posted 6 hours, 27 minutes ago
Expulsion rather than Explosion surely?
posted 6 hours, 26 minutes ago
Because Israel are not the aggressors. They did not start this conflict.
Yes they are the more aggressive now. But they are retaliating.
posted 6 hours, 22 minutes ago
comment by Striketeam7 - staying humble (U18109)
posted 3 minutes ago
Expulsion rather than Explosion surely?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Either that or they want a much more extreme resolution
posted 6 hours, 10 minutes ago
comment by LordDowlias (U3236)
posted 9 minutes ago
Because Israel are not the aggressors. They did not start this conflict.
Yes they are the more aggressive now. But they are retaliating.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not really. They just have enough of the Western media on their side to be able to portray this impression to the general public.
The October 7th attacks were an escalation of an ongoing conflict involving a settler-colonial project that's been murdering the legitimate inhabitants of a territory on virtually a daily basis for decades.
posted 6 hours, 10 minutes ago
comment by LordDowlias (U3236)
posted 16 minutes ago
Because Israel are not the aggressors. They did not start this conflict.
Yes they are the more aggressive now. But they are retaliating.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
shut the fack up you mug
posted 6 hours, 9 minutes ago
comment by it'sonlyagame (U6426)
posted 19 seconds ago
comment by LordDowlias (U3236)
posted 9 minutes ago
Because Israel are not the aggressors. They did not start this conflict.
Yes they are the more aggressive now. But they are retaliating.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not really. They just have enough of the Western media on their side to be able to portray this impression to the general public.
The October 7th attacks were an escalation of an ongoing conflict involving a settler-colonial project that's been murdering the legitimate inhabitants of a territory on virtually a daily basis for decades.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
IOAG yup
posted 6 hours, 7 minutes ago
BOOOM !
posted 6 hours, 1 minute ago
comment by Striketeam7 - staying humble (U18109)
posted 25 minutes ago
Expulsion rather than Explosion surely?
-----------
Corrected. Thanks
posted 5 hours, 59 minutes ago
How would anybody on here feel if a country invaded the Isle of white and mascaraed innocent people and took people from the island hostage ?
Or anywhere in the UK for that thought ?
posted 5 hours, 59 minutes ago
Taken more land of Syria now as well I see.
posted 5 hours, 57 minutes ago
comment by LordDowlias (U3236)
posted 9 seconds ago
How would anybody on here feel if a country invaded the Isle of white and mascaraed innocent people and took people from the island hostage ?
Or anywhere in the UK for that thought ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That would depend? if the Isle of White had done the same as Israel over the years I'd kinda expect it?
posted 5 hours, 56 minutes ago
comment by LordDowlias (U3236)
posted 25 minutes ago
Because Israel are not the aggressors. They did not start this conflict.
Yes they are the more aggressive now. But they are retaliating.
--------
Aggression didn't start on 7th Oct 2023, but since 1947 and much worse.
posted 5 hours, 55 minutes ago
comment by The Goofy One (U16087)
posted 1 minute ago
Taken more land of Syria now as well I see.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You cannot be Syria's!
posted 5 hours, 53 minutes ago
How would anybody on here feel if a country invaded the Isle of white and mascaraed innocent people and took people from the island hostage ?
Is that question directed at Israel?
posted 5 hours, 51 minutes ago
comment by LordDowlias (U3236)
posted 34 minutes ago
Because Israel are not the aggressors. They did not start this conflict.
Yes they are the more aggressive now. But they are retaliating.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah that’s the reason.
posted 5 hours, 49 minutes ago
Bold move from Norway. Suspect they’ll be given a points deduction for their refusal to play them, though.
posted 5 hours, 49 minutes ago
comment by Ruben The King Amorim Tim Tagi Dim (U10026)
posted 37 seconds ago
comment by LordDowlias (U3236)
posted 34 minutes ago
Because Israel are not the aggressors. They did not start this conflict.
