It was a good game, though.

we may be bottom but it's a point more than i expected all we have to do now is win the next 2 home games easy
;-0

got it right that time

like Kean said on sky sports news , "We have 5 points against london clubs so bring on Spurs" what about the other 22 matches? !!

and chelsea easy 6 points and a easy trip norwich in the middle of them no problems

Team looked a little better than normal, Salgado was ok from what I saw but we need to replace Givet.

QPR really are dirty, aren't they? Probably because of that vile, odious creature they have for a manager.

Comment deleted by Article Creator

lol forgot the link
And qualifying for the Champions League is still mathematically possible, only 3 wins needed to get us up there/

what i don't understand is why no formica no the yak and no rochina and why did we start with roberts and 3 defensive midfielders

Do we even have 3 defensive midfielders?

well they are not attacking midfielders

I remembered who you were talking about. I wouldn't class Lowe as a defensive midfielder but I do think he is going to be a top talent for us. A poor clearance from him led to their goal but he did well for us yet again.

I like Lowe as well and i agree he should start but at right back and start with rochina,that way we will more attacking options.We still would not of scored more though cos that flipping joke of a striker started (o why o why o why does he start with roberts and not the yak)

For now, Lowe could be a good stand in rb but I'd want us to sign a new rb in January so that he can play in midfield more.

I didn't manage to catch a lot of the game - how well did we actually do?

I'm same as you home games only for me but i should be happy with a point away from home
agreed about signing a RB in january i would like a LB as well and lowe would only be a stand in
lowe is a good player but i do not like 3 central midfeilders starting gives you less options

Agreed, I'd only be happy playing three midfielders against one of the top sides. Against teams around us we should be looking to play more offensively.

I expect Kean to play 3 midfielders against spurs and would be happy with that but not against QPR they were there for the taking should of gone for the 3 points not 1 point anyway I'm going now bye bye

I seen the game the game, we played quite well, kean did nothing wrong with the way we set up, as its a 4-5-1, going naturally into a 4-3-3 and if loftus road wasn't so narrow we would have a annihilated them with width. Do agreee with roberts, his so lazy its beyond belief. Goodwillie looked good when he came on, got some unfair criticism against city as he was playing outwide.

but we did'nt annihilate them did we that is the problem we scored 1 goal against a poor team,but saying that with roberts starting Kean did,nt go there to annihhilate them he went for a point

"kean did nothing wrong with the way we set up, as its a 4-5-1, going naturally into a 4-3-3 and if loftus road wasn't so narrow we would have a annihilated them with width. "

Surely it is Kean's job as manager to notice that the pitch was narrow and match the tactics accordingly?

rob of the rovers you are forgeting something here Kean does not know what tactics are he is clueless

I thought yesterdays result was about right,we could have nicked it at the death!

it was about right but without Formica,Rochina,Yakuba,Vukcevic and Goodwillie all not starting a draw was the best we could of done

Well I had a good day out and the wheather was great and a meal at weatherspoons afterwards,no moping after the result but I put some money on Kean to go within the next two games.