or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 463 comments are related to an article called:

E- petition

Page 2 of 19

posted on 10/11/11

14104 monthly target?

posted on 10/11/11

As i said Mafia, to reach the required amount of signatures, you need to average 8333 signatures per month.

Come on Mafia, its not rocket science.

posted on 10/11/11

which one is bigger, 14104 or 8333?

posted on 10/11/11

Errr 14104.



But you need 8333 per month, but you only have just over 2500, which leaves you 14104(ish) short after the 2 months since its been released.

Come on Mafia..how plainer do you want me to put it?



posted on 10/11/11

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 10/11/11

As i said earlier you shouldn't consider it as an average.. it's an exponential series..

Give me shout when you got that 17 million cheque from the mayor, would you?.

posted on 10/11/11

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 10/11/11

Mafia,

As i said earlier you shouldn't consider it as an average..

=======================

Can i take that as you actually understand the sums now then?

How long did that take you?

posted on 10/11/11

Well I'm shocked with you Mafia.........

......shocked that you did not re-post this on more team boards with a request for it to be forwarded on, that's more what I would have expected of you.

posted on 10/11/11

This is a good one......

http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/17320

comment by GOODBYE (U1029)

posted on 10/11/11

Oh god! this obsession has jumped up a notch!

posted on 10/11/11

Thudd, sign upto the ban pens vote.

comment by GOODBYE (U1029)

posted on 10/11/11



Tkok I'm so on it!

posted on 10/11/11

Thudd, I bet you're on T's ko k

posted on 10/11/11

Mr Chelsea, I never talk about politics .

The E-petition website is a scream, there are some real nutters out there, I think we should rethink letting certain people vote.

posted on 10/11/11

Mafia,

Do you think the HoC will take this petition more, or less, serious than the one you're advertsing:

"Petition for the government to lobby FIFA, UEFA and the FA to abolish penalty kicks in football during normal play
Responsible department: Department for Culture, Media and Sport

Matches are decided by big decisions. The most obvious big decision is the award or the non-award of a penalty kick. This decision can often be difficult to make. The solution. Abolish penalty kicks. Replace them with direct free-kicks at the source of the infringements. This would have the following benefits: 1. Attackers would remain on their feet to better their chances of scoring. The culture of going down with minimal contact would end. 2. Defenders would have more confidence in making attempts to gain possession of the ball. 3. Free kicks from short ranges would increase excitement. 4. Referees would give the benefit of the doubt in decisions as the outcome of the game would be less effected. 5. The penalty area would exist to mark the area where the goalkeeper could play the ball with their hands. 6. Penalties after extra time would be more entertaining as there would be no so-called "spot-kick experts"


comment by GOODBYE (U1029)

posted on 10/11/11

Mafia

posted on 10/11/11

Chicken, why are you worrying then?

comment by GOODBYE (U1029)

posted on 10/11/11

Mafia has gone mental obsessed

posted on 10/11/11

Thudd has gone metally obsessed with me..

posted on 10/11/11

"Mafia has gone mental obsessed"

Well yes, but so have one or two Spurs fans.

posted on 10/11/11

Mafia,

Chicken, why are you worrying then?

===================

I think you're confusing "worrying" to "laughing".

comment by GOODBYE (U1029)

posted on 10/11/11

Don't flatter yourself Mafia I just like to make a fool of you again. and agian... and again!!

posted on 10/11/11

You are making a fool of me? where and when?

comment by GOODBYE (U1029)

posted on 11/11/11

All day every day

Page 2 of 19

Sign in if you want to comment