Yes they are the more aggressive now. But they are retaliating.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah that’s the reason.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s pretty amazing that some people still think this.
posted 5 hours, 48 minutes ago
comment by LordDowlias (U3236)
posted 9 minutes ago
How would anybody on here feel if a country invaded the Isle of white and mascaraed innocent people and took people from the island hostage ?
Or anywhere in the UK for that thought ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well done, I see you're starting to understand.
Not hard, was it?
posted 5 hours, 45 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - keepy up arbiter. Don’t talk to me unless you can do ten (U6374)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Ruben The King Amorim Tim Tagi Dim (U10026)
posted 37 seconds ago
comment by LordDowlias (U3236)
posted 34 minutes ago
Because Israel are not the aggressors. They did not start this conflict.
Yes they are the more aggressive now. But they are retaliating.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah that’s the reason.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s pretty amazing that some people still think this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It has to be a wum surely at this stage
posted 5 hours, 43 minutes ago
comment by LAMCAM 🧿Liverpool🧿 (U18537)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by LordDowlias (U3236)
posted 25 minutes ago
Because Israel are not the aggressors. They did not start this conflict.
Yes they are the more aggressive now. But they are retaliating.
--------
Aggression didn't start on 7th Oct 2023, but since 1947 and much worse.
-------------
Also, you need to look at what happened in Syria to realise why US and the West keep blind eyes on some invasions and aggressions only when they are benefitting them. Jawlani, a leader in Al Qaeda and Al Nusra and then HTS was on the wanted list by America, but suddenly he's not. He is a murderer but now because he helped them get rid of their enemy and stopped Weapons getting into the hands of Hezbollah, he's a good person. Netanyahu is also a murderer.
posted 5 hours, 34 minutes ago
For Russia: it's called full-scale invasions.
USA: Regime change
Israel : Buffer zone.
This is so true, and we've many examples. Only recently, Israel taken Syrian land and calling it buffer zone.
posted 5 hours, 32 minutes ago
comment by LordDowlias (U3236)
posted 53 minutes ago
Because Israel are not the aggressors. They did not start this conflict.
Yes they are the more aggressive now. But they are retaliating.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who started the conflict then?
posted 5 hours, 30 minutes ago
comment by The Goofy One (U16087)
posted 25 minutes ago
Taken more land of Syria now as well I see.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Stolen more land while bombing the whole country so it never recovers
posted 5 hours, 26 minutes ago
comment by LordDowlias (U3236)
posted 18 minutes ago
How would anybody on here feel if a country invaded the Isle of white and mascaraed innocent people and took people from the island hostage ?
Or anywhere in the UK for that thought ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Let's just imagine that the terrorists who killed innocent civilians on the Isle of Wight were not associated with a people who have suffered decades of dispossession and repression, kick off their land, living as second class citizens, seeing their kids shot with impunity by security forces. Let's assume that, unlike Israel with Hamas, the UK had not directly funded the extremist group with officials of the ruling party stating on record that this is done because it is politically expedient to have a militant adversary rather than dealing with a moderate, democratically elected authority. In this case, with the UK an entirely innocent party, I would still not advocate obliterating entire cities and killing tens of thousands of children, desecrating religious buildings, bulldozing public buildings that have survived the bombs, urinating in the destroyed homes of dead or displaced civilians, posing for photos with their underwear, and leaving racist graffiti.
But maybe that's the noble cause you espouse.
posted 5 hours, 22 minutes ago
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 20 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - keepy up arbiter. Don’t talk to me unless you can do ten (U6374)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Ruben The King Amorim Tim Tagi Dim (U10026)
posted 37 seconds ago
comment by LordDowlias (U3236)
posted 34 minutes ago
Because Israel are not the aggressors. They did not start this conflict.
Yes they are the more aggressive now. But they are retaliating.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah that’s the reason.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s pretty amazing that some people still think this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It has to be a wum surely at this stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------
it's a wum. Don't give it the attetion
Sign in if you want to comment
Well done Norway
Page 1 of 5
posted 6 hours, 27 minutes ago
Expulsion rather than Explosion surely?
posted 6 hours, 26 minutes ago
Because Israel are not the aggressors. They did not start this conflict.
