moral dilemna

Good luck with not being a sxeist man hater

comment by The H (U9129)
posted 12 minutes ago
Galv give up
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Galve up.

I haven't bothered to read all the comments, but for clarity, what does this mean?

"- i have never condoned criminal sanctions against a person who has tried to initiate a sxeual encounter with their partner after a row"

comment by King Jear - Laughing so hard at the girl with the 8 day spell (U1059)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by nWo, making GN great again (U20092)
posted 1 minute ago
like listening to a fish talk about rugby.
----------------------------------------------------------------------



Galv and J, I think your respective credentials need to be stated.

List, in years and months, your age, and the longest 3 relationships you've been involved in.
----------------------------------------------------------------------


My crednetials are as follows :

- i have never supported a person for hitting their partner in the face

- i have never condoned criminal sanctions against a person who has tried to initiate a sxeual encounter with their partner after a row

- i have never advocated a physicalmand sxeual attack upon a person for trying to initiate a sxeual encounter with their partner after a row

- i have never condoned the use of the criminal justice system for revenge by women who have been upset by their ex



----------------------------------------------------------------------

Age and longest 3 relationships, which is what I asked?

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by Galvs...Friend of Reason (U10415)
posted 3 minutes ago


Tell me in what reality have men ever been second class to women?

Pretty much only in lap-dancing clubs and whorehouses can women exert any power (if they're lucky) over lonely men....

----------------------------------------------------------------------


Really just shows how deluded and out of touch with reality you are.

Why dont you just admit that your prejudice views were wildly inappropriate ?


You refuse to comment on the reverse scenario, because it so clearly demonstrates just that.


It's so sad that you cant admit you are a sxeist, brainwashed mignon, who has become a drone for a misguided society because you lap up what you are told without challenging it or applying any moral judgement of your own.

At the end of the day galv, it's you who's the victim. The victim of your own gullability.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by King Jear - Laughing so hard at the girl with the 8 day spell (U1059)
posted 26 minutes ago

posted 1 second ago
comment by Galvs...Friend of Reason (U10415)
posted 1 minute ago
And btw....even though I've already said it wasn't feminism (but rather not accepting that kind of behaviour towards anyone in any status) and linked that other story where I said they were animals, I wonder why you even need to ask what my response would be if the roles were reversed: I have already made myself clear on that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

So just to be clear then.

- a woman asks her boyfriend for a hug
- the boyfriend says no
- they have an argument and the boyfriend slaps the woman in the face
- she pours her drink on him
- she tries to make it up, and comes on to him
- he walks out
- she walks with him, but he walks off

You would advocate criminal charges are brought against the woman, and that she is at least threatened with phsycial violence ?


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Why do you decline to answer this ?

The readers will draw their own conclusions

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Comment deleted by Site Moderator