Yes they are the more aggressive now. But they are retaliating.
posted 6 hours, 22 minutes ago
comment by Striketeam7 - staying humble (U18109)
posted 3 minutes ago
Expulsion rather than Explosion surely?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Either that or they want a much more extreme resolution
posted 6 hours, 10 minutes ago
comment by LordDowlias (U3236)
posted 9 minutes ago
Because Israel are not the aggressors. They did not start this conflict.
Yes they are the more aggressive now. But they are retaliating.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not really. They just have enough of the Western media on their side to be able to portray this impression to the general public.
The October 7th attacks were an escalation of an ongoing conflict involving a settler-colonial project that's been murdering the legitimate inhabitants of a territory on virtually a daily basis for decades.
posted 6 hours, 10 minutes ago
comment by LordDowlias (U3236)
posted 16 minutes ago
Because Israel are not the aggressors. They did not start this conflict.
Yes they are the more aggressive now. But they are retaliating.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
shut the fack up you mug
posted 6 hours, 9 minutes ago
comment by it'sonlyagame (U6426)
posted 19 seconds ago
comment by LordDowlias (U3236)
posted 9 minutes ago
Because Israel are not the aggressors. They did not start this conflict.
Yes they are the more aggressive now. But they are retaliating.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not really. They just have enough of the Western media on their side to be able to portray this impression to the general public.
The October 7th attacks were an escalation of an ongoing conflict involving a settler-colonial project that's been murdering the legitimate inhabitants of a territory on virtually a daily basis for decades.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
IOAG yup
posted 6 hours, 7 minutes ago
BOOOM !
posted 6 hours, 1 minute ago
comment by Striketeam7 - staying humble (U18109)
posted 25 minutes ago
Expulsion rather than Explosion surely?
-----------
Corrected. Thanks
posted 5 hours, 59 minutes ago
How would anybody on here feel if a country invaded the Isle of white and mascaraed innocent people and took people from the island hostage ?
Or anywhere in the UK for that thought ?
posted 5 hours, 59 minutes ago
Taken more land of Syria now as well I see.
posted 5 hours, 57 minutes ago
comment by LordDowlias (U3236)
posted 9 seconds ago
How would anybody on here feel if a country invaded the Isle of white and mascaraed innocent people and took people from the island hostage ?
Or anywhere in the UK for that thought ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That would depend? if the Isle of White had done the same as Israel over the years I'd kinda expect it?
posted 5 hours, 56 minutes ago
comment by LordDowlias (U3236)
posted 25 minutes ago
Because Israel are not the aggressors. They did not start this conflict.
Yes they are the more aggressive now. But they are retaliating.
--------
Aggression didn't start on 7th Oct 2023, but since 1947 and much worse.
posted 5 hours, 55 minutes ago
comment by The Goofy One (U16087)
posted 1 minute ago
Taken more land of Syria now as well I see.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You cannot be Syria's!
posted 5 hours, 53 minutes ago
How would anybody on here feel if a country invaded the Isle of white and mascaraed innocent people and took people from the island hostage ?
Is that question directed at Israel?
posted 5 hours, 51 minutes ago
comment by LordDowlias (U3236)
posted 34 minutes ago
Because Israel are not the aggressors. They did not start this conflict.
Yes they are the more aggressive now. But they are retaliating.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah that’s the reason.
posted 5 hours, 49 minutes ago
Bold move from Norway. Suspect they’ll be given a points deduction for their refusal to play them, though.
posted 5 hours, 49 minutes ago
comment by Ruben The King Amorim Tim Tagi Dim (U10026)
posted 37 seconds ago
comment by LordDowlias (U3236)
posted 34 minutes ago
Because Israel are not the aggressors. They did not start this conflict.
Yes they are the more aggressive now. But they are retaliating.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah that’s the reason.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s pretty amazing that some people still think this.
posted 5 hours, 48 minutes ago
comment by LordDowlias (U3236)
posted 9 minutes ago
How would anybody on here feel if a country invaded the Isle of white and mascaraed innocent people and took people from the island hostage ?
Or anywhere in the UK for that thought ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well done, I see you're starting to understand.
Not hard, was it?
posted 5 hours, 45 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - keepy up arbiter. Don’t talk to me unless you can do ten (U6374)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Ruben The King Amorim Tim Tagi Dim (U10026)
posted 37 seconds ago
comment by LordDowlias (U3236)
posted 34 minutes ago
Because Israel are not the aggressors. They did not start this conflict.
Yes they are the more aggressive now. But they are retaliating.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah that’s the reason.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s pretty amazing that some people still think this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It has to be a wum surely at this stage
posted 5 hours, 43 minutes ago
comment by LAMCAM 🧿Liverpool🧿 (U18537)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by LordDowlias (U3236)
posted 25 minutes ago
Because Israel are not the aggressors. They did not start this conflict.
Yes they are the more aggressive now. But they are retaliating.
--------
Aggression didn't start on 7th Oct 2023, but since 1947 and much worse.
-------------
Also, you need to look at what happened in Syria to realise why US and the West keep blind eyes on some invasions and aggressions only when they are benefitting them. Jawlani, a leader in Al Qaeda and Al Nusra and then HTS was on the wanted list by America, but suddenly he's not. He is a murderer but now because he helped them get rid of their enemy and stopped Weapons getting into the hands of Hezbollah, he's a good person. Netanyahu is also a murderer.
posted 5 hours, 34 minutes ago
For Russia: it's called full-scale invasions.
USA: Regime change
Israel : Buffer zone.
This is so true, and we've many examples. Only recently, Israel taken Syrian land and calling it buffer zone.
posted 5 hours, 32 minutes ago
comment by LordDowlias (U3236)
posted 53 minutes ago
Because Israel are not the aggressors. They did not start this conflict.
Yes they are the more aggressive now. But they are retaliating.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who started the conflict then?
posted 5 hours, 30 minutes ago
comment by The Goofy One (U16087)
posted 25 minutes ago
Taken more land of Syria now as well I see.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Stolen more land while bombing the whole country so it never recovers
posted 5 hours, 26 minutes ago
comment by LordDowlias (U3236)
posted 18 minutes ago
How would anybody on here feel if a country invaded the Isle of white and mascaraed innocent people and took people from the island hostage ?
Or anywhere in the UK for that thought ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Let's just imagine that the terrorists who killed innocent civilians on the Isle of Wight were not associated with a people who have suffered decades of dispossession and repression, kick off their land, living as second class citizens, seeing their kids shot with impunity by security forces. Let's assume that, unlike Israel with Hamas, the UK had not directly funded the extremist group with officials of the ruling party stating on record that this is done because it is politically expedient to have a militant adversary rather than dealing with a moderate, democratically elected authority. In this case, with the UK an entirely innocent party, I would still not advocate obliterating entire cities and killing tens of thousands of children, desecrating religious buildings, bulldozing public buildings that have survived the bombs, urinating in the destroyed homes of dead or displaced civilians, posing for photos with their underwear, and leaving racist graffiti.
But maybe that's the noble cause you espouse.
posted 5 hours, 22 minutes ago
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 20 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - keepy up arbiter. Don’t talk to me unless you can do ten (U6374)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Ruben The King Amorim Tim Tagi Dim (U10026)
posted 37 seconds ago
comment by LordDowlias (U3236)
posted 34 minutes ago
Because Israel are not the aggressors. They did not start this conflict.
Yes they are the more aggressive now. But they are retaliating.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah that’s the reason.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s pretty amazing that some people still think this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It has to be a wum surely at this stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------
it's a wum. Don't give it the attetion
Page 1 of